Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Ariston Against Conon, an Action for Assault

Ariston Against Conon, an Action for Assault (26-30)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg054.perseus-eng2:26-30
Refs {'start': {'reference': '26', 'human_reference': 'Section 26'}, 'end': {'reference': '30', 'human_reference': 'Section 30'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

I wish now to tell you what they sought to do at the arbitration; for from this you will perceive their utter insolence. They spun out the time till past midnight, refusing to read the depositions or to put in copies; leading to the altar one at a time our witnesses who were present and putting them on oath; writing depositions which had nothing to do with the case (for instance that Ctesias was the son of Conon by a mistress, and that he had been treated thus and so[*])—a course of action, men of the jury, which I assure you by the gods roused resentment and disgust in the mind of every one present; and finally they were disgusted at themselves.

Be that as it may, when they had had their fill and were tired of acting thus, they put in a challenge with a view to gaining time and preventing the boxes from being sealed, offering to deliver up certain slaves, whose names they wrote down, to be examined as to the assault. And I fancy that their defence will hinge chiefly upon this point. I think, however, that you should all note one thingthat if these men tendered the challenge in order that the inquiry by the torture should take place, and had confidence in this method of proof, they would not have tendered it when the award was now just being announced, when night had fallen and no further pretext was left them;

no, before the action had been brought, while I was lying ill and not knowing whether I should recover, and was denouncing the defendant to all who came to see me as the one who dealt the first blow and was the perpetrator of most of the maltreatment I received,—it was then, I say, that he would have come to my house without delay, bringing with him a number of witnesses; it was then that he would have offered to deliver up his slaves for the torture, and would have invited some members of the Areopagus to attend; for if I had died, the case would have come before them.

But if he was unaware of this situation, and having this proof, as he will now say, made no preparation against so serious a danger, surely when I had left my sick bed and summoned him, he would at our first meeting before the arbitrator have shown himself ready to deliver up the slaves. But he did nothing of the kind.

To prove that I am speaking the truth, and that the challenge was tendered merely for the sake of gaining time, read this deposition. It will be clear from this.

The Deposition

With regard to the examination by the torture, then, bear these facts in mind: the time when the challenge was tendered, his evasive purpose in doing this, and the first occasions, in the course of which he showed that he did not wish this test to be accorded him, and neither proposed it nor demanded it. Since, however, he was convicted on all these points before the arbitrator, just as he is now, and proved manifestly guilty of all the charges against him,

Tokens

I 1 w 1
wish 1 w 5
now 1 w 8
to 1 w 10
tell 1 w 14
you 1 w 17
what 1 w 21
they 1 w 25
sought 1 w 31
to 2 w 33
do 1 w 35
at 2 w 37
the 2 w 40
arbitration 1 w 51
for 1 w 55
from 1 w 59
this 1 w 63
you 2 w 66
will 1 w 70
perceive 1 w 78
their 1 w 83
utter 1 w 88
insolence 1 w 97
They 1 w 102
spun 1 w 106
out 1 w 109
the 4 w 112
time 1 w 116
till 1 w 120
past 1 w 124
midnight 1 w 132
refusing 1 w 141
to 3 w 143
read 1 w 147
the 5 w 150
depositions 1 w 161
or 2 w 163
to 4 w 165
put 1 w 168
in 3 w 170
copies 1 w 176
leading 1 w 184
to 5 w 186
the 6 w 189
altar 1 w 194
one 1 w 197
at 4 w 199
a 11 w 200
time 2 w 204
our 1 w 207
witnesses 1 w 216
who 1 w 219
were 1 w 223
present 1 w 230
and 1 w 233
putting 1 w 240
them 1 w 244
on 4 w 246
oath 1 w 250
writing 1 w 258
depositions 2 w 269
which 1 w 274
had 1 w 277
nothing 1 w 284
to 6 w 286
do 2 w 288
with 1 w 292
the 8 w 295
case 1 w 299
for 2 w 303
instance 1 w 311
that 1 w 315
Ctesias 1 w 322
was 1 w 325
the 9 w 328
son 1 w 331
of 1 w 333
Conon 1 w 338
by 1 w 340
a 20 w 341
mistress 1 w 349
and 2 w 353
that 2 w 357
he 11 w 359
had 2 w 362
been 1 w 366
treated 1 w 373
thus 1 w 377
and 3 w 380
so 4 w 382
If 1 w 384
Ctesias 2 w 391
were 2 w 395
illegitimate 1 w 407
Conon 2 w 413
could 1 w 418
not 2 w 421
be 2 w 423
held 1 w 427
responsible 1 w 438
for 3 w 441
his 2 w 444
misdoings 1 w 453
and 4 w 457
previous 1 w 465
mistreatment 1 w 477
by 2 w 479
the 10 w 482
plaintiff 1 w 491
is 7 w 493
alleged 1 w 500
as 6 w 502
justification 1 w 515
of 2 w 517
the 11 w 520
assault 1 w 527
made 1 w 531
upon 1 w 535
the 12 w 538
latter 1 w 544
by 3 w 546
Ctesias 3 w 553
a 39 w 557
course 1 w 563
of 3 w 565
action 1 w 571
men 2 w 575
of 4 w 577
the 13 w 580
jury 1 w 584
which 2 w 590
I 3 w 591
assure 1 w 597
you 3 w 600
by 4 w 602
the 14 w 605
gods 1 w 609
roused 1 w 615
resentment 1 w 625
and 5 w 628
disgust 1 w 635
in 11 w 637
the 15 w 640
mind 1 w 644
of 5 w 646
every 1 w 651
one 2 w 654
present 2 w 661
and 6 w 665
finally 1 w 672
they 2 w 676
were 3 w 680
disgusted 1 w 689
at 13 w 691
themselves 1 w 701
Be 1 w 704
that 3 w 708
as 10 w 710
it 8 w 712
may 1 w 715
when 1 w 720
they 3 w 724
had 3 w 727
had 4 w 730
their 2 w 735
fill 1 w 739
and 7 w 742
were 4 w 746
tired 1 w 751
of 6 w 753
acting 1 w 759
thus 2 w 763
they 4 w 768
put 3 w 771
in 15 w 773
a 53 w 774
challenge 1 w 783
with 2 w 787
a 55 w 788
view 1 w 792
to 7 w 794
gaining 1 w 801
time 3 w 805
and 8 w 808
preventing 1 w 818
the 21 w 821
boxes 1 w 826
from 2 w 830
being 1 w 835
sealed 1 w 841
offering 1 w 850
to 8 w 852
deliver 1 w 859
up 2 w 861
certain 1 w 868
slaves 1 w 874
whose 1 w 880
names 1 w 885
they 5 w 889
wrote 1 w 894
down 1 w 898
to 9 w 901
be 4 w 903
examined 1 w 911
as 11 w 913
to 10 w 915
the 23 w 918
assault 2 w 925
And 1 w 929
I 4 w 930
fancy 1 w 935
that 4 w 939
their 3 w 944
defence 1 w 951
will 2 w 955
hinge 1 w 960
chiefly 1 w 967
upon 2 w 971
this 2 w 975
point 1 w 980
I 5 w 982
think 1 w 987
however 1 w 995
that 5 w 1000
you 4 w 1003
should 1 w 1009
all 4 w 1012
note 1 w 1016
one 3 w 1019
thing 2 w 1024
that 6 w 1029
if 3 w 1031
these 1 w 1036
men 4 w 1039
tendered 1 w 1047
the 26 w 1050
challenge 2 w 1059
in 27 w 1061
order 1 w 1066
that 7 w 1070
the 27 w 1073
inquiry 1 w 1080
by 5 w 1082
the 28 w 1085
torture 1 w 1092
should 2 w 1098
take 1 w 1102
place 1 w 1107
and 9 w 1111
had 5 w 1114
confidence 1 w 1124
in 29 w 1126
this 3 w 1130
method 1 w 1136
of 8 w 1138
proof 1 w 1143
they 6 w 1148
would 1 w 1153
not 4 w 1156
have 1 w 1160
tendered 2 w 1168
it 10 w 1170
when 2 w 1174
the 30 w 1177
award 1 w 1182
was 2 w 1185
now 2 w 1188
just 2 w 1192
being 2 w 1197
announced 1 w 1206
when 3 w 1211
night 2 w 1216
had 6 w 1219
fallen 1 w 1225
and 10 w 1228
no 10 w 1230
further 1 w 1237
pretext 1 w 1244
was 3 w 1247
left 1 w 1251
them 3 w 1255
no 11 w 1258
before 1 w 1265
the 33 w 1268
action 2 w 1274
had 7 w 1277
been 2 w 1281
brought 1 w 1288
while 1 w 1294
I 6 w 1295
was 4 w 1298
lying 1 w 1303
ill 6 w 1306
and 11 w 1309
not 5 w 1312
knowing 1 w 1319
whether 1 w 1326
I 7 w 1327
should 3 w 1333
recover 1 w 1340
and 12 w 1344
was 5 w 1347
denouncing 1 w 1357
the 35 w 1360
defendant 1 w 1369
to 12 w 1371
all 7 w 1374
who 3 w 1377
came 1 w 1381
to 13 w 1383
see 1 w 1386
me 11 w 1388
as 17 w 1390
the 36 w 1393
one 4 w 1396
who 4 w 1399
dealt 1 w 1404
the 37 w 1407
first 1 w 1412
blow 1 w 1416
and 13 w 1419
was 6 w 1422
the 38 w 1425
perpetrator 1 w 1436
of 10 w 1438
most 1 w 1442
of 11 w 1444
the 39 w 1447
maltreatment 1 w 1459
I 8 w 1460
received 1 w 1468
it 11 w 1472
was 7 w 1475
then 1 w 1479
I 9 w 1481
say 1 w 1484
that 8 w 1489
he 48 w 1491
would 2 w 1496
have 2 w 1500
come 1 w 1504
to 15 w 1506
my 1 w 1508
house 1 w 1513
without 1 w 1520
delay 1 w 1525
bringing 1 w 1534
with 4 w 1538
him 1 w 1541
a 107 w 1542
number 1 w 1548
of 12 w 1550
witnesses 2 w 1559
it 15 w 1562
was 8 w 1565
then 2 w 1569
that 9 w 1573
he 50 w 1575
would 3 w 1580
have 3 w 1584
offered 1 w 1591
to 16 w 1593
deliver 2 w 1600
up 4 w 1602
his 5 w 1605
slaves 2 w 1611
for 5 w 1614
the 42 w 1617
torture 2 w 1624
and 14 w 1628
would 4 w 1633
have 4 w 1637
invited 1 w 1644
some 1 w 1648
members 1 w 1655
of 14 w 1657
the 43 w 1660
Areopagus 1 w 1669
to 18 w 1671
attend 1 w 1677
for 6 w 1681
if 4 w 1683
I 10 w 1684
had 8 w 1687
died 1 w 1691
the 44 w 1695
case 2 w 1699
would 5 w 1704
have 5 w 1708
come 2 w 1712
before 2 w 1718
them 4 w 1722
But 1 w 1726
if 5 w 1728
he 55 w 1730
was 9 w 1733
unaware 1 w 1740
of 15 w 1742
this 4 w 1746
situation 1 w 1755
and 15 w 1759
having 1 w 1765
this 5 w 1769
proof 2 w 1774
as 23 w 1777
he 56 w 1779
will 3 w 1783
now 4 w 1786
say 2 w 1789
made 2 w 1794
no 16 w 1796
preparation 1 w 1807
against 1 w 1814
so 6 w 1816
serious 1 w 1823
a 132 w 1824
danger 1 w 1830
surely 1 w 1837
when 4 w 1841
I 11 w 1842
had 9 w 1845
left 2 w 1849
my 2 w 1851
sick 1 w 1855
bed 1 w 1858
and 16 w 1861
summoned 1 w 1869
him 2 w 1872
he 58 w 1875
would 6 w 1880
at 26 w 1882
our 3 w 1885
first 2 w 1890
meeting 1 w 1897
before 3 w 1903
the 46 w 1906
arbitrator 1 w 1916
have 6 w 1920
shown 1 w 1925
himself 1 w 1932
ready 1 w 1937
to 20 w 1939
deliver 3 w 1946
up 5 w 1948
the 47 w 1951
slaves 3 w 1957
But 2 w 1961
he 61 w 1963
did 1 w 1966
nothing 2 w 1973
of 17 w 1975
the 48 w 1978
kind 1 w 1982
To 1 w 1985
prove 1 w 1990
that 10 w 1994
I 12 w 1995
am 4 w 1997
speaking 1 w 2005
the 49 w 2008
truth 1 w 2013
and 17 w 2017
that 11 w 2021
the 50 w 2024
challenge 3 w 2033
was 10 w 2036
tendered 3 w 2044
merely 1 w 2050
for 9 w 2053
the 51 w 2056
sake 1 w 2060
of 18 w 2062
gaining 2 w 2069
time 4 w 2073
read 3 w 2078
this 6 w 2082
deposition 3 w 2092
It 1 w 2095
will 4 w 2099
be 13 w 2101
clear 1 w 2106
from 3 w 2110
this 7 w 2114
The 2 w 2118
Deposition 1 w 2128
With 1 w 2132
regard 1 w 2138
to 21 w 2140
the 52 w 2143
examination 1 w 2154
by 6 w 2156
the 53 w 2159
torture 3 w 2166
then 3 w 2171
bear 1 w 2176
these 2 w 2181
facts 1 w 2186
in 46 w 2188
mind 2 w 2192
the 56 w 2196
time 5 w 2200
when 5 w 2204
the 57 w 2207
challenge 4 w 2216
was 11 w 2219
tendered 4 w 2227
his 10 w 2231
evasive 1 w 2238
purpose 1 w 2245
in 48 w 2247
doing 2 w 2252
this 8 w 2256
and 18 w 2260
the 58 w 2263
first 3 w 2268
occasions 1 w 2277
in 50 w 2280
the 59 w 2283
course 2 w 2289
of 19 w 2291
which 3 w 2296
he 76 w 2298
showed 1 w 2304
that 12 w 2308
he 77 w 2310
did 2 w 2313
not 7 w 2316
wish 2 w 2320
this 9 w 2324
test 1 w 2328
to 23 w 2330
be 15 w 2332
accorded 1 w 2340
him 4 w 2343
and 19 w 2347
neither 1 w 2354
proposed 1 w 2362
it 23 w 2364
nor 1 w 2367
demanded 1 w 2375
it 24 w 2377
Since 1 w 2383
however 2 w 2391
he 79 w 2394
was 12 w 2397
convicted 1 w 2406
on 29 w 2408
all 10 w 2411
these 3 w 2416
points 1 w 2422
before 4 w 2428
the 62 w 2431
arbitrator 2 w 2441
just 3 w 2446
as 29 w 2448
he 82 w 2450
is 21 w 2452
now 5 w 2455
and 21 w 2459
proved 1 w 2465
manifestly 1 w 2475
guilty 1 w 2481
of 20 w 2483
all 11 w 2486
the 63 w 2489
charges 1 w 2496
against 2 w 2503
him 5 w 2506