Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Against The Corn-Dealers

Against The Corn-Dealers (6-10)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0540.tlg022.perseus-eng2:6-10
Refs {'start': {'reference': '6', 'human_reference': 'None 6'}, 'end': {'reference': '10', 'human_reference': 'None 10'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Well now, gentlemen, if he proves that there is a law which orders the corn-dealers to buy up the corn on an order from the magistrates, acquit him: if not, it is just that you should condemn him. For we have produced to you the law which forbids anyone in the city to buy up corn in excess of fifty measures.

This accusation of mine should have sufficed, gentlemen of the jury, since this man acknowledges that he bought up the corn, while the law clearly forbids him to do so; and you have sworn to decide in accordance with the laws. Nevertheless, in order that you may be convinced that they are actually traducing the magistrates, it is necessary to speak of them at some greater length.

For since these men shifted the blame on to them, we called the magistrates before us and questioned them. Two of them denied any knowledge of the matter; but Anytus stated that in the previous winter, as the corn was dear, and these men were outbidding each other and fighting amongst themselves, he had advised them to cease their competition, judging it beneficial to you, their customers, that they should purchase at as reasonable a price as possible: for they were bound, in selling, to add no more than an obol to the price.

Now, that he did not order them to buy up the corn for holding in store,[*] but only advised them not to buy against each other, I will produce to you Anytus himself as witness.

Testimony

These statements were made by him in the time of the former Council, whereas these men evidently bought up the corn in the time of the present one.

So now you have heard that it was not on an order from the magistrates that they bought up the corn; yet, in my opinion, however true their statements may be on these points, they will not be clearing themselves, but only accusing the magistrates. For where we have laws expressly drafted for the case, surely punishment should fall alike on those who disobey them and on those who order an infringement of them.

Well 1 w 4
now 1 w 7
gentlemen 1 w 17
if 1 w 20
he 1 w 22
proves 1 w 28
that 1 w 32
there 1 w 37
is 1 w 39
a 2 w 40
law 1 w 43
which 1 w 48
orders 1 w 54
the 2 w 57
corn-dealers 1 w 69
to 1 w 71
buy 1 w 74
up 1 w 76
the 3 w 79
corn 2 w 83
on 1 w 85
an 1 w 87
order 2 w 92
from 1 w 96
the 4 w 99
magistrates 1 w 110
acquit 1 w 117
him 1 w 120
if 2 w 123
not 1 w 126
it 2 w 129
is 3 w 131
just 1 w 135
that 2 w 139
you 1 w 142
should 1 w 148
condemn 1 w 155
him 2 w 158
For 1 w 162
we 1 w 164
have 1 w 168
produced 1 w 176
to 2 w 178
you 2 w 181
the 5 w 184
law 2 w 187
which 2 w 192
forbids 1 w 199
anyone 1 w 205
in 1 w 207
the 6 w 210
city 1 w 214
to 3 w 216
buy 2 w 219
up 2 w 221
corn 3 w 225
in 2 w 227
excess 1 w 233
of 1 w 235
fifty 1 w 240
measures 1 w 248
This 1 w 253
accusation 1 w 263
of 2 w 265
mine 1 w 269
should 2 w 275
have 2 w 279
sufficed 1 w 287
gentlemen 2 w 297
of 3 w 299
the 7 w 302
jury 1 w 306
since 1 w 312
this 1 w 316
man 1 w 319
acknowledges 1 w 331
that 3 w 335
he 9 w 337
bought 1 w 343
up 3 w 345
the 8 w 348
corn 4 w 352
while 1 w 358
the 9 w 361
law 3 w 364
clearly 1 w 371
forbids 2 w 378
him 3 w 381
to 4 w 383
do 1 w 385
so 1 w 387
and 1 w 391
you 3 w 394
have 3 w 398
sworn 1 w 403
to 5 w 405
decide 1 w 411
in 5 w 413
accordance 1 w 423
with 1 w 427
the 10 w 430
laws 1 w 434
Nevertheless 1 w 447
in 6 w 450
order 3 w 455
that 4 w 459
you 4 w 462
may 1 w 465
be 1 w 467
convinced 1 w 476
that 5 w 480
they 1 w 484
are 1 w 487
actually 1 w 495
traducing 1 w 504
the 13 w 507
magistrates 2 w 518
it 5 w 521
is 7 w 523
necessary 1 w 532
to 6 w 534
speak 1 w 539
of 4 w 541
them 1 w 545
at 9 w 547
some 1 w 551
greater 1 w 558
length 1 w 564
For 2 w 568
since 2 w 573
these 1 w 578
men 3 w 581
shifted 1 w 588
the 16 w 591
blame 1 w 596
on 6 w 598
to 7 w 600
them 2 w 604
we 2 w 607
called 1 w 613
the 18 w 616
magistrates 3 w 627
before 1 w 633
us 3 w 635
and 2 w 638
questioned 1 w 648
them 3 w 652
Two 1 w 656
of 5 w 658
them 4 w 662
denied 1 w 668
any 2 w 671
knowledge 2 w 680
of 6 w 682
the 21 w 685
matter 1 w 691
but 1 w 695
Anytus 1 w 701
stated 1 w 707
that 6 w 711
in 10 w 713
the 22 w 716
previous 1 w 724
winter 1 w 730
as 2 w 733
the 23 w 736
corn 5 w 740
was 1 w 743
dear 1 w 747
and 3 w 751
these 2 w 756
men 4 w 759
were 1 w 763
outbidding 1 w 773
each 1 w 777
other 1 w 782
and 4 w 785
fighting 1 w 793
amongst 1 w 800
themselves 1 w 810
he 29 w 813
had 1 w 816
advised 1 w 823
them 6 w 827
to 8 w 829
cease 1 w 834
their 1 w 839
competition 1 w 850
judging 1 w 858
it 7 w 860
beneficial 1 w 870
to 9 w 872
you 5 w 875
their 2 w 881
customers 1 w 890
that 7 w 895
they 2 w 899
should 3 w 905
purchase 1 w 913
at 16 w 915
as 6 w 917
reasonable 1 w 927
a 66 w 928
price 1 w 933
as 8 w 935
possible 1 w 943
for 4 w 947
they 3 w 951
were 2 w 955
bound 1 w 960
in 15 w 963
selling 1 w 970
to 11 w 973
add 1 w 976
no 5 w 978
more 1 w 982
than 1 w 986
an 11 w 988
obol 1 w 992
to 12 w 994
the 32 w 997
price 2 w 1002
Now 1 w 1006
that 8 w 1011
he 36 w 1013
did 1 w 1016
not 2 w 1019
order 4 w 1024
them 7 w 1028
to 13 w 1030
buy 3 w 1033
up 4 w 1035
the 34 w 1038
corn 6 w 1042
for 5 w 1045
holding 1 w 1052
in 18 w 1054
store 1 w 1059
i 64 w 1061
e 136 w 1063
until 1 w 1070
the 35 w 1073
price 3 w 1078
was 2 w 1081
raised 1 w 1087
to 15 w 1089
their 3 w 1094
advantage 1 w 1103
but 2 w 1107
only 1 w 1111
advised 2 w 1118
them 8 w 1122
not 3 w 1125
to 16 w 1127
buy 4 w 1130
against 1 w 1137
each 2 w 1141
other 2 w 1146
I 1 w 1148
will 1 w 1152
produce 2 w 1159
to 17 w 1161
you 6 w 1164
Anytus 2 w 1170
himself 1 w 1177
as 10 w 1179
witness 1 w 1186
Testimony 1 w 1196
These 1 w 1201
statements 1 w 1211
were 3 w 1215
made 1 w 1219
by 1 w 1221
him 5 w 1224
in 20 w 1226
the 39 w 1229
time 1 w 1233
of 7 w 1235
the 40 w 1238
former 1 w 1244
Council 1 w 1251
whereas 1 w 1259
these 3 w 1264
men 6 w 1267
evidently 1 w 1276
bought 2 w 1282
up 5 w 1284
the 42 w 1287
corn 7 w 1291
in 21 w 1293
the 43 w 1296
time 2 w 1300
of 8 w 1302
the 44 w 1305
present 1 w 1312
one 3 w 1315
So 1 w 1318
now 4 w 1321
you 7 w 1324
have 4 w 1328
heard 1 w 1333
that 9 w 1337
it 9 w 1339
was 3 w 1342
not 4 w 1345
on 14 w 1347
an 13 w 1349
order 5 w 1354
from 2 w 1358
the 45 w 1361
magistrates 4 w 1372
that 10 w 1376
they 4 w 1380
bought 3 w 1386
up 6 w 1388
the 47 w 1391
corn 8 w 1395
yet 1 w 1399
in 22 w 1402
my 1 w 1404
opinion 1 w 1411
however 1 w 1419
true 1 w 1423
their 4 w 1428
statements 2 w 1438
may 2 w 1441
be 4 w 1443
on 16 w 1445
these 4 w 1450
points 1 w 1456
they 5 w 1461
will 2 w 1465
not 5 w 1468
be 5 w 1470
clearing 1 w 1478
themselves 2 w 1488
but 3 w 1492
only 2 w 1496
accusing 1 w 1504
the 52 w 1507
magistrates 5 w 1518
For 3 w 1522
where 2 w 1527
we 7 w 1529
have 5 w 1533
laws 2 w 1537
expressly 1 w 1546
drafted 1 w 1553
for 7 w 1556
the 53 w 1559
case 1 w 1563
surely 1 w 1570
punishment 1 w 1580
should 4 w 1586
fall 1 w 1590
alike 1 w 1595
on 18 w 1597
those 1 w 1602
who 1 w 1605
disobey 1 w 1612
them 10 w 1616
and 5 w 1619
on 19 w 1621
those 2 w 1626
who 2 w 1629
order 6 w 1634
an 15 w 1636
infringement 1 w 1648
of 9 w 1650
them 11 w 1654