Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On the Estate of Hagnias

On the Estate of Hagnias (15-19)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg011.perseus-eng2:15-19
Refs {'start': {'reference': '15', 'human_reference': 'Section 15'}, 'end': {'reference': '19', 'human_reference': 'Section 19'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

From what I have already said I think that you fully recognize that I am doing no wrong to the child and that I am not in the least degree guilty of these charges; but you will, I think, understand this still more exactly from the rest of my story, and, in particular, when you have heard how the adjudication to me of the inheritance took place. When I brought the action claiming the inheritance, neither did my opponent, who is now bringing an impeachment against me, think fit to make the necessary deposit on behalf of the child, nor did the sons of Stratius, who stand in the same relationship as the child, either for this[*] or for any other reason think that they had any right to the money;

for my opponent would not be troubling me now, if I had allowed him to dissipate the child's property and had not opposed him. These men, then, as I have said, knowing that they were outside the requisite degree of relationship, kept quiet; but those who were acting on behalf of the daughter of Eubulides, who stands in the same degree of relationship as the child and the sons of Stratius, and the legal representatives of Hagnias's mother, were disposed to contest my claim.

They found it so difficult to know what to say in their written counter-claim about the degree of relationship, that the woman who was in possession of the estate and those who were seeking to explain her kinship, when they lied, were easily convicted by me of daring to put in writing what was not true; and those who were supporting Hagnias's mother, who stands in the same degree of relationship as I do (being sister of Stratius) but who is excluded by the law which ordains that the males shall have the preference, omitted all reference to this point, and, thinking to gain an advantage over me, described her as the mother of the deceasedthe nearest possible relationship by blood, but admittedly conferring no rights as next-of-kin.

Having thus described myself as the son of a cousin and having proved that these women were not within the requisite degree of kinship, I thus had the estate adjudicated to me by you; and her former success against those who claimed on the basis of the will was of no avail to the woman who was in possession of the inheritance, nor did it avail the other woman that she was mother of the deceased who left the estate, but those who were trying the case attached so much importance to justice and their oaths that they gave their verdict in favor of me, whose claim was in conformity with the law.

Yet since I thus triumphed over these women by proving that they were not within the requisite degree of kinship to Hagnias; and since my present opponent did not venture to go to law with me, claiming half the estate for the child; and since the sons of Stratius, who stand in the same degree of kinship as this child, do not even now think of bringing a suit against me for the estate; and since I am in possession of the estate by your adjudication; and since I can prove that my opponent even at the present time cannot state what relationship the child possesses which confers rights as next-of-kin to Hagniaswhat further information do you require, and what more do you wish to hear on the subject? Since I regard you as men of good sense, I think that what I have said is sufficient.

From 1 w 4
what 1 w 8
I 1 w 9
have 1 w 13
already 1 w 20
said 1 w 24
I 2 w 25
think 1 w 30
that 1 w 34
you 1 w 37
fully 1 w 42
recognize 1 w 51
that 2 w 55
I 3 w 56
am 1 w 58
doing 1 w 63
no 1 w 65
wrong 1 w 70
to 1 w 72
the 1 w 75
child 1 w 80
and 1 w 83
that 3 w 87
I 4 w 88
am 2 w 90
not 1 w 93
in 3 w 95
the 2 w 98
least 1 w 103
degree 1 w 109
guilty 1 w 115
of 1 w 117
these 1 w 122
charges 1 w 129
but 1 w 133
you 2 w 136
will 1 w 140
I 5 w 142
think 2 w 147
understand 1 w 158
this 1 w 162
still 1 w 167
more 1 w 171
exactly 1 w 178
from 1 w 182
the 4 w 185
rest 1 w 189
of 2 w 191
my 1 w 193
story 1 w 198
and 3 w 202
in 5 w 205
particular 1 w 215
when 1 w 220
you 3 w 223
have 2 w 227
heard 1 w 232
how 1 w 235
the 5 w 238
adjudication 1 w 250
to 3 w 252
me 1 w 254
of 3 w 256
the 6 w 259
inheritance 1 w 270
took 1 w 274
place 1 w 279
When 1 w 284
I 6 w 285
brought 1 w 292
the 7 w 295
action 1 w 301
claiming 1 w 309
the 8 w 312
inheritance 2 w 323
neither 1 w 331
did 1 w 334
my 2 w 336
opponent 1 w 344
who 1 w 348
is 2 w 350
now 1 w 353
bringing 1 w 361
an 6 w 363
impeachment 1 w 374
against 1 w 381
me 3 w 383
think 3 w 389
fit 1 w 392
to 5 w 394
make 1 w 398
the 10 w 401
necessary 1 w 410
deposit 1 w 417
on 5 w 419
behalf 1 w 425
of 4 w 427
the 11 w 430
child 2 w 435
nor 1 w 439
did 2 w 442
the 12 w 445
sons 1 w 449
of 5 w 451
Stratius 1 w 459
who 2 w 463
stand 2 w 468
in 13 w 470
the 13 w 473
same 1 w 477
relationship 1 w 489
as 2 w 491
the 14 w 494
child 3 w 499
either 2 w 506
for 1 w 509
this 2 w 513
There 1 w 518
is 4 w 520
a 40 w 521
lacuna 1 w 527
in 14 w 529
the 16 w 532
text 1 w 536
at 8 w 538
this 3 w 542
point 1 w 547
or 5 w 550
for 2 w 553
any 1 w 556
other 1 w 561
reason 1 w 567
think 4 w 572
that 4 w 576
they 1 w 580
had 1 w 583
any 2 w 586
right 1 w 591
to 6 w 593
the 19 w 596
money 1 w 601
for 3 w 605
my 3 w 607
opponent 2 w 615
would 1 w 620
not 2 w 623
be 2 w 625
troubling 1 w 634
me 5 w 636
now 2 w 639
if 1 w 642
I 7 w 643
had 2 w 646
allowed 1 w 653
him 1 w 656
to 7 w 658
dissipate 1 w 667
the 20 w 670
child 4 w 675
s 28 w 677
property 1 w 685
and 5 w 688
had 3 w 691
not 3 w 694
opposed 1 w 701
him 2 w 704
These 1 w 710
men 2 w 713
then 1 w 718
as 4 w 721
I 8 w 722
have 3 w 726
said 2 w 730
knowing 1 w 738
that 5 w 742
they 2 w 746
were 1 w 750
outside 1 w 757
the 23 w 760
requisite 1 w 769
degree 2 w 775
of 6 w 777
relationship 2 w 789
kept 1 w 794
quiet 1 w 799
but 2 w 803
those 1 w 808
who 3 w 811
were 2 w 815
acting 1 w 821
on 12 w 823
behalf 2 w 829
of 7 w 831
the 24 w 834
daughter 1 w 842
of 8 w 844
Eubulides 1 w 853
who 4 w 857
stands 1 w 863
in 20 w 865
the 25 w 868
same 2 w 872
degree 3 w 878
of 9 w 880
relationship 3 w 892
as 5 w 894
the 26 w 897
child 5 w 902
and 7 w 905
the 27 w 908
sons 2 w 912
of 10 w 914
Stratius 2 w 922
and 8 w 926
the 28 w 929
legal 1 w 934
representatives 1 w 949
of 11 w 951
Hagnias 1 w 958
s 49 w 960
mother 1 w 966
were 3 w 971
disposed 1 w 979
to 8 w 981
contest 1 w 988
my 4 w 990
claim 2 w 995
They 1 w 1000
found 1 w 1005
it 8 w 1007
so 4 w 1009
difficult 1 w 1018
to 9 w 1020
know 2 w 1024
what 2 w 1028
to 10 w 1030
say 1 w 1033
in 21 w 1035
their 1 w 1040
written 1 w 1047
counter-claim 1 w 1060
about 1 w 1065
the 31 w 1068
degree 4 w 1074
of 12 w 1076
relationship 4 w 1088
that 6 w 1093
the 32 w 1096
woman 1 w 1101
who 5 w 1104
was 1 w 1107
in 22 w 1109
possession 1 w 1119
of 13 w 1121
the 33 w 1124
estate 1 w 1130
and 9 w 1133
those 2 w 1138
who 6 w 1141
were 4 w 1145
seeking 1 w 1152
to 11 w 1154
explain 1 w 1161
her 8 w 1164
kinship 1 w 1171
when 2 w 1176
they 3 w 1180
lied 1 w 1184
were 5 w 1189
easily 1 w 1195
convicted 1 w 1204
by 1 w 1206
me 8 w 1208
of 14 w 1210
daring 1 w 1216
to 12 w 1218
put 1 w 1221
in 27 w 1223
writing 1 w 1230
what 3 w 1234
was 2 w 1237
not 4 w 1240
true 1 w 1244
and 10 w 1248
those 3 w 1253
who 7 w 1256
were 6 w 1260
supporting 1 w 1270
Hagnias 2 w 1277
s 70 w 1279
mother 2 w 1285
who 8 w 1289
stands 2 w 1295
in 30 w 1297
the 36 w 1300
same 3 w 1304
degree 5 w 1310
of 15 w 1312
relationship 5 w 1324
as 11 w 1326
I 9 w 1327
do 2 w 1329
being 1 w 1335
sister 1 w 1341
of 16 w 1343
Stratius 3 w 1351
but 3 w 1355
who 9 w 1358
is 10 w 1360
excluded 1 w 1368
by 2 w 1370
the 37 w 1373
law 1 w 1376
which 1 w 1381
ordains 1 w 1388
that 7 w 1392
the 38 w 1395
males 1 w 1400
shall 1 w 1405
have 4 w 1409
the 39 w 1412
preference 1 w 1422
omitted 1 w 1430
all 3 w 1433
reference 2 w 1442
to 13 w 1444
this 4 w 1448
point 2 w 1453
and 12 w 1457
thinking 1 w 1466
to 14 w 1468
gain 2 w 1472
an 19 w 1474
advantage 1 w 1483
over 1 w 1487
me 10 w 1489
described 1 w 1499
her 10 w 1502
as 12 w 1504
the 40 w 1507
mother 3 w 1513
of 17 w 1515
the 42 w 1518
deceased 1 w 1526
the 43 w 1530
nearest 1 w 1537
possible 1 w 1545
relationship 6 w 1557
by 3 w 1559
blood 1 w 1564
but 4 w 1568
admittedly 1 w 1578
conferring 1 w 1588
no 11 w 1590
rights 1 w 1596
as 14 w 1598
next-of-kin 1 w 1609
Having 1 w 1616
thus 1 w 1620
described 2 w 1629
myself 1 w 1635
as 15 w 1637
the 44 w 1640
son 4 w 1643
of 19 w 1645
a 118 w 1646
cousin 1 w 1652
and 13 w 1655
having 1 w 1661
proved 1 w 1667
that 8 w 1671
these 2 w 1676
women 1 w 1681
were 7 w 1685
not 5 w 1688
within 1 w 1694
the 46 w 1697
requisite 2 w 1706
degree 6 w 1712
of 20 w 1714
kinship 2 w 1721
I 10 w 1723
thus 2 w 1727
had 4 w 1730
the 47 w 1733
estate 2 w 1739
adjudicated 1 w 1750
to 15 w 1752
me 12 w 1754
by 4 w 1756
you 4 w 1759
and 14 w 1763
her 12 w 1766
former 1 w 1772
success 1 w 1779
against 2 w 1786
those 4 w 1791
who 10 w 1794
claimed 1 w 1801
on 23 w 1803
the 48 w 1806
basis 1 w 1811
of 21 w 1813
the 49 w 1816
will 2 w 1820
was 3 w 1823
of 22 w 1825
no 13 w 1827
avail 1 w 1832
to 16 w 1834
the 50 w 1837
woman 2 w 1842
who 11 w 1845
was 4 w 1848
in 45 w 1850
possession 2 w 1860
of 23 w 1862
the 51 w 1865
inheritance 3 w 1876
nor 2 w 1880
did 3 w 1883
it 16 w 1885
avail 2 w 1890
the 52 w 1893
other 5 w 1898
woman 3 w 1903
that 9 w 1907
she 1 w 1910
was 5 w 1913
mother 4 w 1919
of 24 w 1921
the 55 w 1924
deceased 2 w 1932
who 12 w 1935
left 1 w 1939
the 56 w 1942
estate 3 w 1948
but 5 w 1952
those 5 w 1957
who 13 w 1960
were 8 w 1964
trying 1 w 1970
the 57 w 1973
case 1 w 1977
attached 1 w 1985
so 6 w 1987
much 1 w 1991
importance 1 w 2001
to 17 w 2003
justice 1 w 2010
and 15 w 2013
their 2 w 2018
oaths 1 w 2023
that 10 w 2027
they 4 w 2031
gave 1 w 2035
their 3 w 2040
verdict 1 w 2047
in 48 w 2049
favor 1 w 2054
of 25 w 2056
me 15 w 2058
whose 1 w 2064
claim 5 w 2069
was 6 w 2072
in 49 w 2074
conformity 1 w 2084
with 2 w 2088
the 61 w 2091
law 2 w 2094
Yet 1 w 2098
since 1 w 2103
I 11 w 2104
thus 3 w 2108
triumphed 1 w 2117
over 2 w 2121
these 3 w 2126
women 2 w 2131
by 5 w 2133
proving 1 w 2140
that 11 w 2144
they 5 w 2148
were 9 w 2152
not 6 w 2155
within 2 w 2161
the 64 w 2164
requisite 3 w 2173
degree 7 w 2179
of 26 w 2181
kinship 3 w 2188
to 18 w 2190
Hagnias 3 w 2197
and 16 w 2201
since 2 w 2206
my 6 w 2208
present 2 w 2215
opponent 3 w 2223
did 4 w 2226
not 7 w 2229
venture 1 w 2236
to 19 w 2238
go 1 w 2240
to 20 w 2242
law 3 w 2245
with 4 w 2249
me 17 w 2251
claiming 2 w 2260
half 3 w 2264
the 65 w 2267
estate 4 w 2273
for 6 w 2276
the 66 w 2279
child 6 w 2284
and 17 w 2288
since 3 w 2293
the 67 w 2296
sons 3 w 2300
of 27 w 2302
Stratius 4 w 2310
who 15 w 2314
stand 5 w 2319
in 57 w 2321
the 68 w 2324
same 4 w 2328
degree 8 w 2334
of 28 w 2336
kinship 4 w 2343
as 24 w 2345
this 5 w 2349
child 7 w 2354
do 3 w 2357
not 8 w 2360
even 1 w 2364
now 5 w 2367
think 6 w 2372
of 29 w 2374
bringing 2 w 2382
a 169 w 2383
suit 1 w 2387
against 3 w 2394
me 19 w 2396
for 7 w 2399
the 69 w 2402
estate 5 w 2408
and 19 w 2412
since 4 w 2417
I 12 w 2418
am 7 w 2420
in 64 w 2422
possession 3 w 2432
of 30 w 2434
the 70 w 2437
estate 6 w 2443
by 6 w 2445
your 1 w 2449
adjudication 2 w 2461
and 20 w 2465
since 5 w 2470
I 13 w 2471
can 1 w 2474
prove 2 w 2479
that 12 w 2483
my 7 w 2485
opponent 4 w 2493
even 2 w 2497
at 40 w 2499
the 71 w 2502
present 3 w 2509
time 1 w 2513
cannot 1 w 2519
state 7 w 2524
what 4 w 2528
relationship 7 w 2540
the 72 w 2543
child 8 w 2548
possesses 1 w 2557
which 2 w 2562
confers 1 w 2569
rights 2 w 2575
as 25 w 2577
next-of-kin 2 w 2588
to 21 w 2590
Hagnias 4 w 2597
what 5 w 2602
further 1 w 2609
information 1 w 2620
do 4 w 2622
you 6 w 2625
require 1 w 2632
and 21 w 2636
what 6 w 2640
more 2 w 2644
do 5 w 2646
you 7 w 2649
wish 1 w 2653
to 22 w 2655
hear 2 w 2659
on 34 w 2661
the 74 w 2664
subject 1 w 2671
Since 1 w 2677
I 14 w 2678
regard 1 w 2684
you 8 w 2687
as 27 w 2689
men 5 w 2692
of 32 w 2694
good 1 w 2698
sense 1 w 2703
I 15 w 2705
think 7 w 2710
that 13 w 2714
what 7 w 2718
I 16 w 2719
have 5 w 2723
said 3 w 2727
is 17 w 2729
sufficient 1 w 2739