Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias

Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias (11-15)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg043.perseus-eng2:11-15
Refs {'start': {'reference': '11', 'human_reference': 'Section 11'}, 'end': {'reference': '15', 'human_reference': 'Section 15'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

This, then, was what took place at that time. But when this boy was born, and it seemed a fitting time, I, being in no way incensed at what had happened, but considering that the former jurymen had met with a very natural experience, introduced this boy here to the clansmen of Hagnias in the interest of Eubulides, seeing that the boy was the son of his daughter, in order that the family might not become extinct.

For the elder Eubulides, men of the jury, who was next of kin to Hagnias, prayed to the gods above all else that a son might be born to him as a daughter had been, the mother of this boy; but since he failed of this hope and not a single male child was born to him, his next dearest wish was that a son of his daughter should be adopted into his own family and that of Hagnias and should be introduced to the members of his clan; for he thought, men of the jury, that of his surviving relatives this boy was nearest to him, and that in this way their house would best be preserved and kept from extinction.

And I was the one to render him this service, since I was husband to the daughter of Eubulides, she having been adjudged to me as being the nearest of kin, and I introduced this boy to the clansmen of Hagnias and Eubulides, to which fellowship Theopompus, the father of Macartatus here, belonged during his lifetime, and to which Macartatus now belongs.

And the fellow-clansmen of Macartatus here, who knew better than any others the pedigree of the family, seeing that he himself did not choose to risk a contest and did not remove the victim from the altar, as he should have done had the introduction of this boy not been legitimate, but demanded that they commit perjury,6 took the ballot while the victims were still burning, and carried it from the altar of Zeus Phatrius[*] in the presence of the defendant Macartatus, and gave a just verdict, men of the jurythat this boy was duly and rightfully introduced as the adopted son of Eubulides into the family of Hagnias.

But when the fellow-clansmen of the defendant Macartatus had passed this vote, this boy, as the son of Eubulides, cited the defendant Macartatus for an adjudication of claims for the estate of Hagnias, and had a day appointed by the archon for the hearing, inscribing his brothers name as his guardian; for it was no longer open to me, men of the jury, to stand inscribed as guardian, since I had got the boy adopted into the family of Eubulides. And the citation was made by this boy according to the same laws in accordance with which these men had cited his mother, who had won the former suit in court, and was in possession of the estate of Hagnias.

This 1 w 4
then 1 w 9
was 1 w 13
what 1 w 17
took 1 w 21
place 1 w 26
at 2 w 28
that 1 w 32
time 1 w 36
But 1 w 40
when 1 w 44
this 1 w 48
boy 1 w 51
was 2 w 54
born 1 w 58
and 1 w 62
it 1 w 64
seemed 1 w 70
a 8 w 71
fitting 1 w 78
time 2 w 82
I 1 w 84
being 1 w 90
in 3 w 92
no 1 w 94
way 1 w 97
incensed 1 w 105
at 4 w 107
what 2 w 111
had 1 w 114
happened 1 w 122
but 1 w 126
considering 1 w 137
that 2 w 141
the 2 w 144
former 1 w 150
jurymen 1 w 157
had 2 w 160
met 1 w 163
with 1 w 167
a 16 w 168
very 1 w 172
natural 1 w 179
experience 1 w 189
introduced 1 w 200
this 2 w 204
boy 2 w 207
here 1 w 211
to 2 w 213
the 3 w 216
clansmen 1 w 224
of 1 w 226
Hagnias 1 w 233
in 7 w 235
the 4 w 238
interest 1 w 246
of 2 w 248
Eubulides 1 w 257
seeing 1 w 264
that 3 w 268
the 5 w 271
boy 3 w 274
was 3 w 277
the 6 w 280
son 1 w 283
of 3 w 285
his 4 w 288
daughter 1 w 296
in 10 w 299
order 1 w 304
that 4 w 308
the 7 w 311
family 1 w 317
might 1 w 322
not 1 w 325
become 1 w 331
extinct 1 w 338
For 1 w 342
the 8 w 345
elder 1 w 350
Eubulides 2 w 359
men 3 w 363
of 4 w 365
the 9 w 368
jury 2 w 372
who 1 w 376
was 4 w 379
next 1 w 383
of 5 w 385
kin 1 w 388
to 3 w 390
Hagnias 2 w 397
prayed 1 w 404
to 4 w 406
the 10 w 409
gods 1 w 413
above 1 w 418
all 1 w 421
else 1 w 425
that 5 w 429
a 34 w 430
son 2 w 433
might 2 w 438
be 3 w 440
born 2 w 444
to 5 w 446
him 1 w 449
as 7 w 451
a 36 w 452
daughter 2 w 460
had 3 w 463
been 1 w 467
the 11 w 471
mother 1 w 477
of 6 w 479
this 3 w 483
boy 4 w 486
but 2 w 490
since 1 w 495
he 15 w 497
failed 1 w 503
of 7 w 505
this 4 w 509
hope 1 w 513
and 2 w 516
not 2 w 519
a 41 w 520
single 1 w 526
male 1 w 530
child 1 w 535
was 5 w 538
born 3 w 542
to 6 w 544
him 2 w 547
his 7 w 551
next 2 w 555
dearest 1 w 562
wish 1 w 566
was 6 w 569
that 6 w 573
a 47 w 574
son 3 w 577
of 8 w 579
his 8 w 582
daughter 3 w 590
should 1 w 596
be 5 w 598
adopted 1 w 605
into 1 w 609
his 9 w 612
own 1 w 615
family 2 w 621
and 3 w 624
that 7 w 628
of 9 w 630
Hagnias 3 w 637
and 4 w 640
should 2 w 646
be 6 w 648
introduced 2 w 658
to 8 w 660
the 13 w 663
members 1 w 670
of 10 w 672
his 10 w 675
clan 2 w 679
for 2 w 683
he 17 w 685
thought 1 w 692
men 4 w 696
of 11 w 698
the 14 w 701
jury 3 w 705
that 8 w 710
of 12 w 712
his 11 w 715
surviving 1 w 724
relatives 1 w 733
this 5 w 737
boy 5 w 740
was 7 w 743
nearest 1 w 750
to 9 w 752
him 3 w 755
and 5 w 759
that 9 w 763
in 18 w 765
this 6 w 769
way 2 w 772
their 1 w 777
house 1 w 782
would 1 w 787
best 1 w 791
be 9 w 793
preserved 1 w 802
and 6 w 805
kept 1 w 809
from 1 w 813
extinction 1 w 823
And 1 w 827
I 2 w 828
was 8 w 831
the 16 w 834
one 1 w 837
to 10 w 839
render 1 w 845
him 4 w 848
this 7 w 852
service 1 w 859
since 2 w 865
I 3 w 866
was 9 w 869
husband 1 w 876
to 11 w 878
the 17 w 881
daughter 4 w 889
of 13 w 891
Eubulides 3 w 900
she 1 w 904
having 1 w 910
been 2 w 914
adjudged 1 w 922
to 12 w 924
me 12 w 926
as 14 w 928
being 2 w 933
the 18 w 936
nearest 2 w 943
of 14 w 945
kin 2 w 948
and 8 w 952
I 4 w 953
introduced 3 w 963
this 8 w 967
boy 6 w 970
to 13 w 972
the 19 w 975
clansmen 2 w 983
of 15 w 985
Hagnias 4 w 992
and 9 w 995
Eubulides 4 w 1004
to 14 w 1007
which 1 w 1012
fellowship 1 w 1022
Theopompus 1 w 1032
the 20 w 1036
father 1 w 1042
of 16 w 1044
Macartatus 1 w 1054
here 2 w 1058
belonged 1 w 1067
during 1 w 1073
his 16 w 1076
lifetime 1 w 1084
and 10 w 1088
to 15 w 1090
which 2 w 1095
Macartatus 2 w 1105
now 1 w 1108
belongs 1 w 1115
And 2 w 1119
the 22 w 1122
fellow-clansmen 1 w 1137
of 17 w 1139
Macartatus 3 w 1149
here 3 w 1153
who 2 w 1157
knew 1 w 1161
better 1 w 1167
than 1 w 1171
any 1 w 1174
others 1 w 1180
the 24 w 1183
pedigree 1 w 1191
of 18 w 1193
the 25 w 1196
family 3 w 1202
seeing 2 w 1209
that 10 w 1213
he 34 w 1215
himself 1 w 1222
did 1 w 1225
not 3 w 1228
choose 1 w 1234
to 16 w 1236
risk 1 w 1240
a 94 w 1241
contest 1 w 1248
and 11 w 1251
did 2 w 1254
not 4 w 1257
remove 1 w 1263
the 26 w 1266
victim 1 w 1272
from 2 w 1276
the 27 w 1279
altar 1 w 1284
as 16 w 1287
he 37 w 1289
should 3 w 1295
have 1 w 1299
done 1 w 1303
had 4 w 1306
the 28 w 1309
introduction 1 w 1321
of 19 w 1323
this 9 w 1327
boy 7 w 1330
not 5 w 1333
been 3 w 1337
legitimate 1 w 1347
but 3 w 1351
demanded 1 w 1359
that 11 w 1363
they 1 w 1367
commit 1 w 1373
perjury 1 w 1380
6 1 w 1382
took 2 w 1386
the 30 w 1389
ballot 1 w 1395
while 1 w 1400
the 31 w 1403
victims 1 w 1410
were 1 w 1414
still 1 w 1419
burning 1 w 1426
and 13 w 1430
carried 1 w 1437
it 6 w 1439
from 3 w 1443
the 32 w 1446
altar 2 w 1451
of 20 w 1453
Zeus 1 w 1457
Phatrius 1 w 1465
So 1 w 1467
named 1 w 1472
as 17 w 1475
god 2 w 1478
of 21 w 1480
the 33 w 1483
clan 5 w 1487
phratry 1 w 1495
which 3 w 1502
was 10 w 1505
a 115 w 1506
religious 1 w 1515
institution 1 w 1526
in 30 w 1529
the 34 w 1532
presence 1 w 1540
of 22 w 1542
the 35 w 1545
defendant 1 w 1554
Macartatus 4 w 1564
and 14 w 1568
gave 1 w 1572
a 122 w 1573
just 1 w 1577
verdict 1 w 1584
men 7 w 1588
of 23 w 1590
the 36 w 1593
jury 5 w 1597
that 12 w 1602
this 10 w 1606
boy 8 w 1609
was 11 w 1612
duly 1 w 1616
and 15 w 1619
rightfully 1 w 1629
introduced 4 w 1639
as 20 w 1641
the 37 w 1644
adopted 2 w 1651
son 4 w 1654
of 24 w 1656
Eubulides 5 w 1665
into 2 w 1669
the 38 w 1672
family 4 w 1678
of 25 w 1680
Hagnias 5 w 1687
But 2 w 1691
when 2 w 1695
the 39 w 1698
fellow-clansmen 2 w 1713
of 26 w 1715
the 40 w 1718
defendant 2 w 1727
Macartatus 5 w 1737
had 5 w 1740
passed 1 w 1746
this 11 w 1750
vote 1 w 1754
this 12 w 1759
boy 9 w 1762
as 23 w 1765
the 41 w 1768
son 5 w 1771
of 27 w 1773
Eubulides 6 w 1782
cited 1 w 1788
the 42 w 1791
defendant 3 w 1800
Macartatus 6 w 1810
for 3 w 1813
an 27 w 1815
adjudication 1 w 1827
of 28 w 1829
claims 1 w 1835
for 4 w 1838
the 43 w 1841
estate 1 w 1847
of 29 w 1849
Hagnias 6 w 1856
and 16 w 1860
had 6 w 1863
a 152 w 1864
day 1 w 1867
appointed 1 w 1876
by 1 w 1878
the 44 w 1881
archon 1 w 1887
for 5 w 1890
the 45 w 1893
hearing 1 w 1900
inscribing 1 w 1911
his 21 w 1914
brother 1 w 1921
s 114 w 1923
name 2 w 1927
as 25 w 1929
his 22 w 1932
guardian 1 w 1940
for 6 w 1944
it 9 w 1946
was 12 w 1949
no 8 w 1951
longer 1 w 1957
open 1 w 1961
to 19 w 1963
me 20 w 1965
men 9 w 1969
of 30 w 1971
the 47 w 1974
jury 6 w 1978
to 20 w 1981
stand 1 w 1986
inscribed 1 w 1995
as 27 w 1997
guardian 2 w 2005
since 3 w 2011
I 5 w 2012
had 7 w 2015
got 1 w 2018
the 48 w 2021
boy 10 w 2024
adopted 3 w 2031
into 3 w 2035
the 49 w 2038
family 5 w 2044
of 31 w 2046
Eubulides 7 w 2055
And 3 w 2059
the 50 w 2062
citation 1 w 2070
was 13 w 2073
made 1 w 2077
by 2 w 2079
this 13 w 2083
boy 11 w 2086
according 1 w 2095
to 22 w 2097
the 51 w 2100
same 1 w 2104
laws 1 w 2108
in 41 w 2110
accordance 1 w 2120
with 2 w 2124
which 4 w 2129
these 1 w 2134
men 10 w 2137
had 8 w 2140
cited 2 w 2145
his 24 w 2148
mother 2 w 2154
who 3 w 2158
had 9 w 2161
won 1 w 2164
the 54 w 2167
former 2 w 2173
suit 1 w 2177
in 42 w 2179
court 1 w 2184
and 18 w 2188
was 14 w 2191
in 43 w 2193
possession 1 w 2203
of 32 w 2205
the 55 w 2208
estate 2 w 2214
of 33 w 2216
Hagnias 7 w 2223