Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On the Estate of Nicostratus

On the Estate of Nicostratus (2-3)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg004.perseus-eng2:2-3
Refs {'start': {'reference': '2', 'human_reference': 'Section 2'}, 'end': {'reference': '3', 'human_reference': 'Section 3'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain text • XML
next

In the first place, gentlemen, it is proper that you should consider the different names attributed to the deceased and determine which of the two parties has laid his claim in the more straightforward and natural manner. Hagnon here and Hagnotheus described Nicostratus in their claim as the son of Thrasymachus and declare that they are his first cousins and prove these statements by witnesses.

Chariades and his supporters, on the other hand, assert that Nicostratus was the son of Smicrus and yet claim the estate of the son of Thrasymachus. My clients make no pretence that they know anything of the name of Smicrus or that it has anything to do with them; they declare that Nicostratus was the son of Thrasymachus, and it is likewise his estate which they claim.

Tokens

In 1 w 2
the 1 w 5
first 1 w 10
place 1 w 15
gentlemen 1 w 25
it 1 w 28
is 1 w 30
proper 1 w 36
that 1 w 40
you 1 w 43
should 1 w 49
consider 1 w 57
the 2 w 60
different 1 w 69
names 1 w 74
attributed 1 w 84
to 1 w 86
the 3 w 89
deceased 1 w 97
and 1 w 100
determine 1 w 109
which 1 w 114
of 1 w 116
the 4 w 119
two 1 w 122
parties 1 w 129
has 1 w 132
laid 1 w 136
his 1 w 139
claim 1 w 144
in 2 w 146
the 5 w 149
more 1 w 153
straightforward 1 w 168
and 2 w 171
natural 1 w 178
manner 1 w 184
Hagnon 1 w 191
here 1 w 195
and 3 w 198
Hagnotheus 1 w 208
described 1 w 217
Nicostratus 1 w 228
in 3 w 230
their 1 w 235
claim 2 w 240
as 3 w 242
the 8 w 245
son 1 w 248
of 2 w 250
Thrasymachus 1 w 262
and 4 w 265
declare 1 w 272
that 2 w 276
they 1 w 280
are 2 w 283
his 2 w 286
first 2 w 291
cousins 1 w 298
and 5 w 301
prove 1 w 306
these 1 w 311
statements 1 w 321
by 1 w 323
witnesses 1 w 332
Chariades 1 w 342
and 6 w 345
his 3 w 348
supporters 1 w 358
on 4 w 361
the 11 w 364
other 1 w 369
hand 1 w 373
assert 1 w 380
that 3 w 384
Nicostratus 2 w 395
was 1 w 398
the 13 w 401
son 2 w 404
of 3 w 406
Smicrus 1 w 413
and 8 w 416
yet 1 w 419
claim 3 w 424
the 14 w 427
estate 1 w 433
of 4 w 435
the 15 w 438
son 3 w 441
of 5 w 443
Thrasymachus 2 w 455
My 1 w 458
clients 1 w 465
make 1 w 469
no 3 w 471
pretence 1 w 479
that 4 w 483
they 2 w 487
know 1 w 491
anything 1 w 499
of 6 w 501
the 17 w 504
name 2 w 508
of 7 w 510
Smicrus 2 w 517
or 4 w 519
that 5 w 523
it 3 w 525
has 2 w 528
anything 2 w 536
to 2 w 538
do 1 w 540
with 1 w 544
them 1 w 548
they 3 w 553
declare 2 w 560
that 6 w 564
Nicostratus 3 w 575
was 2 w 578
the 20 w 581
son 4 w 584
of 8 w 586
Thrasymachus 3 w 598
and 9 w 602
it 5 w 604
is 5 w 606
likewise 1 w 614
his 4 w 617
estate 2 w 623
which 2 w 628
they 4 w 632
claim 4 w 637