Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On the Estate of Nicostratus

On the Estate of Nicostratus (20-24)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg004.perseus-eng2:20-24
Refs {'start': {'reference': '20', 'human_reference': 'Section 20'}, 'end': {'reference': '24', 'human_reference': 'Section 24'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Shall I be told that, after having performed none of these duties, he administered Nicostratus's property?[*] Evidence of these facts, too, has been given you, and even he himself does not deny most of them. Makeshift excuses have, of course, been found to explain all his acts; for what other resource remains to one who expressly admits the facts?

You must now be well aware, gentlemen, that these persons have no legal right to the property of Nicostratus, but wish to deceive you and to deprive my clients, who are his kinsmen, of an inheritance which lawfully belongs to them. Chariades is not the only person who has acted thus; many other claimants to the property of men who have died abroad have arisen, sometimes even without having been acquainted with them.

For they consider that, if they are successful, it will be possible for them to enjoy the property of others, while, if they fail, the risk is inconsiderable; there are always men who are willing to perjure themselves, and the attempted refutations of their evidence are dealing with the unknown. In a word, there is a vast difference between claiming by right of kinship and claiming under a will. But your duty, gentlemen, is first of all to examine the will and decide whether you think that it is genuine; for this is what the laws enjoin and is the justest course.

But since you have no certain personal knowledge of the truth, and since the witnesses to the will were friends not of the deceased but of Chariades, who wishes to seize property which does not belong to him, what could be juster than by your verdict to award the property of a kinsmen to his kinsmen? For, indeed, if anything had happened to my clients, their property would have passed to none other than Nicostratus; for he would have claimed it by the same right of kinship, being their first cousin, the son of their father's own brother.

But, by Heaven, I am forgetting; Hagnon and Hagnotheus are not kinsmen of Nicostratus according to the allegation of our adversaries, but his kinsmen are quite different people. Are these kinsmen then bearing witness in favor of the claimant under the will rather than themselves contesting the property by right of kinship? Surely they are not so insane as to believe so easily in the will and renounce their claim to so much money! Nay, to judge from what these men themselves say, it is to the advantage of these supposed kinsmen themselves that my clients, rather than Chariades, should have the estate of Nicostratus adjudicated to them.

Shall 1 w 5
I 1 w 6
be 1 w 8
told 1 w 12
that 1 w 16
after 1 w 22
having 1 w 28
performed 1 w 37
none 1 w 41
of 1 w 43
these 1 w 48
duties 1 w 54
he 2 w 57
administered 1 w 69
Nicostratus 1 w 80
s 6 w 82
property 1 w 90
This 1 w 95
sentence 1 w 103
is 3 w 105
apparently 1 w 115
parenthetic 1 w 126
and 1 w 129
ironical 1 w 137
There 1 w 143
is 4 w 145
a 12 w 146
further 1 w 153
reference 1 w 162
in 3 w 164
Isaeus 1 w 170
4 1 w 171
26 1 w 174
to 2 w 176
certain 1 w 183
business 1 w 191
relations 1 w 200
between 1 w 207
Nicostratus 2 w 218
and 2 w 221
Chariades 1 w 230
Evidence 1 w 239
of 2 w 241
these 2 w 246
facts 1 w 251
too 1 w 255
has 1 w 259
been 1 w 263
given 1 w 268
you 1 w 271
and 3 w 275
even 1 w 279
he 7 w 281
himself 1 w 288
does 1 w 292
not 1 w 295
deny 1 w 299
most 1 w 303
of 3 w 305
them 1 w 309
Makeshift 1 w 319
excuses 1 w 326
have 1 w 330
of 4 w 333
course 1 w 339
been 2 w 344
found 1 w 349
to 4 w 351
explain 1 w 358
all 2 w 361
his 2 w 364
acts 2 w 368
for 2 w 372
what 1 w 376
other 1 w 381
resource 1 w 389
remains 1 w 396
to 5 w 398
one 2 w 401
who 1 w 404
expressly 1 w 413
admits 1 w 419
the 7 w 422
facts 2 w 427
You 1 w 431
must 1 w 435
now 1 w 438
be 5 w 440
well 1 w 444
aware 1 w 449
gentlemen 1 w 459
that 2 w 464
these 3 w 469
persons 1 w 476
have 2 w 480
no 4 w 482
legal 1 w 487
right 1 w 492
to 6 w 494
the 9 w 497
property 2 w 505
of 5 w 507
Nicostratus 3 w 518
but 1 w 522
wish 1 w 526
to 7 w 528
deceive 1 w 535
you 2 w 538
and 4 w 541
to 8 w 543
deprive 1 w 550
my 1 w 552
clients 1 w 559
who 2 w 563
are 4 w 566
his 3 w 569
kinsmen 1 w 576
of 6 w 579
an 5 w 581
inheritance 1 w 592
which 1 w 597
lawfully 1 w 605
belongs 1 w 612
to 9 w 614
them 2 w 618
Chariades 2 w 628
is 8 w 630
not 2 w 633
the 11 w 636
only 1 w 640
person 2 w 646
who 3 w 649
has 2 w 652
acted 1 w 657
thus 1 w 661
many 1 w 666
other 2 w 671
claimants 1 w 680
to 10 w 682
the 13 w 685
property 3 w 693
of 7 w 695
men 3 w 698
who 4 w 701
have 3 w 705
died 1 w 709
abroad 1 w 715
have 4 w 719
arisen 1 w 725
sometimes 1 w 735
even 2 w 739
without 1 w 746
having 2 w 752
been 3 w 756
acquainted 1 w 766
with 2 w 770
them 3 w 774
For 1 w 778
they 1 w 782
consider 1 w 790
that 3 w 794
if 2 w 797
they 2 w 801
are 5 w 804
successful 1 w 814
it 5 w 817
will 1 w 821
be 8 w 823
possible 1 w 831
for 3 w 834
them 4 w 838
to 11 w 840
enjoy 1 w 845
the 18 w 848
property 4 w 856
of 8 w 858
others 1 w 864
while 1 w 870
if 3 w 873
they 3 w 877
fail 1 w 881
the 21 w 885
risk 1 w 889
is 11 w 891
inconsiderable 1 w 905
there 1 w 911
are 6 w 914
always 1 w 920
men 4 w 923
who 5 w 926
are 7 w 929
willing 1 w 936
to 12 w 938
perjure 1 w 945
themselves 1 w 955
and 5 w 959
the 24 w 962
attempted 1 w 971
refutations 1 w 982
of 9 w 984
their 1 w 989
evidence 1 w 997
are 8 w 1000
dealing 1 w 1007
with 3 w 1011
the 26 w 1014
unknown 1 w 1021
In 1 w 1024
a 71 w 1025
word 1 w 1029
there 2 w 1035
is 12 w 1037
a 72 w 1038
vast 1 w 1042
difference 1 w 1052
between 2 w 1059
claiming 1 w 1067
by 1 w 1069
right 2 w 1074
of 10 w 1076
kinship 1 w 1083
and 6 w 1086
claiming 2 w 1094
under 1 w 1099
a 77 w 1100
will 3 w 1104
But 1 w 1108
your 1 w 1112
duty 1 w 1116
gentlemen 2 w 1126
is 13 w 1129
first 1 w 1134
of 11 w 1136
all 3 w 1139
to 13 w 1141
examine 1 w 1148
the 28 w 1151
will 4 w 1155
and 7 w 1158
decide 1 w 1164
whether 1 w 1171
you 4 w 1174
think 1 w 1179
that 4 w 1183
it 7 w 1185
is 14 w 1187
genuine 1 w 1194
for 4 w 1198
this 1 w 1202
is 16 w 1204
what 2 w 1208
the 30 w 1211
laws 1 w 1215
enjoin 1 w 1221
and 8 w 1224
is 17 w 1226
the 31 w 1229
justest 1 w 1236
course 2 w 1242
But 2 w 1246
since 1 w 1251
you 5 w 1254
have 5 w 1258
no 7 w 1260
certain 2 w 1267
personal 1 w 1275
knowledge 1 w 1284
of 12 w 1286
the 32 w 1289
truth 1 w 1294
and 9 w 1298
since 2 w 1303
the 33 w 1306
witnesses 1 w 1315
to 14 w 1317
the 34 w 1320
will 5 w 1324
were 1 w 1328
friends 1 w 1335
not 3 w 1338
of 13 w 1340
the 35 w 1343
deceased 1 w 1351
but 2 w 1354
of 14 w 1356
Chariades 3 w 1365
who 6 w 1369
wishes 1 w 1375
to 15 w 1377
seize 1 w 1382
property 5 w 1390
which 2 w 1395
does 2 w 1399
not 4 w 1402
belong 2 w 1408
to 16 w 1410
him 2 w 1413
what 3 w 1418
could 1 w 1423
be 11 w 1425
juster 1 w 1431
than 1 w 1435
by 2 w 1437
your 2 w 1441
verdict 1 w 1448
to 17 w 1450
award 1 w 1455
the 36 w 1458
property 6 w 1466
of 15 w 1468
a 96 w 1469
kinsmen 2 w 1476
to 18 w 1478
his 5 w 1481
kinsmen 3 w 1488
For 2 w 1492
indeed 1 w 1499
if 5 w 1502
anything 1 w 1510
had 1 w 1513
happened 1 w 1521
to 19 w 1523
my 2 w 1525
clients 2 w 1532
their 2 w 1538
property 7 w 1546
would 1 w 1551
have 6 w 1555
passed 1 w 1561
to 20 w 1563
none 2 w 1567
other 4 w 1572
than 2 w 1576
Nicostratus 4 w 1587
for 5 w 1591
he 45 w 1593
would 2 w 1598
have 7 w 1602
claimed 1 w 1609
it 9 w 1611
by 3 w 1613
the 39 w 1616
same 1 w 1620
right 3 w 1625
of 16 w 1627
kinship 2 w 1634
being 1 w 1640
their 3 w 1645
first 2 w 1650
cousin 1 w 1656
the 41 w 1660
son 4 w 1663
of 17 w 1665
their 4 w 1670
father 1 w 1676
s 112 w 1678
own 2 w 1681
brother 1 w 1688
But 3 w 1692
by 4 w 1695
Heaven 1 w 1701
I 4 w 1703
am 3 w 1705
forgetting 1 w 1715
Hagnon 1 w 1722
and 10 w 1725
Hagnotheus 1 w 1735
are 9 w 1738
not 6 w 1741
kinsmen 4 w 1748
of 18 w 1750
Nicostratus 5 w 1761
according 1 w 1770
to 21 w 1772
the 46 w 1775
allegation 1 w 1785
of 19 w 1787
our 6 w 1790
adversaries 1 w 1801
but 3 w 1805
his 6 w 1808
kinsmen 5 w 1815
are 10 w 1818
quite 1 w 1823
different 1 w 1832
people 1 w 1838
Are 1 w 1842
these 4 w 1847
kinsmen 6 w 1854
then 1 w 1858
bearing 1 w 1865
witness 2 w 1872
in 38 w 1874
favor 1 w 1879
of 20 w 1881
the 49 w 1884
claimant 2 w 1892
under 2 w 1897
the 50 w 1900
will 6 w 1904
rather 1 w 1910
than 3 w 1914
themselves 2 w 1924
contesting 1 w 1934
the 53 w 1937
property 8 w 1945
by 5 w 1947
right 4 w 1952
of 21 w 1954
kinship 3 w 1961
Surely 1 w 1968
they 4 w 1972
are 11 w 1975
not 7 w 1978
so 7 w 1980
insane 1 w 1986
as 6 w 1988
to 22 w 1990
believe 1 w 1997
so 8 w 1999
easily 1 w 2005
in 42 w 2007
the 55 w 2010
will 7 w 2014
and 11 w 2017
renounce 1 w 2025
their 5 w 2030
claim 6 w 2035
to 23 w 2037
so 9 w 2039
much 1 w 2043
money 1 w 2048
Nay 1 w 2052
to 24 w 2055
judge 1 w 2060
from 1 w 2064
what 4 w 2068
these 5 w 2073
men 11 w 2076
themselves 3 w 2086
say 1 w 2089
it 12 w 2092
is 21 w 2094
to 25 w 2096
the 59 w 2099
advantage 1 w 2108
of 22 w 2110
these 6 w 2115
supposed 1 w 2123
kinsmen 7 w 2130
themselves 4 w 2140
that 5 w 2144
my 3 w 2146
clients 3 w 2153
rather 2 w 2160
than 4 w 2164
Chariades 4 w 2173
should 1 w 2180
have 8 w 2184
the 63 w 2187
estate 1 w 2193
of 23 w 2195
Nicostratus 6 w 2206
adjudicated 1 w 2217
to 26 w 2219
them 9 w 2223