Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias

Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias (9-12)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg043.perseus-eng2:9-12
Refs {'start': {'reference': '9', 'human_reference': 'Section 9'}, 'end': {'reference': '12', 'human_reference': 'Section 12'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

so that I, who acted as pleader for the lady, was not only unable to explain to the jurymen the relationship and other matters as clearly as I could have wished, but could not even defend myself against the smallest fraction of the lies which they told about us; for I had but a fifth part of the water. Their scheme was this: to tell a wholly false story about us, but to back one another up and agree in everything.

So, since they had formed their plot in this way, and each backed up the others charges against us, when the four ballot-boxes[*] were set out according to law, the jurymen, naturally enough, as I think, were deceived and could not agree with one another, and being led astray by this trick, they voted each as chance determined. And there were a very few more votessome three or fourin the box of Theopompus than in that of the lady.

This, then, was what took place at that time. But when this boy was born, and it seemed a fitting time, I, being in no way incensed at what had happened, but considering that the former jurymen had met with a very natural experience, introduced this boy here to the clansmen of Hagnias in the interest of Eubulides, seeing that the boy was the son of his daughter, in order that the family might not become extinct.

For the elder Eubulides, men of the jury, who was next of kin to Hagnias, prayed to the gods above all else that a son might be born to him as a daughter had been, the mother of this boy; but since he failed of this hope and not a single male child was born to him, his next dearest wish was that a son of his daughter should be adopted into his own family and that of Hagnias and should be introduced to the members of his clan; for he thought, men of the jury, that of his surviving relatives this boy was nearest to him, and that in this way their house would best be preserved and kept from extinction.

Tokens

so 1 w 2
that 1 w 6
I 1 w 7
who 1 w 11
acted 1 w 16
as 1 w 18
pleader 1 w 25
for 1 w 28
the 1 w 31
lady 1 w 35
was 1 w 39
not 1 w 42
only 1 w 46
unable 1 w 52
to 1 w 54
explain 1 w 61
to 2 w 63
the 2 w 66
jurymen 1 w 73
the 3 w 76
relationship 1 w 88
and 1 w 91
other 1 w 96
matters 1 w 103
as 3 w 105
clearly 1 w 112
as 4 w 114
I 2 w 115
could 1 w 120
have 1 w 124
wished 1 w 130
but 1 w 134
could 2 w 139
not 2 w 142
even 1 w 146
defend 1 w 152
myself 1 w 158
against 1 w 165
the 5 w 168
smallest 1 w 176
fraction 1 w 184
of 1 w 186
the 6 w 189
lies 1 w 193
which 1 w 198
they 1 w 202
told 1 w 206
about 1 w 211
us 1 w 213
for 2 w 217
I 3 w 218
had 1 w 221
but 2 w 224
a 22 w 225
fifth 1 w 230
part 1 w 234
of 2 w 236
the 8 w 239
water 1 w 244
Their 1 w 250
scheme 1 w 256
was 2 w 259
this 1 w 263
to 4 w 266
tell 1 w 270
a 26 w 271
wholly 1 w 277
false 1 w 282
story 1 w 287
about 2 w 292
us 2 w 294
but 3 w 298
to 6 w 300
back 1 w 304
one 1 w 307
another 1 w 314
up 1 w 316
and 2 w 319
agree 1 w 324
in 3 w 326
everything 1 w 336
So 1 w 339
since 1 w 345
they 2 w 349
had 2 w 352
formed 1 w 358
their 1 w 363
plot 1 w 367
in 6 w 369
this 2 w 373
way 1 w 376
and 3 w 380
each 1 w 384
backed 1 w 390
up 2 w 392
the 12 w 395
other 3 w 400
s 23 w 402
charges 1 w 409
against 2 w 416
us 3 w 418
when 1 w 423
the 14 w 426
four 1 w 430
ballot-boxes 1 w 442
One 1 w 445
ballot-box 2 w 455
that 2 w 460
is 4 w 462
for 4 w 466
each 2 w 470
contestant 1 w 480
There 1 w 486
were 1 w 490
five 1 w 494
in 8 w 496
all 4 w 499
but 4 w 503
the 15 w 506
two 1 w 509
brothers 1 w 517
Glaucus 1 w 525
and 4 w 528
Glaucon 1 w 535
were 2 w 540
apparently 1 w 550
counted 1 w 557
as 6 w 559
one 2 w 562
since 2 w 568
their 2 w 573
title 1 w 578
was 3 w 581
the 18 w 584
same 1 w 588
This 1 w 593
problem 1 w 600
is 6 w 602
discussed 1 w 611
by 1 w 613
Wyse 1 w 617
in 10 w 619
his 4 w 622
introduction 1 w 634
to 7 w 636
Isaeus 1 w 642
Hag 1 w 645
were 3 w 651
set 1 w 654
out 3 w 657
according 1 w 666
to 8 w 668
law 1 w 671
the 19 w 675
jurymen 2 w 682
naturally 1 w 692
enough 1 w 698
as 8 w 701
I 5 w 702
think 1 w 707
were 4 w 712
deceived 1 w 720
and 5 w 723
could 3 w 728
not 4 w 731
agree 2 w 736
with 1 w 740
one 3 w 743
another 2 w 750
and 6 w 754
being 1 w 759
led 1 w 762
astray 1 w 768
by 2 w 770
this 3 w 774
trick 1 w 779
they 3 w 784
voted 1 w 789
each 3 w 793
as 10 w 795
chance 1 w 801
determined 1 w 811
And 1 w 815
there 1 w 820
were 5 w 824
a 71 w 825
very 2 w 829
few 1 w 832
more 1 w 836
votes 1 w 841
some 1 w 846
three 1 w 851
or 8 w 853
four 2 w 857
in 16 w 860
the 23 w 863
box 3 w 866
of 3 w 868
Theopompus 1 w 878
than 1 w 882
in 17 w 884
that 3 w 888
of 4 w 890
the 24 w 893
lady 2 w 897
This 2 w 902
then 1 w 907
was 4 w 911
what 1 w 915
took 1 w 919
place 1 w 924
at 9 w 926
that 4 w 930
time 1 w 934
But 1 w 938
when 2 w 942
this 4 w 946
boy 1 w 949
was 5 w 952
born 1 w 956
and 7 w 960
it 3 w 962
seemed 1 w 968
a 82 w 969
fitting 1 w 976
time 2 w 980
I 6 w 982
being 2 w 988
in 20 w 990
no 7 w 992
way 2 w 995
incensed 1 w 1003
at 11 w 1005
what 2 w 1009
had 3 w 1012
happened 1 w 1020
but 5 w 1024
considering 1 w 1035
that 5 w 1039
the 26 w 1042
former 1 w 1048
jurymen 3 w 1055
had 4 w 1058
met 1 w 1061
with 2 w 1065
a 90 w 1066
very 3 w 1070
natural 2 w 1077
experience 1 w 1087
introduced 1 w 1098
this 5 w 1102
boy 2 w 1105
here 3 w 1109
to 10 w 1111
the 27 w 1114
clansmen 1 w 1122
of 5 w 1124
Hagnias 1 w 1131
in 24 w 1133
the 28 w 1136
interest 1 w 1144
of 6 w 1146
Eubulides 1 w 1155
seeing 1 w 1162
that 6 w 1166
the 29 w 1169
boy 3 w 1172
was 6 w 1175
the 30 w 1178
son 1 w 1181
of 7 w 1183
his 9 w 1186
daughter 1 w 1194
in 27 w 1197
order 1 w 1202
that 7 w 1206
the 31 w 1209
family 1 w 1215
might 1 w 1220
not 6 w 1223
become 1 w 1229
extinct 1 w 1236
For 1 w 1240
the 32 w 1243
elder 1 w 1248
Eubulides 2 w 1257
men 5 w 1261
of 8 w 1263
the 33 w 1266
jury 4 w 1270
who 3 w 1274
was 7 w 1277
next 1 w 1281
of 9 w 1283
kin 1 w 1286
to 11 w 1288
Hagnias 2 w 1295
prayed 1 w 1302
to 12 w 1304
the 34 w 1307
gods 1 w 1311
above 1 w 1316
all 6 w 1319
else 1 w 1323
that 8 w 1327
a 108 w 1328
son 2 w 1331
might 2 w 1336
be 4 w 1338
born 2 w 1342
to 13 w 1344
him 1 w 1347
as 17 w 1349
a 110 w 1350
daughter 2 w 1358
had 5 w 1361
been 1 w 1365
the 35 w 1369
mother 1 w 1375
of 10 w 1377
this 6 w 1381
boy 4 w 1384
but 6 w 1388
since 3 w 1393
he 45 w 1395
failed 1 w 1401
of 11 w 1403
this 7 w 1407
hope 1 w 1411
and 8 w 1414
not 7 w 1417
a 115 w 1418
single 1 w 1424
male 1 w 1428
child 1 w 1433
was 8 w 1436
born 3 w 1440
to 14 w 1442
him 2 w 1445
his 12 w 1449
next 2 w 1453
dearest 1 w 1460
wish 2 w 1464
was 9 w 1467
that 9 w 1471
a 121 w 1472
son 3 w 1475
of 12 w 1477
his 13 w 1480
daughter 3 w 1488
should 1 w 1494
be 6 w 1496
adopted 1 w 1503
into 1 w 1507
his 14 w 1510
own 1 w 1513
family 2 w 1519
and 9 w 1522
that 10 w 1526
of 13 w 1528
Hagnias 3 w 1535
and 10 w 1538
should 2 w 1544
be 7 w 1546
introduced 2 w 1556
to 16 w 1558
the 37 w 1561
members 1 w 1568
of 14 w 1570
his 15 w 1573
clan 2 w 1577
for 6 w 1581
he 47 w 1583
thought 1 w 1590
men 6 w 1594
of 15 w 1596
the 38 w 1599
jury 5 w 1603
that 11 w 1608
of 16 w 1610
his 16 w 1613
surviving 1 w 1622
relatives 1 w 1631
this 8 w 1635
boy 5 w 1638
was 10 w 1641
nearest 1 w 1648
to 17 w 1650
him 3 w 1653
and 11 w 1657
that 12 w 1661
in 35 w 1663
this 9 w 1667
way 3 w 1670
their 3 w 1675
house 1 w 1680
would 1 w 1685
best 1 w 1689
be 10 w 1691
preserved 1 w 1700
and 12 w 1703
kept 1 w 1707
from 1 w 1711
extinction 1 w 1721