Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate of Ciron

On The Estate of Ciron (20-24)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg008.perseus-eng2:20-24
Refs {'start': {'reference': '20', 'human_reference': 'Section 20'}, 'end': {'reference': '24', 'human_reference': 'Section 24'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Yet do not for a moment suppose, that, if our mother had been such as our opponents allege, our father would have either given a wedding-feast or provided a marriage-banquet and not rather hushed up the whole matter; or that the wives of the other demesmen would have chosen her to celebrate the festival with the wife of Diocles and given the sacred objects into her hands and not rather entrusted this office to some other woman; or that the wardsmen would have admitted us and not rather objected and justified their objection, if it had not been universally admitted that our mother was a legitimate daughter of Ciron. As it was, owing to the notoriety of the fact and its recognition by so many persons, no such question was raised from any quarter. Now call the witnesses to prove the truth of these statements.

Witnesses

Furthermore, gentlemen, the conduct of Diocles on the occasion of our grandfather's death clearly shows that we were acknowledged as the grandchildren of Ciron. I presented myself, accompanied by one of my relatives, a cousin of my father, to convey away the body with the intention of conducting the funeral from my own house. I did not find Diocles in the house, and I entered and was prepared to remove the body, having bearers with me for this purpose.

When, however, my grandfather's widow requested that the funeral should take place from that house, and declared that she would like herself to help us to lay out and deck the corpse, and entreated me and wept, I acceded to her request and went to my opponent and told him in the presence of witnesses that I would conduct the funeral from the house of the deceased, since Diocles' sister had begged me to do so.

Diocles, on hearing this, made no objection, but asserting that he had actually bought some of the requisites for the funeral and had himself paid a deposit for the rest, demanded that I should pay him for these, and arranged to recover from me the cost of the objects which he had purchased and to produce those who had received the deposit for the objects for which he alleged that he had paid a deposit. Immediately afterwards he casually remarked that Ciron had left nothing at all, although I had not said a single word about his money.

Yet had I not been Ciron's grandson, he would never have made these arrangements with me, but would rather have said, Who are you? What right have you to carry out the burial? I do not know you: you shall not set foot in the house.” This is what he ought to have said, and what he has now instigated others to say. As it was, he said nothing of the kind, but only told me to bring the money next morning. And to prove the truth of these statements, please summon the witnesses.

Yet 1 w 3
do 1 w 5
not 1 w 8
for 1 w 11
a 1 w 12
moment 1 w 18
suppose 1 w 25
that 1 w 30
if 1 w 33
our 1 w 36
mother 1 w 42
had 1 w 45
been 1 w 49
such 1 w 53
as 1 w 55
our 2 w 58
opponents 1 w 67
allege 1 w 73
our 3 w 77
father 1 w 83
would 1 w 88
have 1 w 92
either 1 w 98
given 1 w 103
a 8 w 104
wedding-feast 1 w 117
or 2 w 119
provided 1 w 127
a 10 w 128
marriage-banquet 1 w 144
and 1 w 147
not 2 w 150
rather 1 w 156
hushed 1 w 162
up 2 w 164
the 5 w 167
whole 1 w 172
matter 1 w 178
or 3 w 181
that 2 w 185
the 6 w 188
wives 1 w 193
of 1 w 195
the 7 w 198
other 2 w 203
demesmen 1 w 211
would 2 w 216
have 2 w 220
chosen 1 w 226
her 6 w 229
to 1 w 231
celebrate 1 w 240
the 9 w 243
festival 1 w 251
with 1 w 255
the 10 w 258
wife 1 w 262
of 2 w 264
Diocles 1 w 271
and 2 w 274
given 2 w 279
the 11 w 282
sacred 1 w 288
objects 1 w 295
into 1 w 299
her 7 w 302
hands 1 w 307
and 4 w 310
not 3 w 313
rather 2 w 319
entrusted 1 w 328
this 1 w 332
office 1 w 338
to 3 w 340
some 1 w 344
other 3 w 349
woman 1 w 354
or 4 w 357
that 3 w 361
the 14 w 364
wardsmen 1 w 372
would 3 w 377
have 3 w 381
admitted 1 w 389
us 3 w 391
and 5 w 394
not 4 w 397
rather 3 w 403
objected 1 w 411
and 6 w 414
justified 1 w 423
their 1 w 428
objection 1 w 437
if 4 w 440
it 4 w 442
had 2 w 445
not 5 w 448
been 2 w 452
universally 1 w 463
admitted 2 w 471
that 4 w 475
our 4 w 478
mother 2 w 484
was 1 w 487
a 39 w 488
legitimate 1 w 498
daughter 1 w 506
of 4 w 508
Ciron 1 w 513
As 1 w 516
it 7 w 518
was 2 w 521
owing 1 w 527
to 4 w 529
the 18 w 532
notoriety 1 w 541
of 5 w 543
the 19 w 546
fact 1 w 550
and 7 w 553
its 1 w 556
recognition 1 w 567
by 1 w 569
so 2 w 571
many 1 w 575
persons 1 w 582
no 7 w 585
such 2 w 589
question 1 w 597
was 3 w 600
raised 1 w 606
from 1 w 610
any 2 w 613
quarter 1 w 620
Now 1 w 624
call 1 w 628
the 20 w 631
witnesses 1 w 640
to 6 w 642
prove 1 w 647
the 21 w 650
truth 1 w 655
of 6 w 657
these 1 w 662
statements 1 w 672
Witnesses 1 w 682
Furthermore 1 w 693
gentlemen 1 w 703
the 24 w 707
conduct 1 w 714
of 7 w 716
Diocles 2 w 723
on 8 w 725
the 25 w 728
occasion 1 w 736
of 8 w 738
our 5 w 741
grandfather 1 w 752
s 45 w 754
death 1 w 759
clearly 1 w 766
shows 1 w 771
that 5 w 775
we 2 w 777
were 1 w 781
acknowledged 1 w 793
as 7 w 795
the 27 w 798
grandchildren 1 w 811
of 9 w 813
Ciron 2 w 818
I 1 w 820
presented 1 w 829
myself 1 w 835
accompanied 1 w 847
by 2 w 849
one 2 w 852
of 10 w 854
my 2 w 856
relatives 1 w 865
a 64 w 867
cousin 1 w 873
of 11 w 875
my 3 w 877
father 3 w 883
to 7 w 886
convey 1 w 892
away 1 w 896
the 29 w 899
body 1 w 903
with 2 w 907
the 30 w 910
intention 1 w 919
of 12 w 921
conducting 1 w 931
the 31 w 934
funeral 1 w 941
from 2 w 945
my 4 w 947
own 1 w 950
house 1 w 955
I 2 w 957
did 1 w 960
not 7 w 963
find 1 w 967
Diocles 3 w 974
in 8 w 976
the 32 w 979
house 2 w 984
and 10 w 988
I 3 w 989
entered 1 w 996
and 11 w 999
was 4 w 1002
prepared 1 w 1010
to 8 w 1012
remove 1 w 1018
the 33 w 1021
body 2 w 1025
having 1 w 1032
bearers 1 w 1039
with 3 w 1043
me 8 w 1045
for 2 w 1048
this 2 w 1052
purpose 1 w 1059
When 1 w 1064
however 1 w 1072
my 5 w 1075
grandfather 2 w 1086
s 60 w 1088
widow 1 w 1093
requested 1 w 1102
that 6 w 1106
the 35 w 1109
funeral 2 w 1116
should 1 w 1122
take 1 w 1126
place 1 w 1131
from 3 w 1135
that 7 w 1139
house 3 w 1144
and 13 w 1148
declared 1 w 1156
that 8 w 1160
she 2 w 1163
would 4 w 1168
like 1 w 1172
herself 1 w 1179
to 9 w 1181
help 1 w 1185
us 9 w 1187
to 10 w 1189
lay 1 w 1192
out 1 w 1195
and 14 w 1198
deck 1 w 1202
the 36 w 1205
corpse 1 w 1211
and 15 w 1215
entreated 1 w 1224
me 9 w 1226
and 16 w 1229
wept 1 w 1233
I 4 w 1235
acceded 1 w 1242
to 11 w 1244
her 17 w 1247
request 2 w 1254
and 17 w 1257
went 1 w 1261
to 12 w 1263
my 6 w 1265
opponent 2 w 1273
and 18 w 1276
told 1 w 1280
him 1 w 1283
in 10 w 1285
the 37 w 1288
presence 1 w 1296
of 13 w 1298
witnesses 2 w 1307
that 9 w 1311
I 5 w 1312
would 5 w 1317
conduct 3 w 1324
the 38 w 1327
funeral 3 w 1334
from 4 w 1338
the 39 w 1341
house 4 w 1346
of 14 w 1348
the 40 w 1351
deceased 1 w 1359
since 1 w 1365
Diocles 4 w 1372
sister 1 w 1379
had 3 w 1382
begged 1 w 1388
me 10 w 1390
to 14 w 1392
do 3 w 1394
so 4 w 1396
Diocles 5 w 1404
on 17 w 1407
hearing 1 w 1414
this 3 w 1418
made 1 w 1423
no 10 w 1425
objection 2 w 1434
but 1 w 1438
asserting 1 w 1447
that 10 w 1451
he 50 w 1453
had 4 w 1456
actually 1 w 1464
bought 1 w 1470
some 2 w 1474
of 15 w 1476
the 41 w 1479
requisites 1 w 1489
for 3 w 1492
the 42 w 1495
funeral 4 w 1502
and 19 w 1505
had 5 w 1508
himself 1 w 1515
paid 1 w 1519
a 108 w 1520
deposit 1 w 1527
for 4 w 1530
the 43 w 1533
rest 1 w 1537
demanded 1 w 1546
that 11 w 1550
I 6 w 1551
should 2 w 1557
pay 1 w 1560
him 3 w 1563
for 5 w 1566
these 2 w 1571
and 21 w 1575
arranged 1 w 1583
to 15 w 1585
recover 1 w 1592
from 5 w 1596
me 12 w 1598
the 45 w 1601
cost 1 w 1605
of 16 w 1607
the 46 w 1610
objects 2 w 1617
which 1 w 1622
he 57 w 1624
had 6 w 1627
purchased 1 w 1636
and 22 w 1639
to 16 w 1641
produce 1 w 1648
those 1 w 1653
who 2 w 1656
had 7 w 1659
received 1 w 1667
the 47 w 1670
deposit 2 w 1677
for 6 w 1680
the 48 w 1683
objects 3 w 1690
for 7 w 1693
which 2 w 1698
he 60 w 1700
alleged 1 w 1707
that 12 w 1711
he 61 w 1713
had 8 w 1716
paid 2 w 1720
a 123 w 1721
deposit 3 w 1728
Immediately 1 w 1740
afterwards 1 w 1750
he 62 w 1752
casually 1 w 1760
remarked 1 w 1768
that 13 w 1772
Ciron 3 w 1777
had 9 w 1780
left 1 w 1784
nothing 1 w 1791
at 29 w 1793
all 7 w 1796
although 1 w 1805
I 8 w 1806
had 10 w 1809
not 9 w 1812
said 1 w 1816
a 137 w 1817
single 1 w 1823
word 1 w 1827
about 1 w 1832
his 4 w 1835
money 1 w 1840
Yet 2 w 1844
had 11 w 1847
I 9 w 1848
not 10 w 1851
been 3 w 1855
Ciron 4 w 1860
s 104 w 1862
grandson 1 w 1870
he 63 w 1873
would 6 w 1878
never 1 w 1883
have 4 w 1887
made 2 w 1891
these 3 w 1896
arrangements 1 w 1908
with 4 w 1912
me 15 w 1914
but 2 w 1918
would 7 w 1923
rather 4 w 1929
have 5 w 1933
said 2 w 1937
Who 1 w 1942
are 4 w 1945
you 1 w 1948
What 1 w 1953
right 1 w 1958
have 6 w 1962
you 2 w 1965
to 17 w 1967
carry 1 w 1972
out 3 w 1975
the 51 w 1978
burial 1 w 1984
I 10 w 1986
do 4 w 1988
not 11 w 1991
know 2 w 1995
you 3 w 1998
you 4 w 2002
shall 1 w 2007
not 12 w 2010
set 1 w 2013
foot 1 w 2017
in 16 w 2019
the 52 w 2022
house 5 w 2027
This 1 w 2033
is 9 w 2035
what 1 w 2039
he 68 w 2041
ought 2 w 2046
to 18 w 2048
have 7 w 2052
said 3 w 2056
and 24 w 2060
what 2 w 2064
he 69 w 2066
has 2 w 2069
now 3 w 2072
instigated 1 w 2082
others 1 w 2088
to 19 w 2090
say 1 w 2093
As 2 w 2096
it 20 w 2098
was 5 w 2101
he 71 w 2104
said 4 w 2108
nothing 2 w 2115
of 17 w 2117
the 54 w 2120
kind 1 w 2124
but 3 w 2128
only 1 w 2132
told 2 w 2136
me 16 w 2138
to 21 w 2140
bring 1 w 2145
the 55 w 2148
money 2 w 2153
next 1 w 2157
morning 1 w 2164
And 1 w 2168
to 22 w 2170
prove 2 w 2175
the 56 w 2178
truth 2 w 2183
of 18 w 2185
these 4 w 2190
statements 2 w 2200
please 1 w 2207
summon 1 w 2213
the 58 w 2216
witnesses 3 w 2225