Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias

Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias (31-35)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg043.perseus-eng2:31-35
Refs {'start': {'reference': '31', 'human_reference': 'Section 31'}, 'end': {'reference': '35', 'human_reference': 'Section 35'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

I wish now, men of the jury, to produce witnesses in support of the statements which I have made to youfirst, to prove that Phylomachê, the daughter of Eubulides, won judgement for the estate of Hagnias as being the nearest of kin, and then to establish the rest of the facts.

(To the clerk.) Read the deposition.

The Deposition

The deponents state that they were present before the arbitrator in the archonship of Nicophemus,[*] when Phylomachê, the daughter of Eubulides, won judgement for the estate of Hagnias against all who disputed her title.

That Phylomachê, the daughter of Eubulides, won judgement for the estate of Hagnias, you have heard, men of the jury. And she won it, not by wrongful trickery or conspiracy, but in the fairest manner possible, since we proved that she was nearest of kin to Hagnias, whose estate is in question, being the daughter of his cousin on his fathers side, and being of the same branch as Hagnias.

When, therefore, Macartatus says that his father Theopompus won judgement for this estate, make answer to him on your part, men of the jury, that the lady also won judgement before Theopompus, the defendants father, and that the lady won her case fairly, since she was of the same branch as Hagnias, being the daughter of Eubulides, the cousin of Hagnias, but that Theopompus did not win the suit, but prevailed by trickery, being himself in no sense whatever of the branch of Hagnias.

Make this reply to him yourselves, men of the jury, and also state that against this boy Eubulides, son of Eubulides, son of the first cousin on his fathers side of Hagnias, whose estate is in question, neither Theopompus, the father of Macartatus, nor any other man ever at any time won a judgement. At the present time the contest and the trial to adjudge the estate of Hagnias are between this son of Eubulides and the defendant Macartatus, the son of Theopompus; and whichever of these two shall in your judgement speak most in harmony with justice and the laws, to him, it is plain, you jurymen will give your votes.

(To the clerk.) Read the remaining depositions; first, those proving that Phylomachê, the aunt of Hagnias, was sister by the same father and the same mother to Polemon, the father of Hagnias; after that he shall read all the other depositions which have to do with the pedigree.

The Depositions

The deponents testify that they are fellow-demesmen of Philagrus, the father of Eubulides, and Polemon, the father of Hagnias, and that they know that Phylomachê, the mother of Eubulides, was considered to be the sister of Polemon, the father of Hagnias, by the same father and the same mother, and that they never heard from anyone that Polemon, the son of Hagnias, had a brother.

Another

Tokens

I 1 w 1
wish 1 w 5
now 1 w 8
men 1 w 12
of 1 w 14
the 1 w 17
jury 1 w 21
to 1 w 24
produce 1 w 31
witnesses 1 w 40
in 1 w 42
support 1 w 49
of 2 w 51
the 2 w 54
statements 1 w 64
which 1 w 69
I 2 w 70
have 1 w 74
made 1 w 78
to 2 w 80
you 1 w 83
first 1 w 89
to 3 w 92
prove 1 w 97
that 1 w 101
Phylomachê 1 w 111
the 3 w 115
daughter 1 w 123
of 3 w 125
Eubulides 1 w 134
won 1 w 138
judgement 1 w 147
for 1 w 150
the 4 w 153
estate 1 w 159
of 4 w 161
Hagnias 1 w 168
as 2 w 170
being 1 w 175
the 5 w 178
nearest 1 w 185
of 5 w 187
kin 1 w 190
and 1 w 194
then 1 w 198
to 4 w 200
establish 1 w 209
the 7 w 212
rest 2 w 216
of 6 w 218
the 8 w 221
facts 1 w 226
To 1 w 230
the 9 w 233
clerk 1 w 238
Read 1 w 244
the 10 w 247
deposition 1 w 257
The 1 w 261
Deposition 1 w 271
The 2 w 274
deponents 1 w 283
state 3 w 288
that 2 w 292
they 1 w 296
were 1 w 300
present 1 w 307
before 1 w 313
the 12 w 316
arbitrator 1 w 326
in 4 w 328
the 13 w 331
archonship 1 w 341
of 7 w 343
Nicophemus 1 w 353
That 1 w 358
is 3 w 360
in 5 w 363
B 1 w 364
C 1 w 366
361 1 w 370
360 1 w 374
when 1 w 379
Phylomachê 2 w 389
the 14 w 393
daughter 2 w 401
of 8 w 403
Eubulides 2 w 412
won 2 w 416
judgement 2 w 425
for 3 w 428
the 15 w 431
estate 2 w 437
of 9 w 439
Hagnias 2 w 446
against 1 w 453
all 1 w 456
who 1 w 459
disputed 1 w 467
her 1 w 470
title 1 w 475
That 2 w 480
Phylomachê 3 w 490
the 16 w 494
daughter 3 w 502
of 10 w 504
Eubulides 3 w 513
won 3 w 517
judgement 3 w 526
for 4 w 529
the 17 w 532
estate 3 w 538
of 11 w 540
Hagnias 3 w 547
you 2 w 551
have 2 w 555
heard 1 w 560
men 6 w 564
of 12 w 566
the 18 w 569
jury 2 w 573
And 1 w 577
she 1 w 580
won 4 w 583
it 6 w 585
not 1 w 589
by 1 w 591
wrongful 1 w 599
trickery 1 w 607
or 7 w 609
conspiracy 1 w 619
but 1 w 623
in 7 w 625
the 19 w 628
fairest 1 w 635
manner 1 w 641
possible 1 w 649
since 1 w 655
we 2 w 657
proved 1 w 663
that 3 w 667
she 2 w 670
was 1 w 673
nearest 2 w 680
of 13 w 682
kin 2 w 685
to 6 w 687
Hagnias 4 w 694
whose 1 w 700
estate 4 w 706
is 5 w 708
in 10 w 710
question 1 w 718
being 2 w 724
the 20 w 727
daughter 4 w 735
of 14 w 737
his 1 w 740
cousin 1 w 746
on 12 w 748
his 2 w 751
father 1 w 757
s 51 w 759
side 1 w 763
and 2 w 767
being 3 w 772
of 15 w 774
the 22 w 777
same 1 w 781
branch 1 w 787
as 7 w 789
Hagnias 5 w 796
When 1 w 801
therefore 1 w 811
Macartatus 1 w 822
says 1 w 826
that 4 w 830
his 3 w 833
father 2 w 839
Theopompus 1 w 849
won 5 w 852
judgement 4 w 861
for 6 w 864
this 1 w 868
estate 5 w 874
make 1 w 879
answer 1 w 885
to 7 w 887
him 1 w 890
on 14 w 892
your 1 w 896
part 1 w 900
men 8 w 904
of 16 w 906
the 25 w 909
jury 3 w 913
that 5 w 918
the 26 w 921
lady 1 w 925
also 1 w 929
won 6 w 932
judgement 5 w 941
before 2 w 947
Theopompus 2 w 957
the 27 w 961
defendant 1 w 970
s 66 w 972
father 3 w 978
and 3 w 982
that 6 w 986
the 29 w 989
lady 2 w 993
won 7 w 996
her 6 w 999
case 1 w 1003
fairly 1 w 1009
since 2 w 1015
she 3 w 1018
was 2 w 1021
of 17 w 1023
the 30 w 1026
same 2 w 1030
branch 2 w 1036
as 11 w 1038
Hagnias 6 w 1045
being 4 w 1051
the 31 w 1054
daughter 5 w 1062
of 18 w 1064
Eubulides 4 w 1073
the 32 w 1077
cousin 2 w 1083
of 19 w 1085
Hagnias 7 w 1092
but 2 w 1096
that 7 w 1100
Theopompus 3 w 1110
did 1 w 1113
not 2 w 1116
win 1 w 1119
the 33 w 1122
suit 1 w 1126
but 3 w 1130
prevailed 1 w 1139
by 2 w 1141
trickery 2 w 1149
being 5 w 1155
himself 1 w 1162
in 19 w 1164
no 4 w 1166
sense 1 w 1171
whatever 1 w 1179
of 20 w 1181
the 34 w 1184
branch 3 w 1190
of 21 w 1192
Hagnias 8 w 1199
Make 1 w 1204
this 2 w 1208
reply 1 w 1213
to 8 w 1215
him 3 w 1218
yourselves 1 w 1228
men 10 w 1232
of 22 w 1234
the 35 w 1237
jury 4 w 1241
and 4 w 1245
also 2 w 1249
state 8 w 1254
that 8 w 1258
against 2 w 1265
this 3 w 1269
boy 1 w 1272
Eubulides 5 w 1281
son 1 w 1285
of 23 w 1287
Eubulides 6 w 1296
son 2 w 1300
of 24 w 1302
the 36 w 1305
first 2 w 1310
cousin 3 w 1316
on 19 w 1318
his 7 w 1321
father 4 w 1327
s 97 w 1329
side 2 w 1333
of 25 w 1335
Hagnias 9 w 1342
whose 2 w 1348
estate 6 w 1354
is 13 w 1356
in 22 w 1358
question 2 w 1366
neither 1 w 1374
Theopompus 4 w 1384
the 39 w 1388
father 5 w 1394
of 26 w 1396
Macartatus 2 w 1406
nor 1 w 1410
any 1 w 1413
other 1 w 1418
man 2 w 1421
ever 2 w 1425
at 29 w 1427
any 2 w 1430
time 1 w 1434
won 8 w 1437
a 109 w 1438
judgement 6 w 1447
At 1 w 1450
the 42 w 1453
present 2 w 1460
time 2 w 1464
the 43 w 1467
contest 1 w 1474
and 5 w 1477
the 44 w 1480
trial 1 w 1485
to 9 w 1487
adjudge 1 w 1494
the 45 w 1497
estate 7 w 1503
of 27 w 1505
Hagnias 10 w 1512
are 3 w 1515
between 1 w 1522
this 4 w 1526
son 3 w 1529
of 28 w 1531
Eubulides 7 w 1540
and 6 w 1543
the 46 w 1546
defendant 2 w 1555
Macartatus 3 w 1565
the 47 w 1569
son 4 w 1572
of 29 w 1574
Theopompus 5 w 1584
and 7 w 1588
whichever 1 w 1597
of 30 w 1599
these 1 w 1604
two 1 w 1607
shall 1 w 1612
in 23 w 1614
your 3 w 1618
judgement 7 w 1627
speak 1 w 1632
most 1 w 1636
in 24 w 1638
harmony 1 w 1645
with 1 w 1649
justice 1 w 1656
and 8 w 1659
the 49 w 1662
laws 1 w 1666
to 10 w 1669
him 4 w 1672
it 10 w 1675
is 15 w 1677
plain 1 w 1682
you 6 w 1686
jurymen 1 w 1693
will 1 w 1697
give 1 w 1701
your 4 w 1705
votes 1 w 1710
To 2 w 1714
the 50 w 1717
clerk 2 w 1722
Read 2 w 1728
the 51 w 1731
remaining 1 w 1740
depositions 1 w 1751
first 3 w 1757
those 1 w 1763
proving 1 w 1770
that 9 w 1774
Phylomachê 4 w 1784
the 52 w 1788
aunt 1 w 1792
of 31 w 1794
Hagnias 11 w 1801
was 3 w 1805
sister 1 w 1811
by 3 w 1813
the 53 w 1816
same 3 w 1820
father 6 w 1826
and 9 w 1829
the 55 w 1832
same 4 w 1836
mother 1 w 1842
to 11 w 1844
Polemon 1 w 1851
the 57 w 1855
father 7 w 1861
of 32 w 1863
Hagnias 12 w 1870
after 1 w 1876
that 10 w 1880
he 76 w 1882
shall 2 w 1887
read 1 w 1891
all 4 w 1894
the 59 w 1897
other 3 w 1902
depositions 2 w 1913
which 3 w 1918
have 3 w 1922
to 12 w 1924
do 1 w 1926
with 2 w 1930
the 61 w 1933
pedigree 1 w 1941
The 8 w 1945
Depositions 1 w 1956
The 9 w 1959
deponents 2 w 1968
testify 1 w 1975
that 11 w 1979
they 2 w 1983
are 4 w 1986
fellow-demesmen 1 w 2001
of 33 w 2003
Philagrus 1 w 2012
the 63 w 2016
father 8 w 2022
of 34 w 2024
Eubulides 8 w 2033
and 10 w 2037
Polemon 2 w 2044
the 65 w 2048
father 9 w 2054
of 35 w 2056
Hagnias 13 w 2063
and 11 w 2067
that 12 w 2071
they 3 w 2075
know 1 w 2079
that 13 w 2083
Phylomachê 5 w 2093
the 68 w 2097
mother 2 w 2103
of 36 w 2105
Eubulides 9 w 2114
was 4 w 2118
considered 1 w 2128
to 13 w 2130
be 9 w 2132
the 70 w 2135
sister 2 w 2141
of 37 w 2143
Polemon 3 w 2150
the 71 w 2154
father 10 w 2160
of 38 w 2162
Hagnias 14 w 2169
by 4 w 2172
the 73 w 2175
same 5 w 2179
father 11 w 2185
and 12 w 2188
the 75 w 2191
same 6 w 2195
mother 3 w 2201
and 13 w 2205
that 14 w 2209
they 4 w 2213
never 1 w 2218
heard 2 w 2223
from 1 w 2227
anyone 1 w 2233
that 15 w 2237
Polemon 4 w 2244
the 78 w 2248
son 5 w 2251
of 39 w 2253
Hagnias 15 w 2260
had 1 w 2264
a 178 w 2265
brother 1 w 2272
Another 1 w 2280