Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / For P. Sulla

For P. Sulla (58-60)

urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi015.perseus-eng2:58-60
Refs {'start': {'reference': '58', 'human_reference': 'Section 58'}, 'end': {'reference': '60', 'human_reference': 'Section 60'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

But is Sittius himself (for I must not desert the cause of my old friend and host) a man of such a character, or of such a family and such a school as to allow us to believe that he wished to make war on the republic? Can we believe that he, whose father when all our other neighbours and borderers revolted from us behaved with singular duty and loyalty to our republic, should think it possible himself to undertake a nefarious war against his country? A man whose debts we see were contracted not out of luxury but from a desire to increase his property which led him to involve himself in business and who, though he owed debts at Rome, had very large debts owing to him in the provinces and in the confederate kingdoms and when he was applying for them he would not allow his agents to be put in any difficulty by his absence but preferred having all his property sold and being stripped himself of a most beautiful patrimony, to allowing any delay to take place in satisfying his creditors.

And of men of that sort I never, O judges, had any fear when I was in the middle of that tempest which afflicted the republic. The sort of men who were formidable and terrible were those who clung to their property with such affection that you would say it was easier to tear their limbs from them than their lands but Sittius never thought that there was such a relationship between him and his estates, and therefore he cleared himself, not only from all suspicion of such wickedness as theirs, but even from being talked about not by arms, but at the expense of his patrimony.

21

But now, as to what he adds, that the inhabitants of Pompeii were excited by Sulla to join that conspiracy and that abominable wickedness, what sort of statement that I am quite unable to understand. Do the people of Pompeii appear to have joined the conspiracy? Who has ever said so? or when was there the slightest suspicion of this fact? He separated then,” says he, from the settlers, in order that when he had excited dissensions and divisions within, he might be able to have the town and nation of Pompeii in his power.” In the first place, every circumstance of the dissension between the natives of Pompeii and the settlers was referred to the patrons of the town, being a matter of long standing, and having been going on many years. In the second place, the matter was investigated by the patrons in such a way, that Sulla did not in any particular disagree with the opinions of the others. And lastly, the settlers themselves understand that the natives of Pompeii were not more denuded by Sulla than they themselves were.

Tokens

But 1 w 3
is 1 w 5
Sittius 1 w 12
himself 1 w 19
for 1 w 23
I 1 w 24
must 1 w 28
not 1 w 31
desert 1 w 37
the 1 w 40
cause 1 w 45
of 1 w 47
my 1 w 49
old 1 w 52
friend 1 w 58
and 1 w 61
host 1 w 65
a 3 w 67
man 1 w 70
of 2 w 72
such 1 w 76
a 5 w 77
character 1 w 86
or 2 w 89
of 3 w 91
such 2 w 95
a 8 w 96
family 1 w 102
and 2 w 105
such 3 w 109
a 11 w 110
school 1 w 116
as 1 w 118
to 1 w 120
allow 1 w 125
us 4 w 127
to 2 w 129
believe 1 w 136
that 1 w 140
he 2 w 142
wished 1 w 148
to 3 w 150
make 1 w 154
war 1 w 157
on 1 w 159
the 2 w 162
republic 1 w 170
Can 1 w 174
we 1 w 176
believe 2 w 183
that 2 w 187
he 5 w 189
whose 1 w 195
father 1 w 201
when 1 w 205
all 2 w 208
our 1 w 211
other 1 w 216
neighbours 1 w 226
and 3 w 229
borderers 1 w 238
revolted 1 w 246
from 1 w 250
us 5 w 252
behaved 1 w 259
with 1 w 263
singular 1 w 271
duty 1 w 275
and 4 w 278
loyalty 1 w 285
to 4 w 287
our 3 w 290
republic 2 w 298
should 1 w 305
think 1 w 310
it 3 w 312
possible 1 w 320
himself 2 w 327
to 5 w 329
undertake 1 w 338
a 27 w 339
nefarious 1 w 348
war 2 w 351
against 1 w 358
his 1 w 361
country 1 w 368
A 1 w 370
man 2 w 373
whose 2 w 378
debts 1 w 383
we 2 w 385
see 1 w 388
were 1 w 392
contracted 1 w 402
not 2 w 405
out 1 w 408
of 4 w 410
luxury 1 w 416
but 1 w 419
from 2 w 423
a 34 w 424
desire 1 w 430
to 6 w 432
increase 1 w 440
his 2 w 443
property 1 w 451
which 1 w 456
led 1 w 459
him 3 w 462
to 7 w 464
involve 1 w 471
himself 3 w 478
in 6 w 480
business 1 w 488
and 5 w 491
who 3 w 494
though 1 w 501
he 9 w 503
owed 1 w 507
debts 2 w 512
at 4 w 514
Rome 1 w 518
had 1 w 522
very 1 w 526
large 1 w 531
debts 3 w 536
owing 1 w 541
to 8 w 543
him 5 w 546
in 9 w 548
the 5 w 551
provinces 1 w 560
and 6 w 563
in 11 w 565
the 6 w 568
confederate 1 w 579
kingdoms 1 w 587
and 7 w 590
when 2 w 594
he 13 w 596
was 1 w 599
applying 1 w 607
for 2 w 610
them 1 w 614
he 15 w 616
would 1 w 621
not 3 w 624
allow 2 w 629
his 3 w 632
agents 1 w 638
to 9 w 640
be 4 w 642
put 1 w 645
in 14 w 647
any 1 w 650
difficulty 1 w 660
by 1 w 662
his 4 w 665
absence 1 w 672
but 2 w 675
preferred 1 w 684
having 1 w 690
all 4 w 693
his 5 w 696
property 2 w 704
sold 1 w 708
and 8 w 711
being 1 w 716
stripped 1 w 724
himself 4 w 731
of 5 w 733
a 52 w 734
most 1 w 738
beautiful 1 w 747
patrimony 1 w 756
to 10 w 759
allowing 1 w 767
any 2 w 770
delay 1 w 775
to 11 w 777
take 2 w 781
place 1 w 786
in 18 w 788
satisfying 1 w 798
his 6 w 801
creditors 1 w 810
And 1 w 814
of 6 w 816
men 1 w 819
of 7 w 821
that 3 w 825
sort 1 w 829
I 2 w 830
never 1 w 835
O 1 w 837
judges 1 w 843
had 2 w 847
any 3 w 850
fear 1 w 854
when 3 w 858
I 3 w 859
was 2 w 862
in 20 w 864
the 8 w 867
middle 1 w 873
of 8 w 875
that 4 w 879
tempest 1 w 886
which 2 w 891
afflicted 1 w 900
the 9 w 903
republic 3 w 911
The 1 w 915
sort 2 w 919
of 9 w 921
men 2 w 924
who 4 w 927
were 2 w 931
formidable 1 w 941
and 9 w 944
terrible 1 w 952
were 3 w 956
those 1 w 961
who 5 w 964
clung 1 w 969
to 13 w 971
their 1 w 976
property 3 w 984
with 2 w 988
such 4 w 992
affection 1 w 1001
that 5 w 1005
you 1 w 1008
would 2 w 1013
say 1 w 1016
it 6 w 1018
was 3 w 1021
easier 1 w 1027
to 14 w 1029
tear 1 w 1033
their 2 w 1038
limbs 1 w 1043
from 3 w 1047
them 2 w 1051
than 1 w 1055
their 3 w 1060
lands 1 w 1065
but 3 w 1068
Sittius 2 w 1075
never 2 w 1080
thought 1 w 1087
that 6 w 1091
there 1 w 1096
was 4 w 1099
such 5 w 1103
a 80 w 1104
relationship 1 w 1116
between 1 w 1123
him 7 w 1126
and 11 w 1129
his 7 w 1132
estates 1 w 1139
and 12 w 1143
therefore 1 w 1152
he 26 w 1154
cleared 1 w 1161
himself 5 w 1168
not 4 w 1172
only 1 w 1176
from 4 w 1180
all 6 w 1183
suspicion 1 w 1192
of 10 w 1194
such 6 w 1198
wickedness 1 w 1208
as 8 w 1210
theirs 1 w 1216
but 4 w 1220
even 1 w 1224
from 5 w 1228
being 2 w 1233
talked 1 w 1239
about 1 w 1244
not 5 w 1247
by 2 w 1249
arms 1 w 1253
but 5 w 1257
at 14 w 1259
the 17 w 1262
expense 1 w 1269
of 11 w 1271
his 8 w 1274
patrimony 2 w 1283
But 2 w 1287
now 1 w 1290
as 9 w 1293
to 15 w 1295
what 1 w 1299
he 29 w 1301
adds 1 w 1305
that 7 w 1310
the 18 w 1313
inhabitants 1 w 1324
of 12 w 1326
Pompeii 1 w 1333
were 4 w 1337
excited 1 w 1344
by 3 w 1346
Sulla 1 w 1351
to 16 w 1353
join 1 w 1357
that 8 w 1361
conspiracy 1 w 1371
and 13 w 1374
that 9 w 1378
abominable 1 w 1388
wickedness 2 w 1398
what 2 w 1403
sort 3 w 1407
of 13 w 1409
statement 1 w 1418
that 10 w 1422
I 4 w 1423
am 2 w 1425
quite 1 w 1430
unable 1 w 1436
to 17 w 1438
understand 1 w 1448
Do 1 w 1451
the 19 w 1454
people 1 w 1460
of 14 w 1462
Pompeii 2 w 1469
appear 1 w 1475
to 18 w 1477
have 2 w 1481
joined 1 w 1487
the 20 w 1490
conspiracy 2 w 1500
Who 1 w 1504
has 1 w 1507
ever 3 w 1511
said 1 w 1515
so 5 w 1517
or 11 w 1520
when 4 w 1524
was 5 w 1527
there 3 w 1532
the 22 w 1535
slightest 1 w 1544
suspicion 2 w 1553
of 15 w 1555
this 1 w 1559
fact 1 w 1563
He 1 w 1567
separated 1 w 1576
then 1 w 1580
says 1 w 1586
he 37 w 1588
from 6 w 1594
the 24 w 1597
settlers 1 w 1605
in 26 w 1608
order 2 w 1613
that 11 w 1617
when 5 w 1621
he 40 w 1623
had 3 w 1626
excited 2 w 1633
dissensions 1 w 1644
and 15 w 1647
divisions 1 w 1656
within 1 w 1662
he 41 w 1665
might 1 w 1670
be 9 w 1672
able 4 w 1676
to 19 w 1678
have 3 w 1682
the 25 w 1685
town 1 w 1689
and 16 w 1692
nation 1 w 1698
of 16 w 1700
Pompeii 3 w 1707
in 28 w 1709
his 10 w 1712
power 1 w 1717
In 1 w 1721
the 26 w 1724
first 1 w 1729
place 2 w 1734
every 1 w 1740
circumstance 1 w 1752
of 17 w 1754
the 27 w 1757
dissension 2 w 1767
between 2 w 1774
the 28 w 1777
natives 1 w 1784
of 18 w 1786
Pompeii 4 w 1793
and 17 w 1796
the 29 w 1799
settlers 2 w 1807
was 6 w 1810
referred 2 w 1818
to 21 w 1820
the 30 w 1823
patrons 1 w 1830
of 19 w 1832
the 31 w 1835
town 2 w 1839
being 3 w 1845
a 136 w 1846
matter 1 w 1852
of 20 w 1854
long 1 w 1858
standing 1 w 1866
and 19 w 1870
having 2 w 1876
been 1 w 1880
going 1 w 1885
on 19 w 1887
many 1 w 1891
years 1 w 1896
In 2 w 1899
the 32 w 1902
second 1 w 1908
place 3 w 1913
the 33 w 1917
matter 2 w 1923
was 7 w 1926
investigated 1 w 1938
by 4 w 1940
the 34 w 1943
patrons 2 w 1950
in 34 w 1952
such 7 w 1956
a 148 w 1957
way 1 w 1960
that 12 w 1965
Sulla 2 w 1970
did 1 w 1973
not 6 w 1976
in 35 w 1978
any 5 w 1981
particular 1 w 1991
disagree 1 w 1999
with 4 w 2003
the 35 w 2006
opinions 1 w 2014
of 21 w 2016
the 36 w 2019
others 1 w 2025
And 2 w 2029
lastly 1 w 2035
the 38 w 2039
settlers 3 w 2047
themselves 1 w 2057
understand 2 w 2067
that 13 w 2071
the 40 w 2074
natives 2 w 2081
of 22 w 2083
Pompeii 5 w 2090
were 5 w 2094
not 7 w 2097
more 1 w 2101
denuded 1 w 2108
by 5 w 2110
Sulla 3 w 2115
than 2 w 2119
they 1 w 2123
themselves 2 w 2133
were 6 w 2137