Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate Of Pyrrhus

On The Estate Of Pyrrhus (43)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg003.perseus-eng2:43
Refs {'start': {'reference': '43', 'human_reference': 'Section 43'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Laws

Can you suppose that the man who has declared in evidence that he gave his sister in marriage would have allowed any of these things to be done, and, at the moment when Endius claimed to be given possession and applied to the court, would not have set up his niece's title and lodged a protestation that her paternal inheritance was not adjudicable to Endius? And yet that our brother claimed to have the estate adjudicated to him and that no one contested his claim, is proved by a deposition. Read it.

Tokens

Laws 1 w 4
Can 1 w 7
you 1 w 10
suppose 1 w 17
that 1 w 21
the 1 w 24
man 1 w 27
who 1 w 30
has 1 w 33
declared 1 w 41
in 1 w 43
evidence 1 w 51
that 2 w 55
he 2 w 57
gave 1 w 61
his 1 w 64
sister 1 w 70
in 2 w 72
marriage 1 w 80
would 1 w 85
have 1 w 89
allowed 1 w 96
any 1 w 99
of 1 w 101
these 1 w 106
things 1 w 112
to 1 w 114
be 1 w 116
done 1 w 120
and 1 w 124
at 3 w 127
the 3 w 130
moment 1 w 136
when 1 w 140
Endius 1 w 146
claimed 1 w 153
to 2 w 155
be 2 w 157
given 1 w 162
possession 1 w 172
and 2 w 175
applied 1 w 182
to 3 w 184
the 4 w 187
court 1 w 192
would 2 w 198
not 1 w 201
have 2 w 205
set 1 w 208
up 2 w 210
his 2 w 213
niece 1 w 218
s 17 w 220
title 1 w 225
and 3 w 228
lodged 1 w 234
a 21 w 235
protestation 1 w 247
that 3 w 251
her 1 w 254
paternal 1 w 262
inheritance 1 w 273
was 1 w 276
not 2 w 279
adjudicable 1 w 290
to 4 w 292
Endius 2 w 298
And 1 w 302
yet 1 w 305
that 4 w 309
our 2 w 312
brother 1 w 319
claimed 2 w 326
to 5 w 328
have 3 w 332
the 6 w 335
estate 1 w 341
adjudicated 1 w 352
to 6 w 354
him 1 w 357
and 4 w 360
that 5 w 364
no 3 w 366
one 2 w 369
contested 1 w 378
his 3 w 381
claim 3 w 386
is 5 w 389
proved 1 w 395
by 1 w 397
a 39 w 398
deposition 1 w 408
Read 1 w 413
it 4 w 415