Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / The Histories

The Histories (1.11)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0543.tlg001.perseus-eng2:1.11
Refs {'start': {'reference': '1.11', 'human_reference': 'Book 1 Chapter 11'}}
Ancestors [{'reference': '1'}]
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next
Rome Supports the Mamertines

In spite of protracted deliberations, the conflict of [*] motives proved too strong, after all, to allow of the Senate coming to any decision; for the inconsistency of aiding the Messenians appeared to them to be evenly balanced by the advantages to be gained by doing so. The people, however, had suffered much from the previous wars, and wanted some means of repairing the losses which they had sustained in every department. Besides these national advantages to be gained by the war, the military commanders suggested that individually they would get manifest and important benefits from it. They accordingly voted in favour of giving the aid. [*] The decree having thus been passed by the people, they elected one of the consuls, Appius Claudius, to the command, and sent him out with instructions to cross to Messene and relieve the Mamertines. These latter managed, between threats and false representations, to oust the Carthaginian commander who was already in possession of the citadel, invited Appius in, and offered to deliver the city into his hands. The Carthaginians crucified their commander for what they considered to be his cowardice and folly in thus losing the citadel; stationed their fleet near Pelorus; their land forces at a place called Synes; and laid vigorous siege to Messene. [*] Now at this juncture Hiero, thinking it a favourable opportunity for totally expelling from Sicily the foreigners who were in occupation of Messene, made a treaty with the Carthaginians. Having done this, he started from Syracuse upon an expedition against that city. He pitched his camp on the opposite side to the Carthaginians, near what was called the Chalcidian Mount, whereby the garrison were cut off from that way out as well as from the other. The Roman Consul Appius, for his part, gallantly crossed the strait by night and got into Messene. But he found that the enemy had completely surrounded the town and were vigorously pressing on the attack; and he concluded on reflection that the siege could bring him neither credit nor security so long as the enemy commanded land as well as sea. He accordingly first endeavoured

V1_12
to relieve the Mamertines from the contest altogether by sending embassies to both of the attacking forces. [*] Neither of them received his proposals, and at last, from sheer necessity, he made up his mind to hazard an engagement, and that he would begin with the Syracusans. So he led out his forces and drew them up for the fight: nor was the Syracusan backward in accepting the challenge, but descended simultaneously to give him battle. [*] After a prolonged struggle, Appius got the better of the enemy, and chased the opposing forces right up to their entrenchments. The result of this was that Appius, after stripping the dead, retired into Messene again, while Hiero, with a foreboding of the final result, only waited for nightfall to beat a hasty retreat to Syracuse.

Tokens

Rome 1 w 4
Supports 1 w 12
the 1 w 15
Mamertines 1 w 25
In 1 w 27
spite 1 w 32
of 1 w 34
protracted 1 w 44
deliberations 1 w 57
the 2 w 61
conflict 1 w 69
of 2 w 71
The 1 w 74
Senate 1 w 80
shirk 1 w 85
the 3 w 88
responsibility 1 w 102
of 3 w 104
decision 1 w 112
The 2 w 116
people 1 w 122
vote 1 w 126
for 1 w 129
helping 1 w 136
the 4 w 139
Mamertines 2 w 149
motives 1 w 157
proved 1 w 163
too 1 w 166
strong 1 w 172
after 1 w 178
all 1 w 181
to 2 w 184
allow 1 w 189
of 4 w 191
the 5 w 194
Senate 2 w 200
coming 1 w 206
to 3 w 208
any 1 w 211
decision 2 w 219
for 2 w 223
the 6 w 226
inconsistency 1 w 239
of 5 w 241
aiding 1 w 247
the 7 w 250
Messenians 1 w 260
appeared 1 w 268
to 4 w 270
them 1 w 274
to 5 w 276
be 2 w 278
evenly 1 w 284
balanced 1 w 292
by 1 w 294
the 9 w 297
advantages 1 w 307
to 6 w 309
be 3 w 311
gained 1 w 317
by 2 w 319
doing 1 w 324
so 1 w 326
The 3 w 330
people 2 w 336
however 1 w 344
had 1 w 348
suffered 1 w 356
much 1 w 360
from 1 w 364
the 10 w 367
previous 1 w 375
wars 1 w 379
and 1 w 383
wanted 1 w 389
some 1 w 393
means 1 w 398
of 6 w 400
repairing 1 w 409
the 11 w 412
losses 1 w 418
which 1 w 423
they 1 w 427
had 2 w 430
sustained 1 w 439
in 11 w 441
every 1 w 446
department 1 w 456
Besides 1 w 464
these 1 w 469
national 1 w 477
advantages 2 w 487
to 7 w 489
be 4 w 491
gained 2 w 497
by 3 w 499
the 14 w 502
war 2 w 505
the 15 w 509
military 1 w 517
commanders 1 w 527
suggested 1 w 536
that 1 w 540
individually 1 w 552
they 2 w 556
would 1 w 561
get 1 w 564
manifest 1 w 572
and 3 w 575
important 1 w 584
benefits 1 w 592
from 2 w 596
it 5 w 598
They 1 w 603
accordingly 1 w 614
voted 1 w 619
in 15 w 621
favour 1 w 627
of 7 w 629
giving 1 w 635
the 17 w 638
aid 2 w 641
B 2 w 643
C 1 w 645
264 1 w 649
Appius 1 w 656
Claudius 1 w 664
Caudex 1 w 670
M 4 w 672
Fulvius 1 w 680
Flaccus 1 w 687
Coss 1 w 692
The 5 w 696
decree 1 w 702
having 1 w 708
thus 1 w 712
been 1 w 716
passed 1 w 722
by 4 w 724
the 18 w 727
people 3 w 733
they 3 w 738
elected 1 w 745
one 1 w 748
of 8 w 750
the 20 w 753
consuls 1 w 760
Appius 2 w 767
Claudius 2 w 775
to 8 w 778
the 21 w 781
command 2 w 788
and 5 w 792
sent 1 w 796
him 1 w 799
out 1 w 802
with 1 w 806
instructions 1 w 818
to 9 w 820
cross 1 w 825
to 10 w 827
Messene 1 w 834
and 6 w 837
relieve 1 w 844
the 22 w 847
Mamertines 3 w 857
These 1 w 863
latter 1 w 869
managed 1 w 876
between 1 w 884
threats 1 w 891
and 7 w 894
false 1 w 899
representations 1 w 914
to 11 w 917
oust 1 w 921
the 23 w 924
Carthaginian 1 w 936
commander 2 w 945
who 1 w 948
was 1 w 951
already 1 w 958
in 21 w 960
possession 1 w 970
of 9 w 972
the 24 w 975
citadel 1 w 982
invited 1 w 990
Appius 3 w 996
in 23 w 998
and 9 w 1002
offered 1 w 1009
to 12 w 1011
deliver 1 w 1018
the 25 w 1021
city 1 w 1025
into 1 w 1029
his 1 w 1032
hands 1 w 1037
The 7 w 1041
Carthaginians 1 w 1054
crucified 1 w 1063
their 1 w 1068
commander 3 w 1077
for 3 w 1080
what 1 w 1084
they 4 w 1088
considered 1 w 1098
to 14 w 1100
be 8 w 1102
his 2 w 1105
cowardice 1 w 1114
and 12 w 1117
folly 1 w 1122
in 26 w 1124
thus 2 w 1128
losing 1 w 1134
the 28 w 1137
citadel 2 w 1144
stationed 1 w 1154
their 2 w 1159
fleet 1 w 1164
near 1 w 1168
Pelorus 1 w 1175
their 3 w 1181
land 1 w 1185
forces 1 w 1191
at 11 w 1193
a 86 w 1194
place 1 w 1199
called 1 w 1205
Synes 1 w 1210
and 14 w 1214
laid 1 w 1218
vigorous 1 w 1226
siege 1 w 1231
to 15 w 1233
Messene 2 w 1240
Hiero 1 w 1246
joins 1 w 1251
Carthage 1 w 1259
in 29 w 1261
laying 1 w 1267
siege 2 w 1272
to 16 w 1274
the 31 w 1277
Mamertines 4 w 1287
in 32 w 1289
Messene 3 w 1296
Appius 4 w 1303
comes 1 w 1308
to 17 w 1310
the 32 w 1313
relief 1 w 1319
of 11 w 1321
the 33 w 1324
besieged 1 w 1332
B 3 w 1334
C 9 w 1336
264 2 w 1340
Now 1 w 1344
at 12 w 1346
this 1 w 1350
juncture 1 w 1358
Hiero 2 w 1363
thinking 1 w 1372
it 11 w 1374
a 96 w 1375
favourable 1 w 1385
opportunity 1 w 1396
for 5 w 1399
totally 1 w 1406
expelling 1 w 1415
from 3 w 1419
Sicily 1 w 1425
the 34 w 1428
foreigners 1 w 1438
who 2 w 1441
were 1 w 1445
in 36 w 1447
occupation 1 w 1457
of 12 w 1459
Messene 4 w 1466
made 1 w 1471
a 102 w 1472
treaty 1 w 1478
with 2 w 1482
the 35 w 1485
Carthaginians 2 w 1498
Having 1 w 1505
done 1 w 1509
this 2 w 1513
he 44 w 1516
started 1 w 1523
from 4 w 1527
Syracuse 1 w 1535
upon 1 w 1539
an 28 w 1541
expedition 1 w 1551
against 1 w 1558
that 2 w 1562
city 2 w 1566
He 1 w 1569
pitched 1 w 1576
his 5 w 1579
camp 1 w 1583
on 20 w 1585
the 36 w 1588
opposite 1 w 1596
side 3 w 1600
to 19 w 1602
the 37 w 1605
Carthaginians 3 w 1618
near 2 w 1623
what 2 w 1627
was 2 w 1630
called 2 w 1636
the 38 w 1639
Chalcidian 1 w 1649
Mount 1 w 1654
whereby 1 w 1662
the 39 w 1665
garrison 1 w 1673
were 2 w 1677
cut 1 w 1680
off 2 w 1683
from 5 w 1687
that 3 w 1691
way 1 w 1694
out 2 w 1697
as 4 w 1699
well 1 w 1703
as 5 w 1705
from 6 w 1709
the 40 w 1712
other 1 w 1717
The 8 w 1721
Roman 1 w 1726
Consul 1 w 1732
Appius 5 w 1738
for 7 w 1742
his 6 w 1745
part 2 w 1749
gallantly 1 w 1759
crossed 1 w 1766
the 42 w 1769
strait 1 w 1775
by 6 w 1777
night 1 w 1782
and 15 w 1785
got 1 w 1788
into 2 w 1792
Messene 5 w 1799
But 1 w 1803
he 55 w 1805
found 1 w 1810
that 4 w 1814
the 43 w 1817
enemy 1 w 1822
had 3 w 1825
completely 1 w 1835
surrounded 1 w 1845
the 44 w 1848
town 1 w 1852
and 16 w 1855
were 3 w 1859
vigorously 1 w 1869
pressing 1 w 1877
on 23 w 1879
the 45 w 1882
attack 1 w 1888
and 17 w 1892
he 59 w 1894
concluded 1 w 1903
on 25 w 1905
reflection 1 w 1915
that 5 w 1919
the 46 w 1922
siege 4 w 1927
could 1 w 1932
bring 1 w 1937
him 2 w 1940
neither 1 w 1947
credit 1 w 1953
nor 1 w 1956
security 1 w 1964
so 4 w 1966
long 1 w 1970
as 6 w 1972
the 48 w 1975
enemy 2 w 1980
commanded 1 w 1989
land 2 w 1993
as 7 w 1995
well 2 w 1999
as 8 w 2001
sea 1 w 2004
He 2 w 2007
accordingly 2 w 2018
first 1 w 2023
endeavoured 1 w 2034
to 22 w 2036
relieve 2 w 2043
the 49 w 2046
Mamertines 5 w 2056
from 7 w 2060
the 50 w 2063
contest 1 w 2070
altogether 1 w 2080
by 7 w 2082
sending 1 w 2089
embassies 1 w 2098
to 24 w 2100
both 1 w 2104
of 14 w 2106
the 52 w 2109
attacking 1 w 2118
forces 2 w 2124
After 1 w 2130
vain 1 w 2134
attempts 1 w 2142
at 23 w 2144
negotiation 1 w 2155
Appius 6 w 2162
determines 1 w 2172
to 25 w 2174
attack 3 w 2180
Hiero 3 w 2185
Neither 1 w 2193
of 15 w 2195
them 2 w 2199
received 1 w 2207
his 7 w 2210
proposals 1 w 2219
and 20 w 2223
at 26 w 2225
last 1 w 2229
from 8 w 2234
sheer 1 w 2239
necessity 1 w 2248
he 70 w 2251
made 2 w 2255
up 4 w 2257
his 8 w 2260
mind 1 w 2264
to 26 w 2266
hazard 1 w 2272
an 39 w 2274
engagement 1 w 2284
and 21 w 2288
that 6 w 2292
he 71 w 2294
would 2 w 2299
begin 1 w 2304
with 3 w 2308
the 55 w 2311
Syracusans 1 w 2321
So 1 w 2324
he 73 w 2326
led 3 w 2329
out 3 w 2332
his 9 w 2335
forces 3 w 2341
and 22 w 2344
drew 1 w 2348
them 3 w 2352
up 5 w 2354
for 10 w 2357
the 57 w 2360
fight 1 w 2365
nor 2 w 2369
was 3 w 2372
the 58 w 2375
Syracusan 2 w 2384
backward 1 w 2392
in 52 w 2394
accepting 1 w 2403
the 59 w 2406
challenge 1 w 2415
but 1 w 2419
descended 1 w 2428
simultaneously 1 w 2442
to 27 w 2444
give 1 w 2448
him 3 w 2451
battle 1 w 2457
Hiero 4 w 2463
is 14 w 2465
defeated 1 w 2473
and 23 w 2477
returns 1 w 2484
to 28 w 2486
Syracuse 2 w 2494
After 2 w 2500
a 187 w 2501
prolonged 1 w 2510
struggle 1 w 2518
Appius 7 w 2525
got 3 w 2528
the 60 w 2531
better 1 w 2537
of 16 w 2539
the 61 w 2542
enemy 3 w 2547
and 24 w 2551
chased 1 w 2557
the 62 w 2560
opposing 1 w 2568
forces 4 w 2574
right 1 w 2579
up 6 w 2581
to 29 w 2583
their 4 w 2588
entrenchments 1 w 2601
The 9 w 2605
result 1 w 2611
of 17 w 2613
this 3 w 2617
was 4 w 2620
that 7 w 2624
Appius 8 w 2630
after 2 w 2636
stripping 1 w 2645
the 64 w 2648
dead 1 w 2652
retired 1 w 2660
into 3 w 2664
Messene 6 w 2671
again 2 w 2676
while 1 w 2682
Hiero 5 w 2687
with 4 w 2692
a 196 w 2693
foreboding 1 w 2703
of 18 w 2705
the 65 w 2708
final 1 w 2713
result 2 w 2719
only 1 w 2724
waited 1 w 2730
for 13 w 2733
nightfall 1 w 2742
to 31 w 2744
beat 1 w 2748
a 201 w 2749
hasty 1 w 2754
retreat 1 w 2761
to 32 w 2763
Syracuse 3 w 2771