Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Callistratus Against Olympiodorus, an Action for Damages

Callistratus Against Olympiodorus, an Action for Damages (26-28)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg048.perseus-eng2:26-28
Refs {'start': {'reference': '26', 'human_reference': 'Section 26'}, 'end': {'reference': '28', 'human_reference': 'Section 28'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

When the jurors had thus decided, the archon Pythodotus[*] in accordance with the law struck out the claim of the defendant; and when this claim was stricken out I necessarily had to abandon my claim to half the estate. After these steps had been taken, the archon adjudged the estate of Comon to our opponents; for the laws compelled him to do so.

They, as soon as they had won the adjudication, went at once to the Peiraeus and proceeded to take over all that either of us had received from the division. I, being at home, voluntarily gave over to them what I had (for it was necessary to obey the laws), but since Olympiodorus was abroad, they carried off all his effects except the money which he had separately taken from the manthe slave whom he had put to the torture; for they had no means of getting hold of that money.

Such were the events which happened in the absence of Olympiodorus, and such the benefit I derived from my association with him. But when he returned with the rest of the troops, the defendant Olympiodorus was indignant, men of the jury, at what had occurred, and thought he had been outrageously treated. However, when he was at the height of his indignation, we again looked matters over, the defendant Olympiodorus and I, and took counsel together to see how we could get back something of what we had lost.

Tokens

When 1 w 4
the 1 w 7
jurors 1 w 13
had 1 w 16
thus 1 w 20
decided 1 w 27
the 2 w 31
archon 1 w 37
Pythodotus 1 w 47
The 1 w 50
date 1 w 54
was 1 w 57
343 1 w 60
B 1 w 61
C 1 w 63
in 1 w 66
accordance 1 w 76
with 1 w 80
the 3 w 83
law 1 w 86
struck 1 w 92
out 1 w 95
the 4 w 98
claim 1 w 103
of 1 w 105
the 5 w 108
defendant 1 w 117
and 1 w 121
when 1 w 125
this 1 w 129
claim 2 w 134
was 2 w 137
stricken 1 w 145
out 2 w 148
I 1 w 149
necessarily 1 w 160
had 2 w 163
to 1 w 165
abandon 1 w 172
my 1 w 174
claim 3 w 179
to 2 w 181
half 1 w 185
the 6 w 188
estate 1 w 194
After 1 w 200
these 1 w 205
steps 1 w 210
had 3 w 213
been 1 w 217
taken 1 w 222
the 8 w 226
archon 2 w 232
adjudged 1 w 240
the 9 w 243
estate 2 w 249
of 2 w 251
Comon 1 w 256
to 3 w 258
our 1 w 261
opponents 1 w 270
for 1 w 274
the 10 w 277
laws 1 w 281
compelled 1 w 290
him 1 w 293
to 4 w 295
do 3 w 297
so 1 w 299
They 1 w 304
as 3 w 307
soon 1 w 311
as 4 w 313
they 1 w 317
had 4 w 320
won 1 w 323
the 12 w 326
adjudication 1 w 338
went 1 w 343
at 5 w 345
once 1 w 349
to 5 w 351
the 13 w 354
Peiraeus 1 w 362
and 3 w 365
proceeded 1 w 374
to 6 w 376
take 2 w 380
over 1 w 384
all 1 w 387
that 1 w 391
either 1 w 397
of 3 w 399
us 4 w 401
had 5 w 404
received 1 w 412
from 1 w 416
the 15 w 419
division 1 w 427
I 2 w 429
being 1 w 435
at 7 w 437
home 1 w 441
voluntarily 1 w 453
gave 1 w 457
over 2 w 461
to 7 w 463
them 1 w 467
what 1 w 471
I 3 w 472
had 6 w 475
for 2 w 479
it 3 w 481
was 3 w 484
necessary 1 w 493
to 8 w 495
obey 1 w 499
the 17 w 502
laws 2 w 506
but 1 w 511
since 1 w 516
Olympiodorus 1 w 528
was 4 w 531
abroad 1 w 537
they 2 w 542
carried 1 w 549
off 1 w 552
all 2 w 555
his 2 w 558
effects 1 w 565
except 1 w 571
the 19 w 574
money 1 w 579
which 1 w 584
he 24 w 586
had 7 w 589
separately 1 w 599
taken 2 w 604
from 2 w 608
the 20 w 611
man 1 w 614
the 21 w 618
slave 1 w 623
whom 1 w 627
he 27 w 629
had 8 w 632
put 1 w 635
to 9 w 637
the 22 w 640
torture 1 w 647
for 3 w 651
they 3 w 655
had 9 w 658
no 1 w 660
means 1 w 665
of 5 w 667
getting 1 w 674
hold 1 w 678
of 6 w 680
that 2 w 684
money 2 w 689
Such 1 w 694
were 1 w 698
the 24 w 701
events 1 w 707
which 2 w 712
happened 1 w 720
in 5 w 722
the 25 w 725
absence 1 w 732
of 7 w 734
Olympiodorus 2 w 746
and 4 w 750
such 1 w 754
the 26 w 757
benefit 1 w 764
I 4 w 765
derived 1 w 772
from 3 w 776
my 2 w 778
association 1 w 789
with 2 w 793
him 2 w 796
But 1 w 800
when 2 w 804
he 34 w 806
returned 1 w 814
with 3 w 818
the 27 w 821
rest 1 w 825
of 8 w 827
the 28 w 830
troops 1 w 836
the 29 w 840
defendant 2 w 849
Olympiodorus 3 w 861
was 5 w 864
indignant 1 w 873
men 1 w 877
of 9 w 879
the 30 w 882
jury 1 w 886
at 12 w 889
what 2 w 893
had 10 w 896
occurred 1 w 904
and 5 w 908
thought 1 w 915
he 39 w 917
had 11 w 920
been 2 w 924
outrageously 1 w 936
treated 1 w 943
However 1 w 951
when 3 w 956
he 41 w 958
was 6 w 961
at 15 w 963
the 31 w 966
height 1 w 972
of 10 w 974
his 3 w 977
indignation 1 w 988
we 4 w 991
again 1 w 996
looked 1 w 1002
matters 1 w 1009
over 3 w 1013
the 32 w 1017
defendant 3 w 1026
Olympiodorus 4 w 1038
and 6 w 1041
I 5 w 1042
and 7 w 1046
took 1 w 1050
counsel 1 w 1057
together 1 w 1065
to 13 w 1067
see 1 w 1070
how 1 w 1073
we 5 w 1075
could 1 w 1080
get 3 w 1083
back 1 w 1087
something 1 w 1096
of 11 w 1098
what 3 w 1102
we 6 w 1104
had 12 w 1107
lost 1 w 1111