Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate Of Pyrrhus

On The Estate Of Pyrrhus (65-69)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg003.perseus-eng2:65-69
Refs {'start': {'reference': '65', 'human_reference': 'Section 65'}, 'end': {'reference': '69', 'human_reference': 'Section 69'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

While, then, the necessary consequence of this law is that women who have been given in marriage by their fathers are thus liable to be legally claimed, would any one of Pyrrhus's uncles, if Phile were a legitimate daughter left by him, have allowed Xenocles to take and marry a woman who belonged to them by right of kinship and thus make him heir[*] to so large a fortune instead of themselves? Do not believe it, gentlemen;

no man so hates his own advantage and prefers the interest of strangers to his own. If, therefore, they pretend that the adoption of Endius annulled their rights over this woman and allege that it is for this reason that they laid no claim to her, the following questions must be put to them: First, why have they attacked those who have borne witness to the adoption of Endius by Pyrrhus if they admit that it took place?

And, secondly, why did they think fit to claim the succession to Pyrrhus's estate illegally, ignoring him who was its last tenant? Furthermore, you should ask them whether any legitimate child ever thinks of requesting the court to adjudicate to him what is his own. These are the questions with which you should oppose their impudence. That the woman could be legally claimed by her next-of-kin, if she was really a legitimate daughter of the deceased, appears most evidently from the laws.

The law states explicitly that, in the absence of legitimate male issue, a man can dispose of his property as he pleases, but that, if he has daughters, the legatees must take them as well. Thus a man may bequeath and dispose of his property with his daughters, but he may not either adopt a son or leave any of his possessions to anyone without also disposing of his legitimate daughters.

If, therefore, Pyrrhus adopted Endius as his son without also disposing of his legitimate daughter, the adoption would have been void in the eyes of the law; if, on the other hand, he intended to give him his daughter and after adopting him on these terms left her to him, how could you, the uncles of Pyrrhus, have allowed Endius to have the estate of Pyrrhus adjudicated to him without his taking also his legitimate daughter, if he had one, especially as you testified that your nephew solemnly charged you to look after this girl?

Tokens

While 1 w 5
then 1 w 10
the 2 w 14
necessary 1 w 23
consequence 1 w 34
of 1 w 36
this 1 w 40
law 1 w 43
is 2 w 45
that 1 w 49
women 1 w 54
who 1 w 57
have 1 w 61
been 1 w 65
given 1 w 70
in 1 w 72
marriage 1 w 80
by 1 w 82
their 1 w 87
fathers 1 w 94
are 1 w 97
thus 1 w 101
liable 1 w 107
to 1 w 109
be 2 w 111
legally 1 w 118
claimed 1 w 125
would 1 w 131
any 1 w 134
one 1 w 137
of 2 w 139
Pyrrhus 1 w 146
s 9 w 148
uncles 1 w 154
if 1 w 157
Phile 1 w 162
were 1 w 166
a 13 w 167
legitimate 1 w 177
daughter 1 w 185
left 1 w 189
by 2 w 191
him 1 w 194
have 2 w 199
allowed 1 w 206
Xenocles 1 w 214
to 2 w 216
take 1 w 220
and 1 w 223
marry 1 w 228
a 21 w 229
woman 1 w 234
who 2 w 237
belonged 1 w 245
to 3 w 247
them 1 w 251
by 3 w 253
right 1 w 258
of 3 w 260
kinship 1 w 267
and 2 w 270
thus 2 w 274
make 1 w 278
him 2 w 281
heir 2 w 285
As 1 w 287
a 25 w 288
matter 1 w 294
of 4 w 296
fact 1 w 300
the 6 w 303
husband 1 w 310
of 5 w 312
an 6 w 314
heiress 1 w 321
enjoyed 1 w 328
the 7 w 331
use 1 w 334
of 6 w 336
her 2 w 339
fortune 1 w 346
only 1 w 350
during 1 w 356
the 8 w 359
minority 1 w 367
of 7 w 369
their 2 w 374
son 1 w 377
or 3 w 379
sons 1 w 383
to 4 w 386
so 3 w 388
large 1 w 393
a 31 w 394
fortune 2 w 401
instead 1 w 408
of 8 w 410
themselves 1 w 420
Do 1 w 423
not 1 w 426
believe 1 w 433
it 3 w 435
gentlemen 1 w 445
no 4 w 448
man 2 w 451
so 4 w 453
hates 1 w 458
his 2 w 461
own 1 w 464
advantage 1 w 473
and 4 w 476
prefers 1 w 483
the 11 w 486
interest 1 w 494
of 9 w 496
strangers 1 w 505
to 5 w 507
his 3 w 510
own 2 w 513
If 1 w 516
therefore 1 w 526
they 1 w 531
pretend 1 w 538
that 2 w 542
the 14 w 545
adoption 1 w 553
of 10 w 555
Endius 1 w 561
annulled 1 w 569
their 3 w 574
rights 1 w 580
over 1 w 584
this 2 w 588
woman 2 w 593
and 5 w 596
allege 1 w 602
that 3 w 606
it 4 w 608
is 6 w 610
for 4 w 613
this 3 w 617
reason 1 w 623
that 4 w 627
they 2 w 631
laid 1 w 635
no 5 w 637
claim 2 w 642
to 6 w 644
her 4 w 647
the 17 w 651
following 1 w 660
questions 1 w 669
must 1 w 673
be 5 w 675
put 1 w 678
to 7 w 680
them 3 w 684
First 1 w 690
why 1 w 694
have 3 w 698
they 3 w 702
attacked 1 w 710
those 1 w 715
who 3 w 718
have 4 w 722
borne 1 w 727
witness 1 w 734
to 8 w 736
the 20 w 739
adoption 2 w 747
of 11 w 749
Endius 2 w 755
by 4 w 757
Pyrrhus 2 w 764
if 2 w 766
they 4 w 770
admit 1 w 775
that 5 w 779
it 7 w 781
took 1 w 785
place 1 w 790
And 1 w 794
secondly 1 w 803
why 2 w 807
did 1 w 810
they 5 w 814
think 1 w 819
fit 1 w 822
to 10 w 824
claim 3 w 829
the 23 w 832
succession 1 w 842
to 11 w 844
Pyrrhus 3 w 851
s 54 w 853
estate 1 w 859
illegally 1 w 868
ignoring 1 w 877
him 3 w 880
who 4 w 883
was 1 w 886
its 1 w 889
last 1 w 893
tenant 1 w 899
Furthermore 1 w 911
you 1 w 915
should 1 w 921
ask 1 w 924
them 4 w 928
whether 1 w 935
any 2 w 938
legitimate 2 w 948
child 1 w 953
ever 1 w 957
thinks 1 w 963
of 12 w 965
requesting 1 w 975
the 27 w 978
court 1 w 983
to 12 w 985
adjudicate 1 w 995
to 13 w 997
him 4 w 1000
what 1 w 1004
is 8 w 1006
his 6 w 1009
own 3 w 1012
These 1 w 1018
are 2 w 1021
the 28 w 1024
questions 2 w 1033
with 1 w 1037
which 1 w 1042
you 2 w 1045
should 2 w 1051
oppose 1 w 1057
their 4 w 1062
impudence 1 w 1071
That 1 w 1076
the 30 w 1079
woman 3 w 1084
could 1 w 1089
be 6 w 1091
legally 3 w 1098
claimed 2 w 1105
by 5 w 1107
her 7 w 1110
next-of-kin 1 w 1121
if 3 w 1124
she 1 w 1127
was 2 w 1130
really 1 w 1136
a 78 w 1137
legitimate 3 w 1147
daughter 2 w 1155
of 14 w 1157
the 31 w 1160
deceased 1 w 1168
appears 1 w 1176
most 1 w 1180
evidently 1 w 1189
from 1 w 1193
the 32 w 1196
laws 1 w 1200
The 2 w 1204
law 3 w 1207
states 1 w 1213
explicitly 1 w 1223
that 6 w 1227
in 13 w 1230
the 33 w 1233
absence 1 w 1240
of 15 w 1242
legitimate 4 w 1252
male 1 w 1256
issue 1 w 1261
a 91 w 1263
man 5 w 1266
can 1 w 1269
dispose 1 w 1276
of 16 w 1278
his 7 w 1281
property 1 w 1289
as 7 w 1291
he 43 w 1293
pleases 1 w 1300
but 1 w 1304
that 7 w 1308
if 4 w 1311
he 44 w 1313
has 1 w 1316
daughters 1 w 1325
the 34 w 1329
legatees 1 w 1337
must 2 w 1341
take 2 w 1345
them 5 w 1349
as 10 w 1351
well 1 w 1355
Thus 1 w 1360
a 102 w 1361
man 6 w 1364
may 1 w 1367
bequeath 1 w 1375
and 6 w 1378
dispose 2 w 1385
of 17 w 1387
his 8 w 1390
property 2 w 1398
with 2 w 1402
his 9 w 1405
daughters 2 w 1414
but 2 w 1418
he 47 w 1420
may 2 w 1423
not 2 w 1426
either 1 w 1432
adopt 3 w 1437
a 110 w 1438
son 4 w 1441
or 10 w 1443
leave 1 w 1448
any 3 w 1451
of 18 w 1453
his 10 w 1456
possessions 1 w 1467
to 14 w 1469
anyone 1 w 1475
without 1 w 1482
also 1 w 1486
disposing 1 w 1495
of 19 w 1497
his 11 w 1500
legitimate 5 w 1510
daughters 3 w 1519
If 2 w 1522
therefore 2 w 1532
Pyrrhus 4 w 1540
adopted 1 w 1547
Endius 3 w 1553
as 11 w 1555
his 12 w 1558
son 5 w 1561
without 2 w 1568
also 2 w 1572
disposing 2 w 1581
of 20 w 1583
his 13 w 1586
legitimate 6 w 1596
daughter 6 w 1604
the 38 w 1608
adoption 3 w 1616
would 2 w 1621
have 5 w 1625
been 2 w 1629
void 1 w 1633
in 16 w 1635
the 39 w 1638
eyes 1 w 1642
of 21 w 1644
the 40 w 1647
law 4 w 1650
if 5 w 1653
on 19 w 1656
the 41 w 1659
other 1 w 1664
hand 1 w 1668
he 55 w 1671
intended 1 w 1679
to 15 w 1681
give 2 w 1685
him 5 w 1688
his 14 w 1691
daughter 7 w 1699
and 8 w 1702
after 1 w 1707
adopting 1 w 1715
him 6 w 1718
on 20 w 1720
these 1 w 1725
terms 1 w 1730
left 2 w 1734
her 11 w 1737
to 16 w 1739
him 7 w 1742
how 1 w 1746
could 2 w 1751
you 3 w 1754
the 44 w 1758
uncles 2 w 1764
of 22 w 1766
Pyrrhus 5 w 1773
have 6 w 1778
allowed 2 w 1785
Endius 4 w 1791
to 17 w 1793
have 7 w 1797
the 45 w 1800
estate 2 w 1806
of 23 w 1808
Pyrrhus 6 w 1815
adjudicated 1 w 1826
to 18 w 1828
him 8 w 1831
without 3 w 1838
his 15 w 1841
taking 1 w 1847
also 3 w 1851
his 16 w 1854
legitimate 7 w 1864
daughter 8 w 1872
if 6 w 1875
he 60 w 1877
had 1 w 1880
one 3 w 1883
especially 1 w 1894
as 12 w 1896
you 4 w 1899
testified 1 w 1908
that 8 w 1912
your 1 w 1916
nephew 1 w 1922
solemnly 1 w 1930
charged 1 w 1937
you 6 w 1940
to 19 w 1942
look 1 w 1946
after 2 w 1951
this 4 w 1955
girl 1 w 1959