Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Mithridatic Wars

Mithridatic Wars (1.5-1.6)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0551.tlg014.perseus-eng2:1.5-1.6
Refs {'start': {'reference': '1.5', 'human_reference': 'Chapter 1 Section 5'}, 'end': {'reference': '1.6', 'human_reference': 'Chapter 1 Section 6'}}
Ancestors [{'reference': '1'}]
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

In the morning Nicomedes came out of the ship clad in the royal purple and wearing a diadem on his head. Andronicus met him, saluted him as king, and formed an escort for him with 500 soldiers that he had with him. Menas, pretending that he had then for the first time learned that Nicomedes was present, rushed to his 2000 men and exclaimed with assumed trepidation, "Since we have two kings, one at home and the other going there, we must look out for our own interests, and form a careful judgment of the future, because our safety lies in foreseeing correctly which of them will be the stronger. One of them is an old man, the other is young. The Bithynians are averse to Prusias; they are attached to Nicomedes. The leading Romans are fond of the young man, and Andronicus has already furnished him a guard, showing that Nicomedes is in alliance with Attalus, who rules an extensive dominion alongside the Bithynians and is an old enemy of Prusias." In addition to this he expatiated on the cruelty of Prusias and his outrageous conduct toward everybody, and the general hatred in which he was held by the Bithynians on this account. When he saw that the soldiers also abhorred the wickedness of Prusias he led them forthwith to Nicomedes and saluted him as king, just as Andronicus had done before, and formed a guard for him with his 2000 men.

Attalus received the young man warmly and ordered Prusias to assign certain towns for his occupation, and territory to furnish him supplies. Prusias replied that he would presently give his son the whole kingdom of Attalus, which he had intended for Nicomedes when he invaded Asia[*] before. After giving this answer he made a formal accusation at Rome against Nicomedes and Attalus and cited them to trial. The forces of Attalus at once made an incursion into Bithynia, the inhabitants of which gradually took sides with the invaders. Prusias, trusting nobody and hoping that the Romans would rescue him from the toils of the conspiracy, asked and obtained from his son-in-law, Diegylis, the Thracian, 500 men, and with these alone as a body-guard he took refuge in the citadel of Nictæa. The Roman prætor, in order to favor Attalus, delayed introducing the ambassadors of Prusias to the Senate at Rome. When he did introduce them, the Senate voted that the prætor himself should choose legates and send them to settle the difficulty. He selected three men, one of whom had once been struck on the head with a stone, from which he was badly scarred; another was a diseased cripple, and the third was considered almost a fool; wherefore Cato made the contemptuous remark concerning this embassy, that it had no understanding, no feet and no head.

In 1 w 2
the 1 w 5
morning 1 w 12
Nicomedes 1 w 21
came 1 w 25
out 1 w 28
of 1 w 30
the 2 w 33
ship 1 w 37
clad 1 w 41
in 2 w 43
the 3 w 46
royal 1 w 51
purple 1 w 57
and 1 w 60
wearing 1 w 67
a 6 w 68
diadem 1 w 74
on 1 w 76
his 1 w 79
head 1 w 83
Andronicus 1 w 94
met 1 w 97
him 1 w 100
saluted 1 w 108
him 2 w 111
as 1 w 113
king 1 w 117
and 2 w 121
formed 1 w 127
an 3 w 129
escort 1 w 135
for 2 w 138
him 3 w 141
with 1 w 145
500 1 w 148
soldiers 1 w 156
that 1 w 160
he 5 w 162
had 1 w 165
with 2 w 169
him 4 w 172
Menas 1 w 178
pretending 1 w 189
that 2 w 193
he 6 w 195
had 2 w 198
then 1 w 202
for 3 w 205
the 5 w 208
first 1 w 213
time 1 w 217
learned 1 w 224
that 3 w 228
Nicomedes 2 w 237
was 1 w 240
present 1 w 247
rushed 1 w 254
to 1 w 256
his 2 w 259
2000 1 w 263
men 1 w 266
and 3 w 269
exclaimed 1 w 278
with 3 w 282
assumed 1 w 289
trepidation 1 w 300
Since 1 w 307
we 2 w 309
have 1 w 313
two 1 w 316
kings 1 w 321
one 1 w 325
at 5 w 327
home 1 w 331
and 4 w 334
the 6 w 337
other 1 w 342
going 1 w 347
there 1 w 352
we 3 w 355
must 1 w 359
look 1 w 363
out 2 w 366
for 4 w 369
our 1 w 372
own 1 w 375
interests 1 w 384
and 5 w 388
form 2 w 392
a 29 w 393
careful 1 w 400
judgment 1 w 408
of 2 w 410
the 9 w 413
future 1 w 419
because 1 w 427
our 2 w 430
safety 1 w 436
lies 1 w 440
in 10 w 442
foreseeing 1 w 452
correctly 1 w 461
which 1 w 466
of 3 w 468
them 1 w 472
will 1 w 476
be 2 w 478
the 11 w 481
stronger 1 w 489
One 1 w 493
of 4 w 495
them 2 w 499
is 3 w 501
an 7 w 503
old 2 w 506
man 1 w 509
the 13 w 513
other 2 w 518
is 4 w 520
young 1 w 525
The 1 w 529
Bithynians 1 w 539
are 2 w 542
averse 1 w 548
to 2 w 550
Prusias 1 w 557
they 1 w 562
are 3 w 565
attached 1 w 573
to 3 w 575
Nicomedes 3 w 584
The 2 w 588
leading 1 w 595
Romans 1 w 601
are 4 w 604
fond 1 w 608
of 5 w 610
the 16 w 613
young 2 w 618
man 3 w 621
and 6 w 625
Andronicus 2 w 635
has 1 w 638
already 1 w 645
furnished 1 w 654
him 5 w 657
a 50 w 658
guard 1 w 663
showing 1 w 671
that 4 w 675
Nicomedes 4 w 684
is 6 w 686
in 14 w 688
alliance 1 w 696
with 4 w 700
Attalus 1 w 707
who 1 w 711
rules 1 w 716
an 14 w 718
extensive 1 w 727
dominion 1 w 735
alongside 1 w 744
the 17 w 747
Bithynians 2 w 757
and 7 w 760
is 7 w 762
an 17 w 764
old 3 w 767
enemy 1 w 772
of 6 w 774
Prusias 2 w 781
In 2 w 785
addition 1 w 793
to 4 w 795
this 1 w 799
he 26 w 801
expatiated 1 w 811
on 11 w 813
the 18 w 816
cruelty 1 w 823
of 7 w 825
Prusias 3 w 832
and 8 w 835
his 4 w 838
outrageous 1 w 848
conduct 1 w 855
toward 1 w 861
everybody 1 w 870
and 9 w 874
the 19 w 877
general 1 w 884
hatred 1 w 890
in 16 w 892
which 2 w 897
he 29 w 899
was 2 w 902
held 1 w 906
by 1 w 908
the 20 w 911
Bithynians 3 w 921
on 13 w 923
this 2 w 927
account 1 w 934
When 1 w 939
he 33 w 941
saw 1 w 944
that 5 w 948
the 21 w 951
soldiers 2 w 959
also 1 w 963
abhorred 1 w 971
the 22 w 974
wickedness 1 w 984
of 8 w 986
Prusias 4 w 993
he 36 w 995
led 1 w 998
them 3 w 1002
forthwith 1 w 1011
to 6 w 1013
Nicomedes 5 w 1022
and 10 w 1025
saluted 2 w 1032
him 6 w 1035
as 11 w 1037
king 3 w 1041
just 1 w 1046
as 12 w 1048
Andronicus 3 w 1058
had 3 w 1061
done 1 w 1065
before 1 w 1071
and 11 w 1075
formed 2 w 1081
a 86 w 1082
guard 2 w 1087
for 10 w 1090
him 7 w 1093
with 6 w 1097
his 6 w 1100
2000 2 w 1104
men 3 w 1107
Attalus 2 w 1115
received 1 w 1123
the 24 w 1126
young 3 w 1131
man 4 w 1134
warmly 1 w 1140
and 12 w 1143
ordered 1 w 1150
Prusias 5 w 1157
to 7 w 1159
assign 1 w 1165
certain 1 w 1172
towns 1 w 1177
for 11 w 1180
his 7 w 1183
occupation 1 w 1193
and 13 w 1197
territory 1 w 1206
to 10 w 1208
furnish 2 w 1215
him 8 w 1218
supplies 1 w 1226
Prusias 6 w 1234
replied 1 w 1241
that 6 w 1245
he 39 w 1247
would 1 w 1252
presently 1 w 1261
give 1 w 1265
his 8 w 1268
son 1 w 1271
the 25 w 1274
whole 1 w 1279
kingdom 1 w 1286
of 9 w 1288
Attalus 3 w 1295
which 3 w 1301
he 41 w 1303
had 4 w 1306
intended 1 w 1314
for 12 w 1317
Nicomedes 6 w 1326
when 1 w 1330
he 43 w 1332
invaded 1 w 1339
Asia 1 w 1343
In 3 w 1345
Roman 2 w 1350
nomenclature 1 w 1362
Asia 2 w 1366
meant 1 w 1371
the 26 w 1374
proconsular 1 w 1385
province 1 w 1393
composed 1 w 1401
of 10 w 1403
Mysia 1 w 1408
Lydia 1 w 1414
Caria 1 w 1420
and 14 w 1424
Phrygia 1 w 1431
before 2 w 1438
After 1 w 1444
giving 1 w 1450
this 3 w 1454
answer 1 w 1460
he 45 w 1462
made 1 w 1466
a 116 w 1467
formal 1 w 1473
accusation 1 w 1483
at 16 w 1485
Rome 1 w 1489
against 1 w 1496
Nicomedes 7 w 1505
and 15 w 1508
Attalus 4 w 1515
and 16 w 1518
cited 1 w 1523
them 4 w 1527
to 11 w 1529
trial 1 w 1534
The 3 w 1538
forces 1 w 1544
of 11 w 1546
Attalus 5 w 1553
at 17 w 1555
once 1 w 1559
made 2 w 1563
an 32 w 1565
incursion 1 w 1574
into 1 w 1578
Bithynia 4 w 1586
the 28 w 1590
inhabitants 1 w 1601
of 12 w 1603
which 4 w 1608
gradually 1 w 1617
took 1 w 1621
sides 1 w 1626
with 7 w 1630
the 29 w 1633
invaders 1 w 1641
Prusias 7 w 1649
trusting 1 w 1658
nobody 1 w 1664
and 17 w 1667
hoping 1 w 1673
that 7 w 1677
the 30 w 1680
Romans 2 w 1686
would 2 w 1691
rescue 1 w 1697
him 9 w 1700
from 1 w 1704
the 31 w 1707
toils 1 w 1712
of 13 w 1714
the 32 w 1717
conspiracy 1 w 1727
asked 1 w 1733
and 18 w 1736
obtained 1 w 1744
from 2 w 1748
his 10 w 1751
son-in-law 1 w 1761
Diegylis 1 w 1770
the 33 w 1774
Thracian 1 w 1782
500 2 w 1786
men 5 w 1789
and 19 w 1793
with 8 w 1797
these 1 w 1802
alone 1 w 1807
as 18 w 1809
a 151 w 1810
body-guard 1 w 1820
he 55 w 1822
took 2 w 1826
refuge 1 w 1832
in 33 w 1834
the 35 w 1837
citadel 1 w 1844
of 14 w 1846
Nictæa 1 w 1852
The 4 w 1856
Roman 4 w 1861
prætor 1 w 1867
in 34 w 1870
order 2 w 1875
to 17 w 1877
favor 1 w 1882
Attalus 6 w 1889
delayed 1 w 1897
introducing 1 w 1908
the 36 w 1911
ambassadors 1 w 1922
of 15 w 1924
Prusias 8 w 1931
to 18 w 1933
the 37 w 1936
Senate 1 w 1942
at 20 w 1944
Rome 2 w 1948
When 2 w 1953
he 61 w 1955
did 1 w 1958
introduce 1 w 1967
them 5 w 1971
the 39 w 1975
Senate 2 w 1981
voted 1 w 1986
that 8 w 1990
the 40 w 1993
prætor 2 w 1999
himself 1 w 2006
should 1 w 2012
choose 1 w 2018
legates 1 w 2025
and 20 w 2028
send 1 w 2032
them 6 w 2036
to 20 w 2038
settle 1 w 2044
the 42 w 2047
difficulty 1 w 2057
He 1 w 2060
selected 1 w 2068
three 1 w 2073
men 6 w 2076
one 4 w 2080
of 16 w 2082
whom 1 w 2086
had 5 w 2089
once 2 w 2093
been 1 w 2097
struck 1 w 2103
on 27 w 2105
the 43 w 2108
head 2 w 2112
with 9 w 2116
a 171 w 2117
stone 1 w 2122
from 3 w 2127
which 5 w 2132
he 69 w 2134
was 3 w 2137
badly 1 w 2142
scarred 1 w 2149
another 1 w 2157
was 4 w 2160
a 177 w 2161
diseased 1 w 2169
cripple 1 w 2176
and 21 w 2180
the 45 w 2183
third 1 w 2188
was 5 w 2191
considered 1 w 2201
almost 1 w 2207
a 182 w 2208
fool 1 w 2212
wherefore 1 w 2222
Cato 1 w 2226
made 3 w 2230
the 46 w 2233
contemptuous 1 w 2245
remark 1 w 2251
concerning 1 w 2261
this 4 w 2265
embassy 1 w 2272
that 9 w 2277
it 19 w 2279
had 6 w 2282
no 4 w 2284
understanding 1 w 2297
no 5 w 2300
feet 1 w 2304
and 23 w 2307
no 6 w 2309
head 3 w 2313