That alternative remains
 which he did not cease asserting loudly; “that Flaccus ought not, when he was praetor, to have
 attended to his own private concerns, or to have made any mention of the inheritance.” I hear, O
 Lucius Lucullus, that very great inheritances came to you, to you who are about to decide as
 judge on the case of Lucius Flaccus, on account of your exceeding liberality and of the great
 services which you had done your friends, during the time that you were governing the province
 of Asia with consular power. If any one had said that those inheritances belonged to him, would
 you have given them up? You, O Titus Vettius, if any inheritance in Africa comes to you, will
 you abandon it? or, will you retain it as your own, without being liable to the imputation of
 avarice, without any sacrifice of your dignity? “But the possession of the inheritance of which
 we are speaking was demanded in the name of Flaccus, when Globulus was praetor.” Well then, it
 was not any sudden violence, nor the idea of any favourable opportunity, nor force, nor any
 peculiarity of time, nor the possession of command and of the forces which induced Flaccus to
 commit this injury. And, therefore, it is to this point that Marcus Lurco also, a most excellent man, and a great
 friend of mine, has especially addressed the sting of his evidence. He said, that it was not
 becoming for a praetor in his province to claim money from a private individual. Why, I should
 like to know, O Lurco, is it not becoming? It is not becoming to force or extort money, or to
 receive money contrary to the laws; but you will never convince me that it is not becoming to
 claim it, unless you can show that it is not lawful to do so. Is it right to accept of honorary
 lieutenancies for the sake of exacting what is one's due, as you yourselves have done lately,
 and as many good men have often done, (and I, indeed, find no fault with such conduct; I see
 that our allies complain of it;) and, do you think a praetor, if he, being in his province, does
 not abandon an inheritance which comes to him, is not only to be blamed but even to be
 condemned? “But Valeria,” says he, “had given up all her money
 as dower to her husband.” None of those assertions can be admitted, unless you prove that she
 was not under the guardianship of Flaccus. If she was, whatever money on her marriage was
 assigned to her husband without his consent, the assignment is null.