Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias

Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias (25-28)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg043.perseus-eng2:25-28
Refs {'start': {'reference': '25', 'human_reference': 'Section 25'}, 'end': {'reference': '28', 'human_reference': 'Section 28'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Again, then, I ask you, men of the jury, which is nearer of kin and more closely related to the first Hagnias, Hagnias, the son of Polemon, and Eubulides, the son of Phylomachê and Philagrus, or Theopompus, the son of Charidemus and grandson of Stratius? I am of the opinion, men of the jury, that if the son and the daughter are the nearest of kin, so, too, the sons son and the daughters son are more nearly related than the son of a nephew and one who is a member of another branch of the family.

Well, to Theopompus was born a son, Macartatus, the defendant, and to Eubulides, the son of Phylomachê, and cousin of Hagnias on his fathers side; this boy, who is to Hagnias the son of a first cousin on the fathers side; since Phylomachê, the mother of Eubulides and Polemon, the father of Hagnias, were brother and sister, born of the same father and the same mother. But to Macartatus here, the son of Theopompus, there has been no issue which is both in the family of Hagnias and in that of Stratius.

Such being the facts, this boy here has one of the titles mentioned in the law, and up to which the law ordains that the right of succession should extend; for he is the child of the first cousin of Hagnias, since his father Eubulides was cousin to Hagnias, whose inheritance is in question. Theopompus, on the contrary, the father of the defendant Macartatus, could not have appropriated to himself any one of the titles mentioned in the law, for he belonged to another branch of the family, that of Stratius.

But it is not fitting, men of the jury, that any man whatsoever should possess the estate of Hagnias, one who belongs to another branch, so long as there is left any one of those born of the branch of Hagnias; no, nor is it right to expel such person by violence, as these men are trying to do, while they are themselves more distantly related, and not of the same branch of the family. For this, men of the jury, is the point upon which Theopompus, the father of the defendant Macartatus, misled the jury.

Tokens

Again 1 w 5
then 1 w 10
I 1 w 12
ask 1 w 15
you 1 w 18
men 1 w 22
of 1 w 24
the 2 w 27
jury 1 w 31
which 1 w 37
is 1 w 39
nearer 1 w 45
of 2 w 47
kin 1 w 50
and 1 w 53
more 1 w 57
closely 1 w 64
related 1 w 71
to 1 w 73
the 3 w 76
first 1 w 81
Hagnias 1 w 88
Hagnias 2 w 96
the 4 w 100
son 1 w 103
of 3 w 105
Polemon 1 w 112
and 2 w 116
Eubulides 1 w 125
the 5 w 129
son 2 w 132
of 4 w 134
Phylomachê 1 w 144
and 3 w 147
Philagrus 1 w 156
or 2 w 159
Theopompus 1 w 169
the 6 w 173
son 3 w 176
of 5 w 178
Charidemus 1 w 188
and 4 w 191
grandson 1 w 199
of 6 w 201
Stratius 1 w 209
I 2 w 211
am 1 w 213
of 7 w 215
the 7 w 218
opinion 1 w 225
men 2 w 229
of 8 w 231
the 8 w 234
jury 2 w 238
that 1 w 243
if 1 w 245
the 9 w 248
son 5 w 251
and 6 w 254
the 10 w 257
daughter 1 w 265
are 2 w 268
the 11 w 271
nearest 1 w 278
of 9 w 280
kin 2 w 283
so 6 w 286
too 1 w 290
the 12 w 294
son 6 w 297
s 20 w 299
son 7 w 302
and 7 w 305
the 13 w 308
daughter 2 w 316
s 22 w 318
son 8 w 321
are 4 w 324
more 2 w 328
nearly 1 w 334
related 2 w 341
than 1 w 345
the 14 w 348
son 9 w 351
of 10 w 353
a 30 w 354
nephew 1 w 360
and 8 w 363
one 1 w 366
who 1 w 369
is 2 w 371
a 32 w 372
member 1 w 378
of 11 w 380
another 1 w 387
branch 1 w 393
of 12 w 395
the 16 w 398
family 1 w 404
Well 1 w 409
to 3 w 412
Theopompus 2 w 422
was 1 w 425
born 1 w 429
a 37 w 430
son 10 w 433
Macartatus 1 w 444
the 17 w 448
defendant 1 w 457
and 9 w 461
to 4 w 463
Eubulides 2 w 472
the 18 w 476
son 11 w 479
of 13 w 481
Phylomachê 2 w 491
and 10 w 495
cousin 1 w 501
of 14 w 503
Hagnias 3 w 510
on 15 w 512
his 1 w 515
father 1 w 521
s 35 w 523
side 1 w 527
this 1 w 532
boy 1 w 535
who 2 w 539
is 5 w 541
to 5 w 543
Hagnias 4 w 550
the 20 w 553
son 12 w 556
of 15 w 558
a 50 w 559
first 2 w 564
cousin 2 w 570
on 17 w 572
the 21 w 575
father 2 w 581
s 43 w 583
side 2 w 587
since 1 w 593
Phylomachê 3 w 603
the 23 w 607
mother 1 w 613
of 16 w 615
Eubulides 3 w 624
and 11 w 627
Polemon 2 w 634
the 25 w 638
father 3 w 644
of 17 w 646
Hagnias 5 w 653
were 1 w 658
brother 1 w 665
and 12 w 668
sister 1 w 674
born 2 w 679
of 18 w 681
the 28 w 684
same 1 w 688
father 4 w 694
and 13 w 697
the 30 w 700
same 2 w 704
mother 2 w 710
But 1 w 714
to 6 w 716
Macartatus 2 w 726
here 1 w 730
the 32 w 734
son 13 w 737
of 19 w 739
Theopompus 3 w 749
there 1 w 755
has 1 w 758
been 1 w 762
no 2 w 764
issue 1 w 769
which 2 w 774
is 8 w 776
both 1 w 780
in 8 w 782
the 34 w 785
family 2 w 791
of 20 w 793
Hagnias 6 w 800
and 14 w 803
in 9 w 805
that 2 w 809
of 21 w 811
Stratius 2 w 819
Such 1 w 824
being 1 w 829
the 35 w 832
facts 1 w 837
this 2 w 842
boy 2 w 845
here 3 w 849
has 2 w 852
one 2 w 855
of 22 w 857
the 36 w 860
titles 1 w 866
mentioned 1 w 875
in 11 w 877
the 37 w 880
law 1 w 883
and 15 w 887
up 1 w 889
to 7 w 891
which 3 w 896
the 38 w 899
law 2 w 902
ordains 1 w 909
that 3 w 913
the 39 w 916
right 1 w 921
of 23 w 923
succession 1 w 933
should 1 w 939
extend 1 w 945
for 1 w 949
he 46 w 951
is 10 w 953
the 40 w 956
child 1 w 961
of 24 w 963
the 41 w 966
first 3 w 971
cousin 3 w 977
of 25 w 979
Hagnias 7 w 986
since 2 w 992
his 4 w 995
father 5 w 1001
Eubulides 4 w 1010
was 2 w 1013
cousin 4 w 1019
to 8 w 1021
Hagnias 8 w 1028
whose 1 w 1034
inheritance 1 w 1045
is 12 w 1047
in 17 w 1049
question 1 w 1057
Theopompus 4 w 1068
on 24 w 1071
the 43 w 1074
contrary 1 w 1082
the 44 w 1086
father 6 w 1092
of 26 w 1094
the 46 w 1097
defendant 2 w 1106
Macartatus 3 w 1116
could 1 w 1122
not 2 w 1125
have 1 w 1129
appropriated 1 w 1141
to 9 w 1143
himself 1 w 1150
any 1 w 1153
one 4 w 1156
of 27 w 1158
the 47 w 1161
titles 2 w 1167
mentioned 2 w 1176
in 18 w 1178
the 48 w 1181
law 3 w 1184
for 2 w 1188
he 58 w 1190
belonged 1 w 1198
to 10 w 1200
another 2 w 1207
branch 2 w 1213
of 28 w 1215
the 50 w 1218
family 3 w 1224
that 4 w 1229
of 29 w 1231
Stratius 3 w 1239
But 2 w 1243
it 4 w 1245
is 13 w 1247
not 4 w 1250
fitting 1 w 1257
men 5 w 1261
of 30 w 1263
the 51 w 1266
jury 3 w 1270
that 5 w 1275
any 2 w 1278
man 1 w 1281
whatsoever 1 w 1291
should 2 w 1297
possess 1 w 1304
the 52 w 1307
estate 1 w 1313
of 31 w 1315
Hagnias 9 w 1322
one 6 w 1326
who 4 w 1329
belongs 1 w 1336
to 11 w 1338
another 3 w 1345
branch 3 w 1351
so 16 w 1354
long 3 w 1358
as 15 w 1360
there 2 w 1365
is 14 w 1367
left 1 w 1371
any 3 w 1374
one 7 w 1377
of 32 w 1379
those 1 w 1384
born 3 w 1388
of 33 w 1390
the 55 w 1393
branch 4 w 1399
of 34 w 1401
Hagnias 10 w 1408
no 7 w 1411
nor 1 w 1415
is 15 w 1417
it 6 w 1419
right 2 w 1424
to 12 w 1426
expel 1 w 1431
such 1 w 1435
person 1 w 1441
by 1 w 1443
violence 1 w 1451
as 17 w 1454
these 1 w 1459
men 6 w 1462
are 5 w 1465
trying 1 w 1471
to 13 w 1473
do 1 w 1475
while 1 w 1481
they 1 w 1485
are 6 w 1488
themselves 1 w 1498
more 3 w 1502
distantly 1 w 1511
related 3 w 1518
and 16 w 1522
not 6 w 1525
of 35 w 1527
the 59 w 1530
same 3 w 1534
branch 5 w 1540
of 36 w 1542
the 60 w 1545
family 4 w 1551
For 1 w 1555
this 3 w 1559
men 7 w 1563
of 37 w 1565
the 61 w 1568
jury 4 w 1572
is 18 w 1575
the 62 w 1578
point 1 w 1583
upon 1 w 1587
which 4 w 1592
Theopompus 5 w 1602
the 63 w 1606
father 7 w 1612
of 38 w 1614
the 65 w 1617
defendant 3 w 1626
Macartatus 4 w 1636
misled 1 w 1643
the 66 w 1646
jury 5 w 1650