Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / For Publius Quinctius

For Publius Quinctius (67-69)

urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi001.perseus-eng2:67-69
Refs {'start': {'reference': '67', 'human_reference': 'Section 67'}, 'end': {'reference': '69', 'human_reference': 'Section 69'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Many excellent men signed the document setting forth this fact and these conditions. While all matters are still unaltered, while the goods are neither advertised nor taken possession of, Alphenus promises Naevius that Quinctius should appear to his recognizances. Quinctius does appear to his recognizances. The matter lies in dispute while that fellow is spreading his calumnies for two years, until he could find out by what means the affair might be diverted out of the common course of proceeding, and the whole cause he confined to this single point to which it is now limited.

What duty of an agent can possibly be mentioned, O Caius Aquillius, which seems to have been overlooked by Alphenus? What reason is alleged why it should be denied that Publius Quinctius was defended in his absence? Is it that which I suppose Hortensius will allege, because he has lately mentioned it, and because Naevius is always harping on it, that Naevius was not contending on equal terms with Alphenus, at such a time, and with such magistrates? And if I were willing to admit that, they will, I suppose, grant this, that it is not the case that no one was the agent of Publius Quinctius, but that he had one who was popular. But it is quite sufficient for me to prove that there was an agent, with whom he could have tried the matter. What sort of man he was, as long as he defended the man in his absence, according to law and before the proper magistrate, I think has nothing to do with the matter.

For he was,” says he, a man of the opposite party.” No doubt; a man who had been brought up in your house, whom you from a youth had so trained up as not to favour any one of eminence, not even a gladiator. [*] If Alphenus had the same wish as you always especially entertained, was not the contest between you on equal terms in that matter? Oh,” says he, he was an intimate friend of Brutus, and therefore he interposed.” You on the other hand were an intimate friend of Burrienus, who gave an unjust decision; and, in short, of all those men who at that time were both very powerful with violence and wickedness, and who dared do all that they could. Did you wish to overcome those men, who now are labouring with such zeal that you may be victorious? Dare to say that, not openly, but to these very men whom you have brought with you.

Tokens

Many 1 w 4
excellent 1 w 13
men 1 w 16
signed 1 w 22
the 1 w 25
document 1 w 33
setting 1 w 40
forth 1 w 45
this 1 w 49
fact 1 w 53
and 1 w 56
these 1 w 61
conditions 1 w 71
While 1 w 77
all 1 w 80
matters 1 w 87
are 1 w 90
still 1 w 95
unaltered 1 w 104
while 1 w 110
the 3 w 113
goods 1 w 118
are 2 w 121
neither 1 w 128
advertised 1 w 138
nor 1 w 141
taken 1 w 146
possession 1 w 156
of 1 w 158
Alphenus 1 w 167
promises 1 w 175
Naevius 1 w 182
that 1 w 186
Quinctius 1 w 195
should 1 w 201
appear 1 w 207
to 1 w 209
his 2 w 212
recognizances 1 w 225
Quinctius 2 w 235
does 1 w 239
appear 2 w 245
to 2 w 247
his 3 w 250
recognizances 2 w 263
The 1 w 267
matter 2 w 273
lies 1 w 277
in 4 w 279
dispute 1 w 286
while 2 w 291
that 2 w 295
fellow 1 w 301
is 7 w 303
spreading 1 w 312
his 4 w 315
calumnies 1 w 324
for 2 w 327
two 1 w 330
years 1 w 335
until 1 w 341
he 7 w 343
could 1 w 348
find 1 w 352
out 1 w 355
by 1 w 357
what 1 w 361
means 1 w 366
the 5 w 369
affair 1 w 375
might 1 w 380
be 1 w 382
diverted 1 w 390
out 2 w 393
of 2 w 395
the 6 w 398
common 1 w 404
course 1 w 410
of 3 w 412
proceeding 1 w 422
and 2 w 426
the 7 w 429
whole 1 w 434
cause 1 w 439
he 11 w 441
confined 1 w 449
to 3 w 451
this 2 w 455
single 1 w 461
point 1 w 466
to 4 w 468
which 1 w 473
it 3 w 475
is 10 w 477
now 1 w 480
limited 1 w 487
What 1 w 492
duty 1 w 496
of 4 w 498
an 7 w 500
agent 1 w 505
can 1 w 508
possibly 1 w 516
be 2 w 518
mentioned 1 w 527
O 1 w 529
Caius 1 w 534
Aquillius 1 w 543
which 2 w 549
seems 1 w 554
to 5 w 556
have 1 w 560
been 1 w 564
overlooked 1 w 574
by 2 w 576
Alphenus 2 w 584
What 2 w 589
reason 1 w 595
is 11 w 597
alleged 1 w 604
why 1 w 607
it 5 w 609
should 2 w 615
be 4 w 617
denied 1 w 623
that 3 w 627
Publius 1 w 634
Quinctius 3 w 643
was 1 w 646
defended 1 w 654
in 12 w 656
his 6 w 659
absence 1 w 666
Is 1 w 669
it 6 w 671
that 4 w 675
which 3 w 680
I 2 w 681
suppose 1 w 688
Hortensius 1 w 698
will 1 w 702
allege 2 w 708
because 1 w 716
he 13 w 718
has 1 w 721
lately 1 w 727
mentioned 2 w 736
it 7 w 738
and 3 w 742
because 2 w 749
Naevius 2 w 756
is 13 w 758
always 1 w 764
harping 1 w 771
on 9 w 773
it 8 w 775
that 5 w 780
Naevius 3 w 787
was 2 w 790
not 1 w 793
contending 1 w 803
on 11 w 805
equal 1 w 810
terms 1 w 815
with 1 w 819
Alphenus 3 w 827
at 12 w 830
such 1 w 834
a 58 w 835
time 1 w 839
and 4 w 843
with 2 w 847
such 2 w 851
magistrates 1 w 862
And 1 w 866
if 1 w 868
I 3 w 869
were 1 w 873
willing 1 w 880
to 6 w 882
admit 1 w 887
that 6 w 891
they 1 w 896
will 3 w 900
I 4 w 902
suppose 2 w 909
grant 1 w 915
this 3 w 919
that 7 w 924
it 12 w 926
is 16 w 928
not 2 w 931
the 9 w 934
case 1 w 938
that 8 w 942
no 5 w 944
one 3 w 947
was 3 w 950
the 10 w 953
agent 2 w 958
of 5 w 960
Publius 2 w 967
Quinctius 4 w 976
but 1 w 980
that 9 w 984
he 18 w 986
had 1 w 989
one 4 w 992
who 2 w 995
was 4 w 998
popular 1 w 1005
But 1 w 1009
it 13 w 1011
is 17 w 1013
quite 1 w 1018
sufficient 1 w 1028
for 3 w 1031
me 7 w 1033
to 7 w 1035
prove 1 w 1040
that 10 w 1044
there 1 w 1049
was 5 w 1052
an 12 w 1054
agent 3 w 1059
with 3 w 1064
whom 1 w 1068
he 20 w 1070
could 2 w 1075
have 2 w 1079
tried 1 w 1084
the 12 w 1087
matter 3 w 1093
What 3 w 1098
sort 1 w 1102
of 6 w 1104
man 1 w 1107
he 22 w 1109
was 6 w 1112
as 10 w 1115
long 1 w 1119
as 11 w 1121
he 23 w 1123
defended 2 w 1131
the 13 w 1134
man 2 w 1137
in 17 w 1139
his 8 w 1142
absence 2 w 1149
according 1 w 1159
to 8 w 1161
law 1 w 1164
and 5 w 1167
before 1 w 1173
the 14 w 1176
proper 1 w 1182
magistrate 2 w 1192
I 5 w 1194
think 1 w 1199
has 2 w 1202
nothing 1 w 1209
to 9 w 1211
do 3 w 1213
with 4 w 1217
the 15 w 1220
matter 4 w 1226
For 1 w 1231
he 27 w 1233
was 7 w 1236
says 1 w 1242
he 28 w 1244
a 96 w 1247
man 3 w 1250
of 7 w 1252
the 16 w 1255
opposite 1 w 1263
party 1 w 1268
No 1 w 1272
doubt 1 w 1277
a 99 w 1279
man 4 w 1282
who 4 w 1285
had 2 w 1288
been 2 w 1292
brought 1 w 1299
up 3 w 1301
in 21 w 1303
your 1 w 1307
house 1 w 1312
whom 2 w 1317
you 2 w 1320
from 1 w 1324
a 102 w 1325
youth 1 w 1330
had 3 w 1333
so 3 w 1335
trained 1 w 1342
up 4 w 1344
as 14 w 1346
not 4 w 1349
to 10 w 1351
favour 1 w 1357
any 2 w 1360
one 5 w 1363
of 8 w 1365
eminence 1 w 1373
not 5 w 1377
even 1 w 1381
a 108 w 1382
gladiator 1 w 1391
The 2 w 1395
text 1 w 1399
is 20 w 1401
undoubtedly 1 w 1412
corrupt 1 w 1419
here 2 w 1423
Some 1 w 1428
read 2 w 1432
haereret 1 w 1440
some 1 w 1445
cederet 1 w 1452
I 6 w 1454
have 3 w 1458
adopted 1 w 1465
the 17 w 1468
text 2 w 1472
of 9 w 1474
Orellius 1 w 1482
but 2 w 1486
the 18 w 1489
meaning 1 w 1496
is 21 w 1498
not 6 w 1501
very 1 w 1505
plain 1 w 1510
If 1 w 1513
Alphenus 4 w 1521
had 4 w 1524
the 19 w 1527
same 1 w 1531
wish 1 w 1535
as 15 w 1537
you 4 w 1540
always 2 w 1546
especially 1 w 1556
entertained 1 w 1567
was 8 w 1571
not 7 w 1574
the 20 w 1577
contest 1 w 1584
between 1 w 1591
you 5 w 1594
on 17 w 1596
equal 2 w 1601
terms 2 w 1606
in 27 w 1608
that 11 w 1612
matter 5 w 1618
Oh 1 w 1622
says 2 w 1628
he 37 w 1630
he 38 w 1634
was 9 w 1637
an 20 w 1639
intimate 1 w 1647
friend 1 w 1653
of 10 w 1655
Brutus 1 w 1661
and 6 w 1665
therefore 1 w 1674
he 40 w 1676
interposed 1 w 1686
You 1 w 1691
on 18 w 1693
the 22 w 1696
other 1 w 1701
hand 1 w 1705
were 2 w 1709
an 23 w 1711
intimate 2 w 1719
friend 2 w 1725
of 11 w 1727
Burrienus 1 w 1736
who 6 w 1740
gave 1 w 1744
an 24 w 1746
unjust 1 w 1752
decision 1 w 1760
and 8 w 1764
in 31 w 1767
short 1 w 1772
of 12 w 1775
all 5 w 1778
those 1 w 1783
men 5 w 1786
who 7 w 1789
at 28 w 1791
that 12 w 1795
time 2 w 1799
were 3 w 1803
both 1 w 1807
very 2 w 1811
powerful 1 w 1819
with 5 w 1823
violence 1 w 1831
and 9 w 1834
wickedness 1 w 1844
and 10 w 1848
who 8 w 1851
dared 1 w 1856
do 7 w 1858
all 6 w 1861
that 13 w 1865
they 2 w 1869
could 3 w 1874
Did 1 w 1878
you 6 w 1881
wish 2 w 1885
to 12 w 1887
overcome 1 w 1895
those 2 w 1900
men 6 w 1903
who 9 w 1907
now 2 w 1910
are 4 w 1913
labouring 1 w 1922
with 6 w 1926
such 3 w 1930
zeal 1 w 1934
that 14 w 1938
you 7 w 1941
may 1 w 1944
be 10 w 1946
victorious 1 w 1956
Dare 1 w 1961
to 14 w 1963
say 3 w 1966
that 15 w 1970
not 8 w 1974
openly 1 w 1980
but 3 w 1984
to 15 w 1986
these 2 w 1991
very 3 w 1995
men 7 w 1998
whom 3 w 2002
you 8 w 2005
have 4 w 2009
brought 2 w 2016
with 7 w 2020
you 9 w 2023