Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Accusation of Calumny

Accusation of Calumny (11-15)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0540.tlg008.perseus-eng2:11-15
Refs {'start': {'reference': '11', 'human_reference': 'None 11'}, 'end': {'reference': '15', 'human_reference': 'None 15'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Yet in fact they were merely accusing themselves. For if I had no rightful claim in regard to a wrong suffered through an arrangement shared with them, surely they were wrong in so sharing it. And I also thought it was for the mere theory of the thing that they took up the argument in opposition; but I found they were not arguing but acting against me,

and the purpose of their argument was to enable Polycles to know my argument. This became evident: in the presence of the arbitrators Polycles angrily said that even my friends considered that I was in the wrong,—so they told him. Now, does this tally with what was reported to me? My informant himself reported that you declared you would hinder those who intended to speak on my behalf, and had prevented several others already. What need have I to set the proof of these facts in a yet clearer light? I ask you, could that man know that, having asked Cleitodicus to speak next, I was refused?

I was told he was not present at the meeting. Then what profit was he seeking, when he was so zealous in getting me into disgrace with you that he busied himself with fabricating such a story for my relatives?

And I observe that not only now, but for a long time past, you have been seeking a pretext; as when you declared that Thrasymachus was defaming you because of me. Well, I asked him if it was because of me that he was defaming Diodorus; and how he disdained that because of me! For he said he was far from defaming Diodorus because of anybody. If I should prefer this charge, Thrasymachus was anxious to be put to the test in regard to this mans statements;

but to settle it thus was the last thing that the latter would have done. After that Autocrates told Thrasymachus in my presence that Euryptolemus was complaining of him, with the assertion that he was being defamed by him, and that the reporter of this was Menophilus. Immediately Thrasymachus walked over with me to see Menophilus; who asserted that at no time had he either heard it or reported it to Euryptolemus, and what was more, that he had not even talked with him for a long time.

Tokens

Yet 1 w 3
in 1 w 5
fact 1 w 9
they 1 w 13
were 1 w 17
merely 1 w 23
accusing 1 w 31
themselves 1 w 41
For 1 w 45
if 1 w 47
I 1 w 48
had 1 w 51
no 1 w 53
rightful 1 w 61
claim 1 w 66
in 3 w 68
regard 1 w 74
to 1 w 76
a 6 w 77
wrong 1 w 82
suffered 1 w 90
through 1 w 97
an 1 w 99
arrangement 1 w 110
shared 1 w 116
with 1 w 120
them 2 w 124
surely 1 w 131
they 2 w 135
were 2 w 139
wrong 2 w 144
in 4 w 146
so 1 w 148
sharing 1 w 155
it 2 w 157
And 1 w 161
I 2 w 162
also 1 w 166
thought 1 w 173
it 3 w 175
was 1 w 178
for 1 w 181
the 5 w 184
mere 2 w 188
theory 1 w 194
of 1 w 196
the 7 w 199
thing 1 w 204
that 1 w 208
they 3 w 212
took 1 w 216
up 1 w 218
the 9 w 221
argument 1 w 229
in 7 w 231
opposition 1 w 241
but 1 w 245
I 3 w 246
found 1 w 251
they 4 w 255
were 3 w 259
not 1 w 262
arguing 1 w 269
but 2 w 272
acting 1 w 278
against 1 w 285
me 5 w 287
and 1 w 291
the 11 w 294
purpose 1 w 301
of 2 w 303
their 1 w 308
argument 2 w 316
was 2 w 319
to 3 w 321
enable 1 w 327
Polycles 1 w 335
to 4 w 337
know 1 w 341
my 1 w 343
argument 3 w 351
This 1 w 356
became 1 w 362
evident 1 w 369
in 11 w 372
the 13 w 375
presence 1 w 383
of 3 w 385
the 14 w 388
arbitrators 1 w 399
Polycles 2 w 407
angrily 1 w 414
said 1 w 418
that 2 w 422
even 1 w 426
my 2 w 428
friends 1 w 435
considered 1 w 445
that 3 w 449
I 4 w 450
was 3 w 453
in 12 w 455
the 15 w 458
wrong 3 w 463
so 3 w 467
they 5 w 471
told 1 w 475
him 1 w 478
Now 1 w 482
does 1 w 487
this 1 w 491
tally 1 w 496
with 2 w 500
what 1 w 504
was 4 w 507
reported 1 w 515
to 7 w 517
me 9 w 519
My 1 w 522
informant 1 w 531
himself 1 w 538
reported 2 w 546
that 4 w 550
you 1 w 553
declared 1 w 561
you 2 w 564
would 1 w 569
hinder 1 w 575
those 1 w 580
who 1 w 583
intended 1 w 591
to 8 w 593
speak 1 w 598
on 6 w 600
my 3 w 602
behalf 1 w 608
and 2 w 612
had 2 w 615
prevented 1 w 624
several 1 w 631
others 1 w 637
already 1 w 644
What 1 w 649
need 1 w 653
have 1 w 657
I 5 w 658
to 9 w 660
set 1 w 663
the 18 w 666
proof 1 w 671
of 5 w 673
these 1 w 678
facts 1 w 683
in 16 w 685
a 49 w 686
yet 1 w 689
clearer 1 w 696
light 1 w 701
I 6 w 703
ask 1 w 706
you 3 w 709
could 1 w 715
that 5 w 719
man 2 w 722
know 2 w 726
that 6 w 730
having 1 w 737
asked 1 w 742
Cleitodicus 1 w 753
to 11 w 755
speak 2 w 760
next 1 w 764
I 7 w 766
was 5 w 769
refused 1 w 776
I 8 w 778
was 6 w 781
told 2 w 785
he 20 w 787
was 7 w 790
not 2 w 793
present 1 w 800
at 10 w 802
the 20 w 805
meeting 1 w 812
Then 1 w 817
what 2 w 821
profit 1 w 827
was 8 w 830
he 23 w 832
seeking 1 w 839
when 1 w 844
he 25 w 846
was 9 w 849
so 4 w 851
zealous 1 w 858
in 20 w 860
getting 1 w 867
me 11 w 869
into 1 w 873
disgrace 1 w 881
with 3 w 885
you 4 w 888
that 7 w 892
he 26 w 894
busied 1 w 900
himself 2 w 907
with 4 w 911
fabricating 1 w 922
such 1 w 926
a 70 w 927
story 1 w 932
for 3 w 935
my 4 w 937
relatives 1 w 946
And 2 w 950
I 9 w 951
observe 1 w 958
that 8 w 962
not 3 w 965
only 1 w 969
now 3 w 972
but 3 w 976
for 4 w 979
a 73 w 980
long 1 w 984
time 1 w 988
past 1 w 992
you 5 w 996
have 2 w 1000
been 1 w 1004
seeking 2 w 1011
a 76 w 1012
pretext 1 w 1019
as 13 w 1022
when 2 w 1026
you 6 w 1029
declared 2 w 1037
that 9 w 1041
Thrasymachus 1 w 1053
was 10 w 1056
defaming 1 w 1064
you 7 w 1067
because 1 w 1074
of 7 w 1076
me 13 w 1078
Well 1 w 1083
I 10 w 1085
asked 2 w 1090
him 4 w 1093
if 2 w 1095
it 11 w 1097
was 11 w 1100
because 2 w 1107
of 8 w 1109
me 14 w 1111
that 10 w 1115
he 28 w 1117
was 12 w 1120
defaming 2 w 1128
Diodorus 1 w 1136
and 3 w 1140
how 1 w 1143
he 29 w 1145
disdained 1 w 1154
that 11 w 1158
because 3 w 1165
of 9 w 1167
me 15 w 1169
For 2 w 1173
he 30 w 1175
said 2 w 1179
he 31 w 1181
was 13 w 1184
far 1 w 1187
from 1 w 1191
defaming 3 w 1199
Diodorus 2 w 1207
because 4 w 1214
of 10 w 1216
anybody 1 w 1223
If 1 w 1226
I 12 w 1227
should 1 w 1233
prefer 1 w 1239
this 2 w 1243
charge 1 w 1249
Thrasymachus 2 w 1262
was 14 w 1265
anxious 1 w 1272
to 15 w 1274
be 8 w 1276
put 1 w 1279
to 16 w 1281
the 21 w 1284
test 1 w 1288
in 29 w 1290
regard 2 w 1296
to 17 w 1298
this 3 w 1302
man 3 w 1305
s 83 w 1307
statements 1 w 1317
but 4 w 1321
to 18 w 1323
settle 1 w 1329
it 12 w 1331
thus 1 w 1335
was 15 w 1338
the 22 w 1341
last 1 w 1345
thing 2 w 1350
that 12 w 1354
the 23 w 1357
latter 1 w 1363
would 2 w 1368
have 3 w 1372
done 1 w 1376
After 1 w 1382
that 13 w 1386
Autocrates 1 w 1396
told 3 w 1400
Thrasymachus 3 w 1412
in 31 w 1414
my 5 w 1416
presence 2 w 1424
that 14 w 1428
Euryptolemus 1 w 1440
was 16 w 1443
complaining 1 w 1454
of 11 w 1456
him 5 w 1459
with 5 w 1464
the 24 w 1467
assertion 1 w 1476
that 15 w 1480
he 36 w 1482
was 17 w 1485
being 1 w 1490
defamed 1 w 1497
by 1 w 1499
him 6 w 1502
and 4 w 1506
that 16 w 1510
the 25 w 1513
reporter 1 w 1521
of 12 w 1523
this 4 w 1527
was 18 w 1530
Menophilus 1 w 1540
Immediately 1 w 1552
Thrasymachus 4 w 1564
walked 1 w 1570
over 1 w 1574
with 6 w 1578
me 19 w 1580
to 22 w 1582
see 3 w 1585
Menophilus 2 w 1595
who 2 w 1599
asserted 1 w 1607
that 17 w 1611
at 29 w 1613
no 10 w 1615
time 2 w 1619
had 3 w 1622
he 38 w 1624
either 1 w 1630
heard 1 w 1635
it 16 w 1637
or 15 w 1639
reported 3 w 1647
it 17 w 1649
to 23 w 1651
Euryptolemus 2 w 1663
and 5 w 1667
what 3 w 1671
was 19 w 1674
more 1 w 1678
that 18 w 1683
he 41 w 1685
had 4 w 1688
not 4 w 1691
even 3 w 1695
talked 1 w 1701
with 7 w 1705
him 7 w 1708
for 5 w 1711
a 143 w 1712
long 2 w 1716
time 3 w 1720