Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Mantitheus Against Boeotus II

Mantitheus Against Boeotus II (26-30)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg040.perseus-eng2:26-30
Refs {'start': {'reference': '26', 'human_reference': 'Section 26'}, 'end': {'reference': '30', 'human_reference': 'Section 30'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

And besides this, just consider why in the world, if my mother had not been a lawfully espoused wife, and had brought no dowry, while the mother of these men did, should my father have denied that they were his sons, and have acknowledged me, and brought me up? Because, forsooth, as these men will claim, he dishonored them in order to show favor to me and my mother.

But my mother died, leaving me still a little boy, whereas the mother of these men, Plangon, who was a handsome woman, maintained her connection with him both before and after that; so that it was much more likely that for the sake of the living woman, with whom he was in love all this time, he would dishonor the son of her who was dead, than that for my sake and my dead mothers he would refuse to acknowledge the children of her who was living and maintaining her connection with him.

My opponent, however, has come to such a pitch of audacity as to declare that my father made feast for him on the tenth day.[*] And in regard to this he has put in depositions of Timocrates[*] and Promachus alone, who are in no way related to my father, and were not friends of his. The testimony they have borne is so patently false, that, whereas you all know that Boeotus by instituting proceedings forced my father against his will to acknowledge him these men, like witnesses to a summonsand only two of themdepose that he made a feast for this fellow on the tenth day!

Is there anyone of you who can believe that? And assuredly it is not open to him to say this, eitherthat when he was a little child my father acknowledged him, but that when he was grown he scorned him because of some quarrel with the mother of these men;[*] for surely man and wife are much more apt, in cases where they are at variance with one another, to become reconciled for the sake of their children than, because of their enmity toward each other, to hate their common children as well. If, therefore, he attempts to say this, do not permit him to brazen it out.

And should he go on to talk about the actions brought by them, which the arbitrator decided in my favor, and claim that he was caught by me unprepared, remember, first, that it was not a short time that he had in which to prepare himself, but a great many years, and secondly, that it was he who brought the suit, so that it was much more likely that I should be taken unprepared by him than he by me.

And 1 w 3
besides 1 w 10
this 1 w 14
just 1 w 19
consider 1 w 27
why 1 w 30
in 1 w 32
the 1 w 35
world 1 w 40
if 1 w 43
my 1 w 45
mother 1 w 51
had 1 w 54
not 1 w 57
been 1 w 61
a 2 w 62
lawfully 1 w 70
espoused 1 w 78
wife 1 w 82
and 1 w 86
had 2 w 89
brought 1 w 96
no 2 w 98
dowry 1 w 103
while 1 w 109
the 3 w 112
mother 2 w 118
of 1 w 120
these 1 w 125
men 1 w 128
did 1 w 131
should 1 w 138
my 2 w 140
father 1 w 146
have 1 w 150
denied 1 w 156
that 1 w 160
they 1 w 164
were 1 w 168
his 2 w 171
sons 1 w 175
and 2 w 179
have 2 w 183
acknowledged 1 w 195
me 2 w 197
and 3 w 201
brought 2 w 208
me 3 w 210
up 1 w 212
Because 1 w 220
forsooth 1 w 229
as 1 w 232
these 2 w 237
men 2 w 240
will 1 w 244
claim 1 w 249
he 9 w 252
dishonored 1 w 262
them 1 w 266
in 2 w 268
order 1 w 273
to 1 w 275
show 1 w 279
favor 1 w 284
to 2 w 286
me 5 w 288
and 4 w 291
my 3 w 293
mother 3 w 299
But 1 w 303
my 4 w 305
mother 4 w 311
died 1 w 315
leaving 1 w 323
me 6 w 325
still 1 w 330
a 19 w 331
little 1 w 337
boy 1 w 340
whereas 1 w 348
the 12 w 351
mother 5 w 357
of 2 w 359
these 3 w 364
men 3 w 367
Plangon 1 w 375
who 1 w 379
was 1 w 382
a 23 w 383
handsome 1 w 391
woman 1 w 396
maintained 1 w 407
her 8 w 410
connection 1 w 420
with 1 w 424
him 1 w 427
both 1 w 431
before 1 w 437
and 6 w 440
after 1 w 445
that 2 w 449
so 4 w 452
that 3 w 456
it 3 w 458
was 2 w 461
much 1 w 465
more 1 w 469
likely 1 w 475
that 4 w 479
for 3 w 482
the 15 w 485
sake 1 w 489
of 3 w 491
the 16 w 494
living 1 w 500
woman 2 w 505
with 2 w 510
whom 1 w 514
he 20 w 516
was 3 w 519
in 7 w 521
love 1 w 525
all 1 w 528
this 2 w 532
time 1 w 536
he 21 w 539
would 1 w 544
dishonor 2 w 552
the 17 w 555
son 2 w 558
of 4 w 560
her 9 w 563
who 3 w 566
was 4 w 569
dead 1 w 573
than 1 w 578
that 5 w 582
for 4 w 585
my 5 w 587
sake 2 w 591
and 7 w 594
my 6 w 596
dead 2 w 600
mother 6 w 606
s 33 w 608
he 25 w 610
would 2 w 615
refuse 1 w 621
to 3 w 623
acknowledge 2 w 634
the 19 w 637
children 1 w 645
of 5 w 647
her 11 w 650
who 4 w 653
was 5 w 656
living 2 w 662
and 8 w 665
maintaining 1 w 676
her 12 w 679
connection 2 w 689
with 3 w 693
him 2 w 696
My 1 w 699
opponent 1 w 707
however 1 w 715
has 1 w 719
come 1 w 723
to 4 w 725
such 1 w 729
a 51 w 730
pitch 1 w 735
of 6 w 737
audacity 1 w 745
as 9 w 747
to 5 w 749
declare 1 w 756
that 6 w 760
my 7 w 762
father 2 w 768
made 1 w 772
feast 1 w 777
for 5 w 780
him 3 w 783
on 12 w 785
the 21 w 788
tenth 1 w 793
day 1 w 796
See 1 w 800
the 22 w 803
Introduction 1 w 815
to 6 w 817
the 23 w 820
preceding 1 w 829
oration 1 w 836
And 2 w 840
in 13 w 842
regard 1 w 848
to 7 w 850
this 3 w 854
he 33 w 856
has 2 w 859
put 1 w 862
in 14 w 864
depositions 1 w 875
of 7 w 877
Timocrates 1 w 887
Perhaps 1 w 894
to 8 w 896
be 4 w 898
identified 1 w 908
with 4 w 912
the 24 w 915
Timocrates 2 w 925
against 1 w 932
whom 2 w 936
Demosthenes 1 w 947
delivered 1 w 956
Oration 1 w 963
24 1 w 965
Dem 2 w 969
24 2 w 972
and 9 w 977
Promachus 1 w 986
alone 1 w 991
who 6 w 995
are 2 w 998
in 16 w 1000
no 7 w 1002
way 1 w 1005
related 1 w 1012
to 9 w 1014
my 8 w 1016
father 3 w 1022
and 10 w 1026
were 2 w 1030
not 2 w 1033
friends 1 w 1040
of 8 w 1042
his 5 w 1045
The 1 w 1049
testimony 1 w 1058
they 2 w 1062
have 3 w 1066
borne 1 w 1071
is 8 w 1073
so 6 w 1075
patently 1 w 1083
false 1 w 1088
that 7 w 1093
whereas 2 w 1101
you 1 w 1104
all 2 w 1107
know 3 w 1111
that 8 w 1115
Boeotus 1 w 1122
by 1 w 1124
instituting 1 w 1135
proceedings 1 w 1146
forced 1 w 1152
my 9 w 1154
father 4 w 1160
against 2 w 1167
his 6 w 1170
will 2 w 1174
to 10 w 1176
acknowledge 3 w 1187
him 4 w 1190
these 4 w 1195
men 4 w 1198
like 2 w 1203
witnesses 1 w 1212
to 11 w 1214
a 89 w 1215
summons 1 w 1222
and 11 w 1226
only 1 w 1230
two 1 w 1233
of 9 w 1235
them 2 w 1239
depose 1 w 1246
that 9 w 1250
he 43 w 1252
made 2 w 1256
a 93 w 1257
feast 2 w 1262
for 7 w 1265
this 4 w 1269
fellow 1 w 1275
on 21 w 1277
the 31 w 1280
tenth 2 w 1285
day 2 w 1288
Is 1 w 1291
there 1 w 1296
anyone 1 w 1302
of 10 w 1304
you 2 w 1307
who 7 w 1310
can 1 w 1313
believe 1 w 1320
that 10 w 1324
And 3 w 1328
assuredly 1 w 1337
it 12 w 1339
is 11 w 1341
not 3 w 1344
open 1 w 1348
to 12 w 1350
him 5 w 1353
to 13 w 1355
say 1 w 1358
this 5 w 1362
either 1 w 1369
that 11 w 1374
when 1 w 1378
he 48 w 1380
was 6 w 1383
a 103 w 1384
little 2 w 1390
child 2 w 1395
my 10 w 1397
father 5 w 1403
acknowledged 2 w 1415
him 6 w 1418
but 1 w 1422
that 12 w 1426
when 2 w 1430
he 51 w 1432
was 7 w 1435
grown 1 w 1440
he 52 w 1442
scorned 1 w 1449
him 7 w 1452
because 1 w 1459
of 11 w 1461
some 2 w 1465
quarrel 1 w 1472
with 5 w 1476
the 35 w 1479
mother 7 w 1485
of 12 w 1487
these 5 w 1492
men 5 w 1495
Compare 1 w 1503
the 38 w 1506
parallel 1 w 1514
passage 1 w 1521
in 21 w 1523
the 39 w 1526
preceding 2 w 1535
oration 2 w 1542
Dem 3 w 1546
39 1 w 1549
23 1 w 1552
for 8 w 1556
surely 1 w 1562
man 3 w 1565
and 12 w 1568
wife 2 w 1572
are 4 w 1575
much 2 w 1579
more 2 w 1583
apt 1 w 1586
in 23 w 1589
cases 1 w 1594
where 3 w 1599
they 3 w 1603
are 5 w 1606
at 25 w 1608
variance 1 w 1616
with 6 w 1620
one 4 w 1623
another 1 w 1630
to 14 w 1633
become 1 w 1639
reconciled 1 w 1649
for 9 w 1652
the 42 w 1655
sake 3 w 1659
of 13 w 1661
their 1 w 1666
children 2 w 1674
than 2 w 1678
because 2 w 1686
of 14 w 1688
their 2 w 1693
enmity 1 w 1699
toward 1 w 1705
each 1 w 1709
other 9 w 1714
to 16 w 1717
hate 1 w 1721
their 3 w 1726
common 1 w 1732
children 3 w 1740
as 19 w 1742
well 1 w 1746
If 1 w 1749
therefore 1 w 1759
he 67 w 1762
attempts 1 w 1770
to 17 w 1772
say 2 w 1775
this 6 w 1779
do 2 w 1782
not 5 w 1785
permit 1 w 1791
him 8 w 1794
to 18 w 1796
brazen 1 w 1802
it 19 w 1804
out 1 w 1807
And 4 w 1811
should 2 w 1817
he 68 w 1819
go 2 w 1821
on 27 w 1823
to 19 w 1825
talk 1 w 1829
about 1 w 1834
the 48 w 1837
actions 1 w 1844
brought 3 w 1851
by 2 w 1853
them 3 w 1857
which 1 w 1863
the 50 w 1866
arbitrator 1 w 1876
decided 1 w 1883
in 24 w 1885
my 11 w 1887
favor 2 w 1892
and 13 w 1896
claim 2 w 1901
that 13 w 1905
he 72 w 1907
was 8 w 1910
caught 1 w 1916
by 3 w 1918
me 15 w 1920
unprepared 1 w 1930
remember 1 w 1939
first 1 w 1945
that 14 w 1950
it 21 w 1952
was 9 w 1955
not 6 w 1958
a 150 w 1959
short 1 w 1964
time 2 w 1968
that 15 w 1972
he 73 w 1974
had 3 w 1977
in 25 w 1979
which 2 w 1984
to 21 w 1986
prepare 2 w 1993
himself 1 w 2000
but 2 w 2004
a 154 w 2005
great 1 w 2010
many 1 w 2014
years 1 w 2019
and 14 w 2023
secondly 1 w 2031
that 16 w 2036
it 22 w 2038
was 10 w 2041
he 74 w 2043
who 8 w 2046
brought 4 w 2053
the 51 w 2056
suit 1 w 2060
so 8 w 2063
that 17 w 2067
it 24 w 2069
was 11 w 2072
much 3 w 2076
more 3 w 2080
likely 2 w 2086
that 18 w 2090
I 4 w 2091
should 3 w 2097
be 10 w 2099
taken 1 w 2104
unprepared 2 w 2114
by 4 w 2116
him 10 w 2119
than 3 w 2123
he 76 w 2125
by 5 w 2127
me 18 w 2129