Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Unknown Pleader Against Evergus and Mnesibulus, About False Testimony

Unknown Pleader Against Evergus and Mnesibulus, About False Testimony (31-35)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg047.perseus-eng2:31-35
Refs {'start': {'reference': '31', 'human_reference': 'Section 31'}, 'end': {'reference': '35', 'human_reference': 'Section 35'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

It was because Theophemus reasoned in this way that he then refused to restore the equipment but kept himself out of the way, and thought that later on he would he able to rob me; and besides this, he could take refuge in an oath and perjure himself without trouble, a thing which he has done to others also. For the greediness of the mans character in matters where his interests are involved is dreadful, as I shall show you in fact. For Theophemus, while owing this equipment to the state, made a pretence of shifting the charge to Aphareus, but in actual fact he never reported his name for an adjudication, well knowing that he would be convicted of falsehood, if he should come into court.

For Aphareus proved that Theophemus had reckoned up against him the cost of the equipment and had got the money from him, when he took over the trierarchy. Now Theophemus maintains that he gave it over to Demochares, and he is suing the children of Demochares, who is now dead. But, while Demochares lived, Theophemus did not report his name for an adjudication when he was being sued by me for the equipment; he merely wished, on the pretence of the lapse of time, to rob the state of the equipment.

To prove that I am speaking the truth, the clerk shall read you the depositions.

The Depositions

Bearing all these facts in mind, therefore, and hearing from those who had had dealings with Theophemus what sort of a man he was in matters where his interests were involved, and failing to recover the equipment from him, I approached the despatching board and the senate, stating that Theophemus would not return to me the equipment for which he was accountable by judgement of the court. And the other trierarchs also approached the senate, all those who had not been able to recover the equipment from the persons bound to produce it. And after much argument the senate answered by a decree which the clerk shall read to you, instructing us to recover what was due in whatever way we could.

The Decree

When, then, the decree had been passed by the senate, since no one indicted it for illegality, but it became valid, I approached this man Evergus, the brother of Theophemus, since I was unable to see Theophemus; and having the decree in my hand I first demanded the return of the equipment, and bade him inform Theophemus; then, after allowing a few days to pass, since he refused to return the equipment, but only jeered at me, I took some witnesses with me, and asked him whether he had divided the estate with his brother, or whether their property was held in common.

On Everguss answering me that it had been divided and that Theophemus lived in a house by himself, but that he (Evergus) lived with his father, I thus learned where Theophemus lived, and taking with me a servant from the magistrates, I went to Theophemuss house. As I did not find him at home, I bade the woman who answered the door to go and fetch him wherever he might be. This was the woman, whom, according to the depositions of these men, Theophemus offered to deliver up, but whom, after repeated demands, I cannot get from him, that you might learn the truth as to which party began the assault.

Tokens

It 1 w 2
was 1 w 5
because 1 w 12
Theophemus 1 w 22
reasoned 1 w 30
in 1 w 32
this 1 w 36
way 1 w 39
that 1 w 43
he 3 w 45
then 1 w 49
refused 1 w 56
to 1 w 58
restore 1 w 65
the 2 w 68
equipment 1 w 77
but 1 w 80
kept 1 w 84
himself 1 w 91
out 1 w 94
of 1 w 96
the 3 w 99
way 2 w 102
and 1 w 106
thought 1 w 113
that 2 w 117
later 1 w 122
on 2 w 124
he 7 w 126
would 1 w 131
he 8 w 133
able 1 w 137
to 3 w 139
rob 1 w 142
me 2 w 144
and 2 w 148
besides 1 w 155
this 2 w 159
he 9 w 162
could 1 w 167
take 1 w 171
refuge 1 w 177
in 2 w 179
an 3 w 181
oath 1 w 185
and 3 w 188
perjure 1 w 195
himself 2 w 202
without 1 w 209
trouble 1 w 216
a 16 w 218
thing 1 w 223
which 1 w 228
he 10 w 230
has 1 w 233
done 1 w 237
to 4 w 239
others 1 w 245
also 1 w 249
For 1 w 253
the 5 w 256
greediness 1 w 266
of 2 w 268
the 6 w 271
man 1 w 274
s 18 w 276
character 1 w 285
in 5 w 287
matters 1 w 294
where 1 w 299
his 3 w 302
interests 1 w 311
are 1 w 314
involved 1 w 322
is 4 w 324
dreadful 1 w 332
as 4 w 335
I 2 w 336
shall 1 w 341
show 1 w 345
you 1 w 348
in 8 w 350
fact 1 w 354
For 2 w 358
Theophemus 2 w 368
while 1 w 374
owing 1 w 379
this 3 w 383
equipment 2 w 392
to 5 w 394
the 7 w 397
state 1 w 402
made 1 w 407
a 30 w 408
pretence 1 w 416
of 3 w 418
shifting 1 w 426
the 8 w 429
charge 1 w 435
to 6 w 437
Aphareus 1 w 445
but 2 w 449
in 11 w 451
actual 1 w 457
fact 2 w 461
he 19 w 463
never 1 w 468
reported 1 w 476
his 5 w 479
name 1 w 483
for 1 w 486
an 6 w 488
adjudication 1 w 500
well 1 w 505
knowing 1 w 512
that 3 w 516
he 20 w 518
would 2 w 523
be 3 w 525
convicted 1 w 534
of 4 w 536
falsehood 1 w 545
if 2 w 548
he 21 w 550
should 1 w 556
come 1 w 560
into 1 w 564
court 1 w 569
For 3 w 573
Aphareus 2 w 581
proved 1 w 587
that 4 w 591
Theophemus 3 w 601
had 1 w 604
reckoned 1 w 612
up 1 w 614
against 1 w 621
him 3 w 624
the 9 w 627
cost 1 w 631
of 5 w 633
the 10 w 636
equipment 3 w 645
and 4 w 648
had 2 w 651
got 1 w 654
the 11 w 657
money 1 w 662
from 1 w 666
him 4 w 669
when 1 w 674
he 28 w 676
took 1 w 680
over 1 w 684
the 12 w 687
trierarchy 1 w 697
Now 1 w 701
Theophemus 4 w 711
maintains 1 w 720
that 5 w 724
he 32 w 726
gave 1 w 730
it 2 w 732
over 2 w 736
to 9 w 738
Demochares 1 w 748
and 5 w 752
he 33 w 754
is 7 w 756
suing 1 w 761
the 13 w 764
children 1 w 772
of 6 w 774
Demochares 2 w 784
who 1 w 788
is 8 w 790
now 2 w 793
dead 1 w 797
But 1 w 801
while 2 w 807
Demochares 3 w 817
lived 1 w 822
Theophemus 5 w 833
did 1 w 836
not 1 w 839
report 2 w 845
his 6 w 848
name 2 w 852
for 2 w 855
an 9 w 857
adjudication 2 w 869
when 2 w 873
he 38 w 875
was 2 w 878
being 1 w 883
sued 1 w 887
by 1 w 889
me 8 w 891
for 3 w 894
the 14 w 897
equipment 4 w 906
he 40 w 909
merely 1 w 915
wished 1 w 921
on 9 w 924
the 15 w 927
pretence 2 w 935
of 7 w 937
the 16 w 940
lapse 1 w 945
of 8 w 947
time 1 w 951
to 10 w 954
rob 2 w 957
the 17 w 960
state 2 w 965
of 9 w 967
the 18 w 970
equipment 5 w 979
To 1 w 982
prove 2 w 987
that 6 w 991
I 3 w 992
am 3 w 994
speaking 1 w 1002
the 19 w 1005
truth 1 w 1010
the 20 w 1014
clerk 1 w 1019
shall 2 w 1024
read 2 w 1028
you 2 w 1031
the 21 w 1034
depositions 1 w 1045
The 6 w 1049
Depositions 1 w 1060
Bearing 1 w 1067
all 3 w 1070
these 1 w 1075
facts 1 w 1080
in 21 w 1082
mind 1 w 1086
therefore 1 w 1096
and 6 w 1100
hearing 1 w 1107
from 2 w 1111
those 1 w 1116
who 2 w 1119
had 3 w 1122
had 4 w 1125
dealings 1 w 1133
with 2 w 1137
Theophemus 6 w 1147
what 1 w 1151
sort 1 w 1155
of 10 w 1157
a 80 w 1158
man 2 w 1161
he 55 w 1163
was 3 w 1166
in 25 w 1168
matters 2 w 1175
where 2 w 1180
his 7 w 1183
interests 2 w 1192
were 1 w 1196
involved 2 w 1204
and 7 w 1208
failing 1 w 1215
to 11 w 1217
recover 1 w 1224
the 24 w 1227
equipment 6 w 1236
from 3 w 1240
him 5 w 1243
I 4 w 1245
approached 1 w 1255
the 25 w 1258
despatching 1 w 1269
board 1 w 1274
and 8 w 1277
the 26 w 1280
senate 1 w 1286
stating 1 w 1294
that 7 w 1298
Theophemus 7 w 1308
would 3 w 1313
not 2 w 1316
return 1 w 1322
to 12 w 1324
me 14 w 1326
the 27 w 1329
equipment 7 w 1338
for 5 w 1341
which 2 w 1346
he 64 w 1348
was 4 w 1351
accountable 1 w 1362
by 2 w 1364
judgement 1 w 1373
of 11 w 1375
the 28 w 1378
court 2 w 1383
And 1 w 1387
the 29 w 1390
other 2 w 1395
trierarchs 1 w 1405
also 2 w 1409
approached 2 w 1419
the 31 w 1422
senate 2 w 1428
all 4 w 1432
those 2 w 1437
who 3 w 1440
had 5 w 1443
not 3 w 1446
been 1 w 1450
able 3 w 1454
to 13 w 1456
recover 2 w 1463
the 32 w 1466
equipment 8 w 1475
from 4 w 1479
the 33 w 1482
persons 1 w 1489
bound 1 w 1494
to 14 w 1496
produce 1 w 1503
it 6 w 1505
And 2 w 1509
after 1 w 1514
much 1 w 1518
argument 1 w 1526
the 34 w 1529
senate 3 w 1535
answered 1 w 1543
by 3 w 1545
a 109 w 1546
decree 1 w 1552
which 3 w 1557
the 35 w 1560
clerk 2 w 1565
shall 3 w 1570
read 3 w 1574
to 15 w 1576
you 3 w 1579
instructing 1 w 1591
us 12 w 1593
to 16 w 1595
recover 3 w 1602
what 2 w 1606
was 5 w 1609
due 1 w 1612
in 33 w 1614
whatever 1 w 1622
way 3 w 1625
we 4 w 1627
could 2 w 1632
The 9 w 1636
Decree 1 w 1642
When 1 w 1646
then 2 w 1651
the 37 w 1655
decree 2 w 1661
had 6 w 1664
been 2 w 1668
passed 1 w 1674
by 4 w 1676
the 38 w 1679
senate 4 w 1685
since 1 w 1691
no 6 w 1693
one 5 w 1696
indicted 1 w 1704
it 7 w 1706
for 6 w 1709
illegality 1 w 1719
but 3 w 1723
it 9 w 1725
became 1 w 1731
valid 1 w 1736
I 5 w 1738
approached 3 w 1748
this 4 w 1752
man 3 w 1755
Evergus 1 w 1762
the 39 w 1766
brother 1 w 1773
of 12 w 1775
Theophemus 8 w 1785
since 2 w 1791
I 6 w 1792
was 6 w 1795
unable 1 w 1801
to 17 w 1803
see 1 w 1806
Theophemus 9 w 1816
and 9 w 1820
having 1 w 1826
the 41 w 1829
decree 3 w 1835
in 38 w 1837
my 1 w 1839
hand 1 w 1843
I 7 w 1844
first 1 w 1849
demanded 1 w 1857
the 42 w 1860
return 2 w 1866
of 13 w 1868
the 43 w 1871
equipment 9 w 1880
and 12 w 1884
bade 1 w 1888
him 6 w 1891
inform 1 w 1897
Theophemus 10 w 1907
then 3 w 1912
after 2 w 1918
allowing 1 w 1926
a 135 w 1927
few 1 w 1930
days 1 w 1934
to 18 w 1936
pass 2 w 1940
since 3 w 1946
he 92 w 1948
refused 2 w 1955
to 19 w 1957
return 3 w 1963
the 45 w 1966
equipment 10 w 1975
but 4 w 1979
only 1 w 1983
jeered 1 w 1989
at 25 w 1991
me 22 w 1993
I 8 w 1995
took 2 w 1999
some 1 w 2003
witnesses 1 w 2012
with 3 w 2016
me 24 w 2018
and 13 w 2022
asked 1 w 2027
him 7 w 2030
whether 1 w 2037
he 96 w 2039
had 7 w 2042
divided 1 w 2049
the 47 w 2052
estate 1 w 2058
with 4 w 2062
his 9 w 2065
brother 2 w 2072
or 15 w 2075
whether 2 w 2082
their 1 w 2087
property 1 w 2095
was 7 w 2098
held 1 w 2102
in 42 w 2104
common 1 w 2110
On 1 w 2113
Evergus 2 w 2120
s 115 w 2122
answering 1 w 2131
me 25 w 2133
that 8 w 2137
it 13 w 2139
had 8 w 2142
been 3 w 2146
divided 2 w 2153
and 14 w 2156
that 9 w 2160
Theophemus 11 w 2170
lived 2 w 2175
in 44 w 2177
a 149 w 2178
house 1 w 2183
by 5 w 2185
himself 3 w 2192
but 5 w 2196
that 10 w 2200
he 105 w 2202
Evergus 3 w 2210
lived 3 w 2216
with 5 w 2220
his 10 w 2223
father 1 w 2229
I 9 w 2231
thus 1 w 2235
learned 1 w 2242
where 3 w 2247
Theophemus 12 w 2257
lived 4 w 2262
and 15 w 2266
taking 1 w 2272
with 6 w 2276
me 26 w 2278
a 155 w 2279
servant 1 w 2286
from 5 w 2290
the 52 w 2293
magistrates 1 w 2304
I 10 w 2306
went 1 w 2310
to 21 w 2312
Theophemus 13 w 2322
s 128 w 2324
house 2 w 2329
As 1 w 2332
I 11 w 2333
did 2 w 2336
not 4 w 2339
find 1 w 2343
him 9 w 2346
at 32 w 2348
home 1 w 2352
I 12 w 2354
bade 2 w 2358
the 53 w 2361
woman 1 w 2366
who 4 w 2369
answered 2 w 2377
the 54 w 2380
door 1 w 2384
to 22 w 2386
go 2 w 2388
and 16 w 2391
fetch 1 w 2396
him 10 w 2399
wherever 1 w 2407
he 116 w 2409
might 1 w 2414
be 9 w 2416
This 1 w 2421
was 8 w 2424
the 55 w 2427
woman 2 w 2432
whom 1 w 2437
according 1 w 2447
to 23 w 2449
the 56 w 2452
depositions 2 w 2463
of 14 w 2465
these 2 w 2470
men 13 w 2473
Theophemus 14 w 2484
offered 1 w 2491
to 24 w 2493
deliver 1 w 2500
up 2 w 2502
but 6 w 2506
whom 2 w 2510
after 3 w 2516
repeated 1 w 2524
demands 1 w 2531
I 13 w 2533
cannot 1 w 2539
get 1 w 2542
from 6 w 2546
him 11 w 2549
that 11 w 2554
you 4 w 2557
might 2 w 2562
learn 2 w 2567
the 58 w 2570
truth 2 w 2575
as 15 w 2577
to 25 w 2579
which 4 w 2584
party 1 w 2589
began 1 w 2594
the 59 w 2597
assault 1 w 2604