Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate Of Pyrrhus

On The Estate Of Pyrrhus (0-4)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg003.perseus-eng2:0-4
Refs {'start': {'reference': '0', 'human_reference': 'Section 0'}, 'end': {'reference': '4', 'human_reference': 'Section 4'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Argument

Pyrrhus had adopted one of his sister's two sons, Endius, who enjoyed the estate for more than twenty years and then died. Xenocles then sued for the property in the name of Phile, his wife, and declared upon oath that she was a legitimate daughter of Pyrrhus, the succession being claimed by Endius's mother. Xenocles was convicted of perjury. Nicodemus had also borne witness that he had given his daughter in legal marriage to Pyrrhus and that Phile was her child. The brother of Endius declares that while Phile is illegitimate, having been the child of Pyrrhus by a mistress, and that she was given as such in marriage to Xenocles. The question at issue is one of fact, and the action a charge of perjury against Nicodemus.

Judges, my mother's brother, Pyrrhus, having no legitimate issue, adopted my brother Endius as his son. The latter inherited his estate and survived him by more than twenty years; and during all this long period of possession no one claimed the estate or questioned his right of inheritance.

My brother having died last year, Phile, ignoring the existence of the last tenant, came forward, claiming to be the legitimate daughter of our uncle, and Xenocles of Coprus,[*] as her legal representative, demanded to be given possession of the estate of Pyrrhus, who had died more than twenty years before, having fixed the value of the estate at three talents.

When our mother, the sister of Pyrrhus, claimed[*] the estate, the legal representative of the woman who was suing for the estate had the audacity to put in a protestation[*] that the estate was not adjudicable to our mother, because Pyrrhus, to whom it originally belonged, had a legitimate daughter. We denounced his protestation and brought before you the man who had the audacity to make it;

and, having clearly convicted him of having given false evidence, we obtained from you a verdict for perjury against him. At the same time we convicted Nicodemus, the present defendant, before the same judges, of the most shameless lying in the evidence which he then gave, since he had the impudence to bear witness that he had given his sister in marriage to our uncle in the proper legal manner.

Argument 1 w 8
Pyrrhus 1 w 15
had 1 w 18
adopted 1 w 25
one 1 w 28
of 1 w 30
his 1 w 33
sister 1 w 39
s 5 w 41
two 1 w 44
sons 1 w 48
Endius 1 w 55
who 1 w 59
enjoyed 1 w 66
the 1 w 69
estate 1 w 75
for 1 w 78
more 1 w 82
than 1 w 86
twenty 1 w 92
years 1 w 97
and 1 w 100
then 1 w 104
died 1 w 108
Xenocles 1 w 117
then 2 w 121
sued 1 w 125
for 2 w 128
the 4 w 131
property 1 w 139
in 1 w 141
the 5 w 144
name 1 w 148
of 2 w 150
Phile 1 w 155
his 2 w 159
wife 1 w 163
and 2 w 167
declared 1 w 175
upon 1 w 179
oath 1 w 183
that 1 w 187
she 1 w 190
was 1 w 193
a 13 w 194
legitimate 1 w 204
daughter 1 w 212
of 3 w 214
Pyrrhus 2 w 221
the 6 w 225
succession 1 w 235
being 1 w 240
claimed 1 w 247
by 1 w 249
Endius 2 w 255
s 21 w 257
mother 1 w 263
Xenocles 2 w 272
was 2 w 275
convicted 1 w 284
of 4 w 286
perjury 1 w 293
Nicodemus 1 w 303
had 2 w 306
also 1 w 310
borne 1 w 315
witness 1 w 322
that 2 w 326
he 9 w 328
had 3 w 331
given 1 w 336
his 3 w 339
daughter 2 w 347
in 3 w 349
legal 1 w 354
marriage 1 w 362
to 1 w 364
Pyrrhus 3 w 371
and 3 w 374
that 3 w 378
Phile 2 w 383
was 3 w 386
her 2 w 389
child 1 w 394
The 1 w 398
brother 1 w 405
of 5 w 407
Endius 3 w 413
declares 1 w 421
that 4 w 425
while 1 w 430
Phile 3 w 435
is 5 w 437
illegitimate 1 w 449
having 1 w 456
been 1 w 460
the 9 w 463
child 2 w 468
of 6 w 470
Pyrrhus 4 w 477
by 2 w 479
a 33 w 480
mistress 1 w 488
and 4 w 492
that 5 w 496
she 2 w 499
was 4 w 502
given 2 w 507
as 5 w 509
such 1 w 513
in 5 w 515
marriage 2 w 523
to 2 w 525
Xenocles 3 w 533
The 2 w 537
question 1 w 545
at 10 w 547
issue 1 w 552
is 8 w 554
one 2 w 557
of 7 w 559
fact 1 w 563
and 5 w 567
the 10 w 570
action 1 w 576
a 44 w 577
charge 1 w 583
of 8 w 585
perjury 2 w 592
against 1 w 599
Nicodemus 2 w 608
Judges 1 w 615
my 1 w 618
mother 2 w 624
s 50 w 626
brother 2 w 633
Pyrrhus 5 w 641
having 2 w 648
no 4 w 650
legitimate 3 w 660
issue 2 w 665
adopted 2 w 673
my 2 w 675
brother 3 w 682
Endius 4 w 688
as 6 w 690
his 4 w 693
son 2 w 696
The 3 w 700
latter 1 w 706
inherited 1 w 715
his 5 w 718
estate 2 w 724
and 6 w 727
survived 1 w 735
him 1 w 738
by 3 w 740
more 2 w 744
than 2 w 748
twenty 2 w 754
years 2 w 759
and 7 w 763
during 1 w 769
all 1 w 772
this 1 w 776
long 1 w 780
period 1 w 786
of 9 w 788
possession 1 w 798
no 5 w 800
one 3 w 803
claimed 2 w 810
the 14 w 813
estate 3 w 819
or 6 w 821
questioned 1 w 831
his 7 w 834
right 1 w 839
of 10 w 841
inheritance 1 w 852
My 1 w 855
brother 4 w 862
having 3 w 868
died 2 w 872
last 1 w 876
year 3 w 880
Phile 4 w 886
ignoring 1 w 895
the 16 w 898
existence 1 w 907
of 11 w 909
the 17 w 912
last 2 w 916
tenant 1 w 922
came 1 w 927
forward 1 w 934
claiming 1 w 943
to 3 w 945
be 3 w 947
the 18 w 950
legitimate 4 w 960
daughter 3 w 968
of 12 w 970
our 1 w 973
uncle 1 w 978
and 8 w 982
Xenocles 4 w 990
of 13 w 992
Coprus 1 w 998
A 2 w 1000
deme 1 w 1004
belonging 1 w 1013
to 4 w 1015
the 19 w 1018
tribe 1 w 1023
of 14 w 1025
Hippothontis 1 w 1037
A 3 w 1039
scholiast 1 w 1048
on 16 w 1050
Aristoph 1 w 1058
Kn 1 w 1061
899 1 w 1065
states 1 w 1072
that 6 w 1076
it 8 w 1078
was 5 w 1081
an 13 w 1083
island 1 w 1089
off 1 w 1092
Attica 1 w 1098
as 11 w 1101
her 10 w 1104
legal 2 w 1109
representative 1 w 1123
demanded 1 w 1132
to 6 w 1134
be 6 w 1136
given 3 w 1141
possession 2 w 1151
of 16 w 1153
the 20 w 1156
estate 4 w 1162
of 17 w 1164
Pyrrhus 6 w 1171
who 2 w 1175
had 4 w 1178
died 3 w 1182
more 3 w 1186
than 3 w 1190
twenty 3 w 1196
years 3 w 1201
before 1 w 1207
having 4 w 1214
fixed 1 w 1219
the 21 w 1222
value 1 w 1227
of 18 w 1229
the 22 w 1232
estate 5 w 1238
at 21 w 1240
three 1 w 1245
talents 1 w 1252
When 1 w 1257
our 2 w 1260
mother 3 w 1266
the 24 w 1270
sister 2 w 1276
of 19 w 1278
Pyrrhus 7 w 1285
claimed 3 w 1293
She 1 w 1296
claimed 4 w 1303
as 12 w 1305
sister 3 w 1311
of 20 w 1313
Pyrrhus 8 w 1320
not 1 w 1324
as 13 w 1326
mother 4 w 1332
of 21 w 1334
Endius 5 w 1340
in 16 w 1343
which 1 w 1348
capacity 1 w 1356
she 3 w 1359
had 5 w 1362
no 9 w 1364
title 1 w 1369
the 26 w 1373
estate 6 w 1379
the 27 w 1383
legal 3 w 1388
representative 2 w 1402
of 22 w 1404
the 28 w 1407
woman 1 w 1412
who 3 w 1415
was 6 w 1418
suing 1 w 1423
for 5 w 1426
the 29 w 1429
estate 7 w 1435
had 6 w 1438
the 30 w 1441
audacity 1 w 1449
to 7 w 1451
put 1 w 1454
in 18 w 1456
a 109 w 1457
protestation 1 w 1469
For 1 w 1472
the 31 w 1475
meaning 1 w 1482
of 23 w 1484
διαμαρτυρία 1 w 1495
protestation 2 w 1508
see 1 w 1512
Isaeus 1 w 1518
2 1 w 1519
Introduction 1 w 1532
that 7 w 1537
the 32 w 1540
estate 8 w 1546
was 7 w 1549
not 2 w 1552
adjudicable 1 w 1563
to 8 w 1565
our 3 w 1568
mother 5 w 1574
because 1 w 1582
Pyrrhus 9 w 1589
to 9 w 1592
whom 1 w 1596
it 12 w 1598
originally 1 w 1608
belonged 1 w 1616
had 7 w 1620
a 122 w 1621
legitimate 5 w 1631
daughter 4 w 1639
We 1 w 1642
denounced 1 w 1651
his 8 w 1654
protestation 3 w 1666
and 11 w 1669
brought 1 w 1676
before 2 w 1682
you 1 w 1685
the 34 w 1688
man 3 w 1691
who 5 w 1694
had 8 w 1697
the 35 w 1700
audacity 2 w 1708
to 10 w 1710
make 1 w 1714
it 15 w 1716
and 12 w 1720
having 5 w 1727
clearly 1 w 1734
convicted 2 w 1743
him 2 w 1746
of 24 w 1748
having 6 w 1754
given 4 w 1759
false 1 w 1764
evidence 1 w 1772
we 4 w 1775
obtained 1 w 1783
from 1 w 1787
you 2 w 1790
a 138 w 1791
verdict 1 w 1798
for 7 w 1801
perjury 3 w 1808
against 2 w 1815
him 3 w 1818
At 2 w 1821
the 36 w 1824
same 1 w 1828
time 1 w 1832
we 5 w 1834
convicted 3 w 1843
Nicodemus 3 w 1852
the 37 w 1856
present 3 w 1863
defendant 1 w 1872
before 3 w 1879
the 38 w 1882
same 2 w 1886
judges 1 w 1892
of 25 w 1895
the 39 w 1898
most 1 w 1902
shameless 1 w 1911
lying 1 w 1916
in 26 w 1918
the 40 w 1921
evidence 2 w 1929
which 2 w 1934
he 54 w 1936
then 3 w 1940
gave 1 w 1944
since 1 w 1950
he 56 w 1952
had 9 w 1955
the 42 w 1958
impudence 1 w 1967
to 11 w 1969
bear 1 w 1973
witness 2 w 1980
that 8 w 1984
he 58 w 1986
had 10 w 1989
given 5 w 1994
his 9 w 1997
sister 4 w 2003
in 28 w 2005
marriage 3 w 2013
to 12 w 2015
our 4 w 2018
uncle 2 w 2023
in 29 w 2025
the 43 w 2028
proper 2 w 2034
legal 4 w 2039
manner 1 w 2045