Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Plea of Demo Against Zenothemis

Plea of Demo Against Zenothemis (16-20)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg032.perseus-eng2:16-20
Refs {'start': {'reference': '16', 'human_reference': 'Section 16'}, 'end': {'reference': '20', 'human_reference': 'Section 20'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Yes, said another of the bystanders, and that this fellow has co-operated with Hegestratus in the whole matter, I will give you a proof. For before the attempt was made to cut through the ships bottom, this man and Hegestratus deposited with one of the ships company a written agreement. Yet, if you had confidence in him when you gave the money, why should you have sought some security for yourself before the crime? But if you distrusted him, why did you not, like the others, get a legal acknowledgement before sailing?

But why relate all that was said? We made no progress by all this talking; he held on to the grain. Protus tried to put him out, and so did Phertatus, Protuss partner; but he wouldnt budge, declaring point-blank that he would not be put out of possession by anyone, unless I myself should put him out.[*]

After this Protus and I challenged him to go before the Syracusan authorities, and, if it should be shown that Protus had bought the grain, that the customs duties were recorded in his name, and that it was he who had paid the price, we demanded that Zenothemis be punished as a rascal; if this were not proved, we agreed that he should receive back all he had expended and a talent in addition and that we would relinquish our claim to the grain. Despite this challenge and all that Protus and I could say, we made no progress, but I had to choose either to put Zenothemis out, or to lose my property which had been brought safe to port and was there before my eyes.

Protus on his part adjured us by the gods to put him out, declaring himself ready to sail back to Sicily; but if, despite this willingness of his, I should give up the grain to Zenothemis, he said it made no difference to him. To prove that I am telling the truth in thisthat the plaintiff refused to be put out of possession except by me, that he refused the challenge to sail back to Sicily, and that he deposited the agreement in the course of the voyageread the depositions.

TheDepositions

When, therefore, he refused to be put out of possession by Protus, or to sail back to Sicily for an equitable settlement, and when it was proved that he was an accomplice in all the villainy of Hegestratus, the only course left for us, who had lent our money here at Athens and had taken over the grain from the man who had honestly purchased it there in Sicily, was to dispossess the plaintiff.

Tokens

Yes 1 w 3
said 1 w 8
another 1 w 15
of 1 w 17
the 2 w 20
bystanders 1 w 30
and 2 w 34
that 1 w 38
this 1 w 42
fellow 1 w 48
has 1 w 51
co-operated 1 w 62
with 1 w 66
Hegestratus 1 w 77
in 1 w 79
the 3 w 82
whole 1 w 87
matter 1 w 93
I 1 w 95
will 1 w 99
give 1 w 103
you 1 w 106
a 10 w 107
proof 1 w 112
For 1 w 116
before 1 w 122
the 4 w 125
attempt 1 w 132
was 1 w 135
made 1 w 139
to 1 w 141
cut 1 w 144
through 1 w 151
the 5 w 154
ship 1 w 158
s 11 w 160
bottom 1 w 166
this 2 w 171
man 1 w 174
and 3 w 177
Hegestratus 2 w 188
deposited 1 w 197
with 2 w 201
one 1 w 204
of 3 w 206
the 6 w 209
ship 2 w 213
s 17 w 215
company 1 w 222
a 18 w 223
written 1 w 230
agreement 1 w 239
Yet 1 w 243
if 1 w 246
you 2 w 249
had 1 w 252
confidence 1 w 262
in 2 w 264
him 1 w 267
when 1 w 271
you 3 w 274
gave 1 w 278
the 7 w 281
money 1 w 286
why 1 w 290
should 1 w 296
you 4 w 299
have 1 w 303
sought 1 w 309
some 1 w 313
security 1 w 321
for 2 w 324
yourself 1 w 332
before 2 w 338
the 8 w 341
crime 1 w 346
But 1 w 350
if 2 w 352
you 6 w 355
distrusted 1 w 365
him 2 w 368
why 2 w 372
did 1 w 375
you 7 w 378
not 2 w 381
like 1 w 386
the 9 w 389
others 1 w 395
get 1 w 399
a 23 w 400
legal 1 w 405
acknowledgement 1 w 420
before 3 w 426
sailing 1 w 433
But 2 w 437
why 3 w 440
relate 1 w 446
all 1 w 449
that 2 w 453
was 2 w 456
said 2 w 460
We 1 w 463
made 2 w 467
no 4 w 469
progress 1 w 477
by 2 w 479
all 2 w 482
this 3 w 486
talking 1 w 493
he 12 w 496
held 1 w 500
on 4 w 502
to 3 w 504
the 11 w 507
grain 1 w 512
Protus 1 w 519
tried 1 w 524
to 4 w 526
put 1 w 529
him 3 w 532
out 1 w 535
and 4 w 539
so 3 w 541
did 2 w 544
Phertatus 1 w 553
Protus 2 w 560
s 36 w 562
partner 1 w 569
but 1 w 573
he 16 w 575
wouldn 1 w 581
t 64 w 583
budge 1 w 588
declaring 1 w 598
point-blank 1 w 609
that 3 w 613
he 17 w 615
would 2 w 620
not 3 w 623
be 4 w 625
put 2 w 628
out 2 w 631
of 4 w 633
possession 1 w 643
by 3 w 645
anyone 1 w 651
unless 1 w 658
I 2 w 659
myself 1 w 665
should 2 w 671
put 3 w 674
him 4 w 677
out 3 w 680
The 1 w 684
meaning 1 w 691
appears 1 w 698
to 5 w 700
be 5 w 702
that 4 w 706
Zenothemis 1 w 716
considered 1 w 726
Demo 1 w 730
rather 1 w 737
than 1 w 741
Protus 3 w 747
a 49 w 749
person 1 w 755
from 1 w 759
whom 1 w 763
he 21 w 765
might 1 w 770
hope 1 w 774
to 6 w 776
win 1 w 779
damages 1 w 786
for 5 w 789
ejectment 1 w 798
After 1 w 804
this 4 w 808
Protus 4 w 814
and 5 w 817
I 3 w 818
challenged 1 w 828
him 5 w 831
to 7 w 833
go 1 w 835
before 4 w 841
the 14 w 844
Syracusan 1 w 853
authorities 1 w 864
and 6 w 868
if 3 w 871
it 7 w 873
should 3 w 879
be 7 w 881
shown 1 w 886
that 5 w 890
Protus 5 w 896
had 2 w 899
bought 1 w 905
the 15 w 908
grain 2 w 913
that 6 w 918
the 16 w 921
customs 1 w 928
duties 1 w 934
were 1 w 938
recorded 1 w 946
in 11 w 948
his 5 w 951
name 1 w 955
and 7 w 959
that 7 w 963
it 8 w 965
was 3 w 968
he 25 w 970
who 3 w 973
had 3 w 976
paid 1 w 980
the 17 w 983
price 1 w 988
we 2 w 991
demanded 1 w 999
that 8 w 1003
Zenothemis 2 w 1013
be 8 w 1015
punished 1 w 1023
as 5 w 1025
a 71 w 1026
rascal 1 w 1032
if 4 w 1035
this 5 w 1039
were 2 w 1043
not 6 w 1046
proved 1 w 1052
we 4 w 1055
agreed 1 w 1061
that 9 w 1065
he 29 w 1067
should 4 w 1073
receive 1 w 1080
back 1 w 1084
all 4 w 1087
he 30 w 1089
had 4 w 1092
expended 1 w 1100
and 9 w 1103
a 80 w 1104
talent 1 w 1110
in 12 w 1112
addition 1 w 1120
and 10 w 1123
that 10 w 1127
we 5 w 1129
would 3 w 1134
relinquish 1 w 1144
our 2 w 1147
claim 1 w 1152
to 9 w 1154
the 19 w 1157
grain 3 w 1162
Despite 1 w 1170
this 6 w 1174
challenge 2 w 1183
and 11 w 1186
all 6 w 1189
that 11 w 1193
Protus 6 w 1199
and 12 w 1202
I 4 w 1203
could 1 w 1208
say 1 w 1211
we 6 w 1214
made 3 w 1218
no 9 w 1220
progress 2 w 1228
but 2 w 1232
I 5 w 1233
had 5 w 1236
to 10 w 1238
choose 1 w 1244
either 1 w 1250
to 11 w 1252
put 4 w 1255
Zenothemis 3 w 1265
out 4 w 1268
or 10 w 1271
to 12 w 1273
lose 1 w 1277
my 2 w 1279
property 1 w 1287
which 1 w 1292
had 6 w 1295
been 1 w 1299
brought 1 w 1306
safe 1 w 1310
to 13 w 1312
port 1 w 1316
and 13 w 1319
was 4 w 1322
there 1 w 1327
before 5 w 1333
my 3 w 1335
eyes 1 w 1339
Protus 7 w 1346
on 10 w 1348
his 8 w 1351
part 2 w 1355
adjured 1 w 1362
us 14 w 1364
by 4 w 1366
the 23 w 1369
gods 1 w 1373
to 14 w 1375
put 5 w 1378
him 6 w 1381
out 5 w 1384
declaring 2 w 1394
himself 1 w 1401
ready 1 w 1406
to 15 w 1408
sail 2 w 1412
back 2 w 1416
to 16 w 1418
Sicily 1 w 1424
but 3 w 1428
if 5 w 1430
despite 1 w 1438
this 7 w 1442
willingness 1 w 1453
of 5 w 1455
his 10 w 1458
I 6 w 1460
should 5 w 1466
give 2 w 1470
up 1 w 1472
the 24 w 1475
grain 4 w 1480
to 17 w 1482
Zenothemis 4 w 1492
he 38 w 1495
said 3 w 1499
it 13 w 1501
made 4 w 1505
no 12 w 1507
difference 1 w 1517
to 18 w 1519
him 8 w 1522
To 1 w 1525
prove 2 w 1530
that 12 w 1534
I 7 w 1535
am 3 w 1537
telling 1 w 1544
the 26 w 1547
truth 1 w 1552
in 19 w 1554
this 8 w 1558
that 13 w 1563
the 27 w 1566
plaintiff 1 w 1575
refused 1 w 1582
to 19 w 1584
be 11 w 1586
put 6 w 1589
out 6 w 1592
of 6 w 1594
possession 2 w 1604
except 1 w 1610
by 5 w 1612
me 8 w 1614
that 14 w 1619
he 41 w 1621
refused 2 w 1628
the 28 w 1631
challenge 3 w 1640
to 20 w 1642
sail 3 w 1646
back 3 w 1650
to 21 w 1652
Sicily 2 w 1658
and 14 w 1662
that 15 w 1666
he 43 w 1668
deposited 2 w 1677
the 29 w 1680
agreement 2 w 1689
in 21 w 1691
the 30 w 1694
course 1 w 1700
of 7 w 1702
the 31 w 1705
voyage 1 w 1711
read 2 w 1716
the 32 w 1719
depositions 1 w 1730
TheDepositions 1 w 1745
When 1 w 1749
therefore 1 w 1759
he 51 w 1762
refused 3 w 1769
to 22 w 1771
be 12 w 1773
put 7 w 1776
out 7 w 1779
of 8 w 1781
possession 3 w 1791
by 6 w 1793
Protus 8 w 1799
or 14 w 1802
to 23 w 1804
sail 4 w 1808
back 4 w 1812
to 24 w 1814
Sicily 3 w 1820
for 9 w 1823
an 23 w 1825
equitable 1 w 1834
settlement 1 w 1844
and 15 w 1848
when 2 w 1852
it 18 w 1854
was 5 w 1857
proved 2 w 1863
that 16 w 1867
he 53 w 1869
was 6 w 1872
an 25 w 1874
accomplice 1 w 1884
in 22 w 1886
all 8 w 1889
the 34 w 1892
villainy 1 w 1900
of 9 w 1902
Hegestratus 3 w 1913
the 35 w 1917
only 1 w 1921
course 2 w 1927
left 1 w 1931
for 10 w 1934
us 20 w 1936
who 4 w 1940
had 7 w 1943
lent 2 w 1947
our 5 w 1950
money 2 w 1955
here 3 w 1959
at 26 w 1961
Athens 1 w 1967
and 16 w 1970
had 8 w 1973
taken 1 w 1978
over 1 w 1982
the 37 w 1985
grain 5 w 1990
from 2 w 1994
the 38 w 1997
man 3 w 2000
who 5 w 2003
had 9 w 2006
honestly 1 w 2014
purchased 1 w 2023
it 19 w 2025
there 3 w 2030
in 25 w 2032
Sicily 4 w 2038
was 7 w 2042
to 25 w 2044
dispossess 1 w 2054
the 40 w 2057
plaintiff 2 w 2066