Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / For Publius Quinctius

For Publius Quinctius (61-63)

urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi001.perseus-eng2:61-63
Refs {'start': {'reference': '61', 'human_reference': 'Section 61'}, 'end': {'reference': '63', 'human_reference': 'Section 63'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

What was the first opportunity, then, which was given to the agent of defending this absent man? When you were putting up the placards. Then Sextus Alphenus was present: he did not permit it; he tore down the notices. That which was the first step of duty was observed by the agent with the greatest diligence. Let us see what followed on this. You arrest the servant of Publius Quinctius in public: you attempt to take him away. Alphenus does not permit it; he takes him from you by force; he takes care that he is led home to Quinctius. Here too is seen in a high degree the attention of an illustrious agent. You say that Quinctius is in your debt; his agent denies it. You wish security to he given; he promises it. You call him into court; he follows you. You demand a trial; he does not object. What other could be the conduct of one defending a man in his absence I do not understand.

But who was the agent? I suppose it was some insignificant man, poor, litigious, worthless, who might be able to endure the daily abuse of a wealthy buffoon. Nothing of the sort: he was a wealthy Roman knight; a man managing his own affairs well: he was, in short, the man whom Naevius himself as often as he went into Gaul, left as his agent at Rome.

20
And do you dare, O Sextus Naevius, to deny that Quinctius was defended in his absence, when the same man defended him who used to defend you? and when he accepted the trial on behalf of Quinctius, to whom when departing you used to recommend and entrust your own property and character? Do you attempt to say that there was no one who defended Quinctius at the trial?

I demanded,” says he, that security should be given.” You demanded it unjustly. The order was made.” Alphenus objected. He did, but the praetor made the decree.” Therefore the tribunes were appealed to. Here,” said he, I have you: that is not allowing a trial, nor defending a man at a trial, when you ask assistance from the tribunes.” When I consider how prudent Hortensius is, I do not think that he will say this; but when I hear that he has said so before, and when I consider the cause itself I do not see what else he can say; for he admits that Alphenus tore down the bills, undertook to give security, did not object to go to trial in the very terms which Naevius proposed; but on this condition, that according to custom and prescription, it should be before that magistrate who was appointed in order to give assistance.

Tokens

What 1 w 4
was 1 w 7
the 1 w 10
first 1 w 15
opportunity 1 w 26
then 1 w 31
which 1 w 37
was 2 w 40
given 1 w 45
to 1 w 47
the 3 w 50
agent 1 w 55
of 1 w 57
defending 1 w 66
this 1 w 70
absent 1 w 76
man 1 w 79
When 1 w 84
you 1 w 87
were 1 w 91
putting 1 w 98
up 1 w 100
the 4 w 103
placards 1 w 111
Then 1 w 116
Sextus 1 w 122
Alphenus 1 w 130
was 3 w 133
present 1 w 140
he 8 w 143
did 1 w 146
not 1 w 149
permit 1 w 155
it 3 w 157
he 9 w 160
tore 1 w 164
down 1 w 168
the 5 w 171
notices 1 w 178
That 1 w 183
which 2 w 188
was 4 w 191
the 6 w 194
first 2 w 199
step 1 w 203
of 2 w 205
duty 1 w 209
was 5 w 212
observed 1 w 220
by 1 w 222
the 7 w 225
agent 2 w 230
with 1 w 234
the 8 w 237
greatest 1 w 245
diligence 1 w 254
Let 1 w 258
us 3 w 260
see 1 w 263
what 1 w 267
followed 1 w 275
on 1 w 277
this 2 w 281
You 1 w 285
arrest 1 w 291
the 9 w 294
servant 1 w 301
of 3 w 303
Publius 1 w 310
Quinctius 1 w 319
in 4 w 321
public 1 w 327
you 2 w 331
attempt 1 w 338
to 3 w 340
take 1 w 344
him 1 w 347
away 1 w 351
Alphenus 2 w 360
does 1 w 364
not 3 w 367
permit 2 w 373
it 6 w 375
he 16 w 378
takes 1 w 383
him 2 w 386
from 1 w 390
you 3 w 393
by 2 w 395
force 1 w 400
he 17 w 403
takes 2 w 408
care 1 w 412
that 1 w 416
he 18 w 418
is 3 w 420
led 1 w 423
home 1 w 427
to 4 w 429
Quinctius 2 w 438
Here 1 w 443
too 1 w 446
is 4 w 448
seen 1 w 452
in 6 w 454
a 26 w 455
high 1 w 459
degree 1 w 465
the 10 w 468
attention 1 w 477
of 4 w 479
an 3 w 481
illustrious 1 w 492
agent 3 w 497
You 2 w 501
say 1 w 504
that 2 w 508
Quinctius 3 w 517
is 5 w 519
in 8 w 521
your 1 w 525
debt 1 w 529
his 3 w 533
agent 4 w 538
denies 1 w 544
it 7 w 546
You 3 w 550
wish 1 w 554
security 1 w 562
to 6 w 564
he 20 w 566
given 2 w 571
he 21 w 574
promises 1 w 582
it 9 w 584
You 4 w 588
call 1 w 592
him 3 w 595
into 1 w 599
court 1 w 604
he 22 w 607
follows 1 w 614
you 5 w 617
You 5 w 621
demand 1 w 627
a 35 w 628
trial 1 w 633
he 23 w 636
does 2 w 640
not 4 w 643
object 1 w 649
What 2 w 654
other 1 w 659
could 1 w 664
be 1 w 666
the 12 w 669
conduct 1 w 676
of 5 w 678
one 1 w 681
defending 2 w 690
a 38 w 691
man 3 w 694
in 11 w 696
his 4 w 699
absence 1 w 706
I 1 w 707
do 4 w 709
not 5 w 712
understand 1 w 722
But 1 w 726
who 1 w 729
was 6 w 732
the 13 w 735
agent 5 w 740
I 2 w 742
suppose 1 w 749
it 10 w 751
was 7 w 754
some 1 w 758
insignificant 1 w 771
man 4 w 774
poor 1 w 779
litigious 1 w 789
worthless 1 w 799
who 2 w 803
might 1 w 808
be 2 w 810
able 1 w 814
to 8 w 816
endure 1 w 822
the 14 w 825
daily 1 w 830
abuse 1 w 835
of 6 w 837
a 50 w 838
wealthy 1 w 845
buffoon 1 w 852
Nothing 1 w 860
of 7 w 862
the 15 w 865
sort 1 w 869
he 29 w 872
was 8 w 875
a 53 w 876
wealthy 2 w 883
Roman 1 w 888
knight 1 w 894
a 56 w 896
man 6 w 899
managing 1 w 907
his 5 w 910
own 2 w 913
affairs 1 w 920
well 1 w 924
he 30 w 927
was 9 w 930
in 15 w 933
short 1 w 938
the 16 w 942
man 8 w 945
whom 1 w 949
Naevius 1 w 956
himself 1 w 963
as 10 w 965
often 1 w 970
as 11 w 972
he 32 w 974
went 1 w 978
into 2 w 982
Gaul 1 w 986
left 1 w 991
as 12 w 993
his 6 w 996
agent 6 w 1001
at 10 w 1003
Rome 1 w 1007
And 1 w 1011
do 5 w 1013
you 6 w 1016
dare 1 w 1020
O 1 w 1022
Sextus 2 w 1028
Naevius 2 w 1035
to 10 w 1038
deny 1 w 1042
that 3 w 1046
Quinctius 4 w 1055
was 10 w 1058
defended 1 w 1066
in 18 w 1068
his 7 w 1071
absence 2 w 1078
when 1 w 1083
the 17 w 1086
same 1 w 1090
man 9 w 1093
defended 2 w 1101
him 5 w 1104
who 4 w 1107
used 1 w 1111
to 11 w 1113
defend 5 w 1119
you 7 w 1122
and 3 w 1126
when 2 w 1130
he 36 w 1132
accepted 1 w 1140
the 18 w 1143
trial 2 w 1148
on 6 w 1150
behalf 1 w 1156
of 9 w 1158
Quinctius 5 w 1167
to 12 w 1170
whom 2 w 1174
when 3 w 1178
departing 1 w 1187
you 8 w 1190
used 2 w 1194
to 13 w 1196
recommend 1 w 1205
and 4 w 1208
entrust 1 w 1215
your 2 w 1219
own 3 w 1222
property 1 w 1230
and 5 w 1233
character 1 w 1242
Do 1 w 1245
you 10 w 1248
attempt 2 w 1255
to 14 w 1257
say 2 w 1260
that 4 w 1264
there 1 w 1269
was 11 w 1272
no 6 w 1274
one 2 w 1277
who 6 w 1280
defended 3 w 1288
Quinctius 6 w 1297
at 14 w 1299
the 20 w 1302
trial 3 w 1307
I 3 w 1310
demanded 1 w 1318
says 1 w 1324
he 41 w 1326
that 5 w 1332
security 2 w 1340
should 1 w 1346
be 4 w 1348
given 3 w 1353
You 6 w 1358
demanded 2 w 1366
it 13 w 1368
unjustly 1 w 1376
The 2 w 1381
order 1 w 1386
was 12 w 1389
made 1 w 1393
Alphenus 3 w 1403
objected 1 w 1411
He 2 w 1415
did 2 w 1418
but 1 w 1422
the 21 w 1425
praetor 1 w 1432
made 2 w 1436
the 22 w 1439
decree 1 w 1445
Therefore 1 w 1456
the 23 w 1459
tribunes 1 w 1467
were 2 w 1471
appealed 1 w 1479
to 16 w 1481
Here 2 w 1487
said 1 w 1493
he 48 w 1495
I 4 w 1498
have 1 w 1502
you 11 w 1505
that 6 w 1510
is 13 w 1512
not 6 w 1515
allowing 1 w 1523
a 107 w 1524
trial 4 w 1529
nor 1 w 1533
defending 3 w 1542
a 109 w 1543
man 12 w 1546
at 17 w 1548
a 112 w 1549
trial 5 w 1554
when 4 w 1559
you 12 w 1562
ask 1 w 1565
assistance 1 w 1575
from 2 w 1579
the 24 w 1582
tribunes 2 w 1590
When 2 w 1596
I 5 w 1597
consider 1 w 1605
how 1 w 1608
prudent 1 w 1615
Hortensius 1 w 1625
is 15 w 1627
I 6 w 1629
do 6 w 1631
not 7 w 1634
think 1 w 1639
that 7 w 1643
he 52 w 1645
will 1 w 1649
say 4 w 1652
this 3 w 1656
but 2 w 1660
when 5 w 1664
I 7 w 1665
hear 1 w 1669
that 8 w 1673
he 55 w 1675
has 1 w 1678
said 2 w 1682
so 3 w 1684
before 1 w 1690
and 8 w 1694
when 6 w 1698
I 8 w 1699
consider 2 w 1707
the 25 w 1710
cause 1 w 1715
itself 1 w 1721
I 9 w 1722
do 7 w 1724
not 8 w 1727
see 3 w 1730
what 2 w 1734
else 1 w 1738
he 58 w 1740
can 2 w 1743
say 5 w 1746
for 4 w 1750
he 59 w 1752
admits 1 w 1758
that 9 w 1762
Alphenus 4 w 1770
tore 2 w 1774
down 2 w 1778
the 26 w 1781
bills 1 w 1786
undertook 1 w 1796
to 19 w 1798
give 4 w 1802
security 3 w 1810
did 3 w 1814
not 9 w 1817
object 3 w 1823
to 20 w 1825
go 1 w 1827
to 21 w 1829
trial 6 w 1834
in 25 w 1836
the 27 w 1839
very 1 w 1843
terms 1 w 1848
which 3 w 1853
Naevius 3 w 1860
proposed 1 w 1868
but 3 w 1872
on 10 w 1874
this 4 w 1878
condition 1 w 1887
that 10 w 1892
according 1 w 1901
to 22 w 1903
custom 1 w 1909
and 9 w 1912
prescription 1 w 1924
it 18 w 1927
should 2 w 1933
be 6 w 1935
before 2 w 1941
that 11 w 1945
magistrate 1 w 1955
who 7 w 1958
was 13 w 1961
appointed 1 w 1970
in 28 w 1972
order 2 w 1977
to 24 w 1979
give 5 w 1983
assistance 2 w 1993