Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate of Cleonymus

On The Estate of Cleonymus (25-29)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg001.perseus-eng2:25-29
Refs {'start': {'reference': '25', 'human_reference': 'Section 25'}, 'end': {'reference': '29', 'human_reference': 'Section 29'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Furthermore, if he wished to add anything to these dispositions, why did he not record and leave behind him his wishes in a codicil, when he found himself unable to procure the original will from the officials? For he could not annul any other document except that which was deposited at the magistrate's office; but he was at liberty to record anything he liked in a codicil, and thus avoid leaving this matter in dispute between us.

If we concede also that Cleonymus wished to alter his will, it is, I think, obvious to you all that he was dissatisfied with it. Here, again, mark the impudence of our opponents, who claim that the will should be valid, though they admit that even the testator himself was dissatisfied with it, and are trying to persuade you to give a verdict which is contrary to the laws and to justice and to the intentions of the deceased.

Most impudent of all their statements is when they dare to say that Cleonymus did not wish us to have any of his property. Whom, gentlemen, could he have wished to have it rather than those to whom in his lifetime he gave more assistance out of his private means than to any other of his relatives?

It would be most extraordinary if, while Cephisander, the kinsman of our opponents, thought it fair that each of us should have a share of the property, yet Cleonymus, who was our nearest relative and received us into his house and cared for us and looked after our interests as though they were his own, was the only person who wished that we should receive no share of his estate.

Who of you could possibly believe that our opponents-at-law are kinder and more considerate towards us than our closest kindred; and that he, who was bound to treat us well and in whom it would have been disgraceful to neglect us, left us none of his property, whereas these men, who are under no obligation to us and whose disregard of us involves no disgrace, offered us a share of the property to which, as they say, we have no claim? These suppositions, gentlemen, are perfectly incredible.

Furthermore 1 w 11
if 1 w 14
he 2 w 16
wished 1 w 22
to 1 w 24
add 1 w 27
anything 1 w 35
to 2 w 37
these 1 w 42
dispositions 1 w 54
why 1 w 58
did 1 w 61
he 5 w 63
not 1 w 66
record 1 w 72
and 1 w 75
leave 1 w 80
behind 1 w 86
him 1 w 89
his 1 w 92
wishes 1 w 98
in 3 w 100
a 5 w 101
codicil 1 w 108
when 1 w 113
he 8 w 115
found 1 w 120
himself 1 w 127
unable 1 w 133
to 3 w 135
procure 1 w 142
the 3 w 145
original 1 w 153
will 1 w 157
from 1 w 161
the 4 w 164
officials 1 w 173
For 1 w 177
he 11 w 179
could 1 w 184
not 2 w 187
annul 1 w 192
any 2 w 195
other 1 w 200
document 1 w 208
except 1 w 214
that 1 w 218
which 1 w 223
was 1 w 226
deposited 1 w 235
at 2 w 237
the 6 w 240
magistrate 1 w 250
s 14 w 252
office 1 w 258
but 1 w 262
he 14 w 264
was 2 w 267
at 4 w 269
liberty 1 w 276
to 4 w 278
record 2 w 284
anything 2 w 292
he 15 w 294
liked 1 w 299
in 6 w 301
a 19 w 302
codicil 2 w 309
and 2 w 313
thus 1 w 317
avoid 1 w 322
leaving 1 w 329
this 1 w 333
matter 1 w 339
in 8 w 341
dispute 1 w 348
between 1 w 355
us 2 w 357
If 1 w 360
we 2 w 362
concede 1 w 369
also 1 w 373
that 2 w 377
Cleonymus 1 w 386
wished 2 w 392
to 5 w 394
alter 1 w 399
his 3 w 402
will 2 w 406
it 3 w 409
is 10 w 411
I 2 w 413
think 1 w 418
obvious 1 w 426
to 6 w 428
you 1 w 431
all 1 w 434
that 3 w 438
he 17 w 440
was 3 w 443
dissatisfied 1 w 455
with 1 w 459
it 5 w 461
Here 1 w 466
again 1 w 472
mark 1 w 477
the 7 w 480
impudence 1 w 489
of 3 w 491
our 1 w 494
opponents 1 w 503
who 1 w 507
claim 1 w 512
that 4 w 516
the 8 w 519
will 3 w 523
should 1 w 529
be 4 w 531
valid 1 w 536
though 1 w 543
they 1 w 547
admit 1 w 552
that 5 w 556
even 1 w 560
the 10 w 563
testator 1 w 571
himself 2 w 578
was 4 w 581
dissatisfied 2 w 593
with 2 w 597
it 8 w 599
and 3 w 603
are 1 w 606
trying 1 w 612
to 8 w 614
persuade 1 w 622
you 2 w 625
to 9 w 627
give 1 w 631
a 45 w 632
verdict 1 w 639
which 2 w 644
is 15 w 646
contrary 1 w 654
to 10 w 656
the 11 w 659
laws 1 w 663
and 4 w 666
to 11 w 668
justice 1 w 675
and 5 w 678
to 12 w 680
the 12 w 683
intentions 1 w 693
of 4 w 695
the 13 w 698
deceased 1 w 706
Most 1 w 711
impudent 1 w 719
of 5 w 721
all 2 w 724
their 1 w 729
statements 1 w 739
is 16 w 741
when 2 w 745
they 2 w 749
dare 1 w 753
to 13 w 755
say 1 w 758
that 6 w 762
Cleonymus 2 w 771
did 2 w 774
not 3 w 777
wish 4 w 781
us 7 w 783
to 14 w 785
have 1 w 789
any 4 w 792
of 6 w 794
his 4 w 797
property 1 w 805
Whom 1 w 810
gentlemen 1 w 820
could 2 w 826
he 28 w 828
have 2 w 832
wished 3 w 838
to 15 w 840
have 3 w 844
it 9 w 846
rather 1 w 852
than 1 w 856
those 1 w 861
to 16 w 863
whom 1 w 867
in 13 w 869
his 5 w 872
lifetime 1 w 880
he 31 w 882
gave 1 w 886
more 2 w 890
assistance 1 w 900
out 1 w 903
of 7 w 905
his 6 w 908
private 1 w 915
means 1 w 920
than 2 w 924
to 17 w 926
any 5 w 929
other 2 w 934
of 8 w 936
his 7 w 939
relatives 1 w 948
It 1 w 951
would 1 w 956
be 5 w 958
most 1 w 962
extraordinary 1 w 975
if 3 w 977
while 1 w 983
Cephisander 1 w 994
the 18 w 998
kinsman 1 w 1005
of 9 w 1007
our 2 w 1010
opponents 2 w 1019
thought 1 w 1027
it 10 w 1029
fair 1 w 1033
that 7 w 1037
each 1 w 1041
of 10 w 1043
us 8 w 1045
should 2 w 1051
have 4 w 1055
a 78 w 1056
share 1 w 1061
of 11 w 1063
the 19 w 1066
property 2 w 1074
yet 1 w 1078
Cleonymus 3 w 1087
who 3 w 1091
was 5 w 1094
our 3 w 1097
nearest 1 w 1104
relative 2 w 1112
and 7 w 1115
received 1 w 1123
us 10 w 1125
into 1 w 1129
his 9 w 1132
house 1 w 1137
and 8 w 1140
cared 1 w 1145
for 1 w 1148
us 12 w 1150
and 9 w 1153
looked 1 w 1159
after 1 w 1164
our 4 w 1167
interests 1 w 1176
as 8 w 1178
though 3 w 1184
they 3 w 1188
were 1 w 1192
his 10 w 1195
own 1 w 1198
was 6 w 1202
the 21 w 1205
only 1 w 1209
person 1 w 1215
who 4 w 1218
wished 4 w 1224
that 8 w 1228
we 4 w 1230
should 3 w 1236
receive 2 w 1243
no 4 w 1245
share 2 w 1250
of 12 w 1252
his 11 w 1255
estate 1 w 1261
Who 2 w 1265
of 13 w 1267
you 3 w 1270
could 3 w 1275
possibly 1 w 1283
believe 1 w 1290
that 9 w 1294
our 5 w 1297
opponents-at-law 1 w 1313
are 7 w 1316
kinder 1 w 1322
and 10 w 1325
more 3 w 1329
considerate 1 w 1340
towards 1 w 1347
us 13 w 1349
than 3 w 1353
our 6 w 1356
closest 1 w 1363
kindred 1 w 1370
and 11 w 1374
that 10 w 1378
he 38 w 1380
who 5 w 1384
was 7 w 1387
bound 1 w 1392
to 20 w 1394
treat 1 w 1399
us 14 w 1401
well 1 w 1405
and 12 w 1408
in 20 w 1410
whom 2 w 1414
it 11 w 1416
would 2 w 1421
have 5 w 1425
been 1 w 1429
disgraceful 1 w 1440
to 21 w 1442
neglect 1 w 1449
us 15 w 1451
left 1 w 1456
us 16 w 1458
none 1 w 1462
of 14 w 1464
his 12 w 1467
property 3 w 1475
whereas 1 w 1483
these 2 w 1488
men 4 w 1491
who 7 w 1495
are 8 w 1498
under 1 w 1503
no 6 w 1505
obligation 1 w 1515
to 22 w 1517
us 17 w 1519
and 13 w 1522
whose 1 w 1527
disregard 1 w 1536
of 15 w 1538
us 18 w 1540
involves 1 w 1548
no 7 w 1550
disgrace 2 w 1558
offered 1 w 1566
us 19 w 1568
a 114 w 1569
share 3 w 1574
of 17 w 1576
the 23 w 1579
property 4 w 1587
to 23 w 1589
which 3 w 1594
as 12 w 1597
they 4 w 1601
say 2 w 1604
we 6 w 1607
have 6 w 1611
no 8 w 1613
claim 2 w 1618
These 1 w 1624
suppositions 1 w 1636
gentlemen 2 w 1646
are 10 w 1650
perfectly 1 w 1659
incredible 1 w 1669