Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / In Defence of Lycophron

In Defence of Lycophron (frag_4)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0030.tlg001.perseus-eng2:frag_4
Refs {'start': {'reference': 'frag_4', 'human_reference': 'Section frag_4'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Euphemus first when the husband died of Phlya from him that the woman he had left his wife with child, which did not entail any breach of the law. But if their interpretation of this story tallied with that given by Ariston in the impeachment, they[*] should not surely have prevented the nearest relatives from ejecting Euphemus. They ought to have let them do so. Whereas now, by behaving as they did, they have by their own action furnished evidence that the charge against me is false. Besides, is it not strange that if anything had happened to the child at birth, or after, they would have adhered firmly to this will, in which

Tokens

Euphemus 1 w 8
first 1 w 13
when 1 w 17
the 1 w 20
husband 1 w 27
died 1 w 31
of 1 w 33
Phlya 1 w 38
from 1 w 42
him 1 w 45
that 1 w 49
the 2 w 52
woman 1 w 57
he 5 w 59
had 1 w 62
left 1 w 66
his 1 w 69
wife 1 w 73
with 1 w 77
child 1 w 82
which 1 w 88
did 1 w 91
not 1 w 94
entail 1 w 100
any 1 w 103
breach 1 w 109
of 2 w 111
the 3 w 114
law 1 w 117
But 1 w 121
if 2 w 123
their 1 w 128
interpretation 1 w 142
of 3 w 144
this 1 w 148
story 1 w 153
tallied 1 w 160
with 2 w 164
that 2 w 168
given 1 w 173
by 1 w 175
Ariston 1 w 182
in 2 w 184
the 5 w 187
impeachment 1 w 198
they 1 w 203
The 1 w 206
reference 1 w 215
seems 1 w 220
to 3 w 222
be 1 w 224
to 4 w 226
those 1 w 231
relatives 1 w 240
due 1 w 243
to 5 w 245
benefit 1 w 252
by 2 w 254
the 7 w 257
will 1 w 261
in 3 w 263
the 8 w 266
event 1 w 271
of 4 w 273
the 9 w 276
child 2 w 281
s 12 w 283
death 1 w 288
See 1 w 292
Introduction 1 w 304
should 1 w 311
not 2 w 314
surely 1 w 320
have 1 w 324
prevented 1 w 333
the 10 w 336
nearest 1 w 343
relatives 2 w 352
from 2 w 356
ejecting 1 w 364
Euphemus 2 w 372
They 1 w 377
ought 1 w 382
to 6 w 384
have 2 w 388
let 1 w 391
them 1 w 395
do 1 w 397
so 1 w 399
Whereas 1 w 407
now 1 w 410
by 3 w 413
behaving 1 w 421
as 2 w 423
they 2 w 427
did 2 w 430
they 3 w 435
have 3 w 439
by 4 w 441
their 2 w 446
own 1 w 449
action 1 w 455
furnished 1 w 464
evidence 1 w 472
that 3 w 476
the 15 w 479
charge 1 w 485
against 1 w 492
me 2 w 494
is 5 w 496
false 1 w 501
Besides 1 w 509
is 6 w 512
it 4 w 514
not 3 w 517
strange 1 w 524
that 4 w 528
if 3 w 530
anything 1 w 538
had 2 w 541
happened 1 w 549
to 7 w 551
the 16 w 554
child 3 w 559
at 9 w 561
birth 1 w 566
or 2 w 569
after 1 w 574
they 4 w 579
would 1 w 584
have 4 w 588
adhered 1 w 595
firmly 1 w 601
to 8 w 603
this 2 w 607
will 2 w 611
in 8 w 614
which 2 w 619