Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias

Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias (29-32)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg043.perseus-eng2:29-32
Refs {'start': {'reference': '29', 'human_reference': 'Section 29'}, 'end': {'reference': '32', 'human_reference': 'Section 32'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Who, then, are those still surviving in the branch of Hagnias? Phylomachê, my wife, who is the daughter of Eubulides, the cousin of Hagnias, and this boy, who has been adopted into the family of Eubulides and Hagnias. Theopompus, however, the father of the defendant Macartatus, not being himself of the branch of Hagnias, told the jurymen a monstrous lie regarding Phylomachê, the sister of Polemon and the aunt of Hagnias, alleging that she was not the sister of Polemon, the son of Hagnias, by the same father and mother, and another in pretending that he himself was of the same family as Hagnias, whereas he had never belonged to it.

All these assertions Theopompus made fearlessly, not producing any witness who would have been responsible to us, but having only his associates to corroborate what he said; for they were leagued with one another and did everything in concert, in order to rob the lady, the mother of this boy here, of the inheritance which you by your votes had decided to be hers.

I wish now, men of the jury, to produce witnesses in support of the statements which I have made to youfirst, to prove that Phylomachê, the daughter of Eubulides, won judgement for the estate of Hagnias as being the nearest of kin, and then to establish the rest of the facts.

(To the clerk.) Read the deposition.

The Deposition

The deponents state that they were present before the arbitrator in the archonship of Nicophemus,[*] when Phylomachê, the daughter of Eubulides, won judgement for the estate of Hagnias against all who disputed her title.

That Phylomachê, the daughter of Eubulides, won judgement for the estate of Hagnias, you have heard, men of the jury. And she won it, not by wrongful trickery or conspiracy, but in the fairest manner possible, since we proved that she was nearest of kin to Hagnias, whose estate is in question, being the daughter of his cousin on his fathers side, and being of the same branch as Hagnias.

Tokens

Who 1 w 3
then 1 w 8
are 1 w 12
those 1 w 17
still 1 w 22
surviving 1 w 31
in 2 w 33
the 2 w 36
branch 1 w 42
of 1 w 44
Hagnias 1 w 51
Phylomachê 1 w 62
my 1 w 65
wife 1 w 69
who 1 w 73
is 1 w 75
the 3 w 78
daughter 1 w 86
of 2 w 88
Eubulides 1 w 97
the 4 w 101
cousin 1 w 107
of 3 w 109
Hagnias 2 w 116
and 1 w 120
this 1 w 124
boy 1 w 127
who 2 w 131
has 1 w 134
been 1 w 138
adopted 1 w 145
into 1 w 149
the 5 w 152
family 1 w 158
of 4 w 160
Eubulides 2 w 169
and 2 w 172
Hagnias 3 w 179
Theopompus 1 w 190
however 1 w 198
the 6 w 202
father 1 w 208
of 5 w 210
the 8 w 213
defendant 1 w 222
Macartatus 1 w 232
not 1 w 236
being 1 w 241
himself 1 w 248
of 6 w 250
the 9 w 253
branch 2 w 259
of 7 w 261
Hagnias 4 w 268
told 1 w 273
the 10 w 276
jurymen 1 w 283
a 24 w 284
monstrous 1 w 293
lie 1 w 296
regarding 1 w 305
Phylomachê 2 w 315
the 11 w 319
sister 1 w 325
of 8 w 327
Polemon 1 w 334
and 3 w 337
the 12 w 340
aunt 1 w 344
of 9 w 346
Hagnias 5 w 353
alleging 1 w 362
that 1 w 366
she 1 w 369
was 1 w 372
not 2 w 375
the 13 w 378
sister 2 w 384
of 10 w 386
Polemon 2 w 393
the 14 w 397
son 1 w 400
of 11 w 402
Hagnias 6 w 409
by 1 w 412
the 15 w 415
same 1 w 419
father 2 w 425
and 4 w 428
mother 1 w 434
and 5 w 438
another 1 w 445
in 8 w 447
pretending 1 w 457
that 2 w 461
he 21 w 463
himself 2 w 470
was 2 w 473
of 12 w 475
the 19 w 478
same 2 w 482
family 2 w 488
as 10 w 490
Hagnias 7 w 497
whereas 1 w 505
he 24 w 507
had 1 w 510
never 1 w 515
belonged 1 w 523
to 3 w 525
it 1 w 527
All 1 w 531
these 1 w 536
assertions 1 w 546
Theopompus 2 w 556
made 1 w 560
fearlessly 1 w 570
not 4 w 574
producing 1 w 583
any 1 w 586
witness 1 w 593
who 3 w 596
would 1 w 601
have 1 w 605
been 2 w 609
responsible 1 w 620
to 4 w 622
us 6 w 624
but 1 w 628
having 1 w 634
only 1 w 638
his 2 w 641
associates 1 w 651
to 5 w 653
corroborate 1 w 664
what 1 w 668
he 27 w 670
said 1 w 674
for 1 w 678
they 1 w 682
were 1 w 686
leagued 1 w 693
with 1 w 697
one 1 w 700
another 2 w 707
and 6 w 710
did 1 w 713
everything 1 w 723
in 13 w 725
concert 1 w 732
in 14 w 735
order 1 w 740
to 6 w 742
rob 2 w 745
the 23 w 748
lady 1 w 752
the 24 w 756
mother 2 w 762
of 13 w 764
this 2 w 768
boy 2 w 771
here 2 w 775
of 14 w 778
the 26 w 781
inheritance 1 w 792
which 1 w 797
you 1 w 800
by 2 w 802
your 1 w 806
votes 1 w 811
had 2 w 814
decided 1 w 821
to 7 w 823
be 5 w 825
hers 1 w 829
I 1 w 831
wish 1 w 835
now 1 w 838
men 2 w 842
of 15 w 844
the 27 w 847
jury 2 w 851
to 8 w 854
produce 1 w 861
witnesses 1 w 870
in 16 w 872
support 1 w 879
of 16 w 881
the 28 w 884
statements 1 w 894
which 2 w 899
I 2 w 900
have 2 w 904
made 2 w 908
to 9 w 910
you 3 w 913
first 1 w 919
to 10 w 922
prove 1 w 927
that 3 w 931
Phylomachê 3 w 941
the 29 w 945
daughter 2 w 953
of 17 w 955
Eubulides 3 w 964
won 1 w 968
judgement 1 w 977
for 2 w 980
the 30 w 983
estate 1 w 989
of 18 w 991
Hagnias 8 w 998
as 16 w 1000
being 2 w 1005
the 31 w 1008
nearest 1 w 1015
of 19 w 1017
kin 1 w 1020
and 7 w 1024
then 2 w 1028
to 11 w 1030
establish 1 w 1039
the 33 w 1042
rest 2 w 1046
of 20 w 1048
the 34 w 1051
facts 1 w 1056
To 1 w 1060
the 35 w 1063
clerk 1 w 1068
Read 1 w 1074
the 36 w 1077
deposition 1 w 1087
The 3 w 1091
Deposition 1 w 1101
The 4 w 1104
deponents 1 w 1113
state 3 w 1118
that 4 w 1122
they 2 w 1126
were 2 w 1130
present 1 w 1137
before 1 w 1143
the 38 w 1146
arbitrator 1 w 1156
in 19 w 1158
the 39 w 1161
archonship 1 w 1171
of 21 w 1173
Nicophemus 1 w 1183
That 1 w 1188
is 9 w 1190
in 20 w 1193
B 1 w 1194
C 1 w 1196
361 1 w 1200
360 1 w 1204
when 1 w 1209
Phylomachê 4 w 1219
the 40 w 1223
daughter 3 w 1231
of 22 w 1233
Eubulides 4 w 1242
won 2 w 1246
judgement 2 w 1255
for 4 w 1258
the 41 w 1261
estate 2 w 1267
of 23 w 1269
Hagnias 9 w 1276
against 1 w 1283
all 2 w 1286
who 4 w 1289
disputed 1 w 1297
her 11 w 1300
title 1 w 1305
That 2 w 1310
Phylomachê 5 w 1320
the 42 w 1324
daughter 4 w 1332
of 24 w 1334
Eubulides 5 w 1343
won 3 w 1347
judgement 3 w 1356
for 5 w 1359
the 43 w 1362
estate 3 w 1368
of 25 w 1370
Hagnias 10 w 1377
you 4 w 1381
have 3 w 1385
heard 1 w 1390
men 7 w 1394
of 26 w 1396
the 44 w 1399
jury 3 w 1403
And 1 w 1407
she 2 w 1410
won 4 w 1413
it 10 w 1415
not 6 w 1419
by 3 w 1421
wrongful 1 w 1429
trickery 1 w 1437
or 11 w 1439
conspiracy 1 w 1449
but 2 w 1453
in 22 w 1455
the 45 w 1458
fairest 1 w 1465
manner 1 w 1471
possible 1 w 1479
since 1 w 1485
we 4 w 1487
proved 1 w 1493
that 5 w 1497
she 3 w 1500
was 3 w 1503
nearest 2 w 1510
of 27 w 1512
kin 2 w 1515
to 13 w 1517
Hagnias 11 w 1524
whose 1 w 1530
estate 4 w 1536
is 11 w 1538
in 25 w 1540
question 1 w 1548
being 3 w 1554
the 46 w 1557
daughter 5 w 1565
of 28 w 1567
his 4 w 1570
cousin 2 w 1576
on 22 w 1578
his 5 w 1581
father 3 w 1587
s 105 w 1589
side 1 w 1593
and 8 w 1597
being 4 w 1602
of 29 w 1604
the 48 w 1607
same 3 w 1611
branch 3 w 1617
as 21 w 1619
Hagnias 12 w 1626