Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / For Publius Quinctius

For Publius Quinctius (73-75)

urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi001.perseus-eng2:73-75
Refs {'start': {'reference': '73', 'human_reference': 'Section 73'}, 'end': {'reference': '75', 'human_reference': 'Section 75'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

This really is what an unequal contest is; not that one in which you were skirmishing against Alphenus. You did not leave him any place where he could make a stand against you. You must therefore either prove that Alphenus denied he was his agent, did not tear down the bills, and refused to go to trial; or, if all this was done, you must admit that you did not take possession of the goods of Publius Quinctius in accordance with the edict.

23
If, indeed, you did take possession of the things according to the edict, I ask you why they were not soldwhy the others who were his securities and creditors did not meet together? Was there no one to whom Quinctius owed money? There were some, there were many such; because Caius, his brother, had left some amount of debt behind him. What then was the reason? They were all men entirely strangers to him, and he owed them money, and yet not one was found so notoriously infamous as to dare to attack the character of Publius Quinctius in his absences.

There was one man, his relation, his partner, his intimate friend, Sextus Naevius, who, though he himself was in reality in debt to him, as if some extraordinary prize of wickedness was proposed to him, strove with the greatest eagerness to deprive his own relation, oppressed and ruined by his means, not only of property which he had honestly acquired, but even of that light which is common to all men. Where were the rest of the creditors? Even now at this very time where are they? Who is there who says he kept out of the way for the sake of fraud? Who is there who denies that Quinctius was defended in his absence?

Not one is found But, on the other hand, all men who either have or have had any transactions with him are present on his behalf and are defending him; they are labouring that his good faith, known in many places, may not now be disparaged by the perfidy of Sextus Naevius. In a trial of this nature Naevius ought to have brought some witnesses out of that body, who could say; He forfeited his recognizances in my case; he cheated me, he begged a day of me for the payment of a debt which he had denied; could not get him to trial; he kept out of the way; he left no agent:” none of all these things is said. Witnesses are being got ready to say it But we shall examine into that, I suppose, when they have said it: but let them consider this one thing, that they are of weight only so far, that they can preserve that weight, if they also preserve the truth; if they neglect that, they are so insignificant that all men may see that influence is of avail not to support a lie, but only to prove the truth.

Tokens

This 1 w 4
really 1 w 10
is 2 w 12
what 1 w 16
an 1 w 18
unequal 1 w 25
contest 1 w 32
is 3 w 34
not 1 w 38
that 1 w 42
one 1 w 45
in 1 w 47
which 1 w 52
you 1 w 55
were 1 w 59
skirmishing 1 w 70
against 1 w 77
Alphenus 1 w 85
You 1 w 89
did 1 w 92
not 2 w 95
leave 1 w 100
him 1 w 103
any 1 w 106
place 1 w 111
where 1 w 116
he 3 w 118
could 1 w 123
make 1 w 127
a 12 w 128
stand 1 w 133
against 2 w 140
you 2 w 143
You 2 w 147
must 1 w 151
therefore 1 w 160
either 1 w 166
prove 1 w 171
that 2 w 175
Alphenus 2 w 183
denied 1 w 189
he 7 w 191
was 1 w 194
his 2 w 197
agent 1 w 202
did 2 w 206
not 3 w 209
tear 1 w 213
down 1 w 217
the 3 w 220
bills 1 w 225
and 2 w 229
refused 1 w 236
to 1 w 238
go 1 w 240
to 2 w 242
trial 1 w 247
or 2 w 250
if 1 w 253
all 2 w 256
this 1 w 260
was 2 w 263
done 1 w 267
you 3 w 271
must 2 w 275
admit 1 w 280
that 3 w 284
you 4 w 287
did 3 w 290
not 4 w 293
take 1 w 297
possession 1 w 307
of 1 w 309
the 4 w 312
goods 1 w 317
of 2 w 319
Publius 1 w 326
Quinctius 1 w 335
in 6 w 337
accordance 1 w 347
with 1 w 351
the 5 w 354
edict 1 w 359
If 1 w 362
indeed 1 w 369
you 5 w 373
did 4 w 376
take 2 w 380
possession 2 w 390
of 3 w 392
the 6 w 395
things 1 w 401
according 1 w 410
to 3 w 412
the 7 w 415
edict 2 w 420
I 2 w 422
ask 1 w 425
you 6 w 428
why 1 w 431
they 1 w 435
were 2 w 439
not 5 w 442
sold 1 w 446
why 2 w 450
the 9 w 453
others 1 w 459
who 1 w 462
were 3 w 466
his 4 w 469
securities 1 w 479
and 3 w 482
creditors 1 w 491
did 5 w 494
not 6 w 497
meet 1 w 501
together 1 w 509
Was 1 w 513
there 2 w 518
no 7 w 520
one 3 w 523
to 6 w 525
whom 1 w 529
Quinctius 2 w 538
owed 1 w 542
money 1 w 547
There 1 w 553
were 4 w 557
some 1 w 561
there 3 w 567
were 5 w 571
many 1 w 575
such 1 w 579
because 1 w 587
Caius 1 w 592
his 5 w 596
brother 1 w 603
had 1 w 607
left 1 w 611
some 2 w 615
amount 1 w 621
of 4 w 623
debt 1 w 627
behind 1 w 633
him 2 w 636
What 1 w 641
then 1 w 645
was 3 w 648
the 16 w 651
reason 1 w 657
They 1 w 662
were 6 w 666
all 3 w 669
men 1 w 672
entirely 1 w 680
strangers 1 w 689
to 7 w 691
him 3 w 694
and 4 w 698
he 24 w 700
owed 2 w 704
them 1 w 708
money 2 w 713
and 5 w 717
yet 1 w 720
not 7 w 723
one 6 w 726
was 4 w 729
found 1 w 734
so 5 w 736
notoriously 1 w 747
infamous 1 w 755
as 8 w 757
to 9 w 759
dare 1 w 763
to 10 w 765
attack 1 w 771
the 18 w 774
character 1 w 783
of 5 w 785
Publius 2 w 792
Quinctius 3 w 801
in 14 w 803
his 6 w 806
absences 1 w 814
There 2 w 820
was 5 w 823
one 7 w 826
man 2 w 829
his 7 w 833
relation 1 w 841
his 8 w 845
partner 1 w 852
his 9 w 856
intimate 1 w 864
friend 1 w 870
Sextus 1 w 877
Naevius 1 w 884
who 3 w 888
though 1 w 895
he 28 w 897
himself 1 w 904
was 6 w 907
in 16 w 909
reality 1 w 916
in 17 w 918
debt 2 w 922
to 11 w 924
him 5 w 927
as 11 w 930
if 2 w 932
some 3 w 936
extraordinary 1 w 949
prize 1 w 954
of 6 w 956
wickedness 1 w 966
was 7 w 969
proposed 1 w 977
to 12 w 979
him 6 w 982
strove 1 w 989
with 2 w 993
the 19 w 996
greatest 1 w 1004
eagerness 1 w 1013
to 13 w 1015
deprive 1 w 1022
his 10 w 1025
own 2 w 1028
relation 2 w 1036
oppressed 1 w 1046
and 6 w 1049
ruined 1 w 1055
by 1 w 1057
his 11 w 1060
means 1 w 1065
not 9 w 1069
only 1 w 1073
of 7 w 1075
property 1 w 1083
which 2 w 1088
he 30 w 1090
had 2 w 1093
honestly 1 w 1101
acquired 1 w 1109
but 1 w 1113
even 1 w 1117
of 8 w 1119
that 4 w 1123
light 1 w 1128
which 3 w 1133
is 15 w 1135
common 1 w 1141
to 14 w 1143
all 4 w 1146
men 2 w 1149
Where 1 w 1155
were 7 w 1159
the 20 w 1162
rest 1 w 1166
of 9 w 1168
the 21 w 1171
creditors 2 w 1180
Even 1 w 1185
now 1 w 1188
at 12 w 1190
this 2 w 1194
very 1 w 1198
time 1 w 1202
where 2 w 1207
are 2 w 1210
they 2 w 1214
Who 1 w 1218
is 17 w 1220
there 4 w 1225
who 4 w 1228
says 1 w 1232
he 37 w 1234
kept 1 w 1238
out 1 w 1241
of 10 w 1243
the 24 w 1246
way 1 w 1249
for 2 w 1252
the 25 w 1255
sake 1 w 1259
of 11 w 1261
fraud 1 w 1266
Who 2 w 1270
is 18 w 1272
there 5 w 1277
who 5 w 1280
denies 1 w 1286
that 5 w 1290
Quinctius 4 w 1299
was 8 w 1302
defended 1 w 1310
in 21 w 1312
his 13 w 1315
absence 2 w 1322
Not 1 w 1326
one 9 w 1329
is 20 w 1331
found 2 w 1336
But 1 w 1339
on 18 w 1342
the 27 w 1345
other 3 w 1350
hand 1 w 1354
all 5 w 1358
men 3 w 1361
who 6 w 1364
either 2 w 1370
have 1 w 1374
or 10 w 1376
have 2 w 1380
had 3 w 1383
any 3 w 1386
transactions 1 w 1398
with 3 w 1402
him 7 w 1405
are 3 w 1408
present 1 w 1415
on 20 w 1417
his 14 w 1420
behalf 1 w 1426
and 8 w 1429
are 4 w 1432
defending 1 w 1441
him 8 w 1444
they 3 w 1449
are 5 w 1452
labouring 1 w 1461
that 6 w 1465
his 15 w 1468
good 2 w 1472
faith 1 w 1477
known 1 w 1483
in 24 w 1485
many 2 w 1489
places 1 w 1495
may 1 w 1499
not 10 w 1502
now 3 w 1505
be 4 w 1507
disparaged 1 w 1517
by 2 w 1519
the 31 w 1522
perfidy 1 w 1529
of 12 w 1531
Sextus 2 w 1537
Naevius 2 w 1544
In 1 w 1547
a 107 w 1548
trial 2 w 1553
of 13 w 1555
this 3 w 1559
nature 1 w 1565
Naevius 3 w 1572
ought 1 w 1577
to 16 w 1579
have 3 w 1583
brought 1 w 1590
some 4 w 1594
witnesses 1 w 1603
out 2 w 1606
of 14 w 1608
that 7 w 1612
body 1 w 1616
who 7 w 1620
could 2 w 1625
say 2 w 1628
He 1 w 1632
forfeited 1 w 1641
his 17 w 1644
recognizances 1 w 1657
in 25 w 1659
my 1 w 1661
case 1 w 1665
he 46 w 1668
cheated 1 w 1675
me 11 w 1677
he 48 w 1680
begged 1 w 1686
a 117 w 1687
day 1 w 1690
of 15 w 1692
me 12 w 1694
for 4 w 1697
the 32 w 1700
payment 1 w 1707
of 16 w 1709
a 120 w 1710
debt 3 w 1714
which 4 w 1719
he 50 w 1721
had 4 w 1724
denied 2 w 1730
could 3 w 1736
not 11 w 1739
get 2 w 1742
him 9 w 1745
to 17 w 1747
trial 3 w 1752
he 51 w 1755
kept 2 w 1759
out 3 w 1762
of 17 w 1764
the 33 w 1767
way 2 w 1770
he 53 w 1773
left 2 w 1777
no 16 w 1779
agent 2 w 1784
none 1 w 1790
of 18 w 1792
all 6 w 1795
these 1 w 1800
things 2 w 1806
is 26 w 1808
said 1 w 1812
Witnesses 1 w 1822
are 6 w 1825
being 1 w 1830
got 1 w 1833
ready 1 w 1838
to 18 w 1840
say 3 w 1843
it 15 w 1845
But 2 w 1848
we 10 w 1850
shall 1 w 1855
examine 1 w 1862
into 1 w 1866
that 8 w 1870
I 4 w 1872
suppose 1 w 1879
when 1 w 1884
they 4 w 1888
have 4 w 1892
said 2 w 1896
it 16 w 1898
but 2 w 1902
let 1 w 1905
them 2 w 1909
consider 1 w 1917
this 4 w 1921
one 11 w 1924
thing 3 w 1929
that 9 w 1934
they 5 w 1938
are 7 w 1941
of 19 w 1943
weight 1 w 1949
only 2 w 1953
so 8 w 1955
far 1 w 1958
that 10 w 1963
they 6 w 1967
can 1 w 1970
preserve 1 w 1978
that 11 w 1982
weight 2 w 1988
if 3 w 1991
they 7 w 1995
also 1 w 1999
preserve 2 w 2007
the 40 w 2010
truth 1 w 2015
if 4 w 2018
they 8 w 2022
neglect 1 w 2029
that 12 w 2033
they 9 w 2038
are 8 w 2041
so 10 w 2043
insignificant 1 w 2056
that 13 w 2060
all 8 w 2063
men 5 w 2066
may 2 w 2069
see 1 w 2072
that 14 w 2076
influence 1 w 2085
is 28 w 2087
of 20 w 2089
avail 1 w 2094
not 12 w 2097
to 20 w 2099
support 1 w 2106
a 151 w 2107
lie 1 w 2110
but 3 w 2114
only 3 w 2118
to 21 w 2120
prove 2 w 2125
the 43 w 2128
truth 2 w 2133