Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias

Sositheus Against Macartatus in Regard to the Estate of Hagnias (1-5)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg043.perseus-eng2:1-5
Refs {'start': {'reference': '1', 'human_reference': 'Section 1'}, 'end': {'reference': '5', 'human_reference': 'Section 5'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Since we have had suits before now, men of the jury, against these same men regarding the estate of Hagnias, and they do not cease from their lawless and violent conduct, endeavoring by hook or crook to keep what does not belong to them, it is perhaps necessary to set forth all that has been done from the beginning;

for you, men of the jury, will thus more easily follow the course of the whole argument,

2
and these men will be exhibited in their true character, and you will see that they began long ago and still continue to play their tricks, and to think that they may do whatever occurs to them. We therefore beg of you, men of the jury, to listen to our arguments with goodwill, and to follow with close attention. And I, on my part, will endeavor to give you the clearest information I can concerning the facts.

The mother of this boy, men of the jury, being the nearest of kin to Hagnias of Oeon,[*] had the estate of Hagnias adjudged to her according to your laws; and of those who then made counter-claims to this estate not one ventured to swear that he was nearer of kin than the lady (for it was admitted by all that the inheritance belonged to her by virtue of nearest kinship),

but Glaucus of Oeon and Glaucon his brother presented themselves, having concocted a spurious will, and Theopompus, the father of Macartatus here, joined with them in getting up this whole scheme, and was their witness in most of the depositions that were put in. The will which they then produced was proved to be spurious, and they not only lost their case, but went out of court completely disgraced.

And Theopompus, the father of Macartatus here, although he was in town when the herald asked by proclamation whether anyone wished to lay claim to the estate of Hagnias by virtue of kinship or under a will, or to deposit security for the costs of such claim, yet did not venture to make a deposit, but by his own act gave judgement against himself that he had no conceivable claim on the estate of Hagnias.

Since 1 w 5
we 1 w 7
have 1 w 11
had 1 w 14
suits 1 w 19
before 1 w 25
now 1 w 28
men 1 w 32
of 1 w 34
the 1 w 37
jury 1 w 41
against 1 w 49
these 1 w 54
same 1 w 58
men 2 w 61
regarding 1 w 70
the 3 w 73
estate 1 w 79
of 2 w 81
Hagnias 1 w 88
and 1 w 92
they 1 w 96
do 1 w 98
not 1 w 101
cease 1 w 106
from 1 w 110
their 1 w 115
lawless 1 w 122
and 2 w 125
violent 1 w 132
conduct 1 w 139
endeavoring 1 w 151
by 1 w 153
hook 1 w 157
or 3 w 159
crook 1 w 164
to 1 w 166
keep 1 w 170
what 1 w 174
does 1 w 178
not 2 w 181
belong 1 w 187
to 2 w 189
them 1 w 193
it 2 w 196
is 1 w 198
perhaps 1 w 205
necessary 1 w 214
to 3 w 216
set 1 w 219
forth 1 w 224
all 1 w 227
that 1 w 231
has 1 w 234
been 1 w 238
done 1 w 242
from 2 w 246
the 7 w 249
beginning 1 w 258
for 3 w 262
you 1 w 265
men 3 w 269
of 3 w 271
the 8 w 274
jury 2 w 278
will 1 w 283
thus 1 w 287
more 1 w 291
easily 1 w 297
follow 1 w 303
the 9 w 306
course 1 w 312
of 4 w 314
the 10 w 317
whole 1 w 322
argument 1 w 330
and 3 w 334
these 2 w 339
men 5 w 342
will 2 w 346
be 5 w 348
exhibited 1 w 357
in 7 w 359
their 2 w 364
true 1 w 368
character 1 w 377
and 4 w 381
you 2 w 384
will 3 w 388
see 1 w 391
that 2 w 395
they 2 w 399
began 1 w 404
long 2 w 408
ago 1 w 411
and 5 w 414
still 1 w 419
continue 1 w 427
to 4 w 429
play 1 w 433
their 3 w 438
tricks 1 w 444
and 6 w 448
to 5 w 450
think 1 w 455
that 3 w 459
they 3 w 463
may 1 w 466
do 4 w 468
whatever 1 w 476
occurs 1 w 482
to 6 w 484
them 2 w 488
We 1 w 491
therefore 1 w 500
beg 3 w 503
of 5 w 505
you 3 w 508
men 6 w 512
of 6 w 514
the 18 w 517
jury 3 w 521
to 7 w 524
listen 1 w 530
to 8 w 532
our 2 w 535
arguments 1 w 544
with 1 w 548
goodwill 1 w 556
and 7 w 560
to 9 w 562
follow 2 w 568
with 2 w 572
close 1 w 577
attention 1 w 586
And 1 w 590
I 1 w 591
on 7 w 594
my 1 w 596
part 1 w 600
will 5 w 605
endeavor 2 w 613
to 10 w 615
give 1 w 619
you 4 w 622
the 19 w 625
clearest 1 w 633
information 1 w 644
I 2 w 645
can 1 w 648
concerning 1 w 658
the 20 w 661
facts 1 w 666
The 1 w 670
mother 1 w 676
of 7 w 678
this 1 w 682
boy 1 w 685
men 8 w 689
of 8 w 691
the 22 w 694
jury 4 w 698
being 1 w 704
the 23 w 707
nearest 1 w 714
of 9 w 716
kin 1 w 719
to 11 w 721
Hagnias 2 w 728
of 10 w 730
Oeon 1 w 734
There 1 w 740
were 1 w 744
two 1 w 747
demes 1 w 752
bearing 1 w 759
the 24 w 762
name 1 w 766
Oeon 2 w 770
one 2 w 774
belonging 1 w 783
to 12 w 785
the 25 w 788
tribe 1 w 793
Leontis 1 w 800
the 26 w 804
other 2 w 809
to 13 w 811
the 28 w 814
tribe 2 w 819
Hippothontis 1 w 831
had 2 w 835
the 29 w 838
estate 2 w 844
of 11 w 846
Hagnias 3 w 853
adjudged 1 w 861
to 14 w 863
her 5 w 866
according 1 w 875
to 15 w 877
your 1 w 881
laws 1 w 885
and 8 w 889
of 12 w 891
those 1 w 896
who 2 w 899
then 1 w 903
made 1 w 907
counter-claims 1 w 921
to 16 w 923
this 2 w 927
estate 3 w 933
not 3 w 936
one 3 w 939
ventured 1 w 947
to 17 w 949
swear 1 w 954
that 4 w 958
he 34 w 960
was 1 w 963
nearer 1 w 969
of 13 w 971
kin 2 w 974
than 1 w 978
the 31 w 981
lady 1 w 985
for 6 w 989
it 6 w 991
was 2 w 994
admitted 1 w 1002
by 2 w 1004
all 2 w 1007
that 5 w 1011
the 32 w 1014
inheritance 1 w 1025
belonged 1 w 1033
to 18 w 1035
her 7 w 1038
by 3 w 1040
virtue 1 w 1046
of 14 w 1048
nearest 2 w 1055
kinship 1 w 1062
but 1 w 1067
Glaucus 1 w 1074
of 15 w 1076
Oeon 3 w 1080
and 9 w 1083
Glaucon 1 w 1090
his 3 w 1093
brother 1 w 1100
presented 1 w 1109
themselves 1 w 1119
having 1 w 1126
concocted 1 w 1135
a 77 w 1136
spurious 1 w 1144
will 6 w 1148
and 10 w 1152
Theopompus 1 w 1162
the 35 w 1166
father 1 w 1172
of 16 w 1174
Macartatus 1 w 1184
here 3 w 1188
joined 1 w 1195
with 3 w 1199
them 4 w 1203
in 22 w 1205
getting 1 w 1212
up 1 w 1214
this 3 w 1218
whole 2 w 1223
scheme 1 w 1229
and 11 w 1233
was 3 w 1236
their 4 w 1241
witness 1 w 1248
in 24 w 1250
most 1 w 1254
of 17 w 1256
the 39 w 1259
depositions 1 w 1270
that 6 w 1274
were 2 w 1278
put 1 w 1281
in 25 w 1283
The 4 w 1287
will 7 w 1291
which 1 w 1296
they 4 w 1300
then 2 w 1304
produced 1 w 1312
was 4 w 1315
proved 1 w 1321
to 19 w 1323
be 14 w 1325
spurious 2 w 1333
and 12 w 1337
they 5 w 1341
not 4 w 1344
only 1 w 1348
lost 1 w 1352
their 5 w 1357
case 1 w 1361
but 2 w 1365
went 1 w 1369
out 1 w 1372
of 18 w 1374
court 1 w 1379
completely 1 w 1389
disgraced 1 w 1398
And 2 w 1402
Theopompus 2 w 1412
the 44 w 1416
father 2 w 1422
of 19 w 1424
Macartatus 2 w 1434
here 4 w 1438
although 1 w 1447
he 58 w 1449
was 5 w 1452
in 26 w 1454
town 1 w 1458
when 1 w 1462
the 46 w 1465
herald 1 w 1471
asked 1 w 1476
by 4 w 1478
proclamation 1 w 1490
whether 1 w 1497
anyone 1 w 1503
wished 1 w 1509
to 21 w 1511
lay 2 w 1514
claim 2 w 1519
to 22 w 1521
the 48 w 1524
estate 4 w 1530
of 20 w 1532
Hagnias 4 w 1539
by 5 w 1541
virtue 2 w 1547
of 21 w 1549
kinship 2 w 1556
or 12 w 1558
under 1 w 1563
a 106 w 1564
will 8 w 1568
or 13 w 1571
to 23 w 1573
deposit 2 w 1580
security 1 w 1588
for 7 w 1591
the 49 w 1594
costs 1 w 1599
of 22 w 1601
such 1 w 1605
claim 3 w 1610
yet 1 w 1614
did 1 w 1617
not 5 w 1620
venture 2 w 1627
to 24 w 1629
make 1 w 1633
a 109 w 1634
deposit 3 w 1641
but 3 w 1645
by 6 w 1647
his 5 w 1650
own 2 w 1653
act 3 w 1656
gave 1 w 1660
judgement 1 w 1669
against 2 w 1676
himself 1 w 1683
that 7 w 1687
he 67 w 1689
had 3 w 1692
no 7 w 1694
conceivable 1 w 1705
claim 4 w 1710
on 26 w 1712
the 50 w 1715
estate 5 w 1721
of 23 w 1723
Hagnias 5 w 1730