Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On the Olive Stump

On the Olive Stump (17)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0540.tlg007.perseus-eng2:17
Refs {'start': {'reference': '17', 'human_reference': 'None 17'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Furthermore, supposing I had been of a mind to be heedless of my domestics, how should I have dared, when so many persons had rented the plot, and all were acquainted with the facts, to clear away the stump for the sake of a petty profit, while there was no statute of limitations[*] to protect them, so that all who had worked the plot were alike concerned in the preservation of the stump, and hence they would be able, if anyone accused them, to transfer the blame to their successor? But as it is, they have manifestly absolved me,[*] and have thus taken upon themselves a share of the charge in case they are lying.

Tokens

Furthermore 1 w 11
supposing 1 w 21
I 1 w 22
had 1 w 25
been 1 w 29
of 1 w 31
a 2 w 32
mind 1 w 36
to 1 w 38
be 2 w 40
heedless 1 w 48
of 2 w 50
my 1 w 52
domestics 1 w 61
how 1 w 65
should 1 w 71
I 2 w 72
have 1 w 76
dared 1 w 81
when 1 w 86
so 1 w 88
many 1 w 92
persons 1 w 99
had 2 w 102
rented 1 w 108
the 2 w 111
plot 1 w 115
and 1 w 119
all 1 w 122
were 1 w 126
acquainted 1 w 136
with 1 w 140
the 3 w 143
facts 1 w 148
to 2 w 151
clear 1 w 156
away 1 w 160
the 4 w 163
stump 1 w 168
for 1 w 171
the 5 w 174
sake 1 w 178
of 3 w 180
a 16 w 181
petty 1 w 186
profit 1 w 192
while 1 w 198
there 1 w 203
was 1 w 206
no 1 w 208
statute 1 w 215
of 5 w 217
limitations 1 w 228
In 1 w 230
non-religious 1 w 243
cases 1 w 248
a 21 w 250
limit 2 w 255
of 6 w 257
time 1 w 261
might 1 w 266
be 3 w 268
prescribed 1 w 278
by 1 w 280
law 1 w 283
beyond 1 w 289
which 1 w 294
a 23 w 295
crime 1 w 300
was 2 w 303
not 1 w 306
chargeable 1 w 316
to 3 w 318
anyone 1 w 324
Dem 1 w 328
18 1 w 331
269 1 w 335
to 4 w 338
protect 1 w 345
them 1 w 349
so 3 w 352
that 1 w 356
all 2 w 359
who 1 w 362
had 3 w 365
worked 1 w 371
the 8 w 374
plot 2 w 378
were 2 w 382
alike 1 w 387
concerned 1 w 396
in 4 w 398
the 9 w 401
preservation 1 w 413
of 7 w 415
the 10 w 418
stump 2 w 423
and 2 w 427
hence 1 w 432
they 1 w 436
would 1 w 441
be 6 w 443
able 2 w 447
if 1 w 450
anyone 2 w 456
accused 1 w 463
them 2 w 467
to 5 w 470
transfer 1 w 478
the 13 w 481
blame 1 w 486
to 6 w 488
their 1 w 493
successor 1 w 502
But 1 w 506
as 4 w 508
it 5 w 510
is 1 w 512
they 2 w 517
have 2 w 521
manifestly 1 w 531
absolved 1 w 539
me 5 w 541
By 1 w 544
not 2 w 547
accusing 1 w 555
me 6 w 557
for 2 w 560
their 2 w 565
own 1 w 568
exculpation 1 w 579
and 3 w 583
have 3 w 587
thus 1 w 591
taken 1 w 596
upon 1 w 600
themselves 1 w 610
a 48 w 611
share 1 w 616
of 8 w 618
the 18 w 621
charge 2 w 627
in 6 w 629
case 2 w 633
they 3 w 637
are 3 w 640
lying 1 w 645