Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / In Defence of Euxenippus

In Defence of Euxenippus (18)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0030.tlg004.perseus-eng2:18
Refs {'start': {'reference': '18', 'human_reference': 'Section 18'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

These proposals, when examined in court, were considered unsatisfactory, and the jury condemned you. So if you had been acquitted in your trial, Euxenippus would not have misrepresented the god: because you happened to be convicted, must ruin fall on him?[*] And when you, who proposed a decree like that, were fined a mere twenty-five drachmas, is the man who lay down in the temple at the peoples request even to be refused a grave in Attica?

Tokens

These 1 w 5
proposals 1 w 14
when 1 w 19
examined 1 w 27
in 2 w 29
court 1 w 34
were 1 w 39
considered 1 w 49
unsatisfactory 1 w 63
and 1 w 67
the 1 w 70
jury 1 w 74
condemned 1 w 83
you 1 w 86
So 1 w 89
if 1 w 91
you 2 w 94
had 1 w 97
been 1 w 101
acquitted 1 w 110
in 3 w 112
your 1 w 116
trial 1 w 121
Euxenippus 1 w 132
would 1 w 137
not 1 w 140
have 1 w 144
misrepresented 1 w 158
the 2 w 161
god 1 w 164
because 1 w 172
you 4 w 175
happened 1 w 183
to 2 w 185
be 3 w 187
convicted 1 w 196
must 1 w 201
ruin 1 w 205
fall 1 w 209
on 4 w 211
him 1 w 214
Apparently 1 w 225
it 2 w 227
was 1 w 230
loss 1 w 234
of 1 w 236
prestige 1 w 244
which 1 w 249
caused 1 w 255
Polyeuctus 1 w 265
to 3 w 267
be 4 w 269
resentful 1 w 278
against 1 w 285
Euxenippus 2 w 295
since 1 w 301
the 3 w 304
actual 1 w 310
fine 1 w 314
was 2 w 317
negligible 1 w 327
And 1 w 331
when 2 w 335
you 5 w 338
who 1 w 342
proposed 1 w 350
a 21 w 351
decree 1 w 357
like 1 w 361
that 1 w 365
were 2 w 370
fined 1 w 375
a 23 w 376
mere 1 w 380
twenty-five 1 w 391
drachmas 1 w 399
is 3 w 402
the 4 w 405
man 1 w 408
who 2 w 411
lay 1 w 414
down 1 w 418
in 9 w 420
the 5 w 423
temple 1 w 429
at 3 w 431
the 6 w 434
people 1 w 440
s 26 w 442
request 1 w 449
even 1 w 453
to 4 w 455
be 5 w 457
refused 1 w 464
a 29 w 465
grave 1 w 470
in 10 w 472
Attica 1 w 478