Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Apollodorus Against Polycles for Expenses Incurred while Serving as Trierarch

Apollodorus Against Polycles for Expenses Incurred while Serving as Trierarch (67-68)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg050.perseus-eng2:67-68
Refs {'start': {'reference': '67', 'human_reference': 'Section 67'}, 'end': {'reference': '68', 'human_reference': 'Section 68'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

I should gladly ask you, men of the jury, what opinion you would have had of me, if, when my term of service had expired and the defendant had not come to take over the ship, I had refused to serve longer when the general so ordered, but had sailed away. Would you not have been indignant and have thought that I was wronging you? If, then, you would have been indignant in that case, because I refused to serve beyond my term, should you not now exact from the defendant the money expended by me on his behalf, seeing that he did not take over the ship?

To prove that it is not in my case only that he failed to take over his ship, but that on a former occasion also, when he was the associate of Euripides in the trierarchy and there was an agreement between them that each should sail for six months, when Euripides had sailed and the term had expired, Polycles did not take over the ship from him,—to prove this, I say, the clerk shall read the deposition.

The Deposition.

Tokens

I 1 w 1
should 1 w 7
gladly 1 w 13
ask 1 w 16
you 1 w 19
men 1 w 23
of 1 w 25
the 1 w 28
jury 1 w 32
what 1 w 37
opinion 1 w 44
you 2 w 47
would 1 w 52
have 1 w 56
had 1 w 59
of 2 w 61
me 2 w 63
if 1 w 66
when 1 w 71
my 1 w 73
term 1 w 77
of 3 w 79
service 1 w 86
had 2 w 89
expired 1 w 96
and 1 w 99
the 2 w 102
defendant 1 w 111
had 3 w 114
not 1 w 117
come 1 w 121
to 1 w 123
take 1 w 127
over 1 w 131
the 3 w 134
ship 1 w 138
I 2 w 140
had 4 w 143
refused 1 w 150
to 2 w 152
serve 1 w 157
longer 1 w 163
when 2 w 167
the 4 w 170
general 1 w 177
so 1 w 179
ordered 1 w 186
but 1 w 190
had 5 w 193
sailed 1 w 199
away 1 w 203
Would 1 w 209
you 3 w 212
not 2 w 215
have 2 w 219
been 1 w 223
indignant 1 w 232
and 2 w 235
have 3 w 239
thought 1 w 246
that 1 w 250
I 3 w 251
was 1 w 254
wronging 1 w 262
you 4 w 265
If 1 w 268
then 1 w 273
you 5 w 277
would 2 w 282
have 4 w 286
been 2 w 290
indignant 2 w 299
in 5 w 301
that 2 w 305
case 1 w 309
because 1 w 317
I 5 w 318
refused 2 w 325
to 3 w 327
serve 2 w 332
beyond 1 w 338
my 2 w 340
term 2 w 344
should 2 w 351
you 6 w 354
not 3 w 357
now 1 w 360
exact 1 w 365
from 1 w 369
the 6 w 372
defendant 2 w 381
the 7 w 384
money 1 w 389
expended 1 w 397
by 1 w 399
me 4 w 401
on 6 w 403
his 1 w 406
behalf 1 w 412
seeing 1 w 419
that 3 w 423
he 10 w 425
did 1 w 428
not 4 w 431
take 2 w 435
over 2 w 439
the 8 w 442
ship 2 w 446
To 1 w 449
prove 1 w 454
that 4 w 458
it 1 w 460
is 2 w 462
not 5 w 465
in 7 w 467
my 3 w 469
case 2 w 473
only 1 w 477
that 5 w 481
he 12 w 483
failed 1 w 489
to 4 w 491
take 3 w 495
over 3 w 499
his 2 w 502
ship 3 w 506
but 2 w 510
that 6 w 514
on 8 w 516
a 39 w 517
former 1 w 523
occasion 1 w 531
also 1 w 535
when 3 w 540
he 14 w 542
was 2 w 545
the 9 w 548
associate 1 w 557
of 4 w 559
Euripides 1 w 568
in 8 w 570
the 10 w 573
trierarchy 1 w 583
and 3 w 586
there 1 w 591
was 3 w 594
an 8 w 596
agreement 1 w 605
between 1 w 612
them 1 w 616
that 7 w 620
each 1 w 624
should 3 w 630
sail 2 w 634
for 2 w 637
six 1 w 640
months 1 w 646
when 4 w 651
Euripides 2 w 660
had 6 w 663
sailed 2 w 669
and 4 w 672
the 13 w 675
term 3 w 679
had 7 w 682
expired 2 w 689
Polycles 1 w 698
did 2 w 701
not 6 w 704
take 4 w 708
over 4 w 712
the 14 w 715
ship 4 w 719
from 2 w 723
him 1 w 726
to 5 w 730
prove 2 w 735
this 1 w 739
I 6 w 741
say 1 w 744
the 15 w 748
clerk 1 w 753
shall 1 w 758
read 1 w 762
the 16 w 765
deposition 1 w 775
The 1 w 779
Deposition 1 w 789