Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On The Estate of Cleonymus

On The Estate of Cleonymus (10-14)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0017.tlg001.perseus-eng2:10-14
Refs {'start': {'reference': '10', 'human_reference': 'Section 10'}, 'end': {'reference': '14', 'human_reference': 'Section 14'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

It was at this time, under the influence of this anger, that Cleonymus made this will: not because he had any complaint against us, as he subsequently stated, but because he saw that we were under the guardianship of Deinias, and was afraid that he might himself die while we were minors, and that Deinias might obtain control of the property, if it became ours; for he could not bear to think of leaving his bitterest enemy as the guardian of his relatives and in control of his property, and of the customary rites being performed over him, until we grew up, by one with whom he had been at variance in his lifetime.

Such were the sentiments under which, whether rightly or wrongly, he made this will; and when Deinias immediately asked him at the time whether he had any grievance against us or our father, he replied in the hearing of all that he had no fault to find with us, and so testified that it was his anger against Deinias and not his calm judgement which decided him to make this will. For surely, gentlemen, if he had been in his right senses, he would never have wished to injure us, who had never wronged him.

His subsequent conduct is the strongest proof in support of our contention, that even in acting thus he did not intend to injure us. For after Deinias's death, when things were going badly with us, he would not allow us to lack anything, but took us into his own house and brought us up, and saved our property when our creditors were scheming against it, and looked after our interests as though they were his own.

It is from these acts rather than from the will that his intentions must be discerned, and inferences must be drawn not from what he did under the influence of angerthrough which we are all liable to errbut from his subsequent acts, whereby he made his attitude quite clear. In his last hours he showed still more plainly his feelings toward us.

For, when he was suffering from the illness of which he died, he wished to revoke this will, and directed Poseidippus to fetch the magistrate. Not only did he fail to do so, but he even sent away one of the magistrates who had come to the door. Cleonymus was enraged at this, and again gave instructions, this time to Diocles, to summon the magistrates for the following day, though he was in no fit state to transact business owing to his illness; but, although there was still good hope of his recovery, he died suddenly that night.

It 1 w 2
was 1 w 5
at 1 w 7
this 1 w 11
time 1 w 15
under 1 w 21
the 1 w 24
influence 1 w 33
of 1 w 35
this 2 w 39
anger 1 w 44
that 1 w 49
Cleonymus 1 w 58
made 1 w 62
this 3 w 66
will 1 w 70
not 1 w 74
because 1 w 81
he 2 w 83
had 1 w 86
any 1 w 89
complaint 1 w 98
against 1 w 105
us 3 w 107
as 2 w 110
he 3 w 112
subsequently 1 w 124
stated 1 w 130
but 1 w 134
because 2 w 141
he 4 w 143
saw 1 w 146
that 2 w 150
we 1 w 152
were 1 w 156
under 2 w 161
the 2 w 164
guardianship 1 w 176
of 2 w 178
Deinias 1 w 185
and 1 w 189
was 2 w 192
afraid 1 w 198
that 3 w 202
he 6 w 204
might 1 w 209
himself 1 w 216
die 1 w 219
while 1 w 224
we 3 w 226
were 2 w 230
minors 1 w 236
and 2 w 240
that 4 w 244
Deinias 2 w 251
might 2 w 256
obtain 1 w 262
control 1 w 269
of 3 w 271
the 3 w 274
property 1 w 282
if 1 w 285
it 1 w 287
became 1 w 293
ours 1 w 297
for 1 w 301
he 8 w 303
could 1 w 308
not 2 w 311
bear 1 w 315
to 1 w 317
think 1 w 322
of 4 w 324
leaving 1 w 331
his 4 w 334
bitterest 1 w 343
enemy 1 w 348
as 6 w 350
the 4 w 353
guardian 2 w 361
of 5 w 363
his 5 w 366
relatives 1 w 375
and 3 w 378
in 10 w 380
control 2 w 387
of 6 w 389
his 6 w 392
property 2 w 400
and 4 w 404
of 7 w 406
the 5 w 409
customary 1 w 418
rites 1 w 423
being 1 w 428
performed 1 w 437
over 1 w 441
him 2 w 444
until 1 w 450
we 5 w 452
grew 1 w 456
up 1 w 458
by 1 w 461
one 1 w 464
with 1 w 468
whom 1 w 472
he 11 w 474
had 2 w 477
been 1 w 481
at 8 w 483
variance 1 w 491
in 12 w 493
his 7 w 496
lifetime 1 w 504
Such 1 w 509
were 3 w 513
the 6 w 516
sentiments 1 w 526
under 3 w 531
which 1 w 536
whether 1 w 544
rightly 1 w 551
or 4 w 553
wrongly 1 w 560
he 15 w 563
made 2 w 567
this 4 w 571
will 2 w 575
and 5 w 579
when 1 w 583
Deinias 3 w 590
immediately 1 w 601
asked 1 w 606
him 3 w 609
at 10 w 611
the 8 w 614
time 4 w 618
whether 2 w 625
he 20 w 627
had 3 w 630
any 2 w 633
grievance 1 w 642
against 2 w 649
us 6 w 651
or 5 w 653
our 2 w 656
father 1 w 662
he 22 w 665
replied 1 w 672
in 15 w 674
the 11 w 677
hearing 1 w 684
of 8 w 686
all 1 w 689
that 5 w 693
he 25 w 695
had 4 w 698
no 4 w 700
fault 1 w 705
to 3 w 707
find 1 w 711
with 2 w 715
us 7 w 717
and 6 w 721
so 1 w 723
testified 1 w 732
that 6 w 736
it 6 w 738
was 3 w 741
his 9 w 744
anger 2 w 749
against 3 w 756
Deinias 4 w 763
and 7 w 766
not 3 w 769
his 10 w 772
calm 1 w 776
judgement 1 w 785
which 2 w 790
decided 1 w 797
him 4 w 800
to 4 w 802
make 1 w 806
this 5 w 810
will 3 w 814
For 1 w 818
surely 1 w 824
gentlemen 1 w 834
if 4 w 837
he 26 w 839
had 5 w 842
been 2 w 846
in 20 w 848
his 12 w 851
right 2 w 856
senses 1 w 862
he 27 w 865
would 1 w 870
never 1 w 875
have 1 w 879
wished 1 w 885
to 5 w 887
injure 1 w 893
us 8 w 895
who 2 w 899
had 6 w 902
never 2 w 907
wronged 1 w 914
him 5 w 917
His 1 w 921
subsequent 2 w 931
conduct 1 w 938
is 15 w 940
the 12 w 943
strongest 1 w 952
proof 1 w 957
in 22 w 959
support 1 w 966
of 10 w 968
our 3 w 971
contention 1 w 981
that 7 w 986
even 1 w 990
in 23 w 992
acting 1 w 998
thus 1 w 1002
he 30 w 1004
did 1 w 1007
not 4 w 1010
intend 1 w 1016
to 6 w 1018
injure 2 w 1024
us 10 w 1026
For 2 w 1030
after 1 w 1035
Deinias 5 w 1042
s 64 w 1044
death 1 w 1049
when 2 w 1054
things 1 w 1060
were 4 w 1064
going 1 w 1069
badly 1 w 1074
with 3 w 1078
us 11 w 1080
he 32 w 1083
would 2 w 1088
not 5 w 1091
allow 1 w 1096
us 12 w 1098
to 7 w 1100
lack 1 w 1104
anything 1 w 1112
but 2 w 1116
took 1 w 1120
us 13 w 1122
into 1 w 1126
his 13 w 1129
own 1 w 1132
house 1 w 1137
and 8 w 1140
brought 1 w 1147
us 15 w 1149
up 3 w 1151
and 9 w 1155
saved 1 w 1160
our 4 w 1163
property 3 w 1171
when 3 w 1175
our 5 w 1178
creditors 1 w 1187
were 5 w 1191
scheming 1 w 1199
against 4 w 1206
it 9 w 1208
and 10 w 1212
looked 1 w 1218
after 2 w 1223
our 6 w 1226
interests 1 w 1235
as 12 w 1237
though 1 w 1243
they 1 w 1247
were 6 w 1251
his 14 w 1254
own 2 w 1257
It 2 w 1260
is 18 w 1262
from 1 w 1266
these 1 w 1271
acts 1 w 1275
rather 1 w 1281
than 1 w 1285
from 2 w 1289
the 16 w 1292
will 4 w 1296
that 8 w 1300
his 15 w 1303
intentions 1 w 1313
must 1 w 1317
be 8 w 1319
discerned 1 w 1328
and 11 w 1332
inferences 1 w 1342
must 2 w 1346
be 9 w 1348
drawn 1 w 1353
not 6 w 1356
from 3 w 1360
what 1 w 1364
he 39 w 1366
did 2 w 1369
under 4 w 1374
the 17 w 1377
influence 2 w 1386
of 11 w 1388
anger 3 w 1393
through 1 w 1401
which 3 w 1406
we 10 w 1408
are 1 w 1411
all 3 w 1414
liable 1 w 1420
to 11 w 1422
err 1 w 1425
but 3 w 1429
from 4 w 1433
his 16 w 1436
subsequent 3 w 1446
acts 2 w 1450
whereby 1 w 1458
he 42 w 1460
made 3 w 1464
his 17 w 1467
attitude 1 w 1475
quite 1 w 1480
clear 1 w 1485
In 1 w 1488
his 18 w 1491
last 1 w 1495
hours 1 w 1500
he 43 w 1502
showed 1 w 1508
still 1 w 1513
more 1 w 1517
plainly 1 w 1524
his 19 w 1527
feelings 1 w 1535
toward 1 w 1541
us 18 w 1543
For 3 w 1547
when 4 w 1552
he 45 w 1554
was 4 w 1557
suffering 1 w 1566
from 5 w 1570
the 18 w 1573
illness 1 w 1580
of 12 w 1582
which 4 w 1587
he 47 w 1589
died 1 w 1593
he 48 w 1596
wished 2 w 1602
to 13 w 1604
revoke 1 w 1610
this 6 w 1614
will 5 w 1618
and 12 w 1622
directed 1 w 1630
Poseidippus 1 w 1641
to 14 w 1643
fetch 1 w 1648
the 19 w 1651
magistrate 1 w 1661
Not 1 w 1665
only 1 w 1669
did 3 w 1672
he 51 w 1674
fail 1 w 1678
to 15 w 1680
do 1 w 1682
so 2 w 1684
but 4 w 1688
he 52 w 1690
even 2 w 1694
sent 2 w 1698
away 1 w 1702
one 2 w 1705
of 13 w 1707
the 20 w 1710
magistrates 1 w 1721
who 3 w 1724
had 7 w 1727
come 1 w 1731
to 16 w 1733
the 21 w 1736
door 1 w 1740
Cleonymus 2 w 1750
was 5 w 1753
enraged 1 w 1760
at 22 w 1762
this 7 w 1766
and 13 w 1770
again 5 w 1775
gave 1 w 1779
instructions 1 w 1791
this 8 w 1796
time 5 w 1800
to 17 w 1802
Diocles 1 w 1809
to 18 w 1812
summon 1 w 1818
the 22 w 1821
magistrates 2 w 1832
for 3 w 1835
the 23 w 1838
following 1 w 1847
day 1 w 1850
though 2 w 1857
he 57 w 1859
was 6 w 1862
in 44 w 1864
no 9 w 1866
fit 1 w 1869
state 2 w 1874
to 19 w 1876
transact 1 w 1884
business 1 w 1892
owing 2 w 1897
to 20 w 1899
his 23 w 1902
illness 2 w 1909
but 5 w 1913
although 1 w 1922
there 1 w 1927
was 7 w 1930
still 2 w 1935
good 1 w 1939
hope 1 w 1943
of 14 w 1945
his 24 w 1948
recovery 1 w 1956
he 59 w 1959
died 2 w 1963
suddenly 1 w 1971
that 9 w 1975
night 1 w 1980