Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate Of Pyrrhus

On The Estate Of Pyrrhus (75-79)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg003.perseus-eng2:75-79
Refs {'start': {'reference': '75', 'human_reference': 'Section 75'}, 'end': {'reference': '79', 'human_reference': 'Section 79'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

By presenting, then, his daughter to the members of his ward without adopting my brother as his son, he might have obtained this result; whereas, by adopting my brother without introducing his daughter to the members of his ward, he made her illegitimate, as it was right that he should, and therefore incapable of succession, and left my brother heir to his estate.

Further, to prove to you that our uncle never gave a marriage-feast and never thought fit to introduce his daughter, whom our opponents declare to be his legitimate child, to the members of his ward, though their statutes demand that this should be done, the clerk shall read you the deposition of the members of Pyrrhus's ward. Read this; and you, stop the water-clock.

Deposition

Now take the deposition which shows that Pyrrhus adopted my brother.

Deposition

After this will you regard the testimony of Nicodemus as more worthy of credence than the evidence provided by our uncle's own acts?[*] And will anyone attempt to persuade you that our uncle made a legal marriage with this woman who was a common courtezan? No, you will never, I am sure, believe it unless Nicodemus can explain the following points, which I mentioned at the beginning of my speech;

First, with what dowry does he say that he married his sister to Pyrrhus? Secondly, before what archon did this married woman give notice of having quitted her husband or his domicile? Next, from whom did Nicodemus recover her dowry, when the man had died to whom he says that he gave her in marriage? Or if, though he demanded it back, he was unable to recover in the course of twenty years, what action did he bring for alimony or for her dowry on behalf of this married woman against the tenant of Pyrrhus's estate?

Furthermore, in addition to all this, let him explain to whom he married his sister at an earlier or later date and whether she had children by another man. These, then, are the questions which you must make him answer, and do not forget to interrogate him also about the marriage-feast to the members of his ward. This is among the proofs which are most damaging to his evidence; for it is obvious that if Pyrrhus was induced to marry this woman, he would also have been induced to give a marriage-feast for her to the members of his ward and to introduce to them the child, who has been declared to be this woman's daughter, as his legitimate offspring.

Tokens

By 1 w 2
presenting 1 w 12
then 1 w 17
his 1 w 21
daughter 1 w 29
to 1 w 31
the 2 w 34
members 1 w 41
of 1 w 43
his 2 w 46
ward 1 w 50
without 1 w 57
adopting 1 w 65
my 1 w 67
brother 1 w 74
as 1 w 76
his 3 w 79
son 1 w 82
he 4 w 85
might 1 w 90
have 1 w 94
obtained 1 w 102
this 1 w 106
result 1 w 112
whereas 1 w 120
by 1 w 123
adopting 2 w 131
my 2 w 133
brother 2 w 140
without 2 w 147
introducing 1 w 158
his 5 w 161
daughter 2 w 169
to 2 w 171
the 5 w 174
members 2 w 181
of 2 w 183
his 6 w 186
ward 2 w 190
he 8 w 193
made 1 w 197
her 4 w 200
illegitimate 1 w 212
as 3 w 215
it 4 w 217
was 1 w 220
right 1 w 225
that 1 w 229
he 10 w 231
should 1 w 237
and 1 w 241
therefore 1 w 250
incapable 1 w 259
of 3 w 261
succession 1 w 271
and 2 w 275
left 1 w 279
my 3 w 281
brother 3 w 288
heir 1 w 292
to 3 w 294
his 7 w 297
estate 1 w 303
Further 1 w 311
to 4 w 314
prove 1 w 319
to 5 w 321
you 1 w 324
that 2 w 328
our 1 w 331
uncle 1 w 336
never 1 w 341
gave 1 w 345
a 23 w 346
marriage-feast 1 w 360
and 3 w 363
never 2 w 368
thought 1 w 375
fit 1 w 378
to 6 w 380
introduce 1 w 389
his 8 w 392
daughter 3 w 400
whom 1 w 405
our 2 w 408
opponents 1 w 417
declare 1 w 424
to 7 w 426
be 3 w 428
his 9 w 431
legitimate 2 w 441
child 1 w 446
to 8 w 449
the 9 w 452
members 3 w 459
of 4 w 461
his 10 w 464
ward 3 w 468
though 2 w 475
their 1 w 480
statutes 1 w 488
demand 1 w 494
that 3 w 498
this 2 w 502
should 2 w 508
be 5 w 510
done 1 w 514
the 11 w 518
clerk 1 w 523
shall 1 w 528
read 1 w 532
you 2 w 535
the 12 w 538
deposition 1 w 548
of 5 w 550
the 13 w 553
members 4 w 560
of 6 w 562
Pyrrhus 1 w 569
s 36 w 571
ward 4 w 575
Read 1 w 580
this 3 w 584
and 5 w 588
you 3 w 591
stop 1 w 596
the 14 w 599
water-clock 1 w 610
Deposition 1 w 621
Now 1 w 624
take 1 w 628
the 15 w 631
deposition 2 w 641
which 1 w 646
shows 1 w 651
that 4 w 655
Pyrrhus 2 w 662
adopted 1 w 669
my 4 w 671
brother 4 w 678
Deposition 2 w 689
After 1 w 694
this 4 w 698
will 1 w 702
you 4 w 705
regard 1 w 711
the 17 w 714
testimony 1 w 723
of 7 w 725
Nicodemus 1 w 734
as 6 w 736
more 1 w 740
worthy 1 w 746
of 8 w 748
credence 1 w 756
than 1 w 760
the 18 w 763
evidence 1 w 771
provided 1 w 779
by 2 w 781
our 3 w 784
uncle 2 w 789
s 49 w 791
own 1 w 794
acts 1 w 798
ἐκμαρτυρία 1 w 809
which 2 w 815
is 14 w 817
strictly 1 w 825
a 48 w 826
technical 1 w 835
term 1 w 839
meaning 1 w 846
a 51 w 847
deposition 3 w 857
taken 1 w 862
in 10 w 864
writing 1 w 871
outside 1 w 878
the 19 w 881
court 1 w 886
is 15 w 889
here 3 w 893
rhetorically 1 w 905
used 1 w 909
for 2 w 912
the 20 w 915
evidence 2 w 923
of 9 w 925
a 54 w 926
person 1 w 932
s 58 w 934
acts 2 w 938
And 1 w 942
will 2 w 946
anyone 1 w 952
attempt 1 w 959
to 11 w 961
persuade 1 w 969
you 5 w 972
that 5 w 976
our 5 w 979
uncle 3 w 984
made 2 w 988
a 61 w 989
legal 1 w 994
marriage 2 w 1002
with 3 w 1006
this 5 w 1010
woman 1 w 1015
who 2 w 1018
was 2 w 1021
a 67 w 1022
common 1 w 1028
courtezan 1 w 1037
No 2 w 1040
you 6 w 1044
will 3 w 1048
never 3 w 1053
I 1 w 1055
am 1 w 1057
sure 1 w 1061
believe 1 w 1069
it 14 w 1071
unless 1 w 1077
Nicodemus 2 w 1086
can 1 w 1089
explain 1 w 1096
the 21 w 1099
following 1 w 1108
points 1 w 1114
which 3 w 1120
I 2 w 1121
mentioned 1 w 1130
at 12 w 1132
the 22 w 1135
beginning 1 w 1144
of 10 w 1146
my 5 w 1148
speech 1 w 1154
First 1 w 1160
with 4 w 1165
what 1 w 1169
dowry 1 w 1174
does 1 w 1178
he 31 w 1180
say 1 w 1183
that 6 w 1187
he 32 w 1189
married 1 w 1196
his 15 w 1199
sister 1 w 1205
to 12 w 1207
Pyrrhus 3 w 1214
Secondly 1 w 1223
before 1 w 1230
what 2 w 1234
archon 1 w 1240
did 1 w 1243
this 6 w 1247
married 2 w 1254
woman 2 w 1259
give 1 w 1263
notice 1 w 1269
of 11 w 1271
having 1 w 1277
quitted 1 w 1284
her 10 w 1287
husband 1 w 1294
or 7 w 1296
his 17 w 1299
domicile 1 w 1307
Next 1 w 1312
from 1 w 1317
whom 2 w 1321
did 2 w 1324
Nicodemus 3 w 1333
recover 1 w 1340
her 11 w 1343
dowry 2 w 1348
when 1 w 1353
the 23 w 1356
man 4 w 1359
had 1 w 1362
died 1 w 1366
to 13 w 1368
whom 3 w 1372
he 37 w 1374
says 1 w 1378
that 7 w 1382
he 38 w 1384
gave 2 w 1388
her 12 w 1391
in 18 w 1393
marriage 3 w 1401
Or 1 w 1404
if 1 w 1406
though 3 w 1413
he 40 w 1415
demanded 1 w 1423
it 17 w 1425
back 1 w 1429
he 41 w 1432
was 3 w 1435
unable 1 w 1441
to 14 w 1443
recover 2 w 1450
in 19 w 1452
the 24 w 1455
course 1 w 1461
of 12 w 1463
twenty 1 w 1469
years 1 w 1474
what 3 w 1479
action 1 w 1485
did 3 w 1488
he 43 w 1490
bring 1 w 1495
for 4 w 1498
alimony 1 w 1505
or 9 w 1507
for 5 w 1510
her 13 w 1513
dowry 3 w 1518
on 19 w 1520
behalf 1 w 1526
of 13 w 1528
this 7 w 1532
married 3 w 1539
woman 3 w 1544
against 1 w 1551
the 25 w 1554
tenant 1 w 1560
of 14 w 1562
Pyrrhus 4 w 1569
s 88 w 1571
estate 2 w 1577
Furthermore 1 w 1589
in 22 w 1592
addition 1 w 1600
to 15 w 1602
all 3 w 1605
this 8 w 1609
let 1 w 1613
him 1 w 1616
explain 2 w 1623
to 16 w 1625
whom 4 w 1629
he 47 w 1631
married 4 w 1638
his 20 w 1641
sister 2 w 1647
at 19 w 1649
an 18 w 1651
earlier 1 w 1658
or 12 w 1660
later 1 w 1665
date 1 w 1669
and 8 w 1672
whether 1 w 1679
she 1 w 1682
had 2 w 1685
children 1 w 1693
by 3 w 1695
another 1 w 1702
man 7 w 1705
These 1 w 1711
then 2 w 1716
are 2 w 1720
the 30 w 1723
questions 1 w 1732
which 4 w 1737
you 7 w 1740
must 1 w 1744
make 1 w 1748
him 2 w 1751
answer 1 w 1757
and 9 w 1761
do 10 w 1763
not 3 w 1766
forget 1 w 1772
to 17 w 1774
interrogate 1 w 1785
him 3 w 1788
also 1 w 1792
about 1 w 1797
the 31 w 1800
marriage-feast 2 w 1814
to 18 w 1816
the 32 w 1819
members 5 w 1826
of 15 w 1828
his 21 w 1831
ward 5 w 1835
This 1 w 1840
is 27 w 1842
among 1 w 1847
the 33 w 1850
proofs 1 w 1856
which 5 w 1861
are 3 w 1864
most 1 w 1868
damaging 1 w 1876
to 19 w 1878
his 23 w 1881
evidence 3 w 1889
for 7 w 1893
it 19 w 1895
is 29 w 1897
obvious 1 w 1904
that 8 w 1908
if 2 w 1910
Pyrrhus 5 w 1917
was 4 w 1920
induced 1 w 1927
to 20 w 1929
marry 1 w 1934
this 9 w 1938
woman 4 w 1943
he 58 w 1946
would 1 w 1951
also 2 w 1955
have 2 w 1959
been 1 w 1963
induced 2 w 1970
to 21 w 1972
give 2 w 1976
a 139 w 1977
marriage-feast 3 w 1991
for 8 w 1994
her 17 w 1997
to 22 w 1999
the 34 w 2002
members 6 w 2009
of 17 w 2011
his 25 w 2014
ward 6 w 2018
and 10 w 2021
to 23 w 2023
introduce 2 w 2032
to 24 w 2034
them 1 w 2038
the 36 w 2041
child 3 w 2046
who 6 w 2050
has 1 w 2053
been 2 w 2057
declared 1 w 2065
to 25 w 2067
be 15 w 2069
this 10 w 2073
woman 5 w 2078
s 120 w 2080
daughter 4 w 2088
as 13 w 2091
his 27 w 2094
legitimate 3 w 2104
offspring 1 w 2113