Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate Of Pyrrhus

On The Estate Of Pyrrhus (45-49)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg003.perseus-eng2:45-49
Refs {'start': {'reference': '45', 'human_reference': 'Section 45'}, 'end': {'reference': '49', 'human_reference': 'Section 49'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Regarding this claim some lying explanation may be offered to you: the defendant may either pretend that they knew nothing about it or else may accuse us of lying. Let us ignore the latter suggestion. As regards the former, when Endius gave your niece in marriage to Xenocles, did you, Nicodemus, allow the daughter borne to Pyrrhus by his legitimate wife to be married in the quality of the child of a mistress?

And did you fail to bring a denunciation in the archon's court for injury to the heiress thus maltreated by the adopted son and despoiled of her paternal inheritance, especially as this is the only class of public actions which involves no risk to the party who brings it, and anyone who wishes is allowed to defend the rights of heiresses?

For no fine can be inflicted for denunciations made to the archon, even if the informants fail to receive a single vote,[*] and there are no deposits or court fees[*] paid in any impeachments; but while the prosecutors may bring an impeachment without running any risk, extreme penalties are inflicted on those who are convicted in such impeachments.

If, then, the defendant's niece had been the child of our uncle by a legitimate wife, would Nicodemus have allowed her to be married in the quality of the child of a mistress? And, when this happened, would he not have lodged a denunciation before the archon that the heiress was being injured by him who thus gave her in marriage? If what you have now dared, Nicodemus, to depose, were true, you would have immediately have had punishment inflicted on him who was wronging her. Or will you pretend that you knew nothing of these circumstances either?

Next, did not the dowry which was given with her awake your suspicion? This alone might well have aroused your indignation and induced you to denounce Endius, namely, that he himself was claiming as his right a fortune of three talents, but thought fit, when he was giving Pyrrhus's legitimate daughter in marriage to another man, to bestow with her a portion of only a thousand drachmas.[*] Would not this have aroused the defendant's indignation and would he not have denounced Endius? By heavens he would, if his story were true.

Tokens

Regarding 1 w 9
this 1 w 13
claim 1 w 18
some 1 w 22
lying 1 w 27
explanation 1 w 38
may 1 w 41
be 1 w 43
offered 1 w 50
to 1 w 52
you 1 w 55
the 1 w 59
defendant 1 w 68
may 2 w 71
either 1 w 77
pretend 1 w 84
that 1 w 88
they 1 w 92
knew 1 w 96
nothing 1 w 103
about 1 w 108
it 2 w 110
or 1 w 112
else 1 w 116
may 3 w 119
accuse 1 w 125
us 2 w 127
of 2 w 129
lying 2 w 134
Let 1 w 138
us 3 w 140
ignore 1 w 146
the 4 w 149
latter 1 w 155
suggestion 1 w 165
As 1 w 168
regards 1 w 175
the 5 w 178
former 1 w 184
when 1 w 189
Endius 1 w 195
gave 1 w 199
your 1 w 203
niece 1 w 208
in 5 w 210
marriage 1 w 218
to 2 w 220
Xenocles 1 w 228
did 1 w 232
you 3 w 235
Nicodemus 1 w 245
allow 1 w 251
the 6 w 254
daughter 1 w 262
borne 1 w 267
to 3 w 269
Pyrrhus 1 w 276
by 1 w 278
his 2 w 281
legitimate 1 w 291
wife 1 w 295
to 4 w 297
be 2 w 299
married 1 w 306
in 6 w 308
the 7 w 311
quality 1 w 318
of 3 w 320
the 8 w 323
child 1 w 328
of 4 w 330
a 22 w 331
mistress 1 w 339
And 1 w 343
did 2 w 346
you 4 w 349
fail 1 w 353
to 5 w 355
bring 1 w 360
a 24 w 361
denunciation 1 w 373
in 8 w 375
the 9 w 378
archon 1 w 384
s 19 w 386
court 1 w 391
for 2 w 394
injury 1 w 400
to 6 w 402
the 10 w 405
heiress 1 w 412
thus 1 w 416
maltreated 1 w 426
by 2 w 428
the 11 w 431
adopted 1 w 438
son 1 w 441
and 1 w 444
despoiled 1 w 453
of 5 w 455
her 2 w 458
paternal 1 w 466
inheritance 1 w 477
especially 1 w 488
as 1 w 490
this 2 w 494
is 5 w 496
the 12 w 499
only 1 w 503
class 1 w 508
of 6 w 510
public 1 w 516
actions 1 w 523
which 1 w 528
involves 1 w 536
no 4 w 538
risk 1 w 542
to 7 w 544
the 13 w 547
party 1 w 552
who 1 w 555
brings 1 w 561
it 6 w 563
and 2 w 567
anyone 1 w 573
who 2 w 576
wishes 1 w 582
is 8 w 584
allowed 1 w 591
to 8 w 593
defend 2 w 599
the 14 w 602
rights 1 w 608
of 7 w 610
heiresses 1 w 619
For 1 w 623
no 5 w 625
fine 1 w 629
can 1 w 632
be 3 w 634
inflicted 1 w 643
for 3 w 646
denunciations 1 w 659
made 1 w 663
to 9 w 665
the 15 w 668
archon 2 w 674
even 1 w 679
if 2 w 681
the 16 w 684
informants 1 w 694
fail 2 w 698
to 10 w 700
receive 1 w 707
a 48 w 708
single 1 w 714
vote 1 w 718
The 1 w 722
prosecutor 1 w 732
in 17 w 734
other 1 w 739
public 2 w 745
actions 2 w 752
was 1 w 755
liable 1 w 761
to 12 w 763
a 52 w 764
fine 2 w 768
of 8 w 770
1000 1 w 774
drachmas 1 w 782
if 3 w 784
he 25 w 786
failed 1 w 792
to 13 w 794
obtain 1 w 800
one-fifth 1 w 809
of 9 w 811
the 18 w 814
votes 1 w 819
and 3 w 823
there 1 w 828
are 1 w 831
no 6 w 833
deposits 1 w 841
or 10 w 843
court 2 w 848
fees 1 w 852
πρυτανεῖα 1 w 861
deposits 2 w 870
made 2 w 874
by 3 w 876
both 1 w 880
parties 1 w 887
in 20 w 889
a 61 w 890
suit 1 w 894
and 4 w 897
repayable 1 w 906
to 14 w 908
the 20 w 911
successful 1 w 921
litigant 1 w 929
παράστασις 1 w 940
fees 2 w 945
payable 2 w 952
by 4 w 954
a 68 w 955
prosecutor 2 w 965
on 13 w 967
entering 1 w 975
upon 1 w 979
certain 1 w 986
suits 1 w 991
paid 1 w 996
in 23 w 998
any 2 w 1001
impeachments 1 w 1013
but 1 w 1017
while 1 w 1022
the 21 w 1025
prosecutors 1 w 1036
may 4 w 1039
bring 3 w 1044
an 13 w 1046
impeachment 2 w 1057
without 1 w 1064
running 1 w 1071
any 3 w 1074
risk 2 w 1078
extreme 1 w 1086
penalties 1 w 1095
are 2 w 1098
inflicted 2 w 1107
on 15 w 1109
those 1 w 1114
who 3 w 1117
are 3 w 1120
convicted 1 w 1129
in 27 w 1131
such 1 w 1135
impeachments 2 w 1147
If 1 w 1150
then 1 w 1155
the 23 w 1159
defendant 2 w 1168
s 72 w 1170
niece 2 w 1175
had 1 w 1178
been 1 w 1182
the 24 w 1185
child 2 w 1190
of 10 w 1192
our 4 w 1195
uncle 1 w 1200
by 5 w 1202
a 83 w 1203
legitimate 2 w 1213
wife 2 w 1217
would 1 w 1223
Nicodemus 2 w 1232
have 1 w 1236
allowed 2 w 1243
her 6 w 1246
to 17 w 1248
be 5 w 1250
married 2 w 1257
in 28 w 1259
the 25 w 1262
quality 2 w 1269
of 11 w 1271
the 26 w 1274
child 3 w 1279
of 12 w 1281
a 89 w 1282
mistress 2 w 1290
And 2 w 1294
when 2 w 1299
this 3 w 1303
happened 1 w 1311
would 2 w 1317
he 37 w 1319
not 2 w 1322
have 2 w 1326
lodged 1 w 1332
a 92 w 1333
denunciation 3 w 1345
before 1 w 1351
the 27 w 1354
archon 3 w 1360
that 2 w 1364
the 28 w 1367
heiress 3 w 1374
was 2 w 1377
being 1 w 1382
injured 1 w 1389
by 6 w 1391
him 1 w 1394
who 4 w 1397
thus 2 w 1401
gave 2 w 1405
her 7 w 1408
in 31 w 1410
marriage 2 w 1418
If 2 w 1421
what 1 w 1425
you 5 w 1428
have 3 w 1432
now 1 w 1435
dared 1 w 1440
Nicodemus 3 w 1450
to 18 w 1453
depose 1 w 1459
were 1 w 1464
true 1 w 1468
you 6 w 1472
would 3 w 1477
have 4 w 1481
immediately 1 w 1492
have 5 w 1496
had 2 w 1499
punishment 1 w 1509
inflicted 3 w 1518
on 19 w 1520
him 2 w 1523
who 5 w 1526
was 3 w 1529
wronging 1 w 1537
her 8 w 1540
Or 1 w 1543
will 1 w 1547
you 7 w 1550
pretend 2 w 1557
that 3 w 1561
you 8 w 1564
knew 2 w 1568
nothing 2 w 1575
of 13 w 1577
these 1 w 1582
circumstances 1 w 1595
either 2 w 1601
Next 1 w 1606
did 3 w 1610
not 4 w 1613
the 31 w 1616
dowry 1 w 1621
which 2 w 1626
was 4 w 1629
given 1 w 1634
with 2 w 1638
her 10 w 1641
awake 1 w 1646
your 2 w 1650
suspicion 1 w 1659
This 1 w 1664
alone 1 w 1669
might 1 w 1674
well 1 w 1678
have 6 w 1682
aroused 1 w 1689
your 3 w 1693
indignation 1 w 1704
and 5 w 1707
induced 1 w 1714
you 11 w 1717
to 19 w 1719
denounce 1 w 1727
Endius 2 w 1733
namely 1 w 1740
that 4 w 1745
he 47 w 1747
himself 1 w 1754
was 5 w 1757
claiming 1 w 1765
as 9 w 1767
his 6 w 1770
right 2 w 1775
a 123 w 1776
fortune 1 w 1783
of 14 w 1785
three 1 w 1790
talents 1 w 1797
but 2 w 1801
thought 1 w 1808
fit 1 w 1811
when 3 w 1816
he 49 w 1818
was 6 w 1821
giving 1 w 1827
Pyrrhus 2 w 1834
s 102 w 1836
legitimate 3 w 1846
daughter 2 w 1854
in 39 w 1856
marriage 3 w 1864
to 20 w 1866
another 1 w 1873
man 2 w 1876
to 21 w 1879
bestow 1 w 1885
with 3 w 1889
her 12 w 1892
a 132 w 1893
portion 1 w 1900
of 15 w 1902
only 2 w 1906
a 133 w 1907
thousand 1 w 1915
drachmas 2 w 1923
The 2 w 1927
MS 1 w 1929
reading 1 w 1937
gives 1 w 1942
3000 1 w 1947
drachmas 3 w 1955
which 3 w 1962
does 1 w 1966
not 6 w 1969
accord 1 w 1975
with 4 w 1979
the 33 w 1982
statement 1 w 1991
of 16 w 1993
Isaeus 1 w 1999
3 2 w 2000
51 1 w 2003
where 1 w 2009
the 34 w 2012
dowry 2 w 2017
is 15 w 2019
said 1 w 2023
to 23 w 2025
be 9 w 2027
less 1 w 2031
than 1 w 2035
a 145 w 2036
tenth 1 w 2041
of 17 w 2043
Pyrrhus 3 w 2050
s 117 w 2052
estate 1 w 2058
which 4 w 2063
amounted 1 w 2071
to 24 w 2073
three 2 w 2078
talents 2 w 2085
18 1 w 2088
000 3 w 2092
drachmas 4 w 2100
Would 1 w 2107
not 7 w 2110
this 4 w 2114
have 7 w 2118
aroused 2 w 2125
the 35 w 2128
defendant 3 w 2137
s 123 w 2139
indignation 2 w 2150
and 7 w 2153
would 4 w 2158
he 57 w 2160
not 8 w 2163
have 8 w 2167
denounced 1 w 2176
Endius 3 w 2182
By 1 w 2185
heavens 1 w 2192
he 59 w 2194
would 5 w 2199
if 6 w 2202
his 8 w 2205
story 1 w 2210
were 2 w 2214
true 2 w 2218