Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / For Quintus Roscius the Actor

For Quintus Roscius the Actor (21)

urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi003.perseus-eng2:21
Refs {'start': {'reference': '21', 'human_reference': 'Section 21'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Wherefore consider over and over again, O Caius Piso, who is said to have cheated, and who to have been cheated. Roscius is said to have cheated Fannius? What is that? The honest man is said to have cheated the rogue; the modest man, the shameless one; the chaste man, the perjurer; the unpractised man, the cunning one; the liberal man is said to have cheated the covetous one. It is incredible how, if Fannius were said to have cheated Roscius, each fact would appear probable from the character of each man; both that Fannius had acted wickedly, and that Roscius had been cheated by his imprudence. So when Roscius is accused of having cheated Fannius, both parts of the story are incredible, both that Roscius should have sought anything covetously, and that Fannius should have lost anything by his good-nature.

Tokens

Wherefore 1 w 9
consider 1 w 17
over 1 w 21
and 1 w 24
over 2 w 28
again 1 w 33
O 1 w 35
Caius 1 w 40
Piso 1 w 44
who 1 w 48
is 2 w 50
said 1 w 54
to 1 w 56
have 1 w 60
cheated 1 w 67
and 2 w 71
who 2 w 74
to 2 w 76
have 2 w 80
been 1 w 84
cheated 2 w 91
Roscius 1 w 99
is 3 w 101
said 2 w 105
to 3 w 107
have 3 w 111
cheated 3 w 118
Fannius 1 w 125
What 1 w 130
is 4 w 132
that 1 w 136
The 1 w 140
honest 1 w 146
man 1 w 149
is 5 w 151
said 3 w 155
to 4 w 157
have 4 w 161
cheated 4 w 168
the 1 w 171
rogue 1 w 176
the 2 w 180
modest 1 w 186
man 2 w 189
the 3 w 193
shameless 1 w 202
one 2 w 205
the 4 w 209
chaste 1 w 215
man 3 w 218
the 5 w 222
perjurer 1 w 230
the 6 w 234
unpractised 1 w 245
man 4 w 248
the 7 w 252
cunning 1 w 259
one 3 w 262
the 8 w 266
liberal 1 w 273
man 5 w 276
is 7 w 278
said 4 w 282
to 5 w 284
have 5 w 288
cheated 5 w 295
the 9 w 298
covetous 1 w 306
one 4 w 309
It 1 w 312
is 8 w 314
incredible 1 w 324
how 1 w 327
if 1 w 330
Fannius 2 w 337
were 1 w 341
said 5 w 345
to 7 w 347
have 6 w 351
cheated 6 w 358
Roscius 2 w 365
each 1 w 370
fact 1 w 374
would 1 w 379
appear 1 w 385
probable 1 w 393
from 1 w 397
the 10 w 400
character 1 w 409
of 1 w 411
each 2 w 415
man 6 w 418
both 1 w 423
that 2 w 427
Fannius 3 w 434
had 1 w 437
acted 1 w 442
wickedly 1 w 450
and 3 w 454
that 3 w 458
Roscius 3 w 465
had 2 w 468
been 2 w 472
cheated 7 w 479
by 1 w 481
his 1 w 484
imprudence 1 w 494
So 1 w 497
when 1 w 501
Roscius 4 w 508
is 10 w 510
accused 1 w 517
of 2 w 519
having 1 w 525
cheated 8 w 532
Fannius 4 w 539
both 2 w 544
parts 1 w 549
of 3 w 551
the 11 w 554
story 1 w 559
are 1 w 562
incredible 2 w 572
both 3 w 577
that 4 w 581
Roscius 5 w 588
should 1 w 594
have 7 w 598
sought 1 w 604
anything 1 w 612
covetously 1 w 622
and 4 w 626
that 5 w 630
Fannius 5 w 637
should 2 w 643
have 8 w 647
lost 1 w 651
anything 2 w 659
by 2 w 661
his 2 w 664
good-nature 1 w 675