Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias

Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias (26-30)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg043.perseus-eng2:26-30
Refs {'start': {'reference': '26', 'human_reference': 'Section 26'}, 'end': {'reference': '30', 'human_reference': 'Section 30'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Well, to Theopompus was born a son, Macartatus, the defendant, and to Eubulides, the son of Phylomachê, and cousin of Hagnias on his fathers side; this boy, who is to Hagnias the son of a first cousin on the fathers side; since Phylomachê, the mother of Eubulides and Polemon, the father of Hagnias, were brother and sister, born of the same father and the same mother. But to Macartatus here, the son of Theopompus, there has been no issue which is both in the family of Hagnias and in that of Stratius.

Such being the facts, this boy here has one of the titles mentioned in the law, and up to which the law ordains that the right of succession should extend; for he is the child of the first cousin of Hagnias, since his father Eubulides was cousin to Hagnias, whose inheritance is in question. Theopompus, on the contrary, the father of the defendant Macartatus, could not have appropriated to himself any one of the titles mentioned in the law, for he belonged to another branch of the family, that of Stratius.

But it is not fitting, men of the jury, that any man whatsoever should possess the estate of Hagnias, one who belongs to another branch, so long as there is left any one of those born of the branch of Hagnias; no, nor is it right to expel such person by violence, as these men are trying to do, while they are themselves more distantly related, and not of the same branch of the family. For this, men of the jury, is the point upon which Theopompus, the father of the defendant Macartatus, misled the jury.

Who, then, are those still surviving in the branch of Hagnias? Phylomachê, my wife, who is the daughter of Eubulides, the cousin of Hagnias, and this boy, who has been adopted into the family of Eubulides and Hagnias. Theopompus, however, the father of the defendant Macartatus, not being himself of the branch of Hagnias, told the jurymen a monstrous lie regarding Phylomachê, the sister of Polemon and the aunt of Hagnias, alleging that she was not the sister of Polemon, the son of Hagnias, by the same father and mother, and another in pretending that he himself was of the same family as Hagnias, whereas he had never belonged to it.

All these assertions Theopompus made fearlessly, not producing any witness who would have been responsible to us, but having only his associates to corroborate what he said; for they were leagued with one another and did everything in concert, in order to rob the lady, the mother of this boy here, of the inheritance which you by your votes had decided to be hers.

Tokens

Well 1 w 4
to 1 w 7
Theopompus 1 w 17
was 1 w 20
born 1 w 24
a 2 w 25
son 1 w 28
Macartatus 1 w 39
the 1 w 43
defendant 1 w 52
and 1 w 56
to 2 w 58
Eubulides 1 w 67
the 2 w 71
son 2 w 74
of 1 w 76
Phylomachê 1 w 86
and 2 w 90
cousin 1 w 96
of 2 w 98
Hagnias 1 w 105
on 3 w 107
his 1 w 110
father 1 w 116
s 10 w 118
side 1 w 122
this 1 w 127
boy 1 w 130
who 1 w 134
is 3 w 136
to 3 w 138
Hagnias 2 w 145
the 4 w 148
son 3 w 151
of 3 w 153
a 15 w 154
first 1 w 159
cousin 2 w 165
on 5 w 167
the 5 w 170
father 2 w 176
s 18 w 178
side 2 w 182
since 1 w 188
Phylomachê 2 w 198
the 7 w 202
mother 1 w 208
of 4 w 210
Eubulides 2 w 219
and 3 w 222
Polemon 1 w 229
the 9 w 233
father 3 w 239
of 5 w 241
Hagnias 3 w 248
were 1 w 253
brother 1 w 260
and 4 w 263
sister 1 w 269
born 2 w 274
of 6 w 276
the 12 w 279
same 1 w 283
father 4 w 289
and 5 w 292
the 14 w 295
same 2 w 299
mother 2 w 305
But 1 w 309
to 4 w 311
Macartatus 2 w 321
here 1 w 325
the 16 w 329
son 4 w 332
of 7 w 334
Theopompus 2 w 344
there 1 w 350
has 1 w 353
been 1 w 357
no 1 w 359
issue 1 w 364
which 1 w 369
is 6 w 371
both 1 w 375
in 4 w 377
the 18 w 380
family 1 w 386
of 8 w 388
Hagnias 4 w 395
and 6 w 398
in 5 w 400
that 1 w 404
of 9 w 406
Stratius 1 w 414
Such 1 w 419
being 1 w 424
the 19 w 427
facts 1 w 432
this 2 w 437
boy 2 w 440
here 3 w 444
has 2 w 447
one 1 w 450
of 10 w 452
the 20 w 455
titles 1 w 461
mentioned 1 w 470
in 7 w 472
the 21 w 475
law 1 w 478
and 7 w 482
up 1 w 484
to 5 w 486
which 2 w 491
the 22 w 494
law 2 w 497
ordains 1 w 504
that 2 w 508
the 23 w 511
right 1 w 516
of 11 w 518
succession 1 w 528
should 1 w 534
extend 1 w 540
for 1 w 544
he 28 w 546
is 8 w 548
the 24 w 551
child 1 w 556
of 12 w 558
the 25 w 561
first 2 w 566
cousin 3 w 572
of 13 w 574
Hagnias 5 w 581
since 2 w 587
his 4 w 590
father 5 w 596
Eubulides 3 w 605
was 2 w 608
cousin 4 w 614
to 6 w 616
Hagnias 6 w 623
whose 1 w 629
inheritance 1 w 640
is 10 w 642
in 13 w 644
question 1 w 652
Theopompus 3 w 663
on 12 w 666
the 27 w 669
contrary 1 w 677
the 28 w 681
father 6 w 687
of 14 w 689
the 30 w 692
defendant 2 w 701
Macartatus 3 w 711
could 1 w 717
not 1 w 720
have 1 w 724
appropriated 1 w 736
to 7 w 738
himself 1 w 745
any 1 w 748
one 3 w 751
of 15 w 753
the 31 w 756
titles 2 w 762
mentioned 2 w 771
in 14 w 773
the 32 w 776
law 3 w 779
for 2 w 783
he 40 w 785
belonged 1 w 793
to 8 w 795
another 1 w 802
branch 1 w 808
of 16 w 810
the 34 w 813
family 2 w 819
that 3 w 824
of 17 w 826
Stratius 2 w 834
But 2 w 838
it 4 w 840
is 11 w 842
not 3 w 845
fitting 1 w 852
men 3 w 856
of 18 w 858
the 35 w 861
jury 1 w 865
that 4 w 870
any 2 w 873
man 1 w 876
whatsoever 1 w 886
should 2 w 892
possess 1 w 899
the 36 w 902
estate 1 w 908
of 19 w 910
Hagnias 7 w 917
one 5 w 921
who 3 w 924
belongs 1 w 931
to 9 w 933
another 2 w 940
branch 2 w 946
so 6 w 949
long 3 w 953
as 12 w 955
there 2 w 960
is 12 w 962
left 1 w 966
any 3 w 969
one 6 w 972
of 20 w 974
those 1 w 979
born 3 w 983
of 21 w 985
the 39 w 988
branch 3 w 994
of 22 w 996
Hagnias 8 w 1003
no 6 w 1006
nor 1 w 1010
is 13 w 1012
it 6 w 1014
right 2 w 1019
to 10 w 1021
expel 1 w 1026
such 1 w 1030
person 1 w 1036
by 1 w 1038
violence 1 w 1046
as 14 w 1049
these 1 w 1054
men 4 w 1057
are 1 w 1060
trying 1 w 1066
to 11 w 1068
do 1 w 1070
while 1 w 1076
they 1 w 1080
are 2 w 1083
themselves 1 w 1093
more 1 w 1097
distantly 1 w 1106
related 1 w 1113
and 8 w 1117
not 5 w 1120
of 23 w 1122
the 43 w 1125
same 3 w 1129
branch 4 w 1135
of 24 w 1137
the 44 w 1140
family 3 w 1146
For 1 w 1150
this 3 w 1154
men 5 w 1158
of 25 w 1160
the 45 w 1163
jury 2 w 1167
is 16 w 1170
the 46 w 1173
point 1 w 1178
upon 1 w 1182
which 3 w 1187
Theopompus 4 w 1197
the 47 w 1201
father 7 w 1207
of 26 w 1209
the 49 w 1212
defendant 3 w 1221
Macartatus 4 w 1231
misled 1 w 1238
the 50 w 1241
jury 3 w 1245
Who 1 w 1249
then 1 w 1254
are 3 w 1258
those 2 w 1263
still 1 w 1268
surviving 1 w 1277
in 19 w 1279
the 52 w 1282
branch 5 w 1288
of 27 w 1290
Hagnias 9 w 1297
Phylomachê 3 w 1308
my 1 w 1311
wife 1 w 1315
who 4 w 1319
is 18 w 1321
the 53 w 1324
daughter 1 w 1332
of 28 w 1334
Eubulides 4 w 1343
the 54 w 1347
cousin 5 w 1353
of 29 w 1355
Hagnias 10 w 1362
and 9 w 1366
this 4 w 1370
boy 3 w 1373
who 5 w 1377
has 3 w 1380
been 2 w 1384
adopted 1 w 1391
into 1 w 1395
the 55 w 1398
family 4 w 1404
of 30 w 1406
Eubulides 5 w 1415
and 10 w 1418
Hagnias 11 w 1425
Theopompus 5 w 1436
however 1 w 1444
the 56 w 1448
father 8 w 1454
of 31 w 1456
the 58 w 1459
defendant 4 w 1468
Macartatus 5 w 1478
not 6 w 1482
being 2 w 1487
himself 2 w 1494
of 32 w 1496
the 59 w 1499
branch 6 w 1505
of 33 w 1507
Hagnias 12 w 1514
told 1 w 1519
the 60 w 1522
jurymen 1 w 1529
a 118 w 1530
monstrous 1 w 1539
lie 1 w 1542
regarding 1 w 1551
Phylomachê 4 w 1561
the 61 w 1565
sister 2 w 1571
of 34 w 1573
Polemon 2 w 1580
and 11 w 1583
the 62 w 1586
aunt 1 w 1590
of 35 w 1592
Hagnias 13 w 1599
alleging 1 w 1608
that 5 w 1612
she 1 w 1615
was 3 w 1618
not 7 w 1621
the 63 w 1624
sister 3 w 1630
of 36 w 1632
Polemon 3 w 1639
the 64 w 1643
son 6 w 1646
of 37 w 1648
Hagnias 14 w 1655
by 2 w 1658
the 65 w 1661
same 4 w 1665
father 9 w 1671
and 12 w 1674
mother 3 w 1680
and 13 w 1684
another 3 w 1691
in 25 w 1693
pretending 1 w 1703
that 6 w 1707
he 80 w 1709
himself 3 w 1716
was 4 w 1719
of 38 w 1721
the 69 w 1724
same 5 w 1728
family 5 w 1734
as 24 w 1736
Hagnias 15 w 1743
whereas 1 w 1751
he 83 w 1753
had 1 w 1756
never 1 w 1761
belonged 2 w 1769
to 14 w 1771
it 7 w 1773
All 1 w 1777
these 2 w 1782
assertions 1 w 1792
Theopompus 6 w 1802
made 1 w 1806
fearlessly 1 w 1816
not 9 w 1820
producing 1 w 1829
any 4 w 1832
witness 1 w 1839
who 6 w 1842
would 1 w 1847
have 2 w 1851
been 3 w 1855
responsible 1 w 1866
to 15 w 1868
us 20 w 1870
but 1 w 1874
having 1 w 1880
only 1 w 1884
his 7 w 1887
associates 1 w 1897
to 16 w 1899
corroborate 1 w 1910
what 2 w 1914
he 86 w 1916
said 1 w 1920
for 3 w 1924
they 2 w 1928
were 2 w 1932
leagued 1 w 1939
with 1 w 1943
one 7 w 1946
another 4 w 1953
and 14 w 1956
did 1 w 1959
everything 1 w 1969
in 30 w 1971
concert 1 w 1978
in 31 w 1981
order 1 w 1986
to 17 w 1988
rob 2 w 1991
the 73 w 1994
lady 1 w 1998
the 74 w 2002
mother 4 w 2008
of 39 w 2010
this 5 w 2014
boy 4 w 2017
here 6 w 2021
of 40 w 2024
the 76 w 2027
inheritance 2 w 2038
which 4 w 2043
you 1 w 2046
by 3 w 2048
your 1 w 2052
votes 1 w 2057
had 2 w 2060
decided 1 w 2067
to 18 w 2069
be 9 w 2071
hers 1 w 2075