Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Against Eratosthenes

Against Eratosthenes (51-55)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0540.tlg012.perseus-eng2:51-55
Refs {'start': {'reference': '51', 'human_reference': 'None 51'}, 'end': {'reference': '55', 'human_reference': 'None 55'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

No, this man considered the city his enemy, and your enemies his friends; both of these points I will maintain by many evidences, showing that their mutual disputes were not concerned with your advantage but with their own, in the contest of their two parties[*] as to which should have the administration and control the city.

For if their quarrel had been in the cause of those who had suffered wrong, at what moment could a ruler have more gloriously displayed his own loyalty than on the seizure of Phyle by Thrasybulus?[*] But, instead of offering or bringing some aid to the men at Phyle, he went with his partners in power to Salamis and Eleusis, and haled to prison three hundred of the citizens, and by a single resolution[*] condemned them all to death.

After we had come to the Peiraeus, and the commotions had taken place, and the negotiations were in progress for our reconciliation, we were in good hopes on either side of a settlement between us, as both parties made evident.

For the Peiraeus party, having got the upper hand, allowed the others to move off: these went into the town, drove out the Thirty except Pheidon and Eratosthenes, and appointed their bitterest enemies as leaders, judging that the same men might fairly be expected to feel both hate for the Thirty and love for the party of the Peiraeus.

Now among these[*] were Pheidon, Hippocles, and Epichares of the district of Lamptra, with others who were thought to be most opposed to Charicles and Critias and their club: but as soon as they in their turn were raised to power, they set up a far sharper dissension and warfare between the parties of the town and of the Peiraeus,

Tokens

No 1 w 2
this 1 w 7
man 1 w 10
considered 1 w 20
the 1 w 23
city 1 w 27
his 2 w 30
enemy 1 w 35
and 1 w 39
your 1 w 43
enemies 1 w 50
his 3 w 53
friends 1 w 60
both 1 w 65
of 1 w 67
these 1 w 72
points 1 w 78
I 1 w 79
will 1 w 83
maintain 1 w 91
by 1 w 93
many 1 w 97
evidences 1 w 106
showing 1 w 114
that 1 w 118
their 1 w 123
mutual 1 w 129
disputes 1 w 137
were 1 w 141
not 1 w 144
concerned 1 w 153
with 1 w 157
your 2 w 161
advantage 1 w 170
but 1 w 173
with 2 w 177
their 2 w 182
own 1 w 185
in 5 w 188
the 5 w 191
contest 1 w 198
of 2 w 200
their 3 w 205
two 1 w 208
parties 1 w 215
i 22 w 216
e 27 w 218
the 7 w 223
extremists 1 w 233
led 1 w 236
by 2 w 238
Critias 1 w 245
and 2 w 249
the 8 w 252
moderates 1 w 261
led 2 w 264
by 3 w 266
Theramenes 1 w 276
as 2 w 279
to 1 w 281
which 1 w 286
should 1 w 292
have 1 w 296
the 9 w 299
administration 1 w 313
and 3 w 316
control 1 w 323
the 10 w 326
city 2 w 330
For 1 w 334
if 1 w 336
their 4 w 341
quarrel 1 w 348
had 1 w 351
been 1 w 355
in 7 w 357
the 12 w 360
cause 1 w 365
of 3 w 367
those 1 w 372
who 1 w 375
had 2 w 378
suffered 1 w 386
wrong 1 w 391
at 4 w 394
what 1 w 398
moment 1 w 404
could 1 w 409
a 27 w 410
ruler 1 w 415
have 2 w 419
more 1 w 423
gloriously 1 w 433
displayed 1 w 442
his 4 w 445
own 2 w 448
loyalty 1 w 455
than 1 w 459
on 7 w 461
the 13 w 464
seizure 1 w 471
of 4 w 473
Phyle 1 w 478
by 4 w 480
Thrasybulus 1 w 491
In 1 w 494
the 14 w 497
autumn 1 w 503
of 5 w 505
404 1 w 508
B 1 w 509
C 2 w 511
Phyle 2 w 517
commanded 1 w 526
the 15 w 529
road 1 w 533
from 1 w 537
Thebes 1 w 543
to 2 w 545
Athens 1 w 551
about 1 w 557
twelve 1 w 563
miles 1 w 568
from 2 w 572
the 17 w 575
latter 1 w 581
But 1 w 585
instead 1 w 593
of 6 w 595
offering 1 w 603
or 4 w 605
bringing 1 w 613
some 1 w 617
aid 1 w 620
to 3 w 622
the 18 w 625
men 3 w 628
at 7 w 630
Phyle 3 w 635
he 21 w 638
went 1 w 642
with 3 w 646
his 5 w 649
partners 1 w 657
in 12 w 659
power 1 w 664
to 4 w 666
Salamis 1 w 673
and 5 w 676
Eleusis 1 w 683
and 6 w 687
haled 1 w 692
to 5 w 694
prison 1 w 700
three 1 w 705
hundred 1 w 712
of 8 w 714
the 19 w 717
citizens 1 w 725
and 7 w 729
by 5 w 731
a 48 w 732
single 1 w 738
resolution 1 w 748
An 1 w 750
illegality 1 w 760
like 1 w 764
that 2 w 768
of 9 w 770
the 20 w 773
condemnation 1 w 785
of 10 w 787
the 21 w 790
generals 1 w 798
after 1 w 803
Arginusae 1 w 812
The 3 w 816
law 1 w 819
required 1 w 827
that 3 w 831
each 1 w 835
accused 1 w 842
person 1 w 848
should 2 w 854
be 3 w 856
voted 1 w 861
on 13 w 863
separately 1 w 873
condemned 1 w 883
them 1 w 887
all 1 w 890
to 6 w 892
death 1 w 897
After 1 w 903
we 5 w 905
had 3 w 908
come 1 w 912
to 7 w 914
the 23 w 917
Peiraeus 1 w 925
and 8 w 929
the 24 w 932
commotions 1 w 942
had 4 w 945
taken 1 w 950
place 1 w 955
and 9 w 959
the 25 w 962
negotiations 1 w 974
were 2 w 978
in 15 w 980
progress 1 w 988
for 1 w 991
our 3 w 994
reconciliation 1 w 1008
we 7 w 1011
were 3 w 1015
in 16 w 1017
good 1 w 1021
hopes 1 w 1026
on 19 w 1028
either 1 w 1034
side 2 w 1038
of 11 w 1040
a 72 w 1041
settlement 1 w 1051
between 1 w 1058
us 8 w 1060
as 4 w 1063
both 2 w 1067
parties 2 w 1074
made 1 w 1078
evident 1 w 1085
For 2 w 1089
the 27 w 1092
Peiraeus 2 w 1100
party 1 w 1105
having 1 w 1112
got 2 w 1115
the 28 w 1118
upper 1 w 1123
hand 1 w 1127
allowed 1 w 1135
the 29 w 1138
others 1 w 1144
to 8 w 1146
move 1 w 1150
off 2 w 1153
these 2 w 1159
went 2 w 1163
into 1 w 1167
the 32 w 1170
town 1 w 1174
drove 1 w 1180
out 2 w 1183
the 33 w 1186
Thirty 1 w 1192
except 1 w 1198
Pheidon 1 w 1205
and 11 w 1208
Eratosthenes 1 w 1220
and 12 w 1224
appointed 1 w 1233
their 5 w 1238
bitterest 1 w 1247
enemies 2 w 1254
as 5 w 1256
leaders 1 w 1263
judging 1 w 1271
that 4 w 1275
the 36 w 1278
same 1 w 1282
men 5 w 1285
might 1 w 1290
fairly 1 w 1296
be 5 w 1298
expected 1 w 1306
to 12 w 1308
feel 1 w 1312
both 3 w 1316
hate 1 w 1320
for 2 w 1323
the 37 w 1326
Thirty 2 w 1332
and 13 w 1335
love 1 w 1339
for 3 w 1342
the 38 w 1345
party 2 w 1350
of 13 w 1352
the 39 w 1355
Peiraeus 3 w 1363
Now 1 w 1367
among 1 w 1372
these 3 w 1377
The 4 w 1380
ten 1 w 1383
chief 1 w 1388
magistrates 1 w 1399
appointed 2 w 1408
after 2 w 1413
the 41 w 1416
expulsion 1 w 1425
of 14 w 1427
the 42 w 1430
Thirty 3 w 1436
to 13 w 1438
arrange 1 w 1445
terms 1 w 1450
with 4 w 1454
Thrasybolus 1 w 1465
and 14 w 1468
the 43 w 1471
democrats 1 w 1480
but 2 w 1484
they 1 w 1488
only 1 w 1492
tried 1 w 1497
to 14 w 1499
win 2 w 1502
credit 1 w 1508
with 5 w 1512
Sparta 1 w 1518
were 4 w 1523
Pheidon 2 w 1530
Hippocles 1 w 1540
and 15 w 1544
Epichares 1 w 1553
of 15 w 1555
the 45 w 1558
district 1 w 1566
of 16 w 1568
Lamptra 1 w 1575
with 6 w 1580
others 2 w 1586
who 2 w 1589
were 5 w 1593
thought 1 w 1600
to 15 w 1602
be 6 w 1604
most 1 w 1608
opposed 1 w 1615
to 16 w 1617
Charicles 1 w 1626
and 16 w 1629
Critias 2 w 1636
and 17 w 1639
their 6 w 1644
club 1 w 1648
but 3 w 1652
as 8 w 1654
soon 1 w 1658
as 9 w 1660
they 2 w 1664
in 23 w 1666
their 7 w 1671
turn 1 w 1675
were 6 w 1679
raised 1 w 1685
to 17 w 1687
power 2 w 1692
they 3 w 1697
set 2 w 1700
up 2 w 1702
a 117 w 1703
far 1 w 1706
sharper 1 w 1713
dissension 1 w 1723
and 18 w 1726
warfare 1 w 1733
between 2 w 1740
the 51 w 1743
parties 3 w 1750
of 17 w 1752
the 52 w 1755
town 2 w 1759
and 19 w 1762
of 18 w 1764
the 53 w 1767
Peiraeus 4 w 1775