Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / For L. Flaccus

For L. Flaccus (49-50)

urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi017.perseus-eng2:49-50
Refs {'start': {'reference': '49', 'human_reference': 'Section 49'}, 'end': {'reference': '50', 'human_reference': 'Section 50'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Now you know the honesty of the man and the value of his evidence, and the whole reason of his enmity to Flaccus. Having been released by Hermippus after having sold him a few slaves, he came to Rome from thence he returned into Asia, when my brother Quintus had succeeded Flaccus in that government and went to him and related his story in this manner, saying that the judges being compelled and put in fear by the violence of Flaccus had given a false decision against their will. My brother as became his impartiality and prudence, decreed that if he demurred to the previous decision, he was to give security to double the amount; and that if he said that they were compelled by fear at the first trial, he should have the same judges again. He refused this, and as if there had been no trial and no decision, he began on the spot to demand back from Hermippus the slaves which he himself had sold him. Marcus Gratidius, the lieutenant, before whom he went refused to give him leave to proceed with the action, but declared that he should adhere to the decision already given.

A second time, as he had no place anywhere where he could remain, he betook himself to Rome. Hermippus, who never yields to his impudence, follows him hither. Heraclides demands from Caius Plotius, a senator, a man of the highest character, who had served in Asia as lieutenant some slaves, which he said he had sold under compulsion, at a time when an unjust decision had been given against him. Quintus Naso, a most accomplished man, who had been praetor, is appointed judge; and when he showed that he was going to give sentence in favour of Plotius, Heraclides left the judge, and abandoned the whole cause as if he had not had a fair and legal trial. Do I appear to you, O judges, to be dwelling too much on each individual witness, and not to be discussing the whole class of witnesses, as I originally intended?

Tokens

Now 1 w 3
you 1 w 6
know 1 w 10
the 1 w 13
honesty 1 w 20
of 1 w 22
the 2 w 25
man 1 w 28
and 1 w 31
the 3 w 34
value 1 w 39
of 2 w 41
his 1 w 44
evidence 1 w 52
and 2 w 56
the 4 w 59
whole 1 w 64
reason 1 w 70
of 3 w 72
his 2 w 75
enmity 1 w 81
to 1 w 83
Flaccus 1 w 90
Having 1 w 97
been 1 w 101
released 1 w 109
by 1 w 111
Hermippus 1 w 120
after 1 w 125
having 1 w 131
sold 1 w 135
him 1 w 138
a 11 w 139
few 1 w 142
slaves 1 w 148
he 5 w 151
came 1 w 155
to 2 w 157
Rome 1 w 161
from 1 w 165
thence 1 w 171
he 7 w 173
returned 1 w 181
into 1 w 185
Asia 1 w 189
when 1 w 194
my 1 w 196
brother 1 w 203
Quintus 1 w 210
had 1 w 213
succeeded 1 w 222
Flaccus 2 w 229
in 5 w 231
that 1 w 235
government 1 w 245
and 3 w 248
went 1 w 252
to 4 w 254
him 2 w 257
and 4 w 260
related 1 w 267
his 3 w 270
story 1 w 275
in 6 w 277
this 1 w 281
manner 1 w 287
saying 1 w 294
that 2 w 298
the 7 w 301
judges 1 w 307
being 1 w 312
compelled 1 w 321
and 5 w 324
put 1 w 327
in 9 w 329
fear 1 w 333
by 2 w 335
the 8 w 338
violence 1 w 346
of 4 w 348
Flaccus 3 w 355
had 2 w 358
given 1 w 363
a 28 w 364
false 1 w 369
decision 1 w 377
against 1 w 384
their 1 w 389
will 1 w 393
My 1 w 396
brother 2 w 403
as 3 w 405
became 1 w 411
his 5 w 414
impartiality 1 w 426
and 6 w 429
prudence 1 w 437
decreed 1 w 445
that 3 w 449
if 1 w 451
he 14 w 453
demurred 1 w 461
to 6 w 463
the 11 w 466
previous 1 w 474
decision 2 w 482
he 16 w 485
was 1 w 488
to 7 w 490
give 2 w 494
security 1 w 502
to 8 w 504
double 1 w 510
the 12 w 513
amount 1 w 519
and 7 w 523
that 4 w 527
if 2 w 529
he 18 w 531
said 1 w 535
that 5 w 539
they 1 w 543
were 1 w 547
compelled 2 w 556
by 3 w 558
fear 2 w 562
at 7 w 564
the 14 w 567
first 1 w 572
trial 1 w 577
he 21 w 580
should 1 w 586
have 1 w 590
the 15 w 593
same 1 w 597
judges 2 w 603
again 2 w 608
He 2 w 611
refused 1 w 618
this 2 w 622
and 8 w 626
as 5 w 628
if 3 w 630
there 1 w 635
had 3 w 638
been 2 w 642
no 2 w 644
trial 2 w 649
and 9 w 652
no 3 w 654
decision 3 w 662
he 24 w 665
began 1 w 670
on 6 w 672
the 17 w 675
spot 1 w 679
to 9 w 681
demand 1 w 687
back 1 w 691
from 2 w 695
Hermippus 2 w 704
the 18 w 707
slaves 2 w 713
which 1 w 718
he 27 w 720
himself 1 w 727
had 4 w 730
sold 2 w 734
him 4 w 737
Marcus 1 w 744
Gratidius 1 w 753
the 19 w 757
lieutenant 1 w 767
before 1 w 774
whom 1 w 778
he 29 w 780
went 2 w 784
refused 2 w 791
to 10 w 793
give 3 w 797
him 5 w 800
leave 1 w 805
to 11 w 807
proceed 1 w 814
with 1 w 818
the 20 w 821
action 1 w 827
but 1 w 831
declared 1 w 839
that 6 w 843
he 31 w 845
should 2 w 851
adhere 1 w 857
to 12 w 859
the 21 w 862
decision 4 w 870
already 1 w 877
given 2 w 882
A 2 w 884
second 1 w 890
time 1 w 894
as 6 w 897
he 34 w 899
had 5 w 902
no 4 w 904
place 1 w 909
anywhere 1 w 917
where 2 w 922
he 37 w 924
could 1 w 929
remain 1 w 935
he 38 w 938
betook 1 w 944
himself 2 w 951
to 14 w 953
Rome 2 w 957
Hermippus 3 w 967
who 3 w 971
never 1 w 976
yields 1 w 982
to 15 w 984
his 7 w 987
impudence 1 w 996
follows 1 w 1004
him 7 w 1007
hither 1 w 1013
Heraclides 1 w 1024
demands 1 w 1031
from 3 w 1035
Caius 1 w 1040
Plotius 1 w 1047
a 79 w 1049
senator 1 w 1056
a 81 w 1058
man 5 w 1061
of 5 w 1063
the 23 w 1066
highest 1 w 1073
character 1 w 1082
who 4 w 1086
had 6 w 1089
served 1 w 1095
in 13 w 1097
Asia 2 w 1101
as 7 w 1103
lieutenant 2 w 1113
some 1 w 1117
slaves 3 w 1123
which 2 w 1129
he 42 w 1131
said 2 w 1135
he 43 w 1137
had 7 w 1140
sold 3 w 1144
under 1 w 1149
compulsion 1 w 1159
at 11 w 1162
a 93 w 1163
time 2 w 1167
when 2 w 1171
an 19 w 1173
unjust 1 w 1179
decision 5 w 1187
had 8 w 1190
been 3 w 1194
given 3 w 1199
against 2 w 1206
him 8 w 1209
Quintus 2 w 1217
Naso 1 w 1221
a 99 w 1223
most 1 w 1227
accomplished 1 w 1239
man 6 w 1242
who 5 w 1246
had 9 w 1249
been 4 w 1253
praetor 1 w 1260
is 14 w 1263
appointed 1 w 1272
judge 3 w 1277
and 12 w 1281
when 3 w 1285
he 47 w 1287
showed 1 w 1293
that 7 w 1297
he 48 w 1299
was 2 w 1302
going 1 w 1307
to 18 w 1309
give 6 w 1313
sentence 1 w 1321
in 18 w 1323
favour 1 w 1329
of 6 w 1331
Plotius 2 w 1338
Heraclides 2 w 1349
left 1 w 1353
the 24 w 1356
judge 4 w 1361
and 13 w 1365
abandoned 1 w 1374
the 25 w 1377
whole 2 w 1382
cause 1 w 1387
as 10 w 1389
if 4 w 1391
he 51 w 1393
had 10 w 1396
not 1 w 1399
had 11 w 1402
a 117 w 1403
fair 1 w 1407
and 15 w 1410
legal 1 w 1415
trial 3 w 1420
Do 1 w 1423
I 1 w 1424
appear 1 w 1430
to 19 w 1432
you 2 w 1435
O 1 w 1437
judges 3 w 1443
to 20 w 1446
be 10 w 1448
dwelling 1 w 1456
too 2 w 1459
much 1 w 1463
on 13 w 1465
each 1 w 1469
individual 1 w 1479
witness 1 w 1486
and 16 w 1490
not 2 w 1493
to 22 w 1495
be 11 w 1497
discussing 1 w 1507
the 26 w 1510
whole 3 w 1515
class 1 w 1520
of 7 w 1522
witnesses 1 w 1531
as 12 w 1534
I 2 w 1535
originally 1 w 1545
intended 1 w 1553