Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Evagoras

Evagoras (51-55)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg015.perseus-eng2:51-55
Refs {'start': {'reference': '51', 'human_reference': 'Section 51'}, 'end': {'reference': '55', 'human_reference': 'Section 55'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

The most convincing proof of the character and uprightness of Evagoras is thisthat many of the most reputable Greeks left their own fatherlands and came to Cyrus to dwell, because they considered Evagorass rule less burdensome and more equitable than that of their own governments at home.[*] To mention all the others by name would be too great a task:

but who does not know about Conon, first among the Greeks for his very many glorious deeds, that when his own city had met with ill-fortune,[*] hechose out of all the world Evagoras and came to him, believing that for himself Evagoras would provide the most secure asylum and for his country the most speedy assistance. And indeed Conon, although he had been successful in many previous ventures, in no one of them, it is believed, had he planned more wisely than in this;

for the result of his visit to Cyprus was that he both conferred and received most benefits. In the first place, no sooner had Evagoras and Conon met one another than they esteemed each other more highly than those who before had been their intimate friends. Again, they not only were in complete harmony all their lives regarding all other matters, but also in matters relating to our own city they held to the same opinion.

For when they beheld Athens under the domination of the Lacedaemonians and the victim of a great reversal of fortune, they were filled with grief and indignation, both acting fittingly: for Conon was a native son of Athens, and Evagoras, because of his many generous benefactions, had legally been given citizenship by the Athenians.[*] And while they were deliberating how they might free Athens from her misfortunes, the Lacedaemonians themselves soon furnished the opportunity: for, as rulers of the Greeks on land and sea, they became so insatiate that they attempted to ravage Asia[*] also.

Conon and Evagoras seized this opportunity, and, as the generals of the Persian king were at a loss to know how to handle the situation, these two advised them to wage war against the Lacedaemonians, not upon land but upon the sea, their opinion being that if the Persians should organize an army on land and with this should gain a victory, the mainland alone would profit, whereas, if they should be victors on the sea, all Hellas would have a share in the victory.

Tokens

The 1 w 3
most 1 w 7
convincing 1 w 17
proof 1 w 22
of 2 w 24
the 1 w 27
character 1 w 36
and 1 w 39
uprightness 1 w 50
of 3 w 52
Evagoras 1 w 60
is 1 w 62
this 1 w 66
that 1 w 71
many 1 w 75
of 4 w 77
the 2 w 80
most 2 w 84
reputable 1 w 93
Greeks 1 w 99
left 1 w 103
their 1 w 108
own 1 w 111
fatherlands 1 w 122
and 3 w 125
came 1 w 129
to 1 w 131
Cyrus 1 w 136
to 2 w 138
dwell 1 w 143
because 1 w 151
they 1 w 155
considered 1 w 165
Evagoras 2 w 173
s 14 w 175
rule 1 w 179
less 1 w 183
burdensome 1 w 193
and 4 w 196
more 1 w 200
equitable 1 w 209
than 1 w 213
that 2 w 217
of 5 w 219
their 2 w 224
own 2 w 227
governments 1 w 238
at 4 w 240
home 1 w 244
E 3 w 246
g 6 w 248
Andocides 1 w 259
the 7 w 263
Athenian 1 w 271
orator 1 w 277
who 1 w 281
had 1 w 284
an 8 w 286
estate 1 w 292
in 3 w 294
Cyprus 1 w 300
cf 1 w 303
Andoc 2 w 309
1 1 w 311
4 1 w 313
and 5 w 318
other 1 w 323
Greeks 2 w 329
who 2 w 332
were 1 w 336
forced 1 w 342
into 1 w 346
exile 1 w 351
To 1 w 354
mention 1 w 361
all 1 w 364
the 10 w 367
others 1 w 373
by 1 w 375
name 1 w 379
would 1 w 384
be 2 w 386
too 1 w 389
great 1 w 394
a 30 w 395
task 1 w 399
but 1 w 403
who 3 w 406
does 1 w 410
not 1 w 413
know 1 w 417
about 1 w 422
Conon 1 w 427
first 1 w 433
among 1 w 438
the 12 w 441
Greeks 3 w 447
for 2 w 450
his 2 w 453
very 1 w 457
many 2 w 461
glorious 1 w 469
deeds 1 w 474
that 3 w 479
when 1 w 483
his 3 w 486
own 3 w 489
city 1 w 493
had 2 w 496
met 1 w 499
with 1 w 503
ill-fortune 1 w 514
The 2 w 518
Athenian 2 w 526
fleet 1 w 531
under 1 w 536
Conon 2 w 541
was 1 w 544
defeated 1 w 552
by 2 w 554
the 14 w 557
Spartans 1 w 565
at 10 w 567
Aegospotami 1 w 578
in 5 w 580
405 1 w 583
B 1 w 584
C 5 w 586
After 1 w 592
this 2 w 596
ill-fortune 2 w 608
Conon 3 w 614
with 2 w 619
eight 1 w 624
triremes 1 w 632
took 1 w 637
refuge 1 w 643
with 3 w 647
Evagoras 3 w 655
where 1 w 661
he 19 w 663
remained 1 w 671
until 1 w 676
397 1 w 679
B 2 w 680
C 7 w 682
hechose 1 w 690
out 2 w 693
of 6 w 695
all 2 w 698
the 15 w 701
world 1 w 706
Evagoras 4 w 714
and 6 w 717
came 2 w 721
to 7 w 723
him 1 w 726
believing 1 w 736
that 4 w 740
for 5 w 743
himself 1 w 750
Evagoras 5 w 758
would 2 w 763
provide 1 w 770
the 16 w 773
most 3 w 777
secure 1 w 783
asylum 1 w 789
and 7 w 792
for 6 w 795
his 5 w 798
country 1 w 805
the 17 w 808
most 4 w 812
speedy 1 w 818
assistance 1 w 828
And 3 w 832
indeed 1 w 838
Conon 4 w 843
although 1 w 852
he 24 w 854
had 3 w 857
been 1 w 861
successful 1 w 871
in 9 w 873
many 3 w 877
previous 1 w 885
ventures 1 w 893
in 10 w 896
no 7 w 898
one 1 w 901
of 7 w 903
them 1 w 907
it 6 w 910
is 8 w 912
believed 1 w 920
had 4 w 924
he 26 w 926
planned 1 w 933
more 2 w 937
wisely 1 w 943
than 2 w 947
in 11 w 949
this 3 w 953
for 7 w 957
the 19 w 960
result 1 w 966
of 8 w 968
his 7 w 971
visit 1 w 976
to 8 w 978
Cyprus 2 w 984
was 2 w 987
that 5 w 991
he 28 w 993
both 1 w 997
conferred 1 w 1006
and 8 w 1009
received 1 w 1017
most 5 w 1021
benefits 1 w 1029
In 1 w 1032
the 20 w 1035
first 2 w 1040
place 1 w 1045
no 8 w 1048
sooner 1 w 1054
had 5 w 1057
Evagoras 6 w 1065
and 9 w 1068
Conon 5 w 1073
met 2 w 1076
one 3 w 1079
another 1 w 1086
than 3 w 1090
they 2 w 1094
esteemed 1 w 1102
each 1 w 1106
other 4 w 1111
more 3 w 1115
highly 1 w 1121
than 4 w 1125
those 1 w 1130
who 4 w 1133
before 1 w 1139
had 6 w 1142
been 2 w 1146
their 3 w 1151
intimate 1 w 1159
friends 1 w 1166
Again 1 w 1172
they 3 w 1177
not 3 w 1180
only 1 w 1184
were 2 w 1188
in 14 w 1190
complete 1 w 1198
harmony 1 w 1205
all 3 w 1208
their 4 w 1213
lives 1 w 1218
regarding 1 w 1227
all 4 w 1230
other 5 w 1235
matters 1 w 1242
but 2 w 1246
also 1 w 1250
in 16 w 1252
matters 2 w 1259
relating 1 w 1267
to 9 w 1269
our 1 w 1272
own 4 w 1275
city 2 w 1279
they 4 w 1283
held 1 w 1287
to 10 w 1289
the 29 w 1292
same 1 w 1296
opinion 1 w 1303
For 1 w 1307
when 2 w 1311
they 5 w 1315
beheld 1 w 1321
Athens 1 w 1327
under 2 w 1332
the 32 w 1335
domination 1 w 1345
of 9 w 1347
the 33 w 1350
Lacedaemonians 1 w 1364
and 10 w 1367
the 34 w 1370
victim 1 w 1376
of 10 w 1378
a 94 w 1379
great 2 w 1384
reversal 1 w 1392
of 11 w 1394
fortune 3 w 1401
they 6 w 1406
were 3 w 1410
filled 1 w 1416
with 4 w 1420
grief 1 w 1425
and 11 w 1428
indignation 1 w 1439
both 2 w 1444
acting 1 w 1450
fittingly 1 w 1459
for 10 w 1463
Conon 6 w 1468
was 3 w 1471
a 101 w 1472
native 1 w 1478
son 1 w 1481
of 12 w 1483
Athens 2 w 1489
and 12 w 1493
Evagoras 7 w 1501
because 2 w 1509
of 13 w 1511
his 8 w 1514
many 4 w 1518
generous 1 w 1526
benefactions 1 w 1538
had 7 w 1542
legally 1 w 1549
been 3 w 1553
given 1 w 1558
citizenship 1 w 1569
by 3 w 1571
the 37 w 1574
Athenians 1 w 1583
This 1 w 1588
is 15 w 1590
attested 1 w 1598
by 4 w 1600
Dem 1 w 1603
12 1 w 1606
10 1 w 1609
And 4 w 1613
while 1 w 1618
they 7 w 1622
were 4 w 1626
deliberating 1 w 1638
how 1 w 1641
they 8 w 1645
might 1 w 1650
free 1 w 1654
Athens 3 w 1660
from 1 w 1664
her 8 w 1667
misfortunes 1 w 1678
the 42 w 1682
Lacedaemonians 2 w 1696
themselves 1 w 1706
soon 2 w 1710
furnished 1 w 1719
the 44 w 1722
opportunity 1 w 1733
for 12 w 1737
as 14 w 1740
rulers 1 w 1746
of 14 w 1748
the 45 w 1751
Greeks 4 w 1757
on 31 w 1759
land 2 w 1763
and 14 w 1766
sea 1 w 1769
they 9 w 1774
became 1 w 1780
so 6 w 1782
insatiate 1 w 1791
that 6 w 1795
they 10 w 1799
attempted 1 w 1808
to 11 w 1810
ravage 1 w 1816
Asia 1 w 1820
Agesilaus 1 w 1829
king 1 w 1834
of 15 w 1836
Sparta 2 w 1842
was 4 w 1846
leader 1 w 1852
also 2 w 1857
Conon 7 w 1863
and 15 w 1866
Evagoras 8 w 1874
seized 1 w 1880
this 4 w 1884
opportunity 2 w 1895
and 16 w 1899
as 17 w 1902
the 48 w 1905
generals 1 w 1913
of 16 w 1915
the 49 w 1918
Persian 1 w 1925
king 2 w 1929
were 5 w 1933
at 27 w 1935
a 143 w 1936
loss 1 w 1940
to 12 w 1942
know 2 w 1946
how 2 w 1949
to 13 w 1951
handle 1 w 1957
the 50 w 1960
situation 1 w 1969
these 1 w 1975
two 1 w 1978
advised 1 w 1985
them 3 w 1989
to 14 w 1991
wage 1 w 1995
war 1 w 1998
against 1 w 2005
the 53 w 2008
Lacedaemonians 3 w 2022
not 4 w 2026
upon 1 w 2030
land 3 w 2034
but 3 w 2037
upon 2 w 2041
the 54 w 2044
sea 2 w 2047
their 5 w 2053
opinion 2 w 2060
being 1 w 2065
that 7 w 2069
if 1 w 2071
the 56 w 2074
Persians 1 w 2082
should 1 w 2088
organize 1 w 2096
an 41 w 2098
army 1 w 2102
on 39 w 2104
land 4 w 2108
and 20 w 2111
with 5 w 2115
this 5 w 2119
should 2 w 2125
gain 3 w 2129
a 164 w 2130
victory 1 w 2137
the 57 w 2141
mainland 1 w 2149
alone 1 w 2154
would 3 w 2159
profit 1 w 2165
whereas 1 w 2173
if 2 w 2176
they 11 w 2180
should 3 w 2186
be 16 w 2188
victors 1 w 2195
on 41 w 2197
the 59 w 2200
sea 3 w 2203
all 6 w 2207
Hellas 1 w 2213
would 4 w 2218
have 1 w 2222
a 173 w 2223
share 1 w 2228
in 32 w 2230
the 60 w 2233
victory 2 w 2240