Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate of Cleonymus

On The Estate of Cleonymus (28-29)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg001.perseus-eng2:28-29
Refs {'start': {'reference': '28', 'human_reference': 'Section 28'}, 'end': {'reference': '29', 'human_reference': 'Section 29'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

It would be most extraordinary if, while Cephisander, the kinsman of our opponents, thought it fair that each of us should have a share of the property, yet Cleonymus, who was our nearest relative and received us into his house and cared for us and looked after our interests as though they were his own, was the only person who wished that we should receive no share of his estate.

Who of you could possibly believe that our opponents-at-law are kinder and more considerate towards us than our closest kindred; and that he, who was bound to treat us well and in whom it would have been disgraceful to neglect us, left us none of his property, whereas these men, who are under no obligation to us and whose disregard of us involves no disgrace, offered us a share of the property to which, as they say, we have no claim? These suppositions, gentlemen, are perfectly incredible.

Tokens

It 1 w 2
would 1 w 7
be 1 w 9
most 1 w 13
extraordinary 1 w 26
if 1 w 28
while 1 w 34
Cephisander 1 w 45
the 1 w 49
kinsman 1 w 56
of 1 w 58
our 1 w 61
opponents 1 w 70
thought 1 w 78
it 1 w 80
fair 1 w 84
that 1 w 88
each 1 w 92
of 2 w 94
us 1 w 96
should 1 w 102
have 1 w 106
a 9 w 107
share 1 w 112
of 3 w 114
the 2 w 117
property 1 w 125
yet 1 w 129
Cleonymus 1 w 138
who 1 w 142
was 1 w 145
our 2 w 148
nearest 1 w 155
relative 1 w 163
and 2 w 166
received 1 w 174
us 3 w 176
into 1 w 180
his 2 w 183
house 1 w 188
and 3 w 191
cared 1 w 196
for 1 w 199
us 5 w 201
and 4 w 204
looked 1 w 210
after 1 w 215
our 3 w 218
interests 1 w 227
as 2 w 229
though 2 w 235
they 1 w 239
were 1 w 243
his 3 w 246
own 1 w 249
was 2 w 253
the 4 w 256
only 1 w 260
person 1 w 266
who 2 w 269
wished 1 w 275
that 2 w 279
we 2 w 281
should 2 w 287
receive 2 w 294
no 1 w 296
share 2 w 301
of 4 w 303
his 4 w 306
estate 1 w 312
Who 1 w 316
of 5 w 318
you 1 w 321
could 1 w 326
possibly 1 w 334
believe 1 w 341
that 3 w 345
our 4 w 348
opponents-at-law 1 w 364
are 5 w 367
kinder 1 w 373
and 5 w 376
more 1 w 380
considerate 1 w 391
towards 1 w 398
us 6 w 400
than 1 w 404
our 5 w 407
closest 1 w 414
kindred 1 w 421
and 6 w 425
that 4 w 429
he 6 w 431
who 3 w 435
was 3 w 438
bound 1 w 443
to 3 w 445
treat 1 w 450
us 7 w 452
well 1 w 456
and 7 w 459
in 7 w 461
whom 1 w 465
it 2 w 467
would 2 w 472
have 2 w 476
been 1 w 480
disgraceful 1 w 491
to 4 w 493
neglect 1 w 500
us 8 w 502
left 1 w 507
us 9 w 509
none 1 w 513
of 6 w 515
his 5 w 518
property 2 w 526
whereas 1 w 534
these 1 w 539
men 1 w 542
who 5 w 546
are 6 w 549
under 1 w 554
no 3 w 556
obligation 1 w 566
to 5 w 568
us 10 w 570
and 8 w 573
whose 1 w 578
disregard 1 w 587
of 7 w 589
us 11 w 591
involves 1 w 599
no 4 w 601
disgrace 2 w 609
offered 1 w 617
us 12 w 619
a 45 w 620
share 3 w 625
of 9 w 627
the 6 w 630
property 3 w 638
to 6 w 640
which 1 w 645
as 6 w 648
they 2 w 652
say 1 w 655
we 4 w 658
have 3 w 662
no 5 w 664
claim 1 w 669
These 1 w 675
suppositions 1 w 687
gentlemen 1 w 697
are 8 w 701
perfectly 1 w 710
incredible 1 w 720