Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate Of Pyrrhus

On The Estate Of Pyrrhus (54)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg003.perseus-eng2:54
Refs {'start': {'reference': '54', 'human_reference': 'Section 54'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Deposition

How could an accuser establish a charge of perjury more clearly than by adducing proofs from the actual conduct of my adversaries themselves and from all the laws of our state?

I have now said most of what I have to say about the defendant. Consider now whether the conduct of the niece's husband does not provide a convincing argument that Nicodemus's evidence is false.

Tokens

Deposition 1 w 10
How 1 w 13
could 1 w 18
an 1 w 20
accuser 1 w 27
establish 1 w 36
a 4 w 37
charge 1 w 43
of 1 w 45
perjury 1 w 52
more 1 w 56
clearly 1 w 63
than 1 w 67
by 1 w 69
adducing 1 w 77
proofs 1 w 83
from 1 w 87
the 1 w 90
actual 1 w 96
conduct 1 w 103
of 3 w 105
my 1 w 107
adversaries 1 w 118
themselves 1 w 128
and 1 w 131
from 2 w 135
all 1 w 138
the 3 w 141
laws 1 w 145
of 4 w 147
our 1 w 150
state 1 w 155
I 1 w 157
have 1 w 161
now 1 w 164
said 1 w 168
most 1 w 172
of 5 w 174
what 1 w 178
I 2 w 179
have 2 w 183
to 1 w 185
say 1 w 188
about 1 w 193
the 4 w 196
defendant 1 w 205
Consider 1 w 214
now 2 w 217
whether 1 w 224
the 6 w 227
conduct 2 w 234
of 6 w 236
the 7 w 239
niece 1 w 244
s 16 w 246
husband 1 w 253
does 1 w 257
not 1 w 260
provide 1 w 267
a 25 w 268
convincing 1 w 278
argument 1 w 286
that 1 w 290
Nicodemus 1 w 299
s 20 w 301
evidence 1 w 309
is 2 w 311
false 1 w 316