Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate Of Pyrrhus

On The Estate Of Pyrrhus (67)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg003.perseus-eng2:67
Refs {'start': {'reference': '67', 'human_reference': 'Section 67'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

And, secondly, why did they think fit to claim the succession to Pyrrhus's estate illegally, ignoring him who was its last tenant? Furthermore, you should ask them whether any legitimate child ever thinks of requesting the court to adjudicate to him what is his own. These are the questions with which you should oppose their impudence. That the woman could be legally claimed by her next-of-kin, if she was really a legitimate daughter of the deceased, appears most evidently from the laws.

Tokens

And 1 w 3
secondly 1 w 12
why 1 w 16
did 1 w 19
they 1 w 23
think 1 w 28
fit 1 w 31
to 1 w 33
claim 1 w 38
the 2 w 41
succession 1 w 51
to 2 w 53
Pyrrhus 1 w 60
s 6 w 62
estate 1 w 68
illegally 1 w 77
ignoring 1 w 86
him 1 w 89
who 1 w 92
was 1 w 95
its 1 w 98
last 1 w 102
tenant 1 w 108
Furthermore 1 w 120
you 1 w 124
should 1 w 130
ask 1 w 133
them 1 w 137
whether 1 w 144
any 1 w 147
legitimate 1 w 157
child 1 w 162
ever 1 w 166
thinks 1 w 172
of 1 w 174
requesting 1 w 184
the 6 w 187
court 1 w 192
to 3 w 194
adjudicate 1 w 204
to 4 w 206
him 2 w 209
what 1 w 213
is 1 w 215
his 1 w 218
own 1 w 221
These 1 w 227
are 1 w 230
the 7 w 233
questions 1 w 242
with 1 w 246
which 1 w 251
you 2 w 254
should 2 w 260
oppose 1 w 266
their 1 w 271
impudence 1 w 280
That 1 w 285
the 9 w 288
woman 1 w 293
could 1 w 298
be 1 w 300
legally 2 w 307
claimed 1 w 314
by 1 w 316
her 3 w 319
next-of-kin 1 w 330
if 1 w 333
she 1 w 336
was 2 w 339
really 1 w 345
a 20 w 346
legitimate 2 w 356
daughter 1 w 364
of 3 w 366
the 10 w 369
deceased 1 w 377
appears 1 w 385
most 1 w 389
evidently 1 w 398
from 1 w 402
the 11 w 405
laws 1 w 409