Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On the Murder of Herodes

On the Murder of Herodes (36-40)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg005.perseus-eng2:36-40
Refs {'start': {'reference': '36', 'human_reference': 'Section 36'}, 'end': {'reference': '40', 'human_reference': 'Section 40'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Witnesses

In my opinion, they should have produced the informer himself in court, if they wished to prove me guilty. That was the issue to which they should have brought the case. Instead of putting the man to death, they ought to have produced him in the flesh and challenged me to examine him under torture. As it is, which of his statements will they use, may I ask: his first or his second? And which is true: the statement that I committed the murder or the statement that I did not?

If we are to judge from probability, it is obviously the second which is the truer; he was lying to benefit himself, but on finding that those lies were proving fatal, he thought that he would be saved by telling the truth. However, he had no one to stand up for the truth, as I, who was vindicated by his second, true statement, was unfortunately not present; while there were those who were ready to put his first, his false one, beyond all reach of future correction. As a rule, it is the victim who quietly seizes an informer and then makes away with him. In this case, it is the very persons who arrested the slave in order to discover the truth who have done so;

and it is the very person who had supplied information against myself with whom they have made away. Had I myself been responsible for his disappearance, had I refused to surrender him to the prosecution or declined to establish the truth in some other way, they would have treated that very fact as most significant: it would have furnished the strongest presumption in their favor that I was guilty. So now that they themselves have declined to submit to an inquiry, in spite of a challenge from my friends to do so, that fact should in the same way furnish a presumption in my favor that the charge which they are bringing is a false one.[*]

They further allege that the slave admitted under torture that he had been my accomplice in the murder. I maintain that he did not say this; what he said was that he conducted Herodes and myself off the boat, and that after I had murdered him, he helped me pick him up and put him in the boat; then he threw him into the sea.

Also let me point out to you that at the start, before being placed on the wheel, in fact, until extreme pressure was brought to bear, the man adhered to the truth and declared me innocent. It was only when on the wheel, and when driven to it, that he falsely incriminated me, in order to put an end to the torture.

Tokens

Witnesses 1 w 9
In 1 w 11
my 1 w 13
opinion 1 w 20
they 1 w 25
should 1 w 31
have 1 w 35
produced 1 w 43
the 2 w 46
informer 1 w 54
himself 1 w 61
in 3 w 63
court 1 w 68
if 1 w 71
they 2 w 75
wished 1 w 81
to 1 w 83
prove 1 w 88
me 2 w 90
guilty 1 w 96
That 1 w 101
was 1 w 104
the 4 w 107
issue 1 w 112
to 2 w 114
which 1 w 119
they 3 w 123
should 2 w 129
have 2 w 133
brought 1 w 140
the 6 w 143
case 1 w 147
Instead 1 w 155
of 1 w 157
putting 1 w 164
the 7 w 167
man 1 w 170
to 3 w 172
death 1 w 177
they 4 w 182
ought 2 w 187
to 4 w 189
have 3 w 193
produced 2 w 201
him 2 w 204
in 5 w 206
the 9 w 209
flesh 1 w 214
and 1 w 217
challenged 1 w 227
me 3 w 229
to 5 w 231
examine 1 w 238
him 3 w 241
under 1 w 246
torture 1 w 253
As 1 w 256
it 2 w 258
is 3 w 260
which 2 w 266
of 2 w 268
his 1 w 271
statements 1 w 281
will 1 w 285
they 5 w 289
use 1 w 292
may 1 w 296
I 3 w 297
ask 1 w 300
his 2 w 304
first 1 w 309
or 3 w 311
his 3 w 314
second 1 w 320
And 1 w 324
which 3 w 329
is 7 w 331
true 1 w 335
the 11 w 339
statement 2 w 348
that 1 w 352
I 4 w 353
committed 1 w 362
the 12 w 365
murder 1 w 371
or 4 w 373
the 13 w 376
statement 3 w 385
that 2 w 389
I 5 w 390
did 1 w 393
not 1 w 396
If 1 w 399
we 1 w 401
are 1 w 404
to 7 w 406
judge 1 w 411
from 1 w 415
probability 1 w 426
it 5 w 429
is 8 w 431
obviously 1 w 440
the 14 w 443
second 2 w 449
which 4 w 454
is 9 w 456
the 15 w 459
truer 1 w 464
he 17 w 467
was 2 w 470
lying 1 w 475
to 8 w 477
benefit 1 w 484
himself 2 w 491
but 1 w 495
on 4 w 497
finding 1 w 504
that 3 w 508
those 1 w 513
lies 1 w 517
were 1 w 521
proving 1 w 528
fatal 1 w 533
he 18 w 536
thought 1 w 543
that 4 w 547
he 19 w 549
would 1 w 554
be 2 w 556
saved 1 w 561
by 1 w 563
telling 1 w 570
the 16 w 573
truth 1 w 578
However 1 w 586
he 21 w 589
had 1 w 592
no 2 w 594
one 1 w 597
to 9 w 599
stand 1 w 604
up 1 w 606
for 2 w 609
the 17 w 612
truth 2 w 617
as 5 w 620
I 7 w 621
who 1 w 625
was 3 w 628
vindicated 1 w 638
by 2 w 640
his 4 w 643
second 3 w 649
true 3 w 654
statement 4 w 663
was 4 w 667
unfortunately 1 w 680
not 2 w 683
present 1 w 690
while 1 w 696
there 1 w 701
were 2 w 705
those 2 w 710
who 2 w 713
were 3 w 717
ready 1 w 722
to 10 w 724
put 2 w 727
his 5 w 730
first 2 w 735
his 6 w 739
false 1 w 744
one 2 w 747
beyond 1 w 754
all 2 w 757
reach 1 w 762
of 3 w 764
future 1 w 770
correction 1 w 780
As 2 w 783
a 40 w 784
rule 1 w 788
it 7 w 791
is 13 w 793
the 19 w 796
victim 1 w 802
who 3 w 805
quietly 1 w 812
seizes 1 w 818
an 4 w 820
informer 2 w 828
and 3 w 831
then 1 w 835
makes 1 w 840
away 1 w 844
with 1 w 848
him 5 w 851
In 3 w 854
this 1 w 858
case 2 w 862
it 9 w 865
is 15 w 867
the 21 w 870
very 1 w 874
persons 1 w 881
who 4 w 884
arrested 1 w 892
the 22 w 895
slave 1 w 900
in 14 w 902
order 1 w 907
to 11 w 909
discover 1 w 917
the 23 w 920
truth 3 w 925
who 5 w 928
have 4 w 932
done 1 w 936
so 2 w 938
and 4 w 942
it 10 w 944
is 17 w 946
the 24 w 949
very 2 w 953
person 2 w 959
who 6 w 962
had 2 w 965
supplied 1 w 973
information 1 w 984
against 1 w 991
myself 1 w 997
with 2 w 1001
whom 1 w 1005
they 6 w 1009
have 5 w 1013
made 1 w 1017
away 2 w 1021
Had 1 w 1025
I 9 w 1026
myself 2 w 1032
been 1 w 1036
responsible 1 w 1047
for 6 w 1050
his 8 w 1053
disappearance 1 w 1066
had 3 w 1070
I 10 w 1071
refused 1 w 1078
to 12 w 1080
surrender 1 w 1089
him 6 w 1092
to 13 w 1094
the 26 w 1097
prosecution 1 w 1108
or 12 w 1110
declined 1 w 1118
to 14 w 1120
establish 1 w 1129
the 27 w 1132
truth 4 w 1137
in 18 w 1139
some 1 w 1143
other 1 w 1148
way 3 w 1151
they 7 w 1156
would 2 w 1161
have 6 w 1165
treated 1 w 1172
that 5 w 1176
very 3 w 1180
fact 1 w 1184
as 9 w 1186
most 1 w 1190
significant 1 w 1201
it 12 w 1204
would 3 w 1209
have 7 w 1213
furnished 1 w 1222
the 30 w 1225
strongest 1 w 1234
presumption 1 w 1245
in 19 w 1247
their 1 w 1252
favor 1 w 1257
that 6 w 1261
I 11 w 1262
was 5 w 1265
guilty 2 w 1271
So 1 w 1274
now 1 w 1277
that 7 w 1281
they 8 w 1285
themselves 1 w 1295
have 8 w 1299
declined 2 w 1307
to 15 w 1309
submit 1 w 1315
to 16 w 1317
an 9 w 1319
inquiry 1 w 1326
in 22 w 1329
spite 1 w 1334
of 4 w 1336
a 79 w 1337
challenge 2 w 1346
from 2 w 1350
my 4 w 1352
friends 1 w 1359
to 17 w 1361
do 2 w 1363
so 5 w 1365
that 8 w 1370
fact 2 w 1374
should 3 w 1380
in 23 w 1382
the 34 w 1385
same 1 w 1389
way 4 w 1392
furnish 2 w 1399
a 85 w 1400
presumption 2 w 1411
in 24 w 1413
my 5 w 1415
favor 2 w 1420
that 9 w 1424
the 35 w 1427
charge 1 w 1433
which 5 w 1438
they 9 w 1442
are 2 w 1445
bringing 1 w 1453
is 23 w 1455
a 90 w 1456
false 2 w 1461
one 4 w 1464
Cf 1 w 1467
Antiph 1 w 1474
1 1 w 1476
11 1 w 1479
Prosecution 1 w 1491
of 5 w 1493
the 37 w 1496
Stepmother 1 w 1506
and 5 w 1510
Antiph 2 w 1516
6 1 w 1518
27 1 w 1521
On 1 w 1524
the 39 w 1527
Choreutes 1 w 1536
for 7 w 1540
a 93 w 1541
similar 1 w 1548
line 3 w 1552
of 6 w 1554
argument 1 w 1562
They 1 w 1567
further 1 w 1574
allege 1 w 1580
that 10 w 1584
the 41 w 1587
slave 2 w 1592
admitted 1 w 1600
under 2 w 1605
torture 2 w 1612
that 11 w 1616
he 49 w 1618
had 4 w 1621
been 2 w 1625
my 6 w 1627
accomplice 1 w 1637
in 28 w 1639
the 42 w 1642
murder 2 w 1648
I 12 w 1650
maintain 1 w 1658
that 12 w 1662
he 51 w 1664
did 2 w 1667
not 3 w 1670
say 1 w 1673
this 2 w 1677
what 1 w 1682
he 52 w 1684
said 1 w 1688
was 6 w 1691
that 13 w 1695
he 53 w 1697
conducted 1 w 1706
Herodes 1 w 1713
and 6 w 1716
myself 3 w 1722
off 1 w 1725
the 43 w 1728
boat 1 w 1732
and 7 w 1736
that 14 w 1740
after 1 w 1745
I 13 w 1746
had 5 w 1749
murdered 1 w 1757
him 7 w 1760
he 55 w 1763
helped 1 w 1769
me 12 w 1771
pick 1 w 1775
him 8 w 1778
up 3 w 1780
and 8 w 1783
put 3 w 1786
him 9 w 1789
in 31 w 1791
the 44 w 1794
boat 2 w 1798
then 2 w 1803
he 59 w 1805
threw 1 w 1810
him 10 w 1813
into 1 w 1817
the 46 w 1820
sea 1 w 1823
Also 1 w 1828
let 1 w 1831
me 13 w 1833
point 1 w 1838
out 1 w 1841
to 20 w 1843
you 1 w 1846
that 15 w 1850
at 30 w 1852
the 47 w 1855
start 1 w 1860
before 1 w 1867
being 1 w 1872
placed 1 w 1878
on 22 w 1880
the 48 w 1883
wheel 1 w 1888
in 35 w 1891
fact 3 w 1895
until 1 w 1901
extreme 1 w 1908
pressure 1 w 1916
was 7 w 1919
brought 2 w 1926
to 21 w 1928
bear 1 w 1932
the 49 w 1936
man 2 w 1939
adhered 1 w 1946
to 22 w 1948
the 50 w 1951
truth 5 w 1956
and 9 w 1959
declared 1 w 1967
me 15 w 1969
innocent 1 w 1977
It 1 w 1980
was 8 w 1983
only 1 w 1987
when 1 w 1991
on 24 w 1993
the 51 w 1996
wheel 2 w 2001
and 10 w 2005
when 2 w 2009
driven 1 w 2015
to 23 w 2017
it 16 w 2019
that 16 w 2024
he 71 w 2026
falsely 1 w 2033
incriminated 1 w 2045
me 16 w 2047
in 39 w 2050
order 2 w 2055
to 24 w 2057
put 4 w 2060
an 17 w 2062
end 3 w 2065
to 25 w 2067
the 52 w 2070
torture 3 w 2077