Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias

Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias (45-48)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg043.perseus-eng2:45-48
Refs {'start': {'reference': '45', 'human_reference': 'Section 45'}, 'end': {'reference': '48', 'human_reference': 'Section 48'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

The deponent testifies that his father Archimachus was a relative of Polemon, the father of Hagnias, and of Charidemus, the father of Theopompus, and of Philagrus, the father of Eubulides, and that he heard from their father that Philagrus took for his first wife Phylomachê, the sister of Polemon, the father of Hagnias, born of the same father and the same mother, and that by Phylomachê he had a son Eubulides, and that after the death of Phylomachê Philagrus took a second wife Telesippê, and that Philagrus had by Telesippê a son Menestheus, a brother to Eubulides, of the same father but not of the same mother; and that when Eubulides. made claim to the estate of Hagnias on the score of kinship, Menestheus did not dispute his claim to the estate, nor did Euctemon, the brother of Philagrus, nor did anyone else on the score of kinship dispute the title of Eubulides on that occasion.

Another

The deponent testifies that his mothers father Callistratus was brother to Euctemon, who was king, and to Philagrus, the father of Eubulides, and that these men were first cousins to Polemon the father of Hagnias, and to Charidemus, the father of Theopompus, and that he heard from his mother that Polemon, the father of Hagnias, had no brother, but had a sister Phylomachê, born of the same father and the same mother, and that Philagrus married this Phylomachê, and they had a son Eubulides, the father of Phylomachê, the wife of Sositheus.

It was necessary to read these depositions, men of the jury, in order that we might not suffer the same experience as before, by being caught by these men unprepared. But far more convincing even than these shall be the testimony that Macartatus will give against himself, proving that neither his father Theopompus nor himself has any claim whatever to inherit anything from Hagnias, Theopompus being less near of kin, and belonging to quite a different branch of the family.

For suppose one should ask, men of the jury, Who is the person who disputes this boys title to the estate of Hagnias? I know well that he would say, Macartatus. Born of what father? Theopompus. And of what mother? Apolexis, daughter of a Prospaltian,[*] and sister of Macartatus, also a Prospaltian. And who was the father of Theopompus? Charidemus. And of whom was Charidemus the son? Of Stratius. And of whom Stratius? Of Buselus. This, men of the jury, is the branch of Stratius, one of the sons of Buselus; and these whose names you have heard are descendants of Stratius; and among them there is not one single name of those belonging to the branch of Hagnias, or even one that is similar.

Tokens

The 1 w 3
deponent 1 w 11
testifies 1 w 20
that 1 w 24
his 1 w 27
father 1 w 33
Archimachus 1 w 44
was 1 w 47
a 5 w 48
relative 1 w 56
of 1 w 58
Polemon 1 w 65
the 2 w 69
father 2 w 75
of 2 w 77
Hagnias 1 w 84
and 1 w 88
of 3 w 90
Charidemus 1 w 100
the 4 w 104
father 3 w 110
of 4 w 112
Theopompus 1 w 122
and 2 w 126
of 5 w 128
Philagrus 1 w 137
the 6 w 141
father 4 w 147
of 6 w 149
Eubulides 1 w 158
and 3 w 162
that 2 w 166
he 10 w 168
heard 1 w 173
from 1 w 177
their 1 w 182
father 5 w 188
that 3 w 192
Philagrus 2 w 201
took 1 w 205
for 1 w 208
his 2 w 211
first 1 w 216
wife 1 w 220
Phylomachê 1 w 230
the 10 w 234
sister 1 w 240
of 7 w 242
Polemon 2 w 249
the 11 w 253
father 6 w 259
of 8 w 261
Hagnias 2 w 268
born 1 w 273
of 9 w 275
the 13 w 278
same 1 w 282
father 7 w 288
and 4 w 291
the 15 w 294
same 2 w 298
mother 1 w 304
and 5 w 308
that 4 w 312
by 1 w 314
Phylomachê 2 w 324
he 21 w 326
had 1 w 329
a 34 w 330
son 1 w 333
Eubulides 2 w 342
and 6 w 346
that 5 w 350
after 1 w 355
the 17 w 358
death 1 w 363
of 10 w 365
Phylomachê 3 w 375
Philagrus 3 w 384
took 2 w 388
a 41 w 389
second 1 w 395
wife 2 w 399
Telesippê 1 w 408
and 7 w 412
that 6 w 416
Philagrus 4 w 425
had 2 w 428
by 2 w 430
Telesippê 2 w 439
a 46 w 440
son 2 w 443
Menestheus 1 w 453
a 47 w 455
brother 1 w 462
to 3 w 464
Eubulides 3 w 473
of 11 w 476
the 20 w 479
same 3 w 483
father 8 w 489
but 1 w 492
not 1 w 495
of 12 w 497
the 22 w 500
same 4 w 504
mother 2 w 510
and 8 w 514
that 7 w 518
when 1 w 522
Eubulides 4 w 531
made 1 w 536
claim 1 w 541
to 4 w 543
the 24 w 546
estate 1 w 552
of 13 w 554
Hagnias 3 w 561
on 7 w 563
the 25 w 566
score 1 w 571
of 14 w 573
kinship 1 w 580
Menestheus 2 w 591
did 1 w 594
not 2 w 597
dispute 1 w 604
his 3 w 607
claim 2 w 612
to 5 w 614
the 27 w 617
estate 2 w 623
nor 1 w 627
did 2 w 630
Euctemon 1 w 638
the 28 w 642
brother 2 w 649
of 15 w 651
Philagrus 5 w 660
nor 2 w 664
did 3 w 667
anyone 1 w 673
else 1 w 677
on 10 w 679
the 30 w 682
score 2 w 687
of 16 w 689
kinship 2 w 696
dispute 2 w 703
the 31 w 706
title 1 w 711
of 17 w 713
Eubulides 5 w 722
on 11 w 724
that 8 w 728
occasion 1 w 736
Another 1 w 744
The 3 w 747
deponent 2 w 755
testifies 2 w 764
that 9 w 768
his 4 w 771
mother 3 w 777
s 52 w 779
father 9 w 785
Callistratus 1 w 797
was 2 w 800
brother 3 w 807
to 6 w 809
Euctemon 2 w 817
who 1 w 821
was 3 w 824
king 1 w 828
and 9 w 832
to 7 w 834
Philagrus 6 w 843
the 36 w 847
father 10 w 853
of 18 w 855
Eubulides 6 w 864
and 10 w 868
that 10 w 872
these 1 w 877
men 1 w 880
were 1 w 884
first 2 w 889
cousins 1 w 896
to 8 w 898
Polemon 3 w 905
the 39 w 908
father 11 w 914
of 19 w 916
Hagnias 4 w 923
and 11 w 927
to 9 w 929
Charidemus 2 w 939
the 41 w 943
father 12 w 949
of 20 w 951
Theopompus 2 w 961
and 12 w 965
that 11 w 969
he 51 w 971
heard 2 w 976
from 2 w 980
his 5 w 983
mother 4 w 989
that 12 w 993
Polemon 4 w 1000
the 44 w 1004
father 13 w 1010
of 21 w 1012
Hagnias 5 w 1019
had 3 w 1023
no 6 w 1025
brother 4 w 1032
but 2 w 1036
had 4 w 1039
a 90 w 1040
sister 2 w 1046
Phylomachê 4 w 1056
born 2 w 1061
of 22 w 1063
the 47 w 1066
same 5 w 1070
father 14 w 1076
and 13 w 1079
the 49 w 1082
same 6 w 1086
mother 5 w 1092
and 14 w 1096
that 13 w 1100
Philagrus 7 w 1109
married 1 w 1116
this 1 w 1120
Phylomachê 5 w 1130
and 15 w 1134
they 1 w 1138
had 5 w 1141
a 103 w 1142
son 3 w 1145
Eubulides 7 w 1154
the 52 w 1158
father 15 w 1164
of 23 w 1166
Phylomachê 6 w 1176
the 54 w 1180
wife 3 w 1184
of 24 w 1186
Sositheus 1 w 1195
It 1 w 1198
was 4 w 1201
necessary 1 w 1210
to 10 w 1212
read 1 w 1216
these 2 w 1221
depositions 1 w 1232
men 2 w 1236
of 25 w 1238
the 57 w 1241
jury 1 w 1245
in 5 w 1248
order 1 w 1253
that 14 w 1257
we 2 w 1259
might 1 w 1264
not 4 w 1267
suffer 1 w 1273
the 58 w 1276
same 7 w 1280
experience 1 w 1290
as 11 w 1292
before 1 w 1298
by 3 w 1301
being 1 w 1306
caught 1 w 1312
by 4 w 1314
these 3 w 1319
men 3 w 1322
unprepared 1 w 1332
But 1 w 1336
far 1 w 1339
more 1 w 1343
convincing 1 w 1353
even 1 w 1357
than 1 w 1361
these 4 w 1366
shall 1 w 1371
be 3 w 1373
the 61 w 1376
testimony 1 w 1385
that 15 w 1389
Macartatus 1 w 1399
will 1 w 1403
give 1 w 1407
against 1 w 1414
himself 1 w 1421
proving 1 w 1429
that 16 w 1433
neither 1 w 1440
his 7 w 1443
father 16 w 1449
Theopompus 3 w 1459
nor 3 w 1462
himself 2 w 1469
has 1 w 1472
any 2 w 1475
claim 3 w 1480
whatever 1 w 1488
to 11 w 1490
inherit 1 w 1497
anything 1 w 1505
from 3 w 1509
Hagnias 6 w 1516
Theopompus 4 w 1527
being 2 w 1532
less 1 w 1536
near 1 w 1540
of 26 w 1542
kin 4 w 1545
and 16 w 1549
belonging 1 w 1558
to 12 w 1560
quite 1 w 1565
a 134 w 1566
different 1 w 1575
branch 1 w 1581
of 27 w 1583
the 64 w 1586
family 1 w 1592
For 1 w 1596
suppose 1 w 1603
one 4 w 1606
should 1 w 1612
ask 1 w 1615
men 4 w 1619
of 28 w 1621
the 65 w 1624
jury 2 w 1628
Who 1 w 1632
is 13 w 1634
the 66 w 1637
person 1 w 1643
who 2 w 1646
disputes 1 w 1654
this 2 w 1658
boy 1 w 1661
s 111 w 1663
title 2 w 1668
to 13 w 1670
the 67 w 1673
estate 3 w 1679
of 29 w 1681
Hagnias 7 w 1688
I 2 w 1690
know 1 w 1694
well 1 w 1698
that 17 w 1702
he 81 w 1704
would 1 w 1709
say 1 w 1712
Macartatus 2 w 1723
Born 1 w 1728
of 30 w 1730
what 2 w 1734
father 17 w 1740
Theopompus 5 w 1751
And 1 w 1755
of 31 w 1757
what 3 w 1761
mother 6 w 1767
Apolexis 1 w 1776
daughter 1 w 1785
of 32 w 1787
a 150 w 1788
Prospaltian 1 w 1799
Prospalta 1 w 1809
was 5 w 1812
a 156 w 1813
deme 1 w 1817
of 33 w 1819
the 70 w 1822
tribe 1 w 1827
Acamantis 1 w 1836
and 17 w 1840
sister 3 w 1846
of 34 w 1848
Macartatus 3 w 1858
also 1 w 1863
a 164 w 1864
Prospaltian 2 w 1875
And 2 w 1879
who 3 w 1882
was 6 w 1885
the 71 w 1888
father 18 w 1894
of 35 w 1896
Theopompus 6 w 1906
Charidemus 3 w 1917
And 3 w 1921
of 36 w 1923
whom 1 w 1927
was 7 w 1930
Charidemus 4 w 1940
the 73 w 1943
son 5 w 1946
Of 1 w 1949
Stratius 1 w 1957
And 4 w 1961
of 37 w 1963
whom 2 w 1967
Stratius 2 w 1975
Of 2 w 1978
Buselus 1 w 1985
This 1 w 1990
men 5 w 1994
of 38 w 1996
the 74 w 1999
jury 3 w 2003
is 20 w 2006
the 75 w 2009
branch 2 w 2015
of 39 w 2017
Stratius 3 w 2025
one 5 w 2029
of 40 w 2031
the 76 w 2034
sons 1 w 2038
of 41 w 2040
Buselus 2 w 2047
and 18 w 2051
these 5 w 2056
whose 1 w 2061
names 1 w 2066
you 1 w 2069
have 1 w 2073
heard 3 w 2078
are 2 w 2081
descendants 1 w 2092
of 42 w 2094
Stratius 4 w 2102
and 19 w 2106
among 1 w 2111
them 1 w 2115
there 1 w 2120
is 21 w 2122
not 5 w 2125
one 6 w 2128
single 1 w 2134
name 2 w 2138
of 43 w 2140
those 1 w 2145
belonging 2 w 2154
to 14 w 2156
the 80 w 2159
branch 3 w 2165
of 44 w 2167
Hagnias 8 w 2174
or 14 w 2177
even 2 w 2181
one 7 w 2184
that 18 w 2188
is 22 w 2190
similar 1 w 2197