Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / The Third Tetralogy: Prosecution for Murder Of One Who Pleads That He Was Acting in Self-Defence

The Third Tetralogy: Prosecution for Murder Of One Who Pleads That He Was Acting in Self-Defence (1.7-2.3)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0028.tlg004.perseus-eng2:1.7-2.3
Refs {'start': {'reference': '1.7', 'human_reference': 'Tetralogy 1 Section 7'}, 'end': {'reference': '2.3', 'human_reference': 'Tetralogy 2 Section 3'}}
Ancestors [{'reference': '1'}]
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Thus the law rightly hands him over to you for punishment; and you have listened to the witnesses who were present during his drunken assault. It is your duty to take vengeance for the injury which he so lawlessly inflicted: to punish such brutal violence as harshly as the harm which it has caused requires: to deprive him in his turn of a life which was used to plot anothers death.

Reply to a Charge of Murder, Arguing that the Accused Killed in Self-Defense

The fact that their speech was brief does not surprise me: because for them the danger is, not that they may come to some harm, but that they may fail to gratify their animosity by sending me to a death which I do not deserve. On the other hand, that they should want to treat the present matter, in which the victim had himself to blame more than me, as a case of the greatest gravity, gives me, I think, some excuse for indignation. By resorting to violence as he did and making a drunken assault upon a man far more in control of himself than he, he was responsible not only for the disaster which befell himself, but for the accusation which has been brought against me.

In my opinion, the prosecution are setting both God and man at defiance in accusing me. He was the aggressor; and even if I had used steel or stone or wood to beat him off, I was acting within my rights; an aggressor deserves to be answered with, not the same, but more and worse than he gave. Actually, when he struck me with his fists, I used my own to retaliate for the blows which I received. Was that unjustified?

Well and good. But, he will object, the law which forbids the taking of life whether justifiably or not shows you to be liable to the penalty prescribed for murder; for the man is dead. I repeat for a second and a third time that I did not kill him. Had the man died on the spot from the blows which he received, his death would have been due to me, not but what I would have been justifiedan aggressor deserves to be answered with not the same, but more and worse than he gave;

Tokens

Thus 1 w 4
the 1 w 7
law 1 w 10
rightly 1 w 17
hands 1 w 22
him 1 w 25
over 1 w 29
to 1 w 31
you 1 w 34
for 1 w 37
punishment 1 w 47
and 2 w 51
you 2 w 54
have 1 w 58
listened 1 w 66
to 2 w 68
the 2 w 71
witnesses 1 w 80
who 1 w 83
were 1 w 87
present 1 w 94
during 1 w 100
his 1 w 103
drunken 1 w 110
assault 1 w 117
It 1 w 120
is 4 w 122
your 1 w 126
duty 1 w 130
to 3 w 132
take 1 w 136
vengeance 1 w 145
for 2 w 148
the 3 w 151
injury 1 w 157
which 1 w 162
he 4 w 164
so 1 w 166
lawlessly 1 w 175
inflicted 1 w 184
to 4 w 187
punish 2 w 193
such 1 w 197
brutal 1 w 203
violence 1 w 211
as 2 w 213
harshly 1 w 220
as 3 w 222
the 4 w 225
harm 1 w 229
which 2 w 234
it 2 w 236
has 1 w 239
caused 1 w 245
requires 1 w 253
to 5 w 256
deprive 1 w 263
him 2 w 266
in 4 w 268
his 2 w 271
turn 1 w 275
of 1 w 277
a 17 w 278
life 1 w 282
which 3 w 287
was 1 w 290
used 2 w 294
to 6 w 296
plot 1 w 300
another 1 w 307
s 27 w 309
death 1 w 314
Reply 1 w 320
to 7 w 322
a 21 w 323
Charge 1 w 329
of 2 w 331
Murder 1 w 337
Arguing 1 w 345
that 1 w 349
the 6 w 352
Accused 1 w 359
Killed 1 w 365
in 6 w 367
Self-Defense 1 w 379
The 1 w 382
fact 1 w 386
that 2 w 390
their 1 w 395
speech 1 w 401
was 2 w 404
brief 1 w 409
does 1 w 413
not 2 w 416
surprise 1 w 424
me 2 w 426
because 1 w 434
for 3 w 437
them 1 w 441
the 9 w 444
danger 1 w 450
is 8 w 452
not 3 w 456
that 3 w 460
they 1 w 464
may 1 w 467
come 1 w 471
to 8 w 473
some 1 w 477
harm 2 w 481
but 1 w 485
that 4 w 489
they 2 w 493
may 2 w 496
fail 1 w 500
to 9 w 502
gratify 1 w 509
their 2 w 514
animosity 1 w 523
by 1 w 525
sending 1 w 532
me 5 w 534
to 10 w 536
a 37 w 537
death 2 w 542
which 4 w 547
I 2 w 548
do 2 w 550
not 4 w 553
deserve 1 w 560
On 1 w 563
the 13 w 566
other 2 w 571
hand 2 w 575
that 5 w 580
they 3 w 584
should 1 w 590
want 1 w 594
to 11 w 596
treat 1 w 601
the 16 w 604
present 2 w 611
matter 1 w 617
in 8 w 620
which 5 w 625
the 17 w 628
victim 1 w 634
had 1 w 637
himself 1 w 644
to 12 w 646
blame 1 w 651
more 1 w 655
than 1 w 659
me 7 w 661
as 7 w 664
a 48 w 665
case 1 w 669
of 3 w 671
the 18 w 674
greatest 1 w 682
gravity 1 w 689
gives 1 w 695
me 8 w 697
I 3 w 699
think 1 w 704
some 2 w 709
excuse 1 w 715
for 4 w 718
indignation 1 w 729
By 1 w 732
resorting 1 w 741
to 13 w 743
violence 2 w 751
as 9 w 753
he 21 w 755
did 1 w 758
and 4 w 761
making 1 w 767
a 56 w 768
drunken 2 w 775
assault 2 w 782
upon 1 w 786
a 59 w 787
man 1 w 790
far 1 w 793
more 2 w 797
in 13 w 799
control 1 w 806
of 4 w 808
himself 2 w 815
than 2 w 819
he 22 w 821
he 23 w 824
was 3 w 827
responsible 1 w 838
not 5 w 841
only 1 w 845
for 5 w 848
the 19 w 851
disaster 1 w 859
which 6 w 864
befell 1 w 870
himself 3 w 877
but 2 w 881
for 6 w 884
the 20 w 887
accusation 1 w 897
which 7 w 902
has 2 w 905
been 1 w 909
brought 1 w 916
against 1 w 923
me 10 w 925
In 1 w 928
my 1 w 930
opinion 1 w 937
the 21 w 941
prosecution 1 w 952
are 1 w 955
setting 1 w 962
both 1 w 966
God 1 w 969
and 5 w 972
man 2 w 975
at 14 w 977
defiance 1 w 985
in 17 w 987
accusing 1 w 995
me 11 w 997
He 1 w 1000
was 4 w 1003
the 22 w 1006
aggressor 1 w 1015
and 6 w 1019
even 1 w 1023
if 3 w 1025
I 5 w 1026
had 2 w 1029
used 4 w 1033
steel 1 w 1038
or 11 w 1040
stone 1 w 1045
or 12 w 1047
wood 1 w 1051
to 15 w 1053
beat 1 w 1057
him 6 w 1060
off 1 w 1063
I 6 w 1065
was 5 w 1068
acting 1 w 1074
within 1 w 1080
my 2 w 1082
rights 1 w 1088
an 17 w 1091
aggressor 2 w 1100
deserves 1 w 1108
to 16 w 1110
be 5 w 1112
answered 1 w 1120
with 2 w 1124
not 6 w 1128
the 23 w 1131
same 1 w 1135
but 3 w 1139
more 3 w 1143
and 7 w 1146
worse 1 w 1151
than 3 w 1155
he 29 w 1157
gave 1 w 1161
Actually 1 w 1170
when 1 w 1175
he 31 w 1177
struck 1 w 1183
me 13 w 1185
with 3 w 1189
his 3 w 1192
fists 1 w 1197
I 7 w 1199
used 5 w 1203
my 3 w 1205
own 1 w 1208
to 17 w 1210
retaliate 1 w 1219
for 7 w 1222
the 24 w 1225
blows 1 w 1230
which 8 w 1235
I 8 w 1236
received 1 w 1244
Was 1 w 1248
that 6 w 1252
unjustified 1 w 1263
Well 1 w 1268
and 8 w 1271
good 1 w 1275
But 1 w 1279
he 33 w 1282
will 1 w 1286
object 1 w 1292
the 25 w 1296
law 3 w 1299
which 9 w 1304
forbids 1 w 1311
the 26 w 1314
taking 1 w 1320
of 6 w 1322
life 2 w 1326
whether 1 w 1333
justifiably 1 w 1344
or 18 w 1346
not 7 w 1349
shows 1 w 1354
you 4 w 1357
to 18 w 1359
be 6 w 1361
liable 1 w 1367
to 19 w 1369
the 28 w 1372
penalty 1 w 1379
prescribed 1 w 1389
for 9 w 1392
murder 1 w 1398
for 10 w 1402
the 29 w 1405
man 3 w 1408
is 12 w 1410
dead 1 w 1414
I 9 w 1416
repeat 1 w 1422
for 11 w 1425
a 104 w 1426
second 1 w 1432
and 9 w 1435
a 106 w 1436
third 1 w 1441
time 1 w 1445
that 7 w 1449
I 10 w 1450
did 2 w 1453
not 8 w 1456
kill 1 w 1460
him 7 w 1463
Had 1 w 1467
the 30 w 1470
man 4 w 1473
died 1 w 1477
on 11 w 1479
the 31 w 1482
spot 1 w 1486
from 1 w 1490
the 32 w 1493
blows 2 w 1498
which 10 w 1503
he 43 w 1505
received 2 w 1513
his 4 w 1517
death 3 w 1522
would 1 w 1527
have 2 w 1531
been 2 w 1535
due 1 w 1538
to 20 w 1540
me 15 w 1542
not 9 w 1546
but 4 w 1549
what 1 w 1553
I 11 w 1554
would 2 w 1559
have 3 w 1563
been 3 w 1567
justified 2 w 1576
an 25 w 1579
aggressor 3 w 1588
deserves 2 w 1596
to 21 w 1598
be 10 w 1600
answered 2 w 1608
with 4 w 1612
not 10 w 1615
the 33 w 1618
same 2 w 1622
but 5 w 1626
more 4 w 1630
and 10 w 1633
worse 2 w 1638
than 4 w 1642
he 45 w 1644
gave 2 w 1648