Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Divinatio against Q. Caecilius

Divinatio against Q. Caecilius (8-10)

urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi004.perseus-eng2:8-10
Refs {'start': {'reference': '8', 'human_reference': 'Section 8'}, 'end': {'reference': '10', 'human_reference': 'Section 10'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

They who wish the administration of justice still to remain in the hands of the senatorial body, complain that they cannot procure proper accusers; those who are able to act as accusers, complain of the want of impartiality in the decisions. In the meantime the Roman people, although it suffers under many disadvantages and difficulties, yet desires nothing in the republic so much as the restoration of the ancient authority and importance to the courts of law. It is from a regret at the state of our courts of law that the restoration of the power of the tribunes [*] is so eagerly demanded again. It is in consequence of the uncertainty of the courts of law, that another class [*] is demanded to determine law-suits; owing to the crimes and infamy of the judges, even the office of censor, which formerly was used to be accounted too severe by the people, is now again demanded, and has become popular and praiseworthy.

In a time of such licentiousness on the part of the wicked, of daily complaint on the part of the Roman people, of dishonour in the courts of law, of unpopularity of the whole senate, as I thought that this was the only remedy for these numerous evils, for men who were both capable and upright to undertake the cause of the republic and the laws, I confess that I, for the sake of promoting the universal safety, devoted myself to upholding that part of the republic which was in the greatest danger.

Now that I have shown the motives by which I was influenced to undertake the cause, I must necessarily speak of our contention, that, in appointing an accuser, you may have some certain line of conduct to follow. I understand the matter thus, O judges:—when any man is accused of extortion, if there be a contest between any parties as to who may best be entrusted with the prosecution, these two points ought to be regarded most especially; first, whom they, to whom the injury is said to have been done, wish most to be their counsel; and secondly, whom he, who is accused of having done those injuries, would least wish to be so.

Tokens

They 1 w 4
who 1 w 7
wish 1 w 11
the 1 w 14
administration 1 w 28
of 1 w 30
justice 1 w 37
still 1 w 42
to 1 w 44
remain 1 w 50
in 3 w 52
the 2 w 55
hands 1 w 60
of 2 w 62
the 3 w 65
senatorial 1 w 75
body 1 w 79
complain 1 w 88
that 1 w 92
they 1 w 96
cannot 1 w 102
procure 1 w 109
proper 1 w 115
accusers 1 w 123
those 1 w 129
who 2 w 132
are 1 w 135
able 1 w 139
to 3 w 141
act 1 w 144
as 1 w 146
accusers 2 w 154
complain 2 w 163
of 3 w 165
the 5 w 168
want 1 w 172
of 4 w 174
impartiality 1 w 186
in 6 w 188
the 6 w 191
decisions 1 w 200
In 1 w 203
the 7 w 206
meantime 1 w 214
the 8 w 217
Roman 1 w 222
people 1 w 228
although 1 w 237
it 2 w 239
suffers 1 w 246
under 1 w 251
many 1 w 255
disadvantages 1 w 268
and 2 w 271
difficulties 1 w 283
yet 1 w 287
desires 1 w 294
nothing 1 w 301
in 8 w 303
the 9 w 306
republic 1 w 314
so 1 w 316
much 1 w 320
as 2 w 322
the 10 w 325
restoration 1 w 336
of 5 w 338
the 11 w 341
ancient 1 w 348
authority 1 w 357
and 3 w 360
importance 1 w 370
to 5 w 372
the 12 w 375
courts 1 w 381
of 6 w 383
law 1 w 386
It 1 w 389
is 5 w 391
from 1 w 395
a 35 w 396
regret 1 w 402
at 5 w 404
the 13 w 407
state 1 w 412
of 7 w 414
our 2 w 417
courts 2 w 423
of 8 w 425
law 2 w 428
that 2 w 432
the 14 w 435
restoration 2 w 446
of 9 w 448
the 15 w 451
power 1 w 456
of 10 w 458
the 16 w 461
tribunes 1 w 469
Sulla 1 w 474
in 9 w 476
his 1 w 479
reform 1 w 485
of 11 w 487
the 17 w 490
constitution 1 w 502
on 7 w 504
the 18 w 507
early 1 w 512
aristocratic 1 w 524
principles 1 w 534
left 1 w 539
to 8 w 541
the 19 w 544
tribunes 2 w 552
only 1 w 556
the 20 w 559
jus 2 w 562
auxiliandi 1 w 572
but 1 w 576
deprived 1 w 584
them 1 w 588
of 12 w 590
the 22 w 593
right 1 w 598
of 13 w 600
making 1 w 606
legislative 1 w 617
or 7 w 619
other 1 w 624
proposals 1 w 633
either 1 w 639
to 9 w 641
the 25 w 644
senate 1 w 650
or 8 w 652
to 10 w 654
the 26 w 657
comitia 1 w 664
without 1 w 671
having 1 w 677
previously 1 w 687
obtained 1 w 695
the 27 w 698
sanction 1 w 706
of 14 w 708
the 28 w 711
Senate 1 w 717
But 1 w 721
this 1 w 725
arrangement 1 w 736
did 1 w 739
not 3 w 742
last 1 w 746
for 2 w 750
Pompeius 1 w 758
restored 1 w 766
them 2 w 770
to 12 w 772
their 1 w 777
former 1 w 783
rights 1 w 789
Smith 1 w 795
Dict 1 w 800
Ant 1 w 804
p 19 w 806
990 1 w 810
v 6 w 812
Tribunis 1 w 821
is 11 w 824
so 2 w 826
eagerly 1 w 833
demanded 1 w 841
again 1 w 846
It 2 w 849
is 12 w 851
in 15 w 853
consequence 1 w 864
of 15 w 866
the 31 w 869
uncertainty 1 w 880
of 16 w 882
the 32 w 885
courts 3 w 891
of 17 w 893
law 3 w 896
that 3 w 901
another 1 w 908
class 1 w 913
Caius 1 w 918
Gracchus 1 w 926
had 1 w 929
procured 1 w 937
a 71 w 938
law 4 w 941
to 13 w 943
be 1 w 945
passed 1 w 951
that 4 w 956
the 34 w 959
Roman 2 w 964
knights 1 w 971
should 1 w 977
be 2 w 979
the 35 w 982
judges 1 w 988
and 6 w 992
they 2 w 996
acted 1 w 1001
as 6 w 1003
such 1 w 1007
for 4 w 1010
forty 1 w 1015
years 1 w 1020
After 1 w 1026
his 3 w 1029
victory 1 w 1036
over 1 w 1040
Marius 1 w 1046
Sulla 2 w 1052
made 1 w 1056
a 83 w 1057
law 5 w 1060
that 5 w 1064
the 37 w 1067
judges 2 w 1073
should 2 w 1079
be 3 w 1081
selected 1 w 1089
from 2 w 1093
the 38 w 1096
senate 2 w 1102
This 1 w 1107
arrangement 2 w 1118
had 2 w 1121
lasted 1 w 1127
ten 1 w 1130
years 2 w 1135
with 2 w 1139
the 39 w 1142
effect 1 w 1148
mentioned 1 w 1157
here 1 w 1161
by 1 w 1163
Cicero 1 w 1169
and 7 w 1173
Aurelius 1 w 1181
Cotta 1 w 1186
was 1 w 1189
at 17 w 1191
this 2 w 1195
time 2 w 1199
proposing 1 w 1208
a 96 w 1209
law 6 w 1212
that 6 w 1216
the 40 w 1219
judges 3 w 1225
should 3 w 1231
be 4 w 1233
taken 1 w 1238
from 3 w 1242
the 41 w 1245
senators 1 w 1253
knights 2 w 1261
and 8 w 1265
tribuni 1 w 1272
aerarii 1 w 1279
jointly 1 w 1287
is 16 w 1290
demanded 2 w 1298
to 16 w 1300
determine 1 w 1309
law-suits 1 w 1318
owing 1 w 1324
to 17 w 1326
the 42 w 1329
crimes 1 w 1335
and 10 w 1338
infamy 1 w 1344
of 18 w 1346
the 43 w 1349
judges 4 w 1355
even 1 w 1360
the 44 w 1363
office 1 w 1369
of 20 w 1371
censor 1 w 1377
which 1 w 1383
formerly 1 w 1391
was 2 w 1394
used 1 w 1398
to 18 w 1400
be 5 w 1402
accounted 1 w 1411
too 1 w 1414
severe 1 w 1420
by 2 w 1422
the 45 w 1425
people 2 w 1431
is 17 w 1434
now 1 w 1437
again 2 w 1442
demanded 3 w 1450
and 12 w 1454
has 1 w 1457
become 1 w 1463
popular 1 w 1470
and 13 w 1473
praiseworthy 1 w 1485
In 2 w 1488
a 118 w 1489
time 3 w 1493
of 21 w 1495
such 2 w 1499
licentiousness 1 w 1513
on 12 w 1515
the 46 w 1518
part 2 w 1522
of 22 w 1524
the 47 w 1527
wicked 1 w 1533
of 23 w 1536
daily 1 w 1541
complaint 1 w 1550
on 13 w 1552
the 48 w 1555
part 3 w 1559
of 24 w 1561
the 49 w 1564
Roman 3 w 1569
people 3 w 1575
of 25 w 1578
dishonour 1 w 1587
in 24 w 1589
the 50 w 1592
courts 4 w 1598
of 26 w 1600
law 8 w 1603
of 27 w 1606
unpopularity 1 w 1618
of 28 w 1620
the 51 w 1623
whole 1 w 1628
senate 3 w 1634
as 11 w 1637
I 5 w 1638
thought 1 w 1645
that 7 w 1649
this 3 w 1653
was 3 w 1656
the 52 w 1659
only 2 w 1663
remedy 1 w 1669
for 7 w 1672
these 1 w 1677
numerous 1 w 1685
evils 1 w 1690
for 8 w 1694
men 4 w 1697
who 4 w 1700
were 1 w 1704
both 1 w 1708
capable 1 w 1715
and 14 w 1718
upright 1 w 1725
to 20 w 1727
undertake 1 w 1736
the 54 w 1739
cause 1 w 1744
of 29 w 1746
the 55 w 1749
republic 2 w 1757
and 15 w 1760
the 56 w 1763
laws 1 w 1767
I 6 w 1769
confess 1 w 1776
that 8 w 1780
I 7 w 1781
for 9 w 1785
the 57 w 1788
sake 1 w 1792
of 30 w 1794
promoting 1 w 1803
the 58 w 1806
universal 1 w 1815
safety 1 w 1821
devoted 1 w 1829
myself 1 w 1835
to 21 w 1837
upholding 1 w 1846
that 9 w 1850
part 4 w 1854
of 31 w 1856
the 59 w 1859
republic 3 w 1867
which 2 w 1872
was 4 w 1875
in 27 w 1877
the 60 w 1880
greatest 1 w 1888
danger 1 w 1894
Now 1 w 1898
that 10 w 1902
I 8 w 1903
have 1 w 1907
shown 1 w 1912
the 61 w 1915
motives 1 w 1922
by 3 w 1924
which 3 w 1929
I 9 w 1930
was 5 w 1933
influenced 1 w 1943
to 22 w 1945
undertake 2 w 1954
the 62 w 1957
cause 2 w 1962
I 10 w 1964
must 1 w 1968
necessarily 1 w 1979
speak 1 w 1984
of 32 w 1986
our 7 w 1989
contention 1 w 1999
that 11 w 2004
in 29 w 2007
appointing 1 w 2017
an 31 w 2019
accuser 3 w 2026
you 1 w 2030
may 1 w 2033
have 2 w 2037
some 1 w 2041
certain 2 w 2048
line 1 w 2052
of 33 w 2054
conduct 1 w 2061
to 23 w 2063
follow 1 w 2069
I 11 w 2071
understand 1 w 2081
the 63 w 2084
matter 1 w 2090
thus 1 w 2094
O 1 w 2096
judges 5 w 2102
when 1 w 2108
any 2 w 2111
man 8 w 2114
is 21 w 2116
accused 1 w 2123
of 34 w 2125
extortion 1 w 2134
if 2 w 2137
there 1 w 2142
be 7 w 2144
a 165 w 2145
contest 1 w 2152
between 1 w 2159
any 3 w 2162
parties 1 w 2169
as 15 w 2171
to 25 w 2173
who 5 w 2176
may 2 w 2179
best 1 w 2183
be 10 w 2185
entrusted 1 w 2194
with 3 w 2198
the 65 w 2201
prosecution 1 w 2212
these 2 w 2218
two 1 w 2221
points 1 w 2227
ought 2 w 2232
to 26 w 2234
be 11 w 2236
regarded 1 w 2244
most 1 w 2248
especially 1 w 2258
first 1 w 2264
whom 1 w 2269
they 3 w 2273
to 27 w 2276
whom 2 w 2280
the 68 w 2283
injury 1 w 2289
is 22 w 2291
said 1 w 2295
to 28 w 2297
have 3 w 2301
been 1 w 2305
done 1 w 2309
wish 2 w 2314
most 2 w 2318
to 29 w 2320
be 13 w 2322
their 2 w 2327
counsel 1 w 2334
and 17 w 2338
secondly 1 w 2346
whom 3 w 2351
he 73 w 2353
who 9 w 2357
is 24 w 2359
accused 2 w 2366
of 35 w 2368
having 2 w 2374
done 2 w 2378
those 2 w 2383
injuries 1 w 2391
would 1 w 2397
least 1 w 2402
wish 3 w 2406
to 30 w 2408
be 14 w 2410
so 5 w 2412