Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate Of Pyrrhus

On The Estate Of Pyrrhus (20-24)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg003.perseus-eng2:20-24
Refs {'start': {'reference': '20', 'human_reference': 'Section 20'}, 'end': {'reference': '24', 'human_reference': 'Section 24'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

When direct evidence has to be given in court, we are obliged to employ those who were actually present, whosoever they are, as witnesses; but when it is a question of obtaining a written deposition from a witness who is ill or about to go abroad, each of us summons by preference the most reputable among his fellow-citizens and those best known to us,

and we always have written depositions made in the presence not of one or two only but of as many witnesses as possible, in order to preclude the deponent from denying his deposition at some future date, and to give his evidence more weight in your eyes by the unanimous testimony of many honest men.

Thus, when Xenocles went to our factory at the mines at Besa,[*] he did not think it sufficient to rely on any chance person who happened to be there as witness regarding the eviction, but took with him from Athens Diophantus of Sphettus, who defended him in the former case, and Dorotheus of Eleusis,[*] and his brother Philochares, and many other witnesses, having invited them to make a journey of nearly three hundred stades from here to there;

yet when, on the question of the marriage of the grandmother of his own children, he was obtaining, as he declares, a written deposition in Athens itself, he is shown to have summoned none of his own friends but Dionysius of Erchia and Aristolochus of Aethalidae. In the presence of these two men my opponents declare that they obtained the written depositiona document of this nature in the presence of men whom no one else would trust in any matter whatsoever!

Perhaps it will be urged that it was a trifling matter of secondary importance about which they say that they obtained the deposition from Pyretides, so that negligence in the affair was not surprising. How so, when the trial for perjury, in which Xenocles was defendant, turned upon this very point, as to whether his own wife was the child of a concubine or of a legitimate wife? To attest a deposition like this, if it were really true, would he not have thought fit to summon all his own friends?

When 1 w 4
direct 1 w 10
evidence 1 w 18
has 1 w 21
to 1 w 23
be 1 w 25
given 1 w 30
in 1 w 32
court 1 w 37
we 1 w 40
are 1 w 43
obliged 1 w 50
to 2 w 52
employ 1 w 58
those 1 w 63
who 1 w 66
were 1 w 70
actually 1 w 78
present 1 w 85
whosoever 1 w 95
they 1 w 99
are 2 w 102
as 2 w 105
witnesses 1 w 114
but 1 w 118
when 1 w 122
it 2 w 124
is 1 w 126
a 7 w 127
question 1 w 135
of 1 w 137
obtaining 1 w 146
a 9 w 147
written 1 w 154
deposition 1 w 164
from 1 w 168
a 10 w 169
witness 2 w 176
who 3 w 179
is 2 w 181
ill 1 w 184
or 1 w 186
about 1 w 191
to 3 w 193
go 1 w 195
abroad 1 w 201
each 1 w 206
of 2 w 208
us 1 w 210
summons 1 w 217
by 1 w 219
preference 1 w 229
the 2 w 232
most 1 w 236
reputable 1 w 245
among 1 w 250
his 1 w 253
fellow-citizens 1 w 268
and 1 w 271
those 2 w 276
best 1 w 280
known 1 w 285
to 4 w 287
us 2 w 289
and 2 w 293
we 3 w 295
always 1 w 301
have 1 w 305
written 2 w 312
depositions 1 w 323
made 1 w 327
in 4 w 329
the 3 w 332
presence 1 w 340
not 1 w 343
of 3 w 345
one 1 w 348
or 2 w 350
two 1 w 353
only 1 w 357
but 2 w 360
of 4 w 362
as 3 w 364
many 1 w 368
witnesses 2 w 377
as 4 w 379
possible 1 w 387
in 5 w 390
order 1 w 395
to 5 w 397
preclude 1 w 405
the 4 w 408
deponent 1 w 416
from 2 w 420
denying 1 w 427
his 2 w 430
deposition 3 w 440
at 1 w 442
some 1 w 446
future 1 w 452
date 1 w 456
and 3 w 460
to 6 w 462
give 2 w 466
his 3 w 469
evidence 2 w 477
more 1 w 481
weight 1 w 487
in 7 w 489
your 1 w 493
eyes 1 w 497
by 2 w 499
the 5 w 502
unanimous 1 w 511
testimony 1 w 520
of 5 w 522
many 2 w 526
honest 1 w 532
men 1 w 535
Thus 1 w 540
when 2 w 545
Xenocles 1 w 553
went 1 w 557
to 7 w 559
our 3 w 562
factory 1 w 569
at 3 w 571
the 6 w 574
mines 1 w 579
at 4 w 581
Besa 1 w 585
Besa 2 w 590
is 6 w 592
situated 1 w 600
in 9 w 602
the 7 w 605
extreme 1 w 612
south 1 w 617
of 6 w 619
Attica 1 w 625
near 1 w 629
Laurium 1 w 636
It 1 w 639
appears 1 w 646
that 1 w 650
the 8 w 653
estate 1 w 659
of 7 w 661
Pyrrhus 1 w 668
included 1 w 676
a 44 w 677
factory 2 w 684
at 8 w 686
Besa 3 w 690
and 4 w 693
that 2 w 697
Xenocles 2 w 705
proceeded 1 w 714
thither 1 w 721
after 1 w 726
the 10 w 729
death 1 w 734
of 8 w 736
Pyrrhus 2 w 743
in 11 w 745
order 2 w 750
to 10 w 752
take 1 w 756
possession 1 w 766
of 9 w 768
it 13 w 770
knowing 1 w 778
that 3 w 782
he 14 w 784
would 1 w 789
be 3 w 791
forcibly 1 w 799
prevented 1 w 808
from 3 w 812
doing 1 w 817
so 4 w 819
he 15 w 822
took 1 w 826
with 1 w 830
him 1 w 833
witnesses 3 w 842
of 10 w 844
his 4 w 847
eviction 1 w 855
he 16 w 858
did 1 w 861
not 2 w 864
think 1 w 869
it 16 w 871
sufficient 1 w 881
to 12 w 883
rely 1 w 887
on 14 w 889
any 3 w 892
chance 1 w 898
person 1 w 904
who 4 w 907
happened 1 w 915
to 13 w 917
be 4 w 919
there 1 w 924
as 5 w 926
witness 5 w 933
regarding 1 w 942
the 12 w 945
eviction 2 w 953
but 3 w 957
took 2 w 961
with 2 w 965
him 2 w 968
from 4 w 972
Athens 1 w 978
Diophantus 1 w 988
of 11 w 990
Sphettus 1 w 998
who 5 w 1002
defended 1 w 1010
him 3 w 1013
in 16 w 1015
the 14 w 1018
former 1 w 1024
case 1 w 1028
and 5 w 1032
Dorotheus 1 w 1041
of 12 w 1043
Eleusis 1 w 1050
See 1 w 1054
Introduction 1 w 1066
and 6 w 1070
his 5 w 1073
brother 1 w 1080
Philochares 1 w 1091
and 7 w 1095
many 3 w 1099
other 2 w 1104
witnesses 4 w 1113
having 1 w 1120
invited 1 w 1127
them 1 w 1131
to 15 w 1133
make 1 w 1137
a 68 w 1138
journey 1 w 1145
of 13 w 1147
nearly 1 w 1153
three 1 w 1158
hundred 1 w 1165
stades 1 w 1171
from 5 w 1175
here 2 w 1179
to 16 w 1181
there 2 w 1186
yet 1 w 1190
when 3 w 1194
on 18 w 1197
the 20 w 1200
question 2 w 1208
of 14 w 1210
the 21 w 1213
marriage 1 w 1221
of 15 w 1223
the 22 w 1226
grandmother 1 w 1237
of 16 w 1239
his 6 w 1242
own 2 w 1245
children 1 w 1253
he 33 w 1256
was 1 w 1259
obtaining 2 w 1268
as 8 w 1271
he 34 w 1273
declares 1 w 1281
a 78 w 1283
written 3 w 1290
deposition 4 w 1300
in 21 w 1302
Athens 2 w 1308
itself 1 w 1314
he 36 w 1317
is 11 w 1319
shown 1 w 1324
to 17 w 1326
have 2 w 1330
summoned 1 w 1338
none 1 w 1342
of 17 w 1344
his 7 w 1347
own 4 w 1350
friends 1 w 1357
but 4 w 1360
Dionysius 1 w 1369
of 18 w 1371
Erchia 1 w 1377
and 9 w 1380
Aristolochus 1 w 1392
of 19 w 1394
Aethalidae 1 w 1404
In 2 w 1407
the 25 w 1410
presence 2 w 1418
of 20 w 1420
these 1 w 1425
two 2 w 1428
men 2 w 1431
my 1 w 1433
opponents 1 w 1442
declare 2 w 1449
that 4 w 1453
they 2 w 1457
obtained 1 w 1465
the 28 w 1468
written 4 w 1475
deposition 5 w 1485
a 87 w 1487
document 1 w 1495
of 21 w 1497
this 1 w 1501
nature 1 w 1507
in 23 w 1509
the 29 w 1512
presence 3 w 1520
of 22 w 1522
men 4 w 1525
whom 1 w 1529
no 8 w 1531
one 7 w 1534
else 1 w 1538
would 2 w 1543
trust 1 w 1548
in 24 w 1550
any 5 w 1553
matter 1 w 1559
whatsoever 1 w 1569
Perhaps 1 w 1577
it 26 w 1579
will 1 w 1583
be 5 w 1585
urged 1 w 1590
that 5 w 1594
it 27 w 1596
was 2 w 1599
a 95 w 1600
trifling 1 w 1608
matter 2 w 1614
of 23 w 1616
secondary 1 w 1625
importance 1 w 1635
about 2 w 1640
which 1 w 1645
they 3 w 1649
say 1 w 1652
that 6 w 1656
they 4 w 1660
obtained 2 w 1668
the 32 w 1671
deposition 6 w 1681
from 6 w 1685
Pyretides 1 w 1694
so 7 w 1697
that 7 w 1701
negligence 1 w 1711
in 27 w 1713
the 33 w 1716
affair 1 w 1722
was 3 w 1725
not 3 w 1728
surprising 1 w 1738
How 1 w 1742
so 8 w 1744
when 4 w 1749
the 34 w 1752
trial 1 w 1757
for 3 w 1760
perjury 1 w 1767
in 29 w 1770
which 2 w 1775
Xenocles 3 w 1783
was 4 w 1786
defendant 1 w 1795
turned 1 w 1802
upon 1 w 1806
this 2 w 1810
very 1 w 1814
point 1 w 1819
as 12 w 1822
to 19 w 1824
whether 1 w 1831
his 10 w 1834
own 5 w 1837
wife 1 w 1841
was 5 w 1844
the 36 w 1847
child 2 w 1852
of 24 w 1854
a 112 w 1855
concubine 1 w 1864
or 13 w 1866
of 25 w 1868
a 113 w 1869
legitimate 1 w 1879
wife 2 w 1883
To 1 w 1886
attest 1 w 1892
a 116 w 1893
deposition 7 w 1903
like 1 w 1907
this 3 w 1911
if 4 w 1914
it 31 w 1916
were 2 w 1920
really 1 w 1926
true 1 w 1930
would 3 w 1936
he 51 w 1938
not 4 w 1941
have 3 w 1945
thought 1 w 1952
fit 1 w 1955
to 20 w 1957
summon 3 w 1963
all 3 w 1966
his 12 w 1969
own 6 w 1972
friends 2 w 1979