Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / For L. Flaccus

For L. Flaccus (85-86)

urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi017.perseus-eng2:85-86
Refs {'start': {'reference': '85', 'human_reference': 'Section 85'}, 'end': {'reference': '86', 'human_reference': 'Section 86'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

That alternative remains which he did not cease asserting loudly; that Flaccus ought not, when he was praetor, to have attended to his own private concerns, or to have made any mention of the inheritance.” I hear, O Lucius Lucullus, that very great inheritances came to you, to you who are about to decide as judge on the case of Lucius Flaccus, on account of your exceeding liberality and of the great services which you had done your friends, during the time that you were governing the province of Asia with consular power. If any one had said that those inheritances belonged to him, would you have given them up? You, O Titus Vettius, if any inheritance in Africa comes to you, will you abandon it? or, will you retain it as your own, without being liable to the imputation of avarice, without any sacrifice of your dignity? But the possession of the inheritance of which we are speaking was demanded in the name of Flaccus, when Globulus was praetor.” Well then, it was not any sudden violence, nor the idea of any favourable opportunity, nor force, nor any peculiarity of time, nor the possession of command and of the forces which induced Flaccus to commit this injury.

And, therefore, it is to this point that Marcus Lurco also, a most excellent man, and a great friend of mine, has especially addressed the sting of his evidence. He said, that it was not becoming for a praetor in his province to claim money from a private individual. Why, I should like to know, O Lurco, is it not becoming? It is not becoming to force or extort money, or to receive money contrary to the laws; but you will never convince me that it is not becoming to claim it, unless you can show that it is not lawful to do so. Is it right to accept of honorary lieutenancies for the sake of exacting what is one's due, as you yourselves have done lately, and as many good men have often done, (and I, indeed, find no fault with such conduct; I see that our allies complain of it;) and, do you think a praetor, if he, being in his province, does not abandon an inheritance which comes to him, is not only to be blamed but even to be condemned?
35
But Valeria,” says he, had given up all her money as dower to her husband.” None of those assertions can be admitted, unless you prove that she was not under the guardianship of Flaccus. If she was, whatever money on her marriage was assigned to her husband without his consent, the assignment is null.

Tokens

That 1 w 4
alternative 1 w 15
remains 1 w 22
which 1 w 27
he 1 w 29
did 1 w 32
not 1 w 35
cease 1 w 40
asserting 1 w 49
loudly 1 w 55
that 1 w 61
Flaccus 1 w 68
ought 1 w 73
not 2 w 76
when 1 w 81
he 3 w 83
was 1 w 86
praetor 1 w 93
to 2 w 96
have 1 w 100
attended 1 w 108
to 3 w 110
his 1 w 113
own 1 w 116
private 1 w 123
concerns 1 w 131
or 2 w 134
to 4 w 136
have 2 w 140
made 1 w 144
any 1 w 147
mention 1 w 154
of 1 w 156
the 1 w 159
inheritance 1 w 170
I 1 w 173
hear 1 w 177
O 1 w 179
Lucius 1 w 185
Lucullus 1 w 193
that 2 w 198
very 1 w 202
great 1 w 207
inheritances 1 w 219
came 1 w 223
to 5 w 225
you 1 w 228
to 6 w 231
you 2 w 234
who 1 w 237
are 1 w 240
about 1 w 245
to 7 w 247
decide 1 w 253
as 4 w 255
judge 1 w 260
on 3 w 262
the 2 w 265
case 1 w 269
of 2 w 271
Lucius 2 w 277
Flaccus 2 w 284
on 4 w 287
account 1 w 294
of 3 w 296
your 1 w 300
exceeding 1 w 309
liberality 1 w 319
and 1 w 322
of 4 w 324
the 3 w 327
great 2 w 332
services 1 w 340
which 2 w 345
you 4 w 348
had 1 w 351
done 1 w 355
your 2 w 359
friends 1 w 366
during 1 w 373
the 4 w 376
time 1 w 380
that 3 w 384
you 6 w 387
were 1 w 391
governing 1 w 400
the 5 w 403
province 1 w 411
of 5 w 413
Asia 1 w 417
with 1 w 421
consular 1 w 429
power 1 w 434
If 1 w 437
any 2 w 440
one 2 w 443
had 2 w 446
said 1 w 450
that 4 w 454
those 1 w 459
inheritances 2 w 471
belonged 1 w 479
to 8 w 481
him 1 w 484
would 1 w 490
you 7 w 493
have 3 w 497
given 1 w 502
them 1 w 506
up 1 w 508
You 1 w 512
O 2 w 514
Titus 1 w 519
Vettius 1 w 526
if 1 w 529
any 3 w 532
inheritance 4 w 543
in 11 w 545
Africa 1 w 551
comes 1 w 556
to 9 w 558
you 8 w 561
will 1 w 566
you 9 w 569
abandon 1 w 576
it 8 w 578
or 3 w 581
will 2 w 586
you 10 w 589
retain 1 w 595
it 9 w 597
as 6 w 599
your 3 w 603
own 2 w 606
without 1 w 614
being 1 w 619
liable 1 w 625
to 10 w 627
the 7 w 630
imputation 1 w 640
of 6 w 642
avarice 1 w 649
without 2 w 657
any 4 w 660
sacrifice 1 w 669
of 7 w 671
your 4 w 675
dignity 1 w 682
But 1 w 687
the 8 w 690
possession 1 w 700
of 8 w 702
the 9 w 705
inheritance 5 w 716
of 9 w 718
which 3 w 723
we 3 w 725
are 2 w 728
speaking 1 w 736
was 2 w 739
demanded 1 w 747
in 16 w 749
the 10 w 752
name 1 w 756
of 10 w 758
Flaccus 3 w 765
when 2 w 770
Globulus 1 w 778
was 3 w 781
praetor 2 w 788
Well 1 w 794
then 1 w 798
it 14 w 801
was 4 w 804
not 3 w 807
any 5 w 810
sudden 1 w 816
violence 1 w 824
nor 1 w 828
the 12 w 831
idea 1 w 835
of 11 w 837
any 6 w 840
favourable 1 w 850
opportunity 1 w 861
nor 2 w 865
force 1 w 870
nor 3 w 874
any 7 w 877
peculiarity 1 w 888
of 12 w 890
time 2 w 894
nor 4 w 898
the 13 w 901
possession 2 w 911
of 13 w 913
command 1 w 920
and 5 w 923
of 14 w 925
the 14 w 928
forces 1 w 934
which 4 w 939
induced 1 w 946
Flaccus 4 w 953
to 12 w 955
commit 1 w 961
this 1 w 965
injury 1 w 971
And 1 w 975
therefore 1 w 985
it 18 w 988
is 3 w 990
to 13 w 992
this 2 w 996
point 1 w 1001
that 5 w 1005
Marcus 1 w 1011
Lurco 1 w 1016
also 1 w 1020
a 78 w 1022
most 1 w 1026
excellent 1 w 1035
man 3 w 1038
and 6 w 1042
a 81 w 1043
great 3 w 1048
friend 2 w 1054
of 15 w 1056
mine 1 w 1060
has 1 w 1064
especially 1 w 1074
addressed 1 w 1083
the 16 w 1086
sting 1 w 1091
of 16 w 1093
his 4 w 1096
evidence 1 w 1104
He 1 w 1107
said 2 w 1111
that 6 w 1116
it 19 w 1118
was 5 w 1121
not 4 w 1124
becoming 1 w 1132
for 4 w 1135
a 89 w 1136
praetor 3 w 1143
in 23 w 1145
his 5 w 1148
province 2 w 1156
to 15 w 1158
claim 1 w 1163
money 1 w 1168
from 1 w 1172
a 92 w 1173
private 2 w 1180
individual 1 w 1190
Why 1 w 1194
I 3 w 1196
should 1 w 1202
like 1 w 1206
to 16 w 1208
know 1 w 1212
O 3 w 1214
Lurco 2 w 1219
is 7 w 1222
it 20 w 1224
not 5 w 1227
becoming 2 w 1235
It 1 w 1238
is 8 w 1240
not 6 w 1243
becoming 3 w 1251
to 17 w 1253
force 3 w 1258
or 16 w 1260
extort 1 w 1266
money 2 w 1271
or 18 w 1274
to 19 w 1276
receive 1 w 1283
money 3 w 1288
contrary 1 w 1296
to 20 w 1298
the 17 w 1301
laws 1 w 1305
but 1 w 1309
you 13 w 1312
will 3 w 1316
never 1 w 1321
convince 1 w 1329
me 7 w 1331
that 7 w 1335
it 21 w 1337
is 9 w 1339
not 7 w 1342
becoming 4 w 1350
to 21 w 1352
claim 2 w 1357
it 22 w 1359
unless 1 w 1366
you 14 w 1369
can 1 w 1372
show 1 w 1376
that 8 w 1380
it 23 w 1382
is 10 w 1384
not 8 w 1387
lawful 1 w 1393
to 22 w 1395
do 3 w 1397
so 2 w 1399
Is 1 w 1402
it 24 w 1404
right 1 w 1409
to 23 w 1411
accept 1 w 1417
of 17 w 1419
honorary 1 w 1427
lieutenancies 1 w 1440
for 6 w 1443
the 18 w 1446
sake 1 w 1450
of 18 w 1452
exacting 1 w 1460
what 1 w 1464
is 11 w 1466
one 6 w 1469
s 75 w 1471
due 1 w 1474
as 12 w 1477
you 15 w 1480
yourselves 1 w 1490
have 4 w 1494
done 2 w 1498
lately 1 w 1504
and 7 w 1508
as 13 w 1510
many 1 w 1514
good 1 w 1518
men 2 w 1521
have 5 w 1525
often 1 w 1530
done 3 w 1534
and 8 w 1539
I 6 w 1540
indeed 1 w 1547
find 1 w 1552
no 15 w 1554
fault 1 w 1559
with 4 w 1563
such 1 w 1567
conduct 1 w 1574
I 7 w 1576
see 1 w 1579
that 9 w 1583
our 7 w 1586
allies 1 w 1592
complain 1 w 1600
of 20 w 1602
it 26 w 1604
and 9 w 1609
do 6 w 1612
you 17 w 1615
think 1 w 1620
a 121 w 1621
praetor 4 w 1628
if 3 w 1631
he 29 w 1633
being 2 w 1639
in 36 w 1641
his 6 w 1644
province 3 w 1652
does 1 w 1657
not 9 w 1660
abandon 2 w 1667
an 27 w 1669
inheritance 6 w 1680
which 5 w 1685
comes 2 w 1690
to 25 w 1692
him 2 w 1695
is 13 w 1698
not 10 w 1701
only 1 w 1705
to 26 w 1707
be 9 w 1709
blamed 1 w 1715
but 2 w 1718
even 1 w 1722
to 27 w 1724
be 10 w 1726
condemned 1 w 1735
But 2 w 1740
Valeria 1 w 1747
says 1 w 1753
he 31 w 1755
had 3 w 1760
given 2 w 1765
up 2 w 1767
all 3 w 1770
her 8 w 1773
money 4 w 1778
as 14 w 1780
dower 1 w 1785
to 28 w 1787
her 9 w 1790
husband 1 w 1797
None 1 w 1803
of 21 w 1805
those 2 w 1810
assertions 1 w 1820
can 2 w 1823
be 11 w 1825
admitted 1 w 1833
unless 2 w 1840
you 18 w 1843
prove 1 w 1848
that 10 w 1852
she 1 w 1855
was 6 w 1858
not 11 w 1861
under 1 w 1866
the 19 w 1869
guardianship 1 w 1881
of 22 w 1883
Flaccus 5 w 1890
If 2 w 1893
she 2 w 1896
was 7 w 1899
whatever 1 w 1908
money 5 w 1913
on 30 w 1915
her 10 w 1918
marriage 1 w 1926
was 8 w 1929
assigned 1 w 1937
to 29 w 1939
her 11 w 1942
husband 2 w 1949
without 3 w 1956
his 7 w 1959
consent 1 w 1966
the 20 w 1970
assignment 1 w 1980
is 15 w 1982
null 1 w 1986