Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate Of Pyrrhus

On The Estate Of Pyrrhus (70-74)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg003.perseus-eng2:70-74
Refs {'start': {'reference': '70', 'human_reference': 'Section 70'}, 'end': {'reference': '74', 'human_reference': 'Section 74'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Can you say, my good friends, that this point escaped your notice? Yet when Endius betrothed the woman and gave her in marriage, did you, his uncles, allow your own nephew's daughter to be betrothed as his daughter by a mistress, though you declare that you were present when your nephew took her mother to be his wife in due legal form, and further, that you took part by invitation in the celebrations on the tenth day after her child's birth?

Furthermoreand this is the worst part of your conductthough you declare that your nephew solemnly charged you to look after this girl, your mode of looking after her was to allow her to be married as the daughter of a mistress, although, as you testified, she bore the name of your own sister.

From all this, gentlemen, and from what actually happened, it is easy to see that these men attain the limit of human impudence. For why did our uncle, if he had a legitimate daughter who survived him, adopt and leave behind my brother as his son? Had he nearer relatives than us whom he wished, by adopting my brother, to exclude from the right of claiming his daughter? In the absence of legitimate sons of his own, he neither has nor ever had a single relative nearer than us; for he had no brother or brother's sons, and we were the children of his sister.

But, it may be urged, he might have adopted some other kinsman and given him the possession of his estate and his daughter. Yet what need had he openly to incur the enmity of any one of his relatives, when it was in his power, if he had really married the sister of Nicodemus, to introduce the child, who has been declared to be her offspring, to the members of his ward as his own legitimate child, and leave her sole heiress to all his estate and direct that one of her sons should be introduced as his adopted son?

For it is clear that, if he left her sole heiress, he would have been fully aware that one of two things was likely to happen to her: either one of us, the nearest relatives, would obtain an adjudication and take her as wife; or, if none of us wished to take her, one of these uncles who just now gave evidence, or, failing them, one of the other relatives, would, on the same principle, obtain an adjudication of her together with the whole estate and take her as his wife.

Tokens

Can 1 w 3
you 1 w 6
say 1 w 9
my 1 w 12
good 1 w 16
friends 1 w 23
that 1 w 28
this 1 w 32
point 1 w 37
escaped 1 w 44
your 1 w 48
notice 1 w 54
Yet 1 w 58
when 1 w 62
Endius 1 w 68
betrothed 1 w 77
the 2 w 80
woman 1 w 85
and 1 w 88
gave 1 w 92
her 1 w 95
in 2 w 97
marriage 1 w 105
did 1 w 109
you 3 w 112
his 2 w 116
uncles 1 w 122
allow 1 w 128
your 2 w 132
own 1 w 135
nephew 1 w 141
s 8 w 143
daughter 1 w 151
to 1 w 153
be 2 w 155
betrothed 2 w 164
as 1 w 166
his 3 w 169
daughter 2 w 177
by 1 w 179
a 14 w 180
mistress 1 w 188
though 1 w 195
you 5 w 198
declare 1 w 205
that 2 w 209
you 6 w 212
were 1 w 216
present 1 w 223
when 2 w 227
your 3 w 231
nephew 2 w 237
took 1 w 241
her 2 w 244
mother 1 w 250
to 3 w 252
be 4 w 254
his 4 w 257
wife 1 w 261
in 3 w 263
due 1 w 266
legal 1 w 271
form 1 w 275
and 2 w 279
further 1 w 286
that 3 w 291
you 8 w 294
took 2 w 298
part 1 w 302
by 2 w 304
invitation 1 w 314
in 5 w 316
the 6 w 319
celebrations 1 w 331
on 3 w 333
the 7 w 336
tenth 1 w 341
day 1 w 344
after 1 w 349
her 5 w 352
child 1 w 357
s 17 w 359
birth 1 w 364
Furthermore 1 w 376
and 3 w 380
this 2 w 384
is 7 w 386
the 9 w 389
worst 1 w 394
part 2 w 398
of 1 w 400
your 4 w 404
conduct 1 w 411
though 2 w 418
you 10 w 421
declare 2 w 428
that 4 w 432
your 5 w 436
nephew 3 w 442
solemnly 1 w 450
charged 1 w 457
you 12 w 460
to 5 w 462
look 1 w 466
after 2 w 471
this 3 w 475
girl 1 w 479
your 6 w 484
mode 1 w 488
of 2 w 490
looking 1 w 497
after 3 w 502
her 7 w 505
was 1 w 508
to 6 w 510
allow 2 w 515
her 8 w 518
to 7 w 520
be 5 w 522
married 1 w 529
as 3 w 531
the 10 w 534
daughter 3 w 542
of 3 w 544
a 37 w 545
mistress 2 w 553
although 1 w 562
as 4 w 565
you 14 w 568
testified 1 w 577
she 1 w 581
bore 1 w 585
the 11 w 588
name 1 w 592
of 4 w 594
your 7 w 598
own 2 w 601
sister 1 w 607
From 1 w 612
all 3 w 615
this 4 w 619
gentlemen 1 w 629
and 4 w 633
from 1 w 637
what 1 w 641
actually 1 w 649
happened 1 w 657
it 2 w 660
is 12 w 662
easy 1 w 666
to 8 w 668
see 1 w 671
that 5 w 675
these 1 w 680
men 2 w 683
attain 1 w 689
the 13 w 692
limit 1 w 697
of 5 w 699
human 1 w 704
impudence 1 w 713
For 1 w 717
why 1 w 720
did 2 w 723
our 8 w 726
uncle 2 w 731
if 3 w 734
he 25 w 736
had 1 w 739
a 53 w 740
legitimate 1 w 750
daughter 4 w 758
who 1 w 761
survived 1 w 769
him 1 w 772
adopt 1 w 778
and 5 w 781
leave 1 w 786
behind 1 w 792
my 2 w 794
brother 1 w 801
as 6 w 803
his 8 w 806
son 1 w 809
Had 1 w 813
he 27 w 815
nearer 1 w 821
relatives 1 w 830
than 1 w 834
us 2 w 836
whom 1 w 840
he 28 w 842
wished 1 w 848
by 3 w 851
adopting 1 w 859
my 3 w 861
brother 2 w 868
to 9 w 871
exclude 1 w 878
from 2 w 882
the 16 w 885
right 1 w 890
of 6 w 892
claiming 1 w 900
his 9 w 903
daughter 5 w 911
In 1 w 914
the 17 w 917
absence 1 w 924
of 7 w 926
legitimate 2 w 936
sons 1 w 940
of 8 w 942
his 10 w 945
own 3 w 948
he 33 w 951
neither 1 w 958
has 1 w 961
nor 1 w 964
ever 1 w 968
had 2 w 971
a 71 w 972
single 1 w 978
relative 2 w 986
nearer 2 w 992
than 2 w 996
us 3 w 998
for 2 w 1002
he 35 w 1004
had 3 w 1007
no 3 w 1009
brother 3 w 1016
or 8 w 1018
brother 4 w 1025
s 53 w 1027
sons 2 w 1031
and 6 w 1035
we 2 w 1037
were 2 w 1041
the 21 w 1044
children 1 w 1052
of 9 w 1054
his 11 w 1057
sister 2 w 1063
But 1 w 1067
it 7 w 1070
may 1 w 1073
be 7 w 1075
urged 1 w 1080
he 39 w 1083
might 1 w 1088
have 1 w 1092
adopted 1 w 1099
some 1 w 1103
other 6 w 1108
kinsman 1 w 1115
and 7 w 1118
given 1 w 1123
him 2 w 1126
the 23 w 1129
possession 1 w 1139
of 10 w 1141
his 12 w 1144
estate 1 w 1150
and 8 w 1153
his 13 w 1156
daughter 6 w 1164
Yet 2 w 1168
what 2 w 1172
need 1 w 1176
had 4 w 1179
he 42 w 1181
openly 1 w 1187
to 10 w 1189
incur 1 w 1194
the 24 w 1197
enmity 1 w 1203
of 11 w 1205
any 1 w 1208
one 1 w 1211
of 12 w 1213
his 14 w 1216
relatives 2 w 1225
when 3 w 1230
it 9 w 1232
was 2 w 1235
in 14 w 1237
his 15 w 1240
power 1 w 1245
if 4 w 1248
he 45 w 1250
had 5 w 1253
really 1 w 1259
married 2 w 1266
the 25 w 1269
sister 3 w 1275
of 13 w 1277
Nicodemus 1 w 1286
to 11 w 1289
introduce 1 w 1298
the 26 w 1301
child 3 w 1306
who 3 w 1310
has 2 w 1313
been 1 w 1317
declared 1 w 1325
to 12 w 1327
be 9 w 1329
her 15 w 1332
offspring 1 w 1341
to 13 w 1344
the 27 w 1347
members 1 w 1354
of 15 w 1356
his 16 w 1359
ward 1 w 1363
as 10 w 1365
his 17 w 1368
own 4 w 1371
legitimate 3 w 1381
child 4 w 1386
and 9 w 1390
leave 2 w 1395
her 16 w 1398
sole 2 w 1402
heiress 1 w 1409
to 14 w 1411
all 6 w 1414
his 18 w 1417
estate 2 w 1423
and 10 w 1426
direct 1 w 1432
that 6 w 1436
one 2 w 1439
of 16 w 1441
her 17 w 1444
sons 3 w 1448
should 1 w 1454
be 11 w 1456
introduced 1 w 1466
as 11 w 1468
his 19 w 1471
adopted 2 w 1478
son 5 w 1481
For 2 w 1485
it 11 w 1487
is 28 w 1489
clear 1 w 1494
that 7 w 1498
if 5 w 1501
he 53 w 1503
left 1 w 1507
her 18 w 1510
sole 3 w 1514
heiress 2 w 1521
he 56 w 1524
would 1 w 1529
have 2 w 1533
been 2 w 1537
fully 1 w 1542
aware 1 w 1547
that 8 w 1551
one 3 w 1554
of 17 w 1556
two 1 w 1559
things 1 w 1565
was 3 w 1568
likely 1 w 1574
to 15 w 1576
happen 2 w 1582
to 16 w 1584
her 19 w 1587
either 2 w 1594
one 4 w 1597
of 18 w 1599
us 5 w 1601
the 29 w 1605
nearest 1 w 1612
relatives 3 w 1621
would 2 w 1627
obtain 1 w 1633
an 18 w 1635
adjudication 1 w 1647
and 11 w 1650
take 1 w 1654
her 21 w 1657
as 13 w 1659
wife 2 w 1663
or 10 w 1666
if 7 w 1669
none 1 w 1673
of 19 w 1675
us 6 w 1677
wished 2 w 1683
to 17 w 1685
take 2 w 1689
her 22 w 1692
one 6 w 1696
of 20 w 1698
these 2 w 1703
uncles 2 w 1709
who 4 w 1712
just 1 w 1716
now 1 w 1719
gave 2 w 1723
evidence 1 w 1731
or 11 w 1734
failing 1 w 1742
them 1 w 1746
one 7 w 1750
of 21 w 1752
the 32 w 1755
other 7 w 1760
relatives 4 w 1769
would 3 w 1775
on 19 w 1778
the 34 w 1781
same 1 w 1785
principle 1 w 1794
obtain 2 w 1801
an 20 w 1803
adjudication 2 w 1815
of 22 w 1817
her 24 w 1820
together 1 w 1828
with 1 w 1832
the 36 w 1835
whole 1 w 1840
estate 3 w 1846
and 12 w 1849
take 3 w 1853
her 26 w 1856
as 14 w 1858
his 20 w 1861
wife 3 w 1865